從「文學閱讀者」轉化為「文學帶領者」：專案式學習理念融入大學生探究生命大問題之行動研究

From "Literature Readers" to "Literature Leaders": An Action Research on the Integration of Project-based Learning into College Students' Exploration of Big Questions in Life

10.6384/CIQ.202304_26(2).0006

唐淑華(Shu-Hua Tang)；杜鎮宇(Cheng-Yu Tu)

文學帶領 ； 文學閱讀 ； 生命大問題 ； 專案式學習 ； 學習投入 ； literature reading ； literature teaching ； life's big question ； project-based learning ； learning engagement

課程與教學

26卷2期（2023 / 04 / 01）

149 - 184

繁體中文;英文

本研究旨在探討如何融入專案式學習之理念重新設計「文學與情感教育」這門大學選修課程，並運用行動研究發展一個專題實作課程，希冀讓大學生逐步透過文學閱讀討論與文學帶領活動，以啟發他們探究與生命有關之大問題的思考深度和提升學習投入。課程第一階段由教師帶領大學生進行文本閱讀討論和大問題反思寫作，第二階段則由大學生設計教案並實際帶領高中生進行文學閱讀。課程參與對象含大學生53人，及高中生30人。研究結果顯示，文學閱讀討論與反思寫作能讓大學生進一步去理解、發展和修正對生命大問題的思考；當搭配文學帶領活動的實務經驗，大學生對未來學習更能產生新動力和具體規劃。本研究針對整體課程進行反思，並根據研究發現提出相關建議以提供未來閱讀相關課程之參考，進而豐富大學生的情感和生命經驗。

The purpose of this study was to explore how to integrate project-based learning into an elective undergraduate-level course, Literature and Affective Education. Action research was adopted to develop a two-stage hands-on course. By involving college students in literature reading and literature teaching, this course aimed to deepen their thoughts on life's big questions and to improve their learning engagement too. First, the course teacher led college students to inquire big questions through literature reading, discussion and reflective writing, then, the teacher assigned these college students to develop literature reading syllabus and teach high school students. The course participants included 53 college students and 30 high school students. The results showed that literary reading and reflective writing deepen college students' understanding about the big questions in life, and enable students to further develop and modify their thoughts on this. In addition, through the hands-on experience of literature teaching, undergraduates rebooted their learning motivation and facilitated them to make more concrete plans for future learning. Based on the study's findings and our reflections, we provide suggestions for future courses on reading literacy.

1. 吳翠玲(2019)。專案式學習課程設計之個案研究：美國高中生華與文化探究專案。課程與教學季刊，22(3)，31-54。
   連結：
2. 林淑惠,黃鞰臻(2012)。「大學生學習投入量表」之發展。測驗學刊，59(3)，373-396。
   連結：
3. 陳杏容(2021)。探索成年初顯期特徵、家庭經濟與心理健康之關聯。中華心理衛生學刊，34(3)，193-227。
   連結：
4. Adler, M. J.,Van Daren, C.,郝明義（譯）,朱衣（譯）(2003).如何閱讀一本書.臺灣商務.
5. Arnett, J. J.(2004).Emerging adulthood: The two winding road from the late teens through the twenties.Oxford University Press.
6. Arnett, J. J.(2000).Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.American Psychologist,55,469-480.
7. Atkins, L.,Wallace, S.(2012).Qualitative research in education.SAGE.
8. Beard, C.,Wilson, J. P.(2013).Experiential Learning: A handbook for education, training and coaching.Kogan Page.
9. Boss, S,Larmer, J.,Mergendoller, J.,社團法人台灣國際教育資源網學會編譯小組（譯）(2018).21 世紀的 PBL 教學.社團法人台灣國際教育資源網學會.
10. Burke, J.(2010).What’s the big idea?.Heinemann.
11. Campbell, J.,朱侃如（譯）(1997).千面英雄.立緒文化.
12. Carrington, V.(2016).The ‘Next People’: And the Zombies Shall Inherit the Earth.Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education 4--Generation Z: Zombies, Popular Culture and Educating Youth
13. CÔ TÉ, J. E.(2000).Arrested adulthood : The changing nature of maturity and identity.New York University Press.
14. Coles, R.,吳慧貞（譯）(2001).故事的呼喚.遠流.
15. de Bilde, J.,Vansteenkiste, M.,Lens, W.(2011).Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory.Learning and Instruction,21,332-344.
16. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Houghton Mifflin.
17. Doll, B.,Doll, C.(1997).Bibliotherapy with young people.Libraries Unlimited, INc.
18. Eren, A.(2012).Prospective teachers’ future time perspective and professional plans about teaching: The mediating role of academic optimism.Teaching and Teacher Education,28,111-123.
19. Erikson, E. H.(1968).Identity: Youth and crisis.W. W. Norton & Company.
20. Fisher, D.,Frey, N.(2008).Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility.ASCD.
21. Hynes, A. M.,Hynes-Berry, B.(1986).Bibliotherapy--the interactive process.Westview Press.
22. Kappes, H. B.,Oettingen, G.,Mayer, D.(2012).Positive fantasies predict low academic achievement in disadvantaged students.European Journal of Social Psychology,42,53-64.
23. Kolb, D. A.(2015).Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.Pearson Education.
24. Kolb, D. A.(1984).Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development.Prentice-Hall, Inc.
25. Langens, T. A.,Schmalt, H. D.(2002).Emotional consequences of positive daydreaming: The moderating role of fear of failure.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,28(2),1725-1735.
26. Larmer, J.,Mergendoller, J.,Boss, S.(2015).Setting the standard for project based learning.Buck Institute for Education.
27. Liberman, N.,Trope, Y.(2008).The psychology of transcending the here and now.Science,322(21),1201-1205.
28. Manzo, U.C.,Manzo, A. V.,Thomas, M. M.(2009).Content area literacy: A framework for reading-based instruction.John Wiley & Sons.
29. Markham, T.,Mergendoller, J.,Larmer, J.,Ravitz, J.,臺灣國際教育資源網學會編譯小組（譯）(2007).專案式學習手冊.麗文文化.
30. McKee, R.(1997).Story: Substance, Structure, Style, and the Principles of Screenwriting.Harper-Collins.
31. McWhirter, J. J.,McWhirter, B. T.,McWhirter, E. H.,McWhirter, R. J.(2013).At risk youth: A comprehensive response.Brooks/Cole.
32. Nurmi, J. E.(1991).How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning.Developmental Review,11,1-59.
33. Oettingen, G.,Mayer, D.(2002).The motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83(5),1198-1212.
34. Richardson, J. S.,Morgan, R. F.,Fleener, C. E.(2012).Reading to learn in the content areas.Wadsworth.
35. Schwartz, S. J.(2001).The evolution of Eriksonian and Ne0-Eriksonian identity theory and research: A review and integration.Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research,1(1),7-58.
36. Schwartz, S. J.,CÔ TÉ, J. E.,Arnett, J. J.(2005).Identity and agency in emerging adulthood: Two developmental routes in the individualization process.Youth & Society,37(2),201-229.
37. Seemiller, C.,Grace, M.(2016).Generation Z goes to college.Jossey-Bass.
38. Trope, Y.,Liberman, N.(2003).Temporal construal.Psychological Review,110(3),403-421.
39. Upcraft, M. L.,Gardner, J. N.,Barefoot, B. O.(2005).Challenging and Supporting the First-Year Student: A Handbook for Improving the First Year of College.John Wiley & Son.
40. Walker, T. L.,Tracey, T. J. G.(2012).The role of future time perspective in career decision-making.Journal of Vocational Behavior,81,150-158.
41. Yeager, D. S.,Bundick, M. J.(2009).The role of purposeful work goals in promoting meaning in life and in schoolwork during adolescence.Journal of Adolescent Research,24(4),423-452.
42. Yeager, D. S.,Henderson, M. D.,Paunesku, D.,Walton, G. M.,D’Mello, S.,Spitzer, B. J.,Duckworth, A. L.(2014).Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,107(4),559-580.
43. Yopp, R. H.,Yopp, H. K.(2010).Literature-based reading activities.Allyn & Bacon.
44. 王美珍(2014)。滑世代，你讀書了嗎？。遠見雜誌，340，192-200。
45. 王萬清(1999).讀書治療.心理.
46. 吳承紘(2017).厭世代—低薪、貧窮與看不見的未來.月熊.
47. 吳柏軒、林曉雲、邱俊福（2020）。5 天 3 學生憾事台灣大學啟動高關懷行動。自由時報。https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/1412458。
48. 林妙玲(2007)。臺灣閱讀最少族群：13~18 歲不閱讀，青少年如何「轉大人。遠見雜誌，254
49. 徐秋月,吳正新,劉妍希(2011)。閱讀素養與學校因素關係的探討。臺灣 PISA 2009 結果報告，心理:
50. 高野和明,李彥樺（譯）(2015).幽靈人命救助隊.獨步文化.
51. 教育部(2013)。教育部（2013）。中華民國高等教育簡介 2012/2013。教育部。
52. 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要。教育部。
53. 潘乃欣（2020）。今年 76 學生自殺致死。教長：學校輔導人力明年達標。聯合報，2020 年 11 月 19 日，https://udn.com/news/story/6928/5020631。