臺灣與美國職業運動公益活動之比較

Differences in Charitable Activities of Professional Sports between Taiwan and the United States

10.6162/SRR.2017.143.03

曾國峰(Kuo-Feng Tseng)；楊琬琳(Wan-Lin Yang)；鄭志富(Chih-Fu Cheng)

企業社會責任 ； 永續經營 ； 單次性活動 ； 長期合作 ； 網路媒體 ； corporate social responsibility ； sustainable operation ； one-time activities ； long-term corporations ； multimedia

大專體育

143期（2017 / 12 / 31）

22 - 31

繁體中文

企業社會責任近年成為企業永續經營的重要關鍵，職業運動中無論美國或臺灣，皆在聯盟成立初期就出現相關的公益活動，而中華職棒球迷卻對相關公益活動認知普遍偏低。本文透過文件資料的蒐集與分析，目的在比較臺灣與美國職業運動在公益活動推行上之異同。所得結果顯示：推廣議題上，臺灣與美國公益活動皆注重在其基層運動的扎根及醫療議題上，會依聯盟發展的目標市場，發起與其相關的議題；活動形式上，美國職業運動主要以長期的計畫為主，合作的組織較為多元，並透過聯盟官網等相關網路媒體來推行公益活動，臺灣則較少有長期合作之公益活動，主要為單次性的公益活動，推廣形式較為單一，並以義賣及三方合作（職業運動組織、一般企業、非營利組織）方式為主。未來建議臺灣職業運動組織在相關公益活動推廣上，應強化網路媒體廣為推廣外，公益活動建議由單次性之活動朝向長期合作之推廣，並整合聯盟、球團、工會、球員等發起方，以減少資源分散、球迷認知過低等情況產生。

＂Corporate social responsibility＂ has become an essential element in the sustainable operation of enterprises in recent years, and charitable activities have played an important role in professional sports in both the United States and Taiwan since the inception of their professional leagues. However, Taiwan's baseball fans seem to be unfamiliar with the charitable activities conducted by the Chinese Professional Baseball League. This paper uses documentary analysis to collect related information and aims to investigate the differences between the charitable activities of professional sports organizations of Taiwan and the United States. Results show that both Taiwanese and American leagues focus on the promoting and developing the sport at the grassroots level, and they would develop charitable activities according to the league's core strategy and its related areas. The two countries, however, differ in their approach in planning and conducting their charitable activities. Professional leagues in the United States emphasize long term planning and multilateral cooperation in conducting charitable activities. They would also use different media outlets such as the league's official website to promote these activities. On the other hand, Taiwanese leagues rarely commit to a long term cooperation with the relevant parties, instead opting for more one-time activities. The activities tend to be singular in nature (charity sales) and rely mostly on a tripartite cooperation between professional sports organizations, corporations, and nonprofit organizations. This paper suggests that in spite of the difference in size of the professional leagues and the cultural differences between Taiwan and the United States (which may have caused the difference between the modes of operation in charitable activities of the leagues), professional sports in Taiwan should enhance their promotion of charitable activities by employing multimedia and moving away from one-time cooperative activities toward the promotion of more long-term cooperation in order to properly centralize resources and increase awareness among the fans.

1. 林怡秀、陳成業(2009)。運動組織善因行銷之個案分析。大專體育，102，52-59。
   連結：
2. 施致平(2000)。媒體與運動商業化互動關係之研究。體育學報，28，87-100。
   連結：
3. 陳皇達(2014)。影響中華職棒球迷善因運動行銷態度與購買意願模式分析。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，13(1)，119-129。
   連結：
4. 黃玉芳（2006，11 月27 日）。關懷早產兒　建仔捐簽名球。聯合晚報，7 頁。[Huang, Y.-F. (2006, November 27). Care premature baby, Wang donated name-signed commemorative baseball. United Evening News, p. 7.]
5. 中華職棒大聯盟（2017）。關於中職。資料引自http://www.cpbl.com.tw/footer/about/ [Chinese Professional Baseball League. (2017). Brief history of CPBL. Retrieved from http://www.cpbl.com.tw/footer/about/]
6. 王惠民（1992，12 月4 日）。名球會　滿愛心。民生報，5 頁。[Wang, H.-M. (1992, December 4). Sport star play golf, full of love. Min-Sheng Daily, p. 5.]
7. Plunkett Research. (2016). Sports industry statistic and market size overview, business and industry statistics. Retrieved from http://www.plunkettresearch.com/statistics/Industry-Statistics-Sports-Industry-Statistic-and-Market-Size-Overview
8. 臺灣公益資訊中心（2017）。非營利組織名錄。資料引自http://www.npo.org.tw/npolist.asp [Taiwan NPO Information Platform. (2017). NPO list. Retrieved from http://www.npo.org.tw/npolist.asp]
9. 雷光涵、吳育光（2005，4 月5 日）。泰山愛的全壘打　為喜憨兒募基金。聯合報，D7 頁。[Lei, K.-H., & Wu, Y.-G. (2005, April 5). Tai-San hit home run for mentally retarded children. United Daily News, p. D7.]
10. 行政院主計總處（2013）。100 年工商及服務業普查報告綜合報告。臺北市：作者。[Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics of Executive Yuan. (2013). 2011 Industry, commerce and service census preliminary comprehensive report. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.]
11. National Basketball Association. (2017). NBA communications. Retrieved from http://pr.nba.com/
12. 王玉樹（2013，8 月4 日）。幼時家貧獲資助　林智勝見恩人飆淚。蘋果日報。資料引自http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20130804/35197679/ [Wang, Y.-S. (2013, August 4). Once a poverty-stricken kid, Lin cried seeing footage of his benefactor. Apple Daily. Retrieved from http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20130804/35197679/]
13. Major League Baseball. (2017). MLB in the community. Retrieved from http://web.mlbcommunity.org/index.jsp
14. Joo, S,. Koo, J.,Fink, J. S.(2016).Cause-related marketing in sports the power of altruism.European Sport Management Quarterly,16(3),316-340.
15. Lee, J.,Ferreira, M.(2013).A role of team and organizational identification in the success of causerelated sport marketing.Sport Management Review,16(2),161-172.
16. Maguire, J.、Jarvie, G.、Mansfield, L.、Bradley, J.、黃東治譯、邱金松譯(2008)。運動世界的社會學。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:學富文化=Pro-ED。
17. Pharr, J. R.,Lough, N. L.(2012).Differentiation of social marketing and cause-related marketing in US professional sport.Sport Marketing Quarterly,21,91-103.
18. 李嘉宜(2016)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學體育學系=National Taiwan Normal University。
19. 林伯修(2004)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學體育學系=National Taiwan Normal University。
20. 洪義筌、程瑞福(2009)。運動全球在地化概念之建構與挑戰。國民體育季刊，38(3)，43-47。
21. 洪嘉文(2000)。社會化與運動關係初探。中華體育季刊，14(2)，1-9。
22. 國立新竹教育大學(2015)。,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部體育署=Sports Administration, Ministry of Education。
23. 蘇維杉(2009)。運動社會學。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:華都文化=Farseeing。

1. 鄭志富,曾國峰(2019)。中華職棒善因運動行銷合作關係之探討。臺灣體育運動管理學報，19(2)，175-197。
2. (2021).Exploring the localization and home business strategies of the professional sports team -Formosa Dreamer case study.Asia Pacific Management Review,26(3),120-128.