論通勤災害應否視為職業災害

Should Commuting Accidents Be Regarded As The Work-Related Accidents?

10.30388/BLR.201112_(27).0003

張其恆(Chyi-Herng Chan,)

通勤災害 ； 職災補償 ； Commuting Accidents ； Workers'Compensation

政大勞動學報

27期（2011 / 12 / 01）

77 - 99

繁體中文

我國有關通勤災害職災補償之特殊法律規範方式，易使法院於某些個案援用日本法例過於傳統的解釋論，否定通勤災害勞工於勞基法第59條之適用，而形成勞雇雙方於通勤災害職災補償上，權利義務處於不確定之狀態。本文自比較勞雇關係與勞動法的觀點，釐清我國與日本勞基法有關通勤災害職災補償規定之不同立法背景與屬性；甚至包括英美日等國在內的世界主要國家職災補償之制度發展納入通勤災害保護的趨勢；論證法院某些判決以上世紀初葉的陳舊過時的勞動法理排除通勤災害於勞基法第59條之適用，並無助於定爭止紛；而對問題的緩和與制度的健全，仍有賴採取某些必要之立法或行政調整作為。

The way of special legal norms about the commuting accidents in Taiwan, was easy to invoke over-traditional interpretative theory by the court in dealing with some cases, which denied the application of the article 59 of Taiwanese Labor Standards Law about commuting accidents, whatever formed the workers' compensation of both employers and employees in commuting accidents leading to an uncertain state with the right and obligation of employment relations. First, this article from the point of view with the employment relations and labor law tried to clarify the different legislative background between Taiwanese and Japanese Labor Standards Law on the workers' compensation provisions from commuting accidents. Second, there is a tendency towards commuting accidents protection in the advanced countries, even including USA, UK and Japan gradually. Third, to argue the decision of Court in some cases to exclude commuting accidents in the application of the article 59 of the Labor Standards Law adopted out-of-date labor law theory more than half century ago that is no help to terminate related disputes. Lastly, to mitigate the uncertainty and the integrity of the system still relied on some adjustments of the necessary legislative or administration.

1. Bain, Trevor(2009).Workers' Compensation in the United States.政大勞動學報,25
   連結：
2. (2011).Doing Business in Japan in LexisNexis Matthew Bender.New York:Matthew Bender.
3. ISSA, 2009, Social Security Programs throughout the World: Europe.
4. 徐國淦，2005，（勞委會擬修法：通勤職災勞保續給付雇主免補償），《聯合報》，2005-04-25，A6版
5. ISSA, 2009, Social Security Programs throughout the World: Asia and the Pacific.
6. 行政院勞工委員會，2010，《勞工保險統計年報》，台北：勞工保險局
7. ISSA, 2009, Social Security Programs throughout the World: the Americas.
8. Chang, Chyi-herng,Bain, Trevor(2006).Employment Relations across the Taiwan Strait: Globalization and State Corporatism.Journal of Industrial Relations,48(1),99-115.
9. Hanami, Tadashi(1981).The Influence of ILO Standards on Law and Practice in Japan.International Labor Review,120(6)
10. Hepple, Bob(1986).The Making of Labour Law in Europe: a Comparative Study of Nine Countries up to 1945.London:Mansell.
11. ILO(1962).Benefits in the Case of Industrial Accidents and Occupational Disease, Report VII(1).International Labor Conference, 47th Sessions,Geneva:
12. Jamieson, Suzanne(1994).Australian Experience on Workers' Commuting Injuries.Workshop on Workers' Commuting Injuries,Taipei:
13. Klosse, S.(ed.),Hartlief, T.(ed.)(2007).Shift in Compensating Work-Related Injuries and Diseases.Wien:Springer.
14. Larson, Arthur(1996).Workmen's Compensation.New York:Matthew Bender.
15. Muenchen, Rueckversicherungs-Gesellschaft(2004).Commuting Accidents: a Challenge for Workers' Compensation Systems.Germany:Muenchen.
16. Sass, R.(1986).Workplace Health and Safety: Report from Canada.International Journal of Health Services,16(4)
17. Waas, Bernd(1994).German Experience on Workers' Commuting Injuries.Workshop on Workers' Commuting Injuries,Taipei:
18. 上田達子(1993)。イギリスにおける業務上災害の概念（一）。同志社法学，299
19. 山口浩一郎(2008)。労災補償の諸問題（增補版）。東京:信山社。
20. 行政院勞工委員會(1996)。勞工保險法規歷次修正條文彙編。台北:勞工保險局。
21. 佐藤進(1966)。通勤災害（commuting accidents）と產業災害（employment injuries）：ILO121号条約と各国ならびにわが国の立法分析を中心として。世界の労働，16(4)
22. 吳姿慧(2010)。勞工上下班途中之通勤災害與勞基法雇主職業災害補償責任之關係。台灣法學，106
23. 林弘子(1972)。アメリカにおける通勤途上災害問題。ジュリスト，518
24. 林更盛(2009)。勞動法案例研究（二）。台北:五南。
25. 邱駿彥(1998)。我國職業災害補償制度。輔仁法學，17
26. 青木宗也編(1992)。労働判例大系（第8卷）。東京:??旬報社。
27. 桑原昌宏(1974)。「災害補償法論」，労働法の基本問題。沼田稲次郎先生還曆記念‧下卷，東京:
28. 桑原昌宏(1972)。イギリスにおける通勤途上災害。ジュリスト，518
29. 陳金泉(2007)。勞動法一百問。台北:三民。
30. 黃程貫(2006)。勞動法。台北:新學林。
31. 黃越欽(2000)。勞動法新論。台北:翰蘆。
32. 劉志鵬(2007)。法院審理勞資爭議訴訟案件之分析：93年度及94年度之勞資爭議訴訟案件為例。行政院勞工委員會。
33. 劉志鵬、邱駿彥、王惠玲、石發基、董泰琪(1998)。企業法律講座：雇主應就通勤災害負擔職災補償責任嗎？。月旦法學雜誌，41

1. 賴秋帆,賴昱安,陳逸青,沈欣宜(2022)。職業災害認定基準之轉變－以交通事故為例。工業安全衛生，398，9-25。