國小中高年級學童文章結構辨識與閱讀理解之研究

Effects of Text Structures Identification on 3th Graders' to 6th Graders' Reading Comprehension

10.6384/CIQ.202001_23(1).0006

劉佩雲(Pei-Yun Liu)

文章結構 ； 結構辨識 ； 閱讀理解 ； text structure ； structure identification ； reading comprehension

課程與教學

23卷1期（2020 / 01 / 01）

143 - 164

繁體中文

閱讀是學習的敲門磚，而國小階段正是奠定閱讀素養的關鍵期。基於文章結構在閱讀時能引導讀者組織、辨識文本的巨觀結構及重要訊息，進而提升閱讀理解。因此有必要探究國小中高年級學生的文章結構辨識類型差異及發展，及其與閱讀理解的關係。本研究以659名國小三至六年級學生為對象，透過結構辨識測驗及閱讀理解測驗蒐集資料。研究結果發現文章結構能正向預測閱讀理解，年級與結構辨識在閱讀理解上有交互作用，三至六年級學生對故事體結構的辨識優於說明文，且其結構辨識與閱讀理解會隨著年級而遞增並發展，至於高結構辨識者的閱讀理解表現則會優於低結構辨識者。

Reading is the stepping stone of learning, and it is crucial to build up a foundation of reading literacy for children during the period of elementary school. Earlier research indicates that text structure guides readers to organize the macrostructure and identify important information of the text which enhance their reading comprehension. This study aims to explore the development of text structure awareness of the middle and senior grades of elementary school students, the difference of development, and the relationship between text structure and their reading comprehension. 659 3rd to 6th graders are probed with data collected through tests implemented with structure identification and reading comprehension. The main research result indicates that text structure can positively predict reading comprehension. Other results also include that (1) graders and structure awareness interact with each other on influencing reading comprehension; (2) 3rd-6th Graders perform better in identifying the narration structure than exposition type; (3) the structure awareness and reading comprehension grow when grade levels get advanced and the graders who recognizes the higher level structure perform better than the graders who does the lower level one.

1. 宋曜廷,陳茹玲,李宜憲,查日龢,曾厚強,林維駿,張道行,張國恩(2013)。中文文本可讀性探討：指標選取、模型建立與效度驗證。中華心理學刊，1，75-406。
   連結：
2. 柯華葳,陳冠銘(2004)。文章結構標示與閱讀理解-以低年級學生為例。教育心理學報，36(2)，185-200。
   連結：
3. 柯華葳,詹益綾(2007)。國民中學閱讀推理篩選測驗編製報告。測驗學刊，54(2)，429-450。
   連結：
4. Akhondi, M.,Malayeri, F. A.,Samad, A. A.(2011).How to teach expository text structure to facilitate reading comprehension.Reading Teacher,64(5),368-372.
5. Alves, K. D.,Kennedy, M. J.,Brown, T. S.,Solis, M.(2015).Story grammar instruction with third and fifth grade students with learning disabilities and other struggling readers.Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal,13(1),73-93.
6. Armbruster, B. B.(1986).Schema theory and the design of content-area textbooks.Educational Psychologist,21(4),253-267.
7. Armbruster, B. B.,Anderson, T. H.,Ostertag, J.(1987).Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text?.Reading Research Quarterly,22,331-346.
8. Bohaty, J. J.,Hebert, M. A.,Nelson, J. R.,Brown, J. A.(2015).Methodological status and trends in expository text structure instruction efficacy research.Reading Horizons,54(2),35-65.
9. Chall, J.(1983).Stages of reading development.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
10. Chall, J. S.,Jacobs, V. A.(2003).Poor children’s fourth-grade slump.American Educator,27(1),14-15.
11. Chall, J. S.,Jacobs, V. A.,Baldwin, L. E.(1990).The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
12. Cheuvront, M. L.(2002).Boston,Boston University.
13. Cook, L. K.,Mayer, R.(1988).Teaching readers about the structure of scientific texts.Journal of Educational Psychology,80,448-456.
14. Englert, C. S.,Hiebert, E. H.(1984).Children’s developing awareness of text structure in expository materials.Journal of Educational Psychology,76,65-74.
15. Englert, C. S.,Thomas, C. C.(1987).Sensitivity to text structure in reading and writing: A comparison between learning disabled and non-learning disabled students.Learning Disability Quarterly,10,93-105.
16. Garner, R.,Gillingham, M. G.(1987).Students’ knowledge of text structure.Journal of Reading Behavior,19(3),247-259.
17. Hare, V. C.,Rabinowitz, M.,Schieble, K. M.(1989).Text effects on main idea comprehension.Reading Research Quarterly,24(1),72-88.
18. Hebert, M.,Bohaty, J. J.,Nelson, J. R.,Brown, J.(2016).The effects of text structure instruction on informational text comprehension: A meta-analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology,108(5),609-929.
19. Kintsch, W.(1988).The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review,95,163-182.
20. Marinak, B. A.,Gambrell, L. B.(2008).Intrinsic motivation and rewards: What sustains young children’s engagement with text?.Literacy Research and Instruction,47(1),9-26.
21. Mayer, R. E.(1987).Educational psychology: A cognitive approach.Boston, MA:Little, Brown and Company Limited.
22. Meyer, B. J. F.(1987).Following the author’s top-level organization: An important skill for reading comprehension.Understanding readers’ understanding,Hillsdale, NJ:
23. Meyer, B. J. F.,Brandt, D. H.,Bluth, G. J.(1980).Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of 9th grader students.Reading Research Quarterly,16,72-103.
24. Meyer, B. J. F.,Freedle, R. O.(1984).Effects of discourse type on recall.American Educational Research Journal,21,121-143.
25. Meyer, B. J. F.,Poon, L. W.(2001).Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text.Journal of Educational Psychology,93,141-159.
26. Meyer, B. J. F.,Ray, M. N.(2011).Structure strategy interventions: Increasing reading comprehension of expository text.International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education (Special Issue on Reading Comprehension),4(1),127-152.
27. Nation, K.,Snowling, M. J.(2000).Factors influencing syntactic awareness skills in normal readers and poor comprehenders.Applied Psycholinguistics,21,229-241.
28. Reutzel, D. R.,Johns, C. D.,Clark, S. K.,Kumar, T.(2016).The informational text structure survey (ITS2): An exploration of primary grade teachers’ sensitivity to text structure in young children’s informational text.The Journal of Educational Research,109(1),81-98.
29. Richgels, P.,McGee, L.M.,Lomax, R.,Sheard, C.(1987).Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text.Reading Research Quarterly,22,177-196.
30. Shanahan, T.,Callison, K.,Carriere, C.,Duke, N. K.,Pearson, P. D.,Schatschneider, C.,Torgesen, J.(2010).,Washington, DC:National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
31. Stanovich, K. E.(1986).Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy.Reading Research Quarterly,21,360-407.
32. Stein, N. L.,Glenn, C. G.(1979).An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children.New direction in discourse processing,Norwood, NJ:
33. Stetter, M. E.,Hughes, M. T.(2010).Using story grammar to assist students with learning disabilities and reading difficulties improve their comprehension.Education & Treatment of Children,33,115-151.
34. Williams, J. P. (2017). Teaching text structure improves reading comprehension. APA’s Division of Education Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psyched/201703/teaching-text-structure-improves-reading-comprehension
35. Williams, J. P.(2005).Instruction in reading comprehension for primary-grade students: A focus on text structure.The Journal of Special Education,39(1),6-18.
36. Williams, J. P.,Kao, C. J.,Pao, L. S.,Ordynans, J. G.,Atkins, J. G.,Cheng, R.,DeBonis, D.(2016).Close analysis of texts with structure (CATS): An intervention to teach reading comprehension to at-risk second grands.Journal of Educational Psychology,108(8),1061-1077.
37. Williams, J. P.,Pao, L. S.(2011).Teaching narrative and expository text structure to improve interventions.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
38. Williams, J. P.,Pollini, S.,Nubla-Kung, A. M.,Snyder, A. E.,Garcia, A.,Ordynans, J. G.,Atkins, J. G.(2014).An intervention to improve comprehension of cause-effect through expository text structure instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology,106(1),1-17.
39. 王瓊珠(2010).故事結構教學與分享閱讀.臺北市:心理.
40. 江淑卿(1992)。國小兒童文章結構覺察之探討。臺灣省第二屆教育學術論文發表會之論文
41. 吳英長(1998)。國民小學國語故事體課文摘寫大意的教學過程之分析。臺東師院學報，9，149-184。
42. 官美媛(1999)。花蓮縣，國立東華大學教育研究所。
43. 林俊賢(2004)。小學國語文摘寫大意的教學過程分析─以議論文為例。臺東大學教育學報，15(2)，123-162。
44. 林曉萍(2016)。臺南市，國立臺南大學國語文學系國語文教學碩士班。
45. 林蕙君(1995)。新竹市，國立新竹師範學院初等教育學系。
46. 柯華葳,詹益綾,丘嘉慧(2013)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告,未出版
47. 徐菁彣(2011)。臺南市，國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學碩士班。
48. 教育部。教育部（無日期）。課文本位閱讀理解教學．教學策略資料庫。取自http://pair.nknu.edu.tw/pair_system/Search_index.aspx?PN。http://pair.nknu.edu.tw/pair_system/Search_index.aspx?PN=Reader
49. 教育部（2017）。臺灣參加 PIRLS 2016 成果發表。取自 https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/14-1000-13859,r107-1.php
50. 陳幸玉(2016)。新竹市，國立新竹教育大學中國語文學系語文教師碩士在職專班。
51. 陳海泓(2011)。說明文體的閱讀理解教學。教師天地，172，28-36。
52. 陳端品(2013)。臺南市，國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學碩士班。
53. 萬雲英(1991)。兒童學習漢字的心理特點與教學。中國人．中國心：發展與教學篇，臺北市:
54. 蔡銘津(1996)。文章結構的理論與研究對寫作教學的啟思。高市鐸聲，7(1)，46-53。
55. 鄭妃玲(2003)。嘉義縣，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所。
56. 錢昭文(2016)。新竹市，國立新竹教育大學臺灣語言與語文教育研究所。

1. 唐淑華(2021)。多文本主題式閱讀對高一學生學科閱讀素養之準實驗研究。課程與教學，24(4)，27-62。