應用教中學模式培養大學國際生華語文跨文化溝通能力之研究

A Study on Applying Learning by Teaching Strategy to Cultivate Intercultural Communicative Competence of International Students in TCSL Course

10.6384/CIQ.202210_25(4).0003

黃雅英(Ya-Ying Huang)

高等教育 ； 華語文 ； 教中學 ； 跨文化溝通 ； higher education ； mandarin L2 learning ； LdL ； learning by teaching ； intercultural communication

課程與教學

25卷4期（2022 / 10 / 01）

63 - 94

繁體中文

本研究以行動研究為基礎，透過觀察法、文件分析以及焦點團體訪談、深度訪談等技術探討「教中學」模式應用於混程度之大學國際生華語課的歷程及其對國際生華語文跨文化溝通能力的影響。研究發現此模式可回應混程度課堂的評量公平性問題，授課的使命感則有助於自主學習的動能，師生角色互換則促進了促進跨文化課堂的師生同理；在培養華語文跨文化溝通能力方面，尤其有助於跨文化批判意識的培養，並有以下發現：（一）備課階段可喚醒對於跨文化溝通的正向態度與華語文跨文化溝通的後設認知。（二）教學階段展現對跨文化課堂多元學習圖像的理解與發現，且有益於華語文跨文化溝通轉述技能與策略的發展。（三）議課階段回應跨文化批判意識所需的系統性思考脈絡，透過差異的比較與反思，得檢視自我侷限以重建適切的跨文化華語學習模式。

This study applies action research, observational method, document analysis, focus group interview and in-depth interview to explore the effectiveness of integrating LdL (Lernen durch Lehren, learning by teaching) into Mandarin curriculum in the university and how it affects the development of students' intercultural communication competence. The result shows that LdL can solve the problems of mixed-ability and fairness issue in course assessment. Moreover, students' commitments in teaching actually facilitate their motivations of self-learning as well as in-depth thinking. The study selects five international students from those attending in this Mandarin L2 course of a university in the northern Taiwan to participate in focus group interview in the December of 2020. Then, the recording data and notes were turned into transcripts for researchers to read, discuss, and carry out data analysis. The finding are as follows. First, teaching preparation can facilitate students' positive attitudes towards intercultural communication. Second, during teaching and classroom observation, the micro-teaching presentation help students develop Chinese intercultural communication and paraphrasing skills and strategies. Finally, the stage of classroom debriefing enables students to reflect and establish the appropriate intercultural Chinese learning model.

1. 王俊斌(2020)。多元文化、文化際與後素養導向：能力取向觀點的批判性擴展。課程與教學，23(3)，1-27。
   連結：
2. 黃政傑(2007)。我國大學課程教學的改革方向與未來。課程與教學，10(4)，1-14。
   連結：
3. 黃雅英(2020)。高教國際化下通識學分型華語課程架構分析與改進之研究。通識教育學刊，25，29-64。
   連結：
4. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2017). The NCSSFL ACTFL Can-Do Statements for Intercultural Communication. National Council of State Supervisors for Languages. https://ncssfl.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/LF-Intercultural_Can-Do.pdf
5. Bauman, R.,Briggs, C. L.(1990).Poetics and performances as critical perspectives on language and social life.Annual review of Anthropology,19(1),59-88.
6. Bennett, M. J.(1984).Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity.The Annual Conference of the Council on International Exchange,Minneapolis, Minnesota:
7. Benware, C. A.,Deci, E. L.(1984).Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set.American Educational Research Journal,21(4),755-765.
8. Byram, M.(2008).From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship.Multilingual Matters.
9. Byram, M.(2019).An internationalist perspective on internationalisation.Educational Approaches to Internationalization through Intercultural Dialogue
10. Byram, M.(2018).An essay on internationalism in foreign language education.Intercultural communication education,1(2),64-82.
11. Byram, M.(2020).Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence revisited.Multilingual Matters.
12. Byram, M.(1997).Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence.Multilingual Matters.
13. Chen, G. -M.,Starosta, W. J.(2000).The development and validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale.Human Communication,3(1),3-14.
14. Council of Europe(2018).Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume with New Descriptors.Council of Europe.
15. Council of Europe(2001).Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment.Cambridge University Press.
16. Coyle, D.,Hood, P.,Marsh, D.(2010).CLIL: Content and language integrated learning.Cambridge University Press.
17. Crowne, D. P.,Marlowe, D.(1960).A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.Journal of consulting psychology,24(4),349.
18. Deardorff, D. K.(2009).Implementing intercultural competence assessment.The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence
19. Deardorff, D. K.(2004).The Identification and Assessment of Intercultural Competence as a Student Outcome of Internationalization at Institutions of Higher Education in the United States.Journal of Studies in International Education,10(3),241-266.
20. Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think. D. C Heath & Co Publishers.
21. Duran, D.(2017).Learning-by-teaching. Evidence and implications as a pedagogical mechanism.Innovations in Education and Teaching International,54(5),476-484.
22. Fantini, A. E.(2000).A central concern: Developing intercultural competence.SIT Occasional Paper Series,1,25-42.
23. Fantini, A. E.(1995).Introduction-language, culture and world view: Exploring the nexus.International Journal of Intercultural Relations,2(19),143-153.
24. Fiorella, L.,Mayer, R. E.(2013).The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teaching expectancy.Contemporary Educational Psychology,38(4),281-288.
25. Gadamer, H. G.(1990).Gesammelte Werke/1: Hermeneutik; 1 Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik.Mohr.
26. Gipps, C.V.(1994).Beyond Testing: Towards a Theory of Educational Assessment.Falmer.
27. Grzega, J.,Schöner, M.(2008).The didactic model Ldl (Lerner durch Lehren) as a way of preparing students for communication in a knowledge society.Journal of Education for Teaching,34,167-175.
28. Gudykunst, W. B.(2004).Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication.Sage.
29. Guilherme, M. M.(2002).Critical Citizens for an Intercultural World.Multilingual Matters.
30. Hutchins, M. R.(1990).The great conversation.Encyclopedia Britannica, Incorporated.
31. Ito, T.,Kakihana, S.(2009).Why Does Explanation Improve Student Tutors' Understanding? Effect of Presence of a Peer.Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology,57(1),86-98.
32. King, A.(1992).Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning.Educational psychologist,27(1),111-126.
33. Koh, A. W. L.,Lee, S. C.,Lim, S. W. H.(2018).The learning benefits of teaching: A retrieval practice hypothesis.Applied Cognitive Psychology,32(3),401-410.
34. Kolb, D.A.(1984).Experiential Learning: Experience asthe Source of Learning and Development.Prentice-Hall.
35. Koross, R.(2016).Micro teaching an efficient technique for learning effective teaching skills: Preservice teachers’ perspective.IRA International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies,4(2),289-299.
36. Kramsch, C.(2006).From communicative competence to symbolic competence.The Modern Language Journal,90(2),249-252.
37. Kramsch, C.(1993).Context and culture in language teaching.Oxford university press.
38. Lázár, I.(Ed.),Huber-Kriegler, M.(Ed.),Lussier, D.(Ed.),Matei, G. S.(Ed.),Peck, C.(Ed.)(2007).Developing and assessing intercultural communicative competence: A guide for language teachers and teacher educators.European Centre for Modern Languages.
39. Martin, J.-P.(1985).Zum Aufbau didaktischer Teilkompetenzen beim Schüler: Fremdsprachenunterricht auf der lerntheoretischen Basis des Informationsverarbeitungsansatzes.Narr Verlag.
40. McNiff, J.,Whitehead, J.(2010).You and your Action research project.Routledge.
41. Nestojko, J. F.,Bui, D. C.,Kornell, N.,Bjork, E. L.(2014).Expecting to teach enhances learning and organization of knowledge in free recall of text passages.Memory & Cognition,42(7),1038-1048.
42. Noffke, S. E.(1998).Multicultural curricula: “Whose knowledge?” and beyond.The curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities
43. Oebel, G.(2005).Lernen durch Lehren (LdL) im DaF-Unterricht: Eine ‘echte’ Alternative zum traditionellen Frontalunterricht.Herausforderung und Chance: Krisenbewa¨ltigung im Fach Deutsch als Fremdsprache in Japan
44. Paige, R. M.(Ed.)(1993).Education for the intercultural experience.Intercultural Press.
45. Pfeiffer, J.,Rusam, A. M.(1992).Der Student als Dozent. Die Methode ‚Lernen durch Lehren’an der Universität.Praktische Handreichung für Fremdsprachenlehrer,Frankfurt/Main:
46. Rienovita, E.,Taniguchi, M.,Kawahara, M.,Hayashi, Y.,Takeuchi, Y.(2018).Implementation of interactive peer learning environment enhances learners’selfesteem and self-efficacy.International Journal of Learning Technologies and Learning Environments,1(1),1-24.
47. Roscoe, R. D.,Chi, M. T.(2007).Understanding tutor learning: Knowledgebuilding and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions.Review of educational research,77(4),534-574.
48. Rosenshine, B.,Meister, C.,Chapman, S.(1996).Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies.Review of Educational Research,66(2),181-221.
49. Schneider, B.,Jermann, P.,Zufferey, G.,Dillenbourg, P.(2010).Benefits of a tangible interface for collaborative learning and interaction.IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies,4(3),222-232.
50. Sercu, L.(2002).Autonomous learning and the acquisition of intercultural communicative competence: Some implications for course development.Language Culture and Curriculum,15(1),61-74.
51. Sercu, L.(2004).Assessing intercultural competence: A framework for systematic text.Intercultural Education,15(1),73-89.
52. Skinner, J.(1994).Learning by teaching.Zielsprache Englisch,2(94),38-39.
53. Spitzberg, B. H.(2000).A model of intercultural communication competence.Intercultural Communication: A Reader,Wadsworth:
54. Spitzberg, B.H.,Changnon, G.(2009).Conceptualizing intercultural competence.The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence
55. Tan, Charlene(2006).Philosophical perspectives on education.Critical Perspectives on Education: An Introduction
56. 黃雅英(2015).華語文跨文化溝通教學理論與實務.新學林.
57. 黃雅英(2021)。LdL 教中學應用於大學國際學位生華語教學域之先導研究。臺灣教育研究期刊，2(1)，113-135。
58. 劉美慧,游美惠,李淑菁(2016).多元文化教育.高等教育.