專題、問題與探究導向總整課程教學策略對學習成效的影響

The Influence of Teaching Strategies on Learning Effectiveness in the Project-, Problem- and Inquiry-Based Capstone Course

10.6384/CIQ.201907_22(3).0003

李隆盛(Lung-Sheng Lee)；孔心怡(Hsin-Yi Kung)；陳芊妤(Chian-Yu Chen)；林坤誼(Kuen-Yi Lin)

總整課程 ； 專題導向學習 ； 問題導向學習 ； 探究導向學習 ； 教學策略 ； 學習成效 ； capstone course ； project-based learning ； problem-based learning ； inquiry-based learning ； teaching strategy ； learning effectiveness

課程與教學

22卷3期（2019 / 07 / 01）

55 - 76

繁體中文

兼容專題、問題和探究導向學習的總整課程，幾乎已成為工程（或科技）取向班制的必修畢業課程，且修課學生常分成多個組別、由多位教師帶領，因而引發「不同教師教學策略差異，對學生學習成效有何影響」的問題。為解答此一問題，本研究針對某大學已實施多年總整課程的科技系，透過教師深度訪談問卷、學生自評核心能力表現問卷及學生訪談問卷進行資料蒐集與分析。結果發現：一、教師的教學策略類型可分為著重學生經驗擴展、設計思考和同儕協作；二、第一類型（經驗擴展型）教學策略就學習動機、上課時間及學習成效三方面，在學生知覺與教師期望兩方面有明顯落差，其他兩類型策略在各方面則無教與學上的落差；三、不同類型教學策略的學生學習成效，由高而低序大致為第三、第二和第一類型，但採第一、三類型策略教師都強調學生主動學習態度高度影響學習成效。

The capstone course including project-, problem- and inquiry-based learning has become a required graduation course for engineering- or technology-rich programs. The students in this course are often divided into groups and supervised by multiple teachers. What are the influence of teaching strategies on learning effectiveness? In order to answer this question, this study interviewed the teacher and the students, and surveyed the students' self-assessed core competence. The results showed that: (1) The teaching strategies of the group supervisors can be divided into three types: Type I--student experience expansion, Type II--student design thinking and Type III-- student peer collaboration; (2) Only Type I strategy showed gap between student's perception and teacher expectation in terms of learning motivation, class time and learning effectiveness; and (3) The learning effectiveness of students with different types of teaching strategies can be roughly ranked, in descending order, as: Type III, II and I. However, the teachers adopting Types I or II strategy claimed that students' active learning attitudes had high impact on learning effectiveness.

1. 岳修平,鐘婉莉(2005)。專題式學習小組網路溝通互動之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系教育學刊，25，1-23。
   連結：
2. Al-Balushi, S. M.,Al-Aamri, S. S.(2014).The effect of environmental science projects on students’ environmental knowledge and science attitudes.International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education,23(3),213-227.
3. Atman, C. J.,Adams, R. S.,Cardella, M. E.,Turns, J.,Mosborg, S.,Saleem, J.(2007).Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners.Journal of Engineering Education,96(4),359-379.
4. Bell, S.(2010).Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future.The Clearing House,83(2),39-43.
5. Bilgin, I.,Karakuyu, Y.,Ay, Y.(2015).The effects of project based learning on undergraduate students’ achievement and self-efficacy beliefs towards science teaching.Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,11(3),469-477.
6. Blumenfeid, P. C.,Soloway, E.,Marx, R. W.,Krajcik, J. S.,Guzidiai, M.,Palincsar, A.(1991).Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning.Educational Psychology,26(3&4),369-398.
7. DeWaters, J. E.,Powers, S. E.(2011).Energy literacy of secondary students in New York. State (USA): A measure of knowledge, affect, and behavior.Energy policy,39(3),1699-1710.
8. Du, X. M.,Han, J.(2016).A literature review on the definition and process of project-based learning and other relative studies.Creative Education,7,1079-1083.
9. Dutson, A. J.,Todd, R. H.,Magleby, S. P.,Sorensen, C. D.(1997).A review of literature on teaching engineering design through project ‐ oriented capstone courses.Journal of Engineering Education,86(1),17-28.
10. Han, S.,Capraro, R.,Capraro, M. M.(2015).How science, technology, engineering, and. mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,13(5),1089-1113.
11. Heitmann, G.(1996).Project-oriented study and project-organized curricula: A brief review of intentions and solutions.European Journal of Engineering Education,21(2),121-131.
12. Hotaling, N.,Fasse, B. B.,Bost, L. F.,Hermann, C. D.,Forest, C. R.(2012).A quantitative analysis of the effects of a multidisciplinary engineering capstone design course.Journal of Engineering Education,101(4),630-656.
13. Karpudewan, M.,Ponniah, J.,Zain, A. N. Md.(2016).Project-based learning: An approach to promote energy literacy among secondary school students.The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,25(2),229-237.
14. Kokotsaki, D.,Menzies, V.,Wiggins, A.(2016).Project-based learning: A review of the literature.Improving schools,19(3),267-277.
15. Lee, L. S.,Lin, K. Y.,Guu, Y. H.,Chang, L. T.,Lai, C. C.(2013).The effect of hands-on ‘energy-saving house’ learning activities on elementary school students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behavior regarding energy saving and carbon-emissions reduction.Environmental Education Research,19(5),610-638.
16. Lee, N.,Loton, D. J.(2015).Capstone curriculum across disciplines: Synthesising theory, practice and policy to provide practical tools for curriculum design.Sydney, Australia:Office for Learning and Teaching, Department of Education and Training.
17. Leu, L. J.,Liu, M.(2015).Summary of developments in the civil engineering capstone course in Taiwan.2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL)
18. Luo, S. J.,Liu, Y. H.,Shih, R. C.,Tseng, K. H.(2011).The senior high school students’ learning behavioral model of STEM in PBL.International Journal of Technology and Design Education,21(2),161-183.
19. Maleki, R. A.(2009).Business and industry project-based capstone courses: A reflection on the performance of student teams.Industry and Higher Education,23(2),103-110.
20. Miller, R. L.,Olds, B. M.(1994).A model curriculum for a capstone course in multidisciplinary engineering design.Journal of Engineering Education,83(4),311-316.
21. Mills, J. E.,Treagust, D. F.(2003).Engineering education -Is problem-based or projected-based learning the answer?.Australasian Journal of Engineering Education,3(2),2-16.
22. Noble, J. S.(1998).An approach for engineering curriculum integration in capstone. design courses.International Journal of Engineering Education,14(3),197-203.
23. Oscarson, M.(1989).Self-assessment of language proficiency: Rationale and applications.Language Testing,6(1),1-13.
24. Pierrakos, O. (2016). Building strong academic mindsets focusing on grit, mastery orientation, belonging, and self-efficacy via an effort contingent learning environment in a senior engineering capstone design course. Retrieved from http://capstoneconf.org/resources/2016%20Proceedings/Papers/0051.pdf
25. Pratt, M. A.,Hahn, S.(2015).Effects of simulation on student satisfaction with a capstone course.Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education,27(1),39-46.
26. Todd, R. H.,Magleby, S. P.(2007).Elements of a successful capstone course considering the needs of stakeholders.European Journal of Engineering Education,30(2),203-214.
27. Todd, R. H.,Magleby, S. P.,Sorensen, B. R.,Swan, B. R.,Anthony, D. K.(1995).A survey of capstone engineering courses in North America.Journal of Engineering Education,84(2),165-174.
28. Verbič, G.,Keerthisinghe, C.,Chapman, A. C.(2017).A project-based cooperative approach to teaching sustainable energy systems.IEEE Transactions on Education,60(3),221-228.
29. 呂良正（2016）。透過 Capstone 課程評量「應屆畢業生核心能力」。取自https://www.ieet.org.tw/text/Capstone/20160617_1/20160617_IEET 成果導向教學與評量策略研討會(I)_Capstone 檢視核心能力.pdf
30. 李隆盛(1996)。工藝科教材教法新趨勢：模組化的課程設計與解決問題的教學策略。科技與技職教育的課題，臺北市:
31. 邱于真(2014)。教與學的合頂石—總整課程（Capstone Course）。評鑑雙月刊，49
32. 國立臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系（無日期）。科技系專業核心能力指標與課程對應表 。取自 http://coursemap.itc.ntnu.edu.tw/course_map_all/relations.php?code=HU71
33. 國立臺灣師範大學教務處 （ 2018 ） 。 特色與教育目標。 取自http://www.aa.ntnu.edu.tw/files/archive/686_2d73b468.pdf
34. 國立臺灣師範大學教學發展中心 （ 無日期 ） 。 總整課程 。取自https://www.ctld.ntnu.edu.tw/%E6%95%99%E5%B8%AB%E5%B0%88%E6%A5%AD%E7%99%BC%E5%B1%95/%E7%B8%BD%E6%95%B4%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B
35. 張仁家,林癸妙,彭儀雯,周全鋒(2017)。實務專題課程應用探究式教學對電資相關系科大學生探究能力與創造思考能力之影響。科技與工程教育學刊，48(2)，17-43。
36. 陳毓凱,洪振方(2007)。兩種探究取向教學模式之分析與比較。科學教育月刊，305，4-19。

1. 郭勝煌(2021)。「後疫情時代」停課不停學之PBL遠距教學實踐研究。臺北海洋科技大學學報，12(2)，95-120。
2. 薛名淳,陳銨漵,邱薰範(2023)。專題導向學習策略對大專運動員運動處方知識學習表現之影響。運動表現期刊，10(2)，93-109。