题名

人工膝關節及髖關節置換術病患術後疼痛之分析

并列篇名

Analysis of Post-Operative Pain for Patients with Total Knee Replacement and Total Hip Replacement

DOI

10.29494/LN.201606_17(2).0008

作者

吳依蘋(Yi-Ping Wu);唐國民(Kwok-Man Tong);洪麗珍(Li-Chen Hung)

关键词

全人工膝關節置換術 ; 全人工髖關節置換術 ; 術後疼痛 ; 疼痛影響 ; total knee joint replacement (TKR) ; total hip joint replacement (THR) ; postoperative pain ; pain effect

期刊名称

領導護理

卷期/出版年月

17卷2期(2016 / 06 / 01)

页次

80 - 93

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

預防術後疼痛是術後病人的權益,也是術後病患最重要且極為困擾的問題。本研究目的為探討人工膝、髖關節病患手術後疼痛及疼痛影響之差異。採縱貫式研究設計方式,以中部某醫學中心施行人工膝、髖關節置換術病患共150名,分為全人工膝關節置換術(TKR)極權人工髖關節置換術(THR)兩組。以結構式問卷、疼痛評估紀錄包括疼痛影響項目及視覺類比量表(VAS),收集術後三天疼痛評估資料並進行分析。研究結果發現術後疼痛程度及疼痛影響及發生率均隨時間增加而降低(P<.001);TKR組病患手術後疼痛程度高於THR組病患;然採MIS(微創)術式之病患疼痛程度雖於術後24小時略高於傳統術式,但術後48、72小時疼痛程度已明顯低於傳統術式,因此總結MIS(微創)術式之病患術後疼痛程度是較低的。兩組皆被不敢翻身的問題困擾,其次為失眠,TKR組在手術後24、48小時所產生的疼痛影響多於THR組,而THR組在術後72小時則多於TKR組。未來人工膝關節及髖關節置換手術後病患的疼痛程度,可藉由視覺類比量表得分的改變做為參考,並提供選擇合適的照顧措施協助。

英文摘要

Prevention of post-operative pain is a patient's right, but it has been an extremely distressing issue for post-operative patients. This study aims to investigate the post-operative pain variance between patients receiving total knee replacements and patients with total hip replacements. A longitudinal study design was used with a sample of 150 subjects at a medical center in central Taiwan. The subjects were divided into two groups: one group received total knee replacement (TKR) and the other group had total hip replacement (THR). Structured questionnaires, pain assessment records regarding adverse effects due to pain and visual analog scale (VAS) were utilized for data collection and analysis for three post-operative days. The results revealed that level of pain and occurrence of adverse effects due to pain decreased by time (p < .001). The TKR group's pain level was higher than that of the THR group. Although the patients with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) had higher levels of pain compared with those who received traditional surgery during the post-operative 24 hours, the patients with MIS had significantly lower levels of pain 48 and 72 hours after surgery than the patients who had traditional surgery. In summary, patients with MIS had lower levels of pain. Both groups had problems with repositioning and insomnia was next. The TKR group suffered more adverse effects secondary to pain than the THR group did during 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery. The THR group suffered more pain than the TKR group did during the 72 hour post- operative period. We suggested that VAS can be used for patients' pain assessment after TKR and THR surgeries with the proper care measures provided.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 宋威穎,雷文谷(2007)。以運動預防角度淺談退化性關節炎。大專體育,92,169-173。
    連結:
  2. Brown, A. K.,Christo, P. J.,Wu, C. L.(2004).Strategies for postoperative pain management.Best Practice and Research Clinical Anaesthesiology,18(4),703-717.
  3. Chung, J. W. Y.,Lui, J. C. Z.(2003).Postoperative pain management: study of patients' level of pain and satisfaction with health care providers'responsiveness to their reports of pain.Nursing & Health Sciences,5(1),13-21.
  4. Dunwoody, C. J.,Krenzischek, D. A.,Pasero, C.,Rathmell, J. P.,Polomano, R. C.(2008).Assessment, physiological monitoring, and consequences of inadequately treated acute pain.Pain Management Nursing: Official Journal Of The American Society Of Pain Management Nurses,9(Suppl),11-21.
  5. Horbury, C.,Henderson, A.,Bromley, B.(2005).Influences of patient behavior on clinical nurses'pain assessment: Implication for continuing education.Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing,36(1),18-24+46-47.
  6. Lewis, S. М.(Ed.),Heitkemper, M. M.(Ed.),Dirksen, S. R.(Ed.)(2004).Medical-surgical nursing: Assessment and management of clinical problems.St. Louis, MO:Mosby.
  7. Maciocia, P, M.,Strachan, E. M.,Akram, A. R.,Hendrie, R. E.,Kelly, D. N.,Kemp, A.(2003).Pain assessment in the paediatric emergency department: Whose view counts?.European Journal of Medicine,10(4),264-267.
  8. Marquie, L.,Raufaste, E.,Laugue, D.,Marine, C.,Ecoiffier, M.,Sorum, P.(2003).Pain rating by patients and physicians: Evidence of systemic pain miscalibration.Pain,102(3),289-296.
  9. Pellegrini, C. A.(1986).Current medical diagnosis & treatment.California:Lange Medical.
  10. Puntillo, K.,Neighbor, M.,O'Neil, N.,Nixan, R.(2003).Accuracy of emergency nurses in assessment of patients'pain.Pain Management Nursing,4(4),171-175.
  11. Waltz, C.(Ed),Strickland, O.(Ed)(1988).Measurement of nursing outcomes.New York:Springer.
  12. 丁肇鳳,周繡玲,陳銘渼(2006)。老人髖關節置換術之護理指導專案。護理雜誌,53(1),36-45。
  13. 司麗雲,劉鳳婕,周蕙珠,馬素華(2009)。膝關節置換術後疼痛處理護理指導完整性改善方案。護理雜誌,56(1),63-72。
  14. 余美蓮,魏良琪,蔡美娟,徐淑貞,張文英(2004)。提升骨外科術後病患自控式止痛使用成效之改善專案。新臺北護理期刊,6(2),87-97。
  15. 吳輝秋(2005)。退化性關節炎。高雄縣醫師,16,31-37。
  16. 李秀枝,吳聖良(2010)。病人主訴術後疼痛強度與護理人員評估結果差異之比較。護理雜誌,57(3),60-68。
  17. 林瓊珠,姚吟蓮,廖素滿,莊淑娟,林金燕,林碧珠(2002)。探討不同給藥方式對脊椎手術病患疼痛控制之成效。榮總護理,19(1),21-34。
  18. 陳美秀,于普華,楊苔蓉(2005)。術後疼痛護理改善專案。澄清醫護管理雜誌,1(1),82-89。
  19. 程金瀛(2006)。台北,台北醫學大學。
  20. 靳燕芬(2007)。傷口換藥疼痛護理。護理雜誌,54(3),87-91。
  21. 廖振焜,侯勝茂(2009)。微創人工髖關節置換術。台灣醫學,13(2),147-149。
  22. 蘇輕感,鍾玉珠,曾秋蘭,汪志雄(2006)。手術後患者使用病患自控式止痛之認知 、 止痛成效滿意度及影響因素。台灣醫學,10(5),557-565。
被引用次数
  1. 陳錚(2021)。一位年輕女性接受全髖關節置換術之護理經驗。領導護理,22(3),101-116。
  2. 湯婉孏,孫碧貞,李奇紋,吳加雯(2022)。照護一位睡眠呼吸中止症行懸壅顎咽整形手術病人之護理經驗。志為護理-慈濟護理雜誌,21(1),119-129。
  3. 謝逸雯、薛宏昇、鄭淑臻、蔡馥光、劉耕豪、葉柏巖、楊宗憲、黃新家、陳彥融、唐遠雲、尤紹雯(2018)。比較針剌與病人自控式止痛對下背痛手術術後止痛之療效觀察。中醫藥雜誌,29(2),42-50。
  4. 鍾玉珠,黃曉令,張雪玲(2023)。混合式衛教對全膝關節置換術老年病人疼痛及關節角度之成效。護理雜誌,70(2),45-55。