專案式學習課程設計之個案研究：美國高中生華語文化探究專案

A Case Study of PBL Curriculum Design and Application to A Chinese Culture Inquiry Project Conducted for American Senior High School Students in Taiwan

10.6384/CIQ.201907_22(3).0002

吳翠玲(Tsui-Ling Wu)

課程設計 ； 專案式學習 ； 華語文教育 ； 專題導向學習 ； curriculum design ； project-based learning ； PBL ； Chinese language education

課程與教學

22卷3期（2019 / 07 / 01）

31 - 53

繁體中文

本研究旨在探究以PBL理念設計的課程模式個案。研究者以美國高中生華語文化探究專案為範例，透過PBL課程設計八大要素為架構進行課程設計與課程實踐。本研究採個案研究，以觀察法與文件分析方式檢視本研究課程內涵。先就PBL學習與課程設計理論加以釐清，建構出PBL課程設計架構。續分析個案PBL課程模式的活動歷程，萃取轉化為PBL課程模式，以提供具體華語文化探究專案課程的事例參考。研究結果發現PBL課程設計八大要素具體可行；課程的實踐宜增加「專案準備」階段；八大要素的實踐需考量時間、人力與物力等配套因素；教師與學生之先備經驗與知識影響PBL課程品質。據此建議，本研究的模式可提供教師設計PBL課程之架構參考。惟教師經驗、時間精力的壓力、與學生學習模式並未列在本研究的範圍中，建議後續可針對上述議題進行研究分析，讓PBL的課程設計能更臻完善。

This study discussed the PBL curriculum design and its application, with an illustrative example of a Chinese Culture Inquiry Project conducted for students of an American Senior High School in Taiwan. The eight Essential Elements of PBL were implemented as the design framework for this project. Observations and document analysis were adopted to examine the results. The PBL curriculum model was used to analyze the activities' process and their transformation into PBL curriculum, along with the learning theory and curriculum theory oriented by PBL constructivism. The finding is that the framework of PBL elements, refined by the researcher, worked feasibly for PBL-based curriculum design. However, an extra phase of ＂Project Preparation＂ could make a better process if added into the current Phase Four, as several supporting factors are important, including the length of time, availability of human and material resources, and prior experience and knowledge about PBL from teachers and students. Further studies are suggested to focus on the teacher's former pedagogical experience in PBL, their pressure from the time-constraint or affordable effort, as well as the learning styles from students.

1. Bender, M. N.(2012).Project-based learning: Differentiating instruction for the 21st century.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
2. Boss, S,Larmer, J.,Mergendoller, J.(2013).PBL for 21st century success: Teaching critical thinking, collaboration, communication and creativity.Novato, CA:Buck Institute for Education.
3. Codur, K. B.,Karatas, S.,Dogru, A. H.(2012).Application of project-based learning in a theoretical course: Process, difficulties and recommendations.International Journal of Engineering Education,28(1),17-25.
4. Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
5. Edutopia. (2014). 5 Keys to rigorous project-based learning. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/video/5-keys-rigorous-project-based-learning
6. Hasni, A.,Bousadra, F.,Belletete, V.,Benabdallah, A.,Nicole, M. C.,Dumais, N.(2016).Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K-12 levels: A systematic review.Studies in Science Education,52(2),199-231.
7. Hou, H. T.,Chang, K. E.,Sung, Y. T.(2007).An analysis of peer assessment online discussions within a course that uses project-based learning.Interactive Learning Environments,15(3),237-251.
8. Larmer, J. (2016). The perils of PBL's popularity. Retrieved from http://bie.org/blog/the_perils_of_pbls_popularity
9. Larmer, J.,Mergendoller, J.,Boss, S.(2015).Setting the standard for project based learning.Novato, CA:Buck Institute for Education.
10. Lee, H. J.,Lim, C.(2012).Peer evaluation in blended team project-based learning: What do students find important?.Educational Technology & Society,15(4),214-224.
11. Marquez, J. J.,Martinez, M. L.,Romero, G.,Perez, J. M.(2011).New methodology for integrating teams into multidisciplinary project based learning.International Journal of Engineering Education,27(4),746-756.
12. NSLI-Y. (n.d.). About NSLI-Y. Retrieved from https://www.nsliforyouth.org/nsli-y/
13. Ornstein, A. C.,Hunkins, F. P.(2009).Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues.Boston, MA:Person.
14. Thom, M. (2016). Taking PBL online: The power to evangelize, transform, and sustain. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/taking-pbl-online-power-evangelize-transform-sustain-markham-phd?trk=mp-reader-card
15. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16. Wang, Y.-J.,Song, H.-B.(2005).Project-based learning (PBL) for enhancing Chinese college students’ English performance.Sino-US English Teaching,2(5),59-64.
17. 王致遠,林千惠(2011)。專題導向學習與問題導向學習教學法之異同探討。研習資訊，28(1)，41-47。
18. 吳佳芬(2018)。華語文教學研究文獻計量學分析：以 1992 至 2016 WOS 資料庫為基礎。科學與人文研究，5(3)，144-169。
19. 吳翠玲(2014)。美國高中生臺灣文化學習之課程探究：以台灣「美國國家安全語言學習 NSLI-Y 計畫」為例。「特色課程、課程特色與十二年國民基本教育學術研討會」暨「第 30 屆課程與教學論壇」，嘉義縣，臺灣:
20. 李秀芬(2011)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。
21. 邱瀞瑩(2011)。國立雲林科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士班。
22. 國際及兩岸教育司（2018）。106 華語生人數統計-按國別。取自 https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2500/cp.aspx?n=985B0E34256FDC9E&s=3146119524BF3BF9
23. 教育部統計處（2018）。大專外國學位生及附設華語生人數歷屆統計。取自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/cp.aspx?n=1B58E0B736635285&s=D04C74553DB60CAD
24. 黃光雄,蔡清田(2015).課程發展與設計新論.臺北市:五南書局.
25. 楊坤原(2005)。問題本位學習的理論基礎與教學歷程。中原學報，33(2)，215-235。
26. 蔡清田(2016).50 則非知不可的課程學概念.臺北市:五南書局.
27. 蔡雅薰(2017)。從 IB 國際文憑教育探究全球視角的國際華語文教學新變。華文世界，120，101-109。

1. 林慧芸(2022)。觀察「學生教外師中文」技巧對偏遠小學生英語學習焦慮影響之個案研究。學校行政，141，127-148。
2. 唐淑華,杜鎮宇(2023)。從「文學閱讀者」轉化為「文學帶領者」：專案式學習理念融入大學生探究生命大問題之行動研究。課程與教學，26(2)，149-184。