澎湖縣國民小學海洋教育之研究

A Research of Marine Education at Elementary Schools in Penghu County

10.6384/CIQ.202104_24(2).0008

葉子超(Tzu-Chau Yeh)

海洋教育 ； 國民小學 ； 焦點團體 ； 澎湖縣 ； marine education ； elementary school ； focus group ； Penghu County

課程與教學

24卷2期（2021 / 04 / 01）

201 - 224

繁體中文

本文介紹澎湖縣國民小學海洋教育的概況，探究海洋教育理論的沿用與實務執行而衍生的問題，從而提出解決之道，焦點團體座談共有11位國小校長、主任、組長及教師，再訪談另外14位。結果發現：海洋教育推動成效還有待努力及更積極的推動。課程與教材需加強研發，評量要再多元化積極推動，加強教學時師生安全的觀念及親師合作，校方應多配合支援，爭取各方支持與協助，從多元管道去徹底解決所有問題，讓澎湖縣海洋教育更蓬勃發展，學校教育績效更卓越，學生更能適性成長發展。研究提出了具體建議，可供教育實務參考及進一步研究的依據。

The purpose of this article is to introduce the educational profile of elementary schools in Penghu County. After exploring the use of ocean educational theory and problems, the researcher came up with some solutions. The researcher held a focus group forum with 11 school staff and interviewed another 14 members of school staff, including principals, directors, and section directors from various elementary schools. The study's results showed that there is room for improvement to promote marine education. We need to research and develop courses and teaching materials, and diversify assessments. Teachers should enhance the concept of safety in class and work more closely with parents. School staff should ask for help and support from others to solve problems. Only by doing so can the development of marine education in Penghu flourish. The performance of school education would be better, and students would have more adaptive development. This research also offers insights for teaching practice and future research.

1. 李弘善(2018)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
   連結：
2. 張正杰,羅綸新(2016)。分析海洋教育議題學習內涵之重要性。課程與教育學刊，19(2)，53-82。
   連結：
3. 葉子超(2019)。澎湖縣國中小學教育問題與解決之道。學校行政雙月刊，120，141-155。
   連結：
4. Berg, J. H.,Carver, C. L.,Mangin, M. M.(2014).Teacher leader model standards: Implications for preparation, policy, and practice.Journal of Research on Leadership Education,9(2),195-217.
5. Chen, C. L.,Tsai, C. H.(2015).Marine environmental awareness among university students in Taiwan: A potential signal for sustainability of the oceans.Environmental Education Research,22(7),958-977.
6. Cruickshank, E.(2013).Arizona, UA,Northcentral University.
7. Green, R. L.(2017).Practicing the art of leadership: A problem-based approach to implementing the professional standards for educational leaders.Boston, MA:Pearson.
8. Hammouri, H. A. M.(2004).Attudinal and motivational variables related to mathematics achievement in Jordan: Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study(TIMSS).Educational Research,46,214-251.
9. Helterbrann, V.(2010).Teacher leadership: Overcoming “I am just a teacher” syndrome.Education,131(2),363-371.
10. Ingler, M. C.,O’Neal, D,Rawls, J.,Cumiskey, S.(2013).The role of school leaders in teacher leadership development.Rural Educator,35(1),34-43.
11. Jacobsen, S.(2011).Leadership effects on student achievement and sustained school success.International Journal of Educational Management,25(1),33-44.
12. Krueger, R. A.,Casey, M. A.(2015).Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
13. Lambert, J.(2006).High school marine science and scientific literacy: The promise of an integrated science course.International Journal of Science Education,28(6),633-654.
14. Lee, J. S.,Bowen, N. K.(2006).Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children.American Educational Research Journal,43(2),193-213.
15. Marjoribanks, K.(2002).Family and school capital: Towards a context theory of students’ school outcomes.The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. Marrero, M. E.,Mensah, F. M. M.(2010).Socioscientific decision making and the ocean: A case study of 7th grade life science students.Electronic Journal of Science Education,14(1),1-26.
17. Meinhold, J. L.,Malkus, A. J.(2005).Adolescent environmental behaviors: Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference?.Environment and Behavior,37(4),511-532.
18. Teddlie, C.,Tashakkori, A.(2009).Fundations of mixed methods research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
19. Wilkins, J. L. M.(2004).Mathematics and science self-concept: An international investigation.Journal of Experimental Education,72,331-346.
20. 吳清山(2016).教育的正向力量.臺北市:高等教育.
21. 吳靖國(2009).海洋教育—教科書、教師與教學.臺北市:五南文化.
22. 吳靖國(2017)。海洋教育在偏鄉?各縣市海洋教育資源中心面臨的難題與發展契機。臺灣教育評論月刊，6(9)，33-39。
23. 林宜君(2014)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學。
24. 施心茹(2017)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
25. 徐毓謙(2010)。屏東市，國立屏東教育大學。
26. 張文權,范熾文(2018)。凝聚學校共責的新力量：教師績效責任領導之實踐分析。教育政策論壇，21(3)，143-180。
27. 張美雲(2017)。臺中市，國立臺中教育大學。
28. 教育部(2017).海洋教育政策白皮書.臺北市:作者.
29. 陳幸仁(2018)。國小校長營造社區關係之研究：情緒距離觀點。教育政策論壇，21(1)，59-91。
30. 陳銘賢(2009)。屏東市，國立屏東教育大學。
31. 陳慧玲(2011)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
32. 楊玉梅(2006)。基隆市，國立臺灣海洋大學。
33. 楊麗美(2008)。屏東市，國立屏東教育大學。
34. 葉子超(2017).澎湖縣教育處議會定期會施政報告.澎湖縣:澎湖縣政府.
35. 葉子超(2018)。如何提升澎湖縣國民中小學教育品質。澎湖教育，1，5-6。
36. 葉子超,林宜君(2012).澎湖縣海洋小學之研究.澎湖縣:澎湖縣政府.
37. 廖姿婷(2015)。臺北市，國立臺北大學。
38. 澎湖縣政府教育處(2018)。澎湖縣政府教育處（2018）、澎湖縣教育處2018年教育經費認預算書、澎湖縣：澎湖縣政府。
39. 澎湖縣政府教育處(2018)。澎湖縣政府教育處（2018）、澎湖縣各級學校教育概況手冊、澎湖縣：澎湖縣政府。
40. 錢彩雲(2016)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
41. 蘇倫甲(2017)。臺南市，真理大學。