题名

加拿大之育嬰假與津貼發放制度

并列篇名

A Study on Canadian Parental Leave and It's Benefits

DOI

10.30388/BLR.200607_(20).0004

作者

謝棋楠(Chey-Nan Hsieh)

关键词

育嬰假 ; 育嬰津貼 ; 留職停薪 ; 請假期間 ; 所得保障 ; parental leave ; benefit of parental leave ; unpaid leave ; leave duration ; income security leave duration ; income security

期刊名称

政大勞動學報

卷期/出版年月

20期(2006 / 07 / 01)

页次

125 - 181

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

加拿大各省規範育嬰假所屬法律之名稱,或稱為雇用基準法,或稱為勞動基準法。而聯邦育嬰假則規定在加拿大勞工法之中,聯邦法適用範圍極狹。然其國各省與聯邦規定育嬰假之基本要件之原則,卻是大致相同。育嬰假假期在一年左右,其適用雇主無僱用人數限制,適用範圍內之勞工並不限於婚生之父母,而且收養者亦得享育嬰假,其部份工時之勞工亦適用之。而基於勞雇間關係,育嬰假之法律性質屬於留職停薪。 而加拿大育嬰津貼之發放制度,是以其全國一致之聯邦就業保險法規範之。其國政府於二○○○年底將可領取育嬰津貼週數修正延長為35週。各省之立法機關配合於二○○○年前後,修改其雇用基準法或勞動基準法,而延長其育嬰假假期為35週。顯現其國各界對育嬰假與津貼之發放制度具有高度之一致之共識。

英文摘要

The laws governing parental leave in the provinces of the Canada are mainly entitled as Employment Standards Act, Labor Standards Act or Act respecting labor standards. Canadian Labor Code actually is a federal labor law governing the employees and employers under the federal jurisdiction. It covers only very limited employees and employers as a whole. Parental leave is also regulated under this law for the jurisdiction. Though there are diverse jurisdictions in regulating Canadian parental leave, the basic requirements qualifying an employee to enjoy the leave are quite similar to each other under different jurisdictions. The similarities include approximately one year term leave duration, no limitation on minimum number of workers employed, not exclusive for natural parents, and part-timers are qualified. The leave is granted unpaid by the employers under employment relations. The benefit of parental leave is governed under the Employment Insurance Act. This social insurance scheme is a federal scheme but is applicable to the employees of all jurisdictions. In year 2000, its federal government extend the payable weeks of the benefit up to 35 weeks. The legislative bodies of different provinces concertedly amended their labor standard to extend their leave duration up to 35 weeks. Without consensus on the need to grant adequate parental leave and its benefit to their workers, the laws may not have been established in that way.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 管理學
社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. Abou-Nassif, Fida(2002).Canadian Women and the Welfare State in an Age of Globalization.Unpublished Master Thesis, Ontario, Canada:Department of Sociology, University Of Ottawa.
  2. World Web Site
  3. Burns, James MacGregor,Peltason, J. W.(1987).Government by the People.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  4. Burns, Kimberly A.(2001).Laurentian University Of Sudbury.
  5. Calder, Gillian Margaret.(2003).Unpublished Master Thesis, Toronto, Canada: Osgoode Hall Law School.York University.
  6. Today`s Parent.com. Retrieved
  7. "Welfare," Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia 2004
  8. Crichton, Pierre(2000).Changes to the Pregnancy and Parental Leave Provisions of the Employment Insurance Act and Employment Standards Legislation.10 Employment And Labor Law Reporter 103.
  9. DeRiviere, Linda.(2000).Unpublished Master Thesis, Department of Economics, Manitoba.Canada:The University Of Manitoba.
  10. Gauthier, Anne Helene.(1996).The State and the Family: A Comparative Analysis of Family Policies in Industrialized Countries.Oxford, UK:Clarendon Press.
  11. One-Year Maternity and Parental Leave: What it Means for Parents and Employers
  12. Kamerman, Sheila B.(2000).Parental Leave Policies: An Essential Ingredient in Early Childhood Education and Care Policies.Social Policy Report,14(2),3-15.
  13. Kay, Fiona M.(2002).Crossroads to Innovation and Diversity: The Careers of Women Lawyers in Quebec.Mcgill Law Journal,47,699-745.
  14. Dollars and Sense
  15. Knitzer, Jane(2001).Federal and State Efforts to Improve Care for Infants and Toddlers.The Future of Children,11(1),79-98.
  16. Lawrence, Miranda(1997).Approaches to Gender Equality in the Workplace: Dumont-Ferlatte v. Canada (Employment and Immigration Commission).Ottawa Law Review,29(2),477-495.
  17. Lero, Donna S.,Tremblay R. E., Barr R. G.,Peters RDeV (eds.)(2003).Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development.Montreal, Quebec:Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development.
  18. L''Heureux-Dube, Claire(2000).The Search for Equality: A Human Rights Issue.Queen`s Law Journal,25,401-423.
  19. Madsen, Lene.(2002).Citizen, Worker, Mother: Canadian Women`s Claims to Parental Leave and Childcare.Canadian Journal of Family Law,19,11-74.
  20. Parental Leave Benefits: 10 Things You Should Know about the New Pregnancy and Parental Benefits
  21. Pull, Kerstin,Alewell, Dorothea(2001).An International Comparison and Assessment of Maternity Leave Legislation.Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal,22(2-3),297-326.
  22. Rogers, Derek L.(1995).Ontario Labor Law Reform: Bill 7 vs. Bill 40.5 Employment and Labor Law Reporter 87.
  23. Sujit, Choudhry(2002).Recasting Social Canada: A Reconsideration of Federal Jurisdiction over Social Policy.Univ. of Toronto Law Journal,52,163-164.
  24. Tong, Rosemarie.(1998).Feminist thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
  25. Wiegers, Wanda A.(2001).The National Child Benefit: Social Inequality under the New 'Social Union'.Ottawa Law Review,33(2),73-82.
  26. 林晨柏、魏麒原(2002)。中國時報。台北:中國時報社。
  27. 盧智芳(2004)。CHEERS雜誌。台北:商周。
  28. 謝棋楠(1997)。中美工資工時法之適用與修正。台南:漢家出版社。
被引用次数
  1. 廖曉柔、陳鳳如(2014)。臺中市國小教師對育嬰假的認知與期待之探究。政策研究學報,13,48-73。
  2. 吳姿慧(2016)。我國育嬰留職停薪制度申請要件及程序之檢討—兼論育嬰之本質及責任。臺北大學法學論叢,98,85-135。