题名

網路倫理認知與行為間矛盾與誘惑之探究

并列篇名

A Probe into the Contradiction and Temptation Between Network Ethics Cognitive and Behaviors

DOI

10.6384/CIQ.202007_23(3).0006

作者

溫明麗(Sophia Ming-Lee Wen)；張雅淨(Ya-Ching Chang)；李詠絮(Mai, Y. H. Lee)；胡玉玲(Yu-Ling Hu)

关键词

網路倫理 ； 課程與教學 ； 認知與行為 ； 系譜學分析 ； 權力 ； network ethics ； curriculum and instruction ； cognitive and behavior ； genealogical analysis ； power

期刊名称

課程與教學

卷期/出版年月

23卷3期（2020 / 07 / 01）

页次

141 - 170

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

資訊科技滿足物質生活也伴隨權力宰制。面對主體性消蝕之危，教育更應發揮人文性、倫理性及審美性的化育之功，以維護使用的安全與公平，亦敏銳覺知使用者權力限縮，甚至斲傷主體性的矛盾。本文借傅柯權力系譜學彰顯不當權力和喚醒主體性的理念，以訪談27名師生及家長蒐集資料，透過批判論述法探究網路倫理認知與行為間的矛盾和誘惑，並據此提出課程與教學建言。本研究結果發現，目前網路倫理認知存在人性盲點，教學成效尚不足；師生對非屬科學真理的網路倫理覺知甚為薄弱，可見網絡文化環境亟待建立；復以，受訪者對網路倫理的認知和行為與其自我意識互有異同，可見規劃共通性和彈性課程實有必要；本文提出「思覺行盼」的批判思維，歸納網路倫理課程與教學原則，並勾勒出教學架構和課程地圖，對網路倫理課程與教學具有引導作用，也為後續縱貫與橫斷面行動研究奠定參照基礎。
英文摘要

This article is based on the fact that information technology (IT) has the characteristics of satisfying human needs for material life, while its companion power challenging the connotation of all human beings on happy life. Education can enhance people's understanding and application of IT. However, in the face of human subjectivity and the dignity being dysfunction, education should highlight its humanity, ethics, and even the ultimate vision of aesthetics. In light of Foucault's genealogical analysis and critique of power, knowledge and subjectivity being similar to the nature of the instrumental rationality and manipulations of IT, this paper borrowed these concepts to probe users' contradictions and temptations between cognition and behaviors to illuminate a network ethics curriculum and teaching. Beside literature review, the data were collected from 27 subjects of the schools at all levels, including teachers, students and parents to clarify the current situation and teaching needs through critical discourse analysis. Secondly, based on the empirical findings by means of a meta-philosophy, i.e. thinking, feeling, acting and wishing, the network ethics curriculum and course objectives, connotation and teaching principles were summarized. Finally, the course structure and curriculum map were provided for teachers. This article provides a solid base for teaching and the action research for the future research of cross-section and cross-section.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 劉燕青(2003)。「網路空間」的控制邏輯。資訊社會研究，5，283-303。
    連結：
  2. Batson, C. D.(2011).Altruism in humans.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  3. Batson, C. D.,Thompson, E. R.,Seuferling, G.,Whitney, H.,Strongman, J.(1999).Moral hypocrisy: Appearing moral to oneself without being so.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,77,525-537.
  4. Batson, C. D,Thompson, E. R.,Chen, H.(2002).Moral hypocrisy: Addressing some alternatives.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83(2),330-339.
  5. Brainy Quote (2018). Bernard Williams quotes. Retrieved from https://www.brainyquote.com/search_results?q=Bernard+williams+
  6. Calaprice, A.(2011).The ultimate quotable Einstein.
  7. Castañieda, H.(Ed.),Nakhnikian, G.(Ed.)(1963).Morality and the language of conduct.Detroit, MI:Wayne State University Press.
  8. Castells, M.(2000).The rise of the network society.Malden, MA:Blackwell.
  9. Civic Service (2015). Talent action plan 2016: Removing the barriers to success. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/510994/Talent_Action_Plan_2016.pdf
  10. Dreyfus, H. L.(Ed.),Rabinow, P.(Ed.)(1982).Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
  11. Fairclough, N.(1995).Critical discourse analysis.London, UK:Longman.
  12. Foucault, M.,Gordon, C.(Ed. & Trans.)(1980).Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings: 1972-1997.New York, NY:Pantheon.
  13. Foucault, M.,Shenden, A.(Trans.)(1995).Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison.New York, NY:Random House.
  14. Frimer, J. A.,Schaefer, N. K.,Oakes, H.(2014).Moral actor, selfish agent.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,106,790-802.
  15. Gopinathan, S.(2007).Globalisation, the Singapore developmental state and education policy: A thesis revisited.Globalisation Societies and Education,5(1),53-70.
  16. Goulding, C.(1998).Grounded theory: The missing methodology on the interpretivist agenda.Qualitative Market Research: An international journal,1(1),50-57.
  17. Goulding, C.(1999).Grounded theory: Some reflections on paradigm, procedures and misconceptions.Wolverhampton Business School Management Research Centre Working Paper Series,WP006/99
  18. Halasz, G.,Michel, A.(2011).Key competences in Europe: Interpretation, policy formulation and implementation.European Journal of Education,46(3),289-306.
  19. Hamelink, C. J.(2000).The ethics of cyberspace.London, UK:Sage.
  20. Hardy, S. A.,Carlo, G.(2011).Moral identity: What is it, how does it develop, and is it linked to moral action?.Child Development Perspectives,5,212-218.
  21. Hart, H. L. A.(1963).Law, liberty and morality.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  22. Hawisher, G. E.,Selfe, C. L.(1997).Literacy, technology and society: Confronting the issues.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  23. Hegel, G. W. F.,Miller, A. V.(Trans.)(1977).Phenomenology of spirit.Oxford, New York:Oxford University Press.
  24. Hertz, S. G.,Krettenauer, T.(2016).Does moral identity effectively predict moral behavior? A meta-analysis.Review of General Psychology,20(2),129-140.
  25. Hindess, B.(1996).Discourses of power: From Hobbes to Foucault.Malden, MA:Blackwell.
  26. Ho, W. K.,Gopinathan, S.(1999).Recent developments in education in Singapore.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,10(1),99-117.
  27. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (n.d.). Hannah Arendt. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/a/arendt.htm
  28. Jennings, P. L.,Mitchell, M. S.,Hannah, S. T.(2015).The moral self: A review and integration of the literature.Journal of Organizational Behavior,36(1),104-168.
  29. Khazanchi, D.(1994).Does pedagogy make a difference? An experimental study of unethical behavior in information systems.Journal of Computer Information,Fall,54-63.
  30. Landis, D.,Umolu, J.,Mancha, S.(2011).The power of language experience for cross-cultural reading and writing.The Reading Teacher,63,580-589.
  31. Lincoln, Y. S.,Guba, E. G.(1985).Narrative inquiry.London, UK:Sage.
  32. McClure, C. R.(1994).Network literacy: A role for libraries?.Information Technology and Libraries,13(2),115-125.
  33. McLuhan, M.(1964).Understanding media: The extensions of man.New York, NY:McGraw Hill.
  34. Micklethwait, J.,Wooldrige, A.(2000).A future perfect: The essentials of globalization.New York, NY:Crown.
  35. Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2010). Nurturing our young for the future: Competences for the 21st century. Retrieved from https://bioquest.org/nie2011/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/nurturing-our-young1.pdf
  36. Novak, J. D.(2010).Learning, creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations.New York, NY:Routledge.
  37. OECD(2005).OECD annual report 2005.
  38. Pring, R.(2001).Education as moral practice.Journal of Moral Education,30(2),101-112.
  39. Rest, J. R.(1988).Can ethics be taught in professional school? The psychological research.Ethics: Easier Said Than Done,1,22-26.
  40. Self, D. J.,Olivarez, M.,Baldwin, D.(1998).The amount of small-group case-study discussion needed to improve moral reasoning skills of medical students.Acad Med,73(5),521-523.
  41. Tutu, D. M.(2004).God has a dream: A vision of hope for our time.London, UK:Rider.
  42. van Dijk, T.(Ed.)(1997).Discourse as social interaction: A multidisciplinary introduction.London, UK:Sage.
  43. Williams, B.(2010).Making sense of humanity and other philosophical papers, 1982-1993.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  44. Williams, B.(2002).Truth and truthfulness: An essay in genealogy.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  45. World Economic Forum(2019).The global risks report 2019.
  46. 尹玫君(2003)。我國師範院校學生資訊倫理的認知與行為之研究。台南師院學報，37(1)，1-18。
  47. 王梅君(2017)。臺南市，臺灣首府大學教育研究所。
  48. 李柏毅,陳伃穎,林信榕,劉旨峰(2010)。網路素養文獻回顧與分析—以 2000-2009 學位論文為例。國立臺南大學理工研究學報，44(2)，1-12。
  49. 李詠絮(2013)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。
  50. 林佳旺(2003)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學教育科技研究所。
  51. 林葙葙(2013)。當科技與人文相遇：科技融入幼兒園教學之再思。幼兒教保研究期刊，10，39-68。
  52. 夏鑄九（編譯）,王志弘（編譯）(2004).空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本.臺北市:唐山.
  53. 張芳綺(2002)。新竹市，國立交通大學傳播研究所。
  54. 張雅淨(2012)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系。
  55. 教育部（2001）。中小學資訊教育總藍圖。取自 http://www2.edu.tw/moecc/information/itpolicy/itprojects/itm asterplan.htm
  56. 教育部(2016)。教育部（2016）。教育部 105 年度施政目標與重點。臺北市：教育部。
  57. 莊道明(1997)。臺北市，國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學系。
  58. 溫明麗(2008).教育 101：教育理論與實踐.臺北市:高等教育.
  59. 溫明麗(2008)。教育家的智慧—思、覺、行、盼。教育資料與研究雙月刊，82，193-194。
  60. 溫明麗(1997).批判性思考教學─哲學之旅.臺北市:師大書苑.
  61. 溫明麗(2009)。康德的道德智慧。教育資料與研究雙月刊，87，183-186。
  62. 溫明麗(2006)。PACT 倫理模式及其在網路倫理的運用─本質與內涵分析。當代教育季刊，14(3)，1-24。
  63. 葉坤靈(2008)。赫欽斯「民主社會中教育的矛盾」中的博雅教育理念。通識教育學刊，2，87-102。
  64. 翟本瑞(2001).網路文化.臺北市:揚智.
  65. 鄧達鈞,張志銘,陳昭秀,周倩(2007)。國小六年級網路素養與倫理課程之發展與實施成效探討。第三屆兩岸傳播媒體邁入二十一世紀研討會，臺中市:
  66. 魏彗娟,鄭承昌,連廷嘉,廖本裕,林玟伶(2007)。大專生之網路倫理相關行為之研究。網路社會學通訊，62
print cancel