改變週邊靜脈導管留置天數是否會增加靜脈炎之風險

The Effect of Duration of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter (PIC) Placement on Peripheral Thrombophlebitis

10.29494/LN.201509_16(3).0007

陳婷琬(Ting-Wan Tan)；林小絹(Hsiao-Chuan Lin)；張志明(Chih-Ming Chang)；方喻慧(Yu-Hui Fang)

週邊靜脈導管 ； 靜脈炎 ； 留置時間 ； Peripheral intravenous catheter ； Phlebitis ； Dwell duration

領導護理

16卷3期（2015 / 09 / 01）

69 - 87

繁體中文

留置週邊靜脈導管是住院病人常見的侵入性治療，但最常見之併發症為靜脈炎。本文旨在依據實證研究結果，驗證於台灣住院外科病人之適用性，目的在於建立一個協助病人週邊靜脈導管留置時間可依據臨床表徵更換之適切性，故採前瞻性研究設計，自收案對象放置導管起，每班追蹤注射部位情形至移除導管止。本文應用實證資料庫進行檢索查詢成人之週邊靜脈導管依臨床表徵更換，對靜脈炎發生率及留置時間之影響並檢視臨床應用之成效。從8個資料庫中搜尋系統性回顧之統合分析文獻兩篇，並以CASP十項評析文章、CEBM證據等級去研究品質及GRADE證據品質去評析證據強度。本文收案場所為北區某區域醫院，並採信封抽籤之簡單隨機取樣方式收案，於2014/1/1至2014/4/30共收案犯人，對象為住院中有注射週邊靜脈導管的外科病人，實驗組為依臨床表徵更換導管、控制組為依常規每72小時更換導管。基於有效暨安全的考量下，採Lundgren & Wahren（1999）靜脈炎評估表，利用Stomaguide-Coloplast評估工具來監測注射部位。本案之靜脈炎發生率實驗組6.7%（n=2）、控制組17.9%（n=5），P=0.205；留置時間以實驗組109.4小時、控制組66小時，P=0.000；實驗組比控制組平均延長留置43.4小時，結果發現依臨床表徵更換導管不會增加靜脈炎的發生率。

Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIC) insertion is an often performed invasive procedure in hospitals. ＂Peripheral＂ catheter thrombophlebitis is a common complication secondary to PIC insertion. This article is an evidence-based study to verify the appropriate use of PIC for the surgical patients in Taiwan, with an intention to establish a guideline for appropriate PIC replacement based on clinical exhibitions. Through systematic review of literature, two articles were searched from eight databases. They were examined and evaluated with the CASP systematic review appraisal tool, the CEBM level of evidence system, and the GRADE Working Group. A prospective study design was conducted in the general surgical unit of a regional hospital in Northern Taiwan. 58 subjects with PIC insertion were assigned to either the experimental group or the control groups by random drawing from January 1 to April 30, 2014. The PIC in the experimental group was replaced according to clinical exhibitions, and the PIC in the controlled group was replaced every 72 hours routinely. Considering the research's effectiveness and safety, Lundgren & Wahren (1999) thrombophlebitis scale and Stomaguide-Coloplast assessment tool were adopted to monitor insertion sites. The results showed that the incidence rate of thrombophlebitis was 6.7 % (n=2) in the experimental group and 17.9% (n=5) in the control group with a p value of 0.205, which indicated no significant change. However, the duration of placement was 109.4 hours in the experimental group and 66 hours in the control group. A 43.4 hour variance with p=0.0000 between the two groups was significantly different statistically. In conclusion, PIC replacement based on clinical exhibition will not increase the incidence rate of thrombophlebitis.

1. Bradley, M.,Pupiales, M.(1997).Essential elements of ostomy care.American Journal of Nursing,97(7),38-46.
2. Guyatt, G.,Oxman, A.D.,Kunz, R.,Falck-Ytter, Y.,Alonso-Coello, P.,Schunemann, H. J.(2008).Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.Journal of Biomedical medicine,336(5),924-926.
3. Karadag, A.,Gorgulu, s.(2000).Effect of two different short peripheral catheter materials on phlebitis development.Jounral of Intravenous Nursing,23(3),158-166.
4. Lundren, A.,Wahren, L. K.(1999).Effect of education on evidence-based care and handling of peripheral intravenous lines.Journal of Clinical nursing,8(5),577-585.
5. Meyer, J.,Herrmann, M.(1998).Prevention of catheter-related infections, the official American guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control.Der Anesthetist,47(2),136-142.
6. O'Grady, N. P.,Alexander, M.,Dellinger, E. P.,Garland, J.,Heard, S. O.,Lipsett, P. A.,Masur, H.,Mermel, L. A.,Pearson, M. L.,Randolph, A. G.,Rupp, M. E.,Saint, S.,Healthcare infection practices advisory committee(2011).Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.American Journal of Infection Control,39(4),1-34.
7. Oxford Centre for evidence based medicine (2012). Oxford Centre for evidence-based medicine, 2011: Level of evidence. Retrived from http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?0=1025
8. Public Health Resource Unit (2013). Critical Appraisal skills programme. Retrived from http://www.phru.nhs.uk/
9. Ray-Banuel, G.,Polit, D. F.,Murfield, J. E.,Rickard, C. M.(2014).Infusion phlebitis assessment measures: a systematic review.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice,20(2),191-202.
10. Rickard, C. M.,Munnings, J.,McGrail, M. R.(2010).Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite : a randomized controlled trial.Journal of Biomedcentral medicine,10(8),1-6.
11. Webster, J.,Osborne, S.,Rickard, C. M.,Hall, J.(2010).Clinically indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters.Cochrane database systematic review,17(3),1-29.
12. Webster, J.,Osborne, S.,Rickard, C. M.,New, K.(2013).Clinically indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters.Cochrane database systematic review,14(114),1-40.
13. 于普華, P. H.,柯素綾, S. L.,葉書儀, S. Y.(2005)。週邊靜脈留置護理改善專案。澄清醫護管理雜誌，1(2)，83-93。
14. 方莉, L.,陳秀貞, J. Y.,陳彰惠, C. H.(2009)。成人週邊靜脈管路引起之靜脈炎相關因素探討：系統性回顧。長庚護理，20(4)，463-470。
15. 全民健康保險爭議審議委員會=NHl Dispute Mediation Committee(2008)。周邊靜脈留置針置換給付之爭議。台灣醫學，12(3)，341-345。
16. 全國法規資料庫（2013，12月11日）．護理人員法．取自http://laq.moj.gov.tw [Law & regulations database of the republic of China (2013, December 11). Nursing law. Retrived from http://laq.moj.gov.tw]
17. 盧麗華, L. H.(2008)。台北=Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC，國立陽明大學護理學系研究所=National Yang-Ming university。

1. 闕靜儀,楊麗瓊,黃秀英,梁巧儒,林小玲,明金蓮(2022)。比較內科病人72小時與96小時更換靜脈導管其靜脈炎發生率：前瞻型研究。榮總護理，39(2)，172-186。