融合式體育課程中身心障礙學生無動機之教學策略

Teaching Strategies in Inclusive Physical Education for Amotivated Students with Disabilities

10.6162/SRR.2015.133.01

尚憶薇(I -Wei Shang)；徐偉庭(Wei-Ting Hsu)

學習動機 ； 自我決定理論 ； 學習性無助 ； learning motivation ； self-determination theory ； learned-helplessness

大專體育

133期（2015 / 06 / 30）

1 - 6

繁體中文

身心障礙學生的身體外觀差異與動作範圍限制，影響參與體育課程的意願。　過去相關文獻發現身心障礙學生參與體育課程聚焦於降低歧視、鼓勵接納與合作教學等，卻忽略了身心障礙者本身的學習動機。本文整理自我決定理論中無動機模式與融合式體育課程在特殊教育或體育之文獻，目的是提出無動機學習之教學策略，作為融合式體育課程之參考。研究結果如下：本文以自我決定理論中無動機模式探究學生在學習上缺乏動機的機制，提出了四個向度的無動機模式，分別為：能力信念、努力的信念、工作特性、以及工作價值等。當身心障礙學生在融合式體育課程感到無聊、不想出席和低參與率，則呈現無動機狀態，將無法從課程得到期望的各種效益。在融合式體育課程中，依據無動機模式的四個向度提出教學策略之建議：建立成功經驗的體驗感、強調個人學習努力層級、給予快樂正向學習環境、與提供正向訊息回饋，以利改善身心障礙學生參與融合式體育課程中無動機情形。

Students with disabilities have different physical appearances and limited movement ability, which may affect their willingness to participate in sports. Relevant literature on students with disabilities who participate in sports has in the past focused mainly on reducing discrimination, encouraging acceptance, and fostering a collaborative teaching approach. This literature tended to overlook any examination of the learning motivation of such students. This article combines self-determination theory with the concept of amotivation to explore the mechanism of motivation in students with disabilities in integrated and inclusive physical education courses, and propose relevant teaching strategies. The four dimensions of amotivation include ability beliefs, effort beliefs, characteristics of the task, and value placed on the task. When students in integrated physical education courses display boredom, low attendance and low levels of participation, they are in a state of amotivation and do not gain any desired benefits from the curriculum. Based on the above four dimensions of amotivation, teaching strategies for integrated and inclusive physical education are given as follows: establish a sense of successful experiences, emphasize individual learning effort level, offer a happy learning environment, and provide positive feedback.

1. 許雅雯、蔡佳良(2007)。下半身脊髓損傷者接受不同訓練器材之效益與運動策略。大專體育，92，174-180。
   連結：
2. 陳張榮、許柏仁(2010)。生態評量法在適應體育個別化教學方案課程設計之應用。中華體育季刊，24(4)，184-191。
   連結：
3. 陳理哲、周宏室、李文心(2011)。國民小學適應體育實施概況之分析。大專體育學刊，13(2)，122-131。
   連結：
4. 潘倩玉(2007)。特殊學校學生適應體育課程的身體活動。體育學報，40(1)，105-118。
   連結：
5. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York:Freeman.
6. Blinde, E. M.,McCallister, S. G.(1998).Listening to the voices of students with physical disabilities: Experiences in the physical education classroom.Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance,69(6),64-68.
7. Carter, E. W.,Owens, L.,Trainor, A. A.,Sun, Y.,Swedeen, B.(2009).Self-determination skills and opportunities of adolescents with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities.American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,114(3),179-192.
8. Chase, M. A.,Magyar, M. T.,Drake, B. M.(2005).Fear of injury in gymnastics: Self-efficacy and psychological strategies to keep on tumbling.Journal of Sports Sciences,23(5),465-475.
9. Corr, P. J.(Ed.),Matthews, G.(Ed.)(2009).The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology.New York:Cambridge University Press.
10. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(2002).Handbook of selfdetermination research.Rochester, NY:University of Rochester Press.
11. Evans, A. B.,Bright, J. L.,Brown, L. J.(2013).Non-disabled secondary school children's lived experiences of a wheelchair basketball programme delivered in the East of England.Sport, Education and Society,20(6),741-761.
12. Glaser, R.,Resnick, L. B.(1989).Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser,Hillsdale, NJ:
13. Goodwin, D. L.,Thurmeier, R.,Gustafson, P.(2004).Reactions to the metaphors of disability: The mediating effects of physical activity.Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly,21,379-398.
14. Green-Demers, I.,Pelletier, L. G.(2008).Factorial invariance of the academic amotivation inventory (AAI) across gender and grade in a sample of Canadian high school students.Educational and Psychological Measurement,68(5),862-880.
15. Harackiewicz, J. M.(1979).The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,37(8),1352-1363.
16. Hirst, G.,van Knippenberg, D.,Zhou, J.(2009).A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity.Academy of Management Journal,52(2),280-293.
17. Ntoumanis, N.,Standage, M.(2009).Morality in sport: A self-determination theory perspective.Journal of Applied Sport Psychology,21(4),365-380.
18. Obrusnikova, I.,Valkova, H.,Block, M. E.(2003).Impact of inclusion in general physical education on students without disabilities.Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly,20(3),230-245.
19. Porretta, D.,Sherrill, C.(2005).APAQ at twenty: A documentary analysis.Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly,22(2),119-135.
20. Rimmer, J. H.,Riley, B.,Wang, E.,Rauworth, A.(2005).Accessibility of health clubs for people with mobility disabilities and visual impairments.American Journal of Public Health,95(11),2022-2028.
21. Sayers, L. K.,Shapiro, D. R.,Webster, G.(2003).Community-based physical activities for elementary students.Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance,74(4),49-54.
22. Sherrill, C.(1998).Adapted physical activity, recreation, and sport: Crossdisciplinary and lifespan.Madison, WI:McGraw-Hill.
23. Standage, M.,Sebire, S. J.,Loney, T.(2008).Does exercise motivation predict engagement in objectively assessed bouts of moderate-intensity exercise? A self-determination theory perspective.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,30(4),337-352.
24. Tenenbaum, G.(Ed.),Eklund, R. C.(Ed.)(2007).Handbook of sport psychology.New York:Wiley.
25. Wiskochil, B.,Lieberman, L. J.,Houston-Wilson, C.,Petersen, S.(2007).The effects of trained peer tutors on the physical education of children who are visually impaired.Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness,101(6),339-350.
26. 姚韋如(2010)。桃園縣=Taoyuan, Taiwan，國立體育大學體育研究所=Graduate Institute of Physical Education, National Taiwan Sport University。
27. 闕月清(2010)。學校適應體育的推動計畫與成果。學校體育，120，15-18。

1. 陳美莉、姜義村、丁雨婷(2017)。「我有辦法教他們嗎？」以自我效能理論解構大專院校體育教師面對身心障礙學生之教學歷程初探。臺大體育學報，32，83-94。
2. 黃相瑋、陳儷今(2018)。黏多醣學生與體育教學。大專體育，144，1-13。
3. (2021)。教科書多元文化內涵之分析研究－以馬來西亞小一華文版健體教科書為例。教育學報，49(2)，97-114。