桌球、羽球及網球選手競技體適能之差異

Differences of Competitive Fitness among Table-Tennis, Badminton and Tennis Players

10.6162/SRR.2016.138.07

陳建利(Jiann-Li Chen)

無氧動力 ； T字敏捷測驗 ； 反應時間 ； anaerobic power ； T agility test ； reaction time

大專體育

138期（2016 / 09 / 30）

72 - 76

繁體中文

雖然桌球、羽球和網球都是依賴快速移動及快速反應而影響比賽結果的運動項目，但是桌球選手移動的距離較短，因此快速反應更是影響勝利的關鍵因子。本文目的比較桌球、羽球及網球選手競技體適能上之差異，並作為未來教練在訓練及課程安排的參考。我們招募36位高中甲組桌球、羽球及網球選手，進行十二項測驗，包含反應時間、仰臥起坐、30米衝刺及無氧動力等項目及其子分項，共為18項數據。本文結果發現：桌球與羽球選手在體重、神經反應時間、動作反應時間、握力、柔軟度、啟動爆發力、加速爆發力、無氧爆發力、疲勞指數、立定跳遠、啟動爆發力、加速爆發力及體力指數上表現不同。桌球選手在反應時間、下肢爆發力及握力上具有優勢。然而，桌球比羽球及網球選手之心肺適能（體力指數）較差。本文建議上述桌球相關競技體適能參數在未來訓練計畫中可以繼續維持或特別加強。

Although table-tennis, badminton, and tennis rely on quick movements and swift reflexes to affect the outcome of a match, table-tennis players move relatively shorter distances, making quick reflexes a critical element of victory. The purpose of this paper is to compare the differences of competitive fitness among table-tennis, badminton and tennis players, and provide coaches with a frame of reference in future training. Participants were high-school students in the first division in table-tennis, badminton and tennis. The study included 12 players in each sport category totaling 36 players. We evaluated 12 items including body height, weight, body mass index, flexibility, standing long jump, grip, sit-ups, 3-minute step climbing, body composition, reflexes, 30-meter sprint, anaerobic power, triple standing jump and the T agility test. There were 18 kinds of data, comprising 12 testing items such as reaction time, sit-ups, 30 meter sprint, anaerobic power and relevant sub-items. The results showed that table tennis players had superior lower limb power, reaction times, and grip than badminton and tennis players. However, table-tennis players' cardiorespiratory fitness (physical index) results were lower than those for tennis and badminton players. We suggest that these parameters of competitive fitness could be maintained and enhanced for future training regimen.

1. 涂國誠(2013)。增強式跳躍訓練對大專羽球運動員專項體能的影響。運動教練科學，30，1-13。
   連結：
2. Corbin, C. B.(2008).Concepts of physical fitness: Active lifestyle for wellness.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
3. Hall, S. J.(2007).Basic biomechanics.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
4. Morel, E. A.,Zagatto, A. M.(2008).Adaptation of the lactate minimum critical power and anaerobic threshold tests for assessment of the aerobic/anaerobic transition in a protocol specific for table tennis.Rev Bras Med Esporte,14(6),512-522.
5. Zagatto, A. M.,Morel, E. A.,Gobatto, C. A.(2010).Physiological responses and characteristics of table tennis matches determined in official tournaments.Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,24(4),942-949.
6. 周仁豪(2014)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，臺北市立大學競技運動訓練研究所=University of Taipei。
7. 周鳳珍(2014)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，臺北市立大學競技運動訓練研究所=University of Taipei。
8. 徐本力(1990)。運動訓練學。濟南市=Jinan, China:山東教育=Shandong Education Press。
9. 張祐碩(2014)。花蓮縣=Hualien, Taiwan，國立東華大學體育與運動科學系=National Dong Hwa University。
10. 張瀞文(2011)。運動力，學習的新處方。親子天下雜誌，28
11. 謝幸珠、王儀祥(2001)。淡江大學甄選國民小學教育學程學生有氧適能測驗成績分析。淡江人文社會學刊，9，165-185。
12. 魏君同(2011)。屏東市=Pingtung, Taiwan，國立屏東教育大學體育學系=National Pingtung University。

1. 龔庭儀,蘇蕙芬,顏啟修,鄭羽淇,陳克豪(2020)。短期攝取紅藜對桌球運動員下肢運動表現之影響。成大體育學刊，52(2)，27-45。
2. 黃湘涵,郭智翔,張立羣,吳昇光(2022)。桌球專項敏捷性測驗之信度與效度。大專體育學刊，24(3)，418-431。
3. 吳文郁(2020)。競技桌球運動體能訓練之探討。淡江體育學刊，23，25-36。
4. (2024)。不同層級大專羽毛球選手單打發球後準備接球動作之下肢肌電訊號分析。華人運動生物力學期刊，21(2)，13-24。