國中小學版幽默理解與幽默創造能力測驗之編製

Development of "Humor Comprehension and Humor Creativity Test"

吳靜宜(Ching-Yi Wu)；陳學志(Hsueh-Chih Chen)；邱發忠(Fa-Chung Chiou)；徐芝君(Chih-Chun Hsi)

中小學生 ； 幽默理解與幽默創造能力測驗 ； 幽默感 ； 量表編製 ； humor comprehension ； humor creativity ； Humor Comprehension and Humor Creativity Tests HCHCT

應用心理研究

35期（2007 / 09 / 01）

185 - 210

繁體中文

過去國內外所編製的幽默感測驗多為自陳式測驗，易受社會贊許反應影響而難以客觀測量受試者的幽默能力；此外，過去所編製的幽默測驗多以成人為對象，較少有適用於中小學生的幽默測驗量表。職是之故，本研究回顧相關文獻，編製一套具有客觀評分指標的「幽默理解與幽默創造能力測驗」。本測驗分為「幽默理解能力」以及「幽默創造能力」兩個分測驗。其中「幽默理解能力」分測驗中包含「幽默笑話選擇」以及「幽默笑話改編」各7題；而「幽默創造能力」分測驗則由「幽默短文改寫」以及「幽默標題命名」各7題組成。本測驗之兩個分測驗的內部一致性信度係數分別為.80與.79，再測信度為.65與.65，評分者間信度則介於.78~.90間。在效度方面，「幽默理解與幽默創造能力測驗」與自陳式「多成份幽默感量表」的相關介於.032~.318之間，僅有低相關存在，顯示本測驗具有良好區辨效度。再者，由於「幽默理解與幽默創造能力測驗」與同儕互評的相關，高於自陳式之「多成份幽默感量表」與同儕互評間的相關，顯示本測驗較過去的自陳式幽默測驗更能測量出受試者真實的幽默能力。最後，本研究以台灣2443名中小學生建立此份測驗的常模。

Most humor tests developed in the past were both self-report and for adults only, those tests readily induced social desirability. Therefore the main purposes of this study were to develop Humor Comprehension and Humor Creativity Test (HCHCT) suiting the junior and elementary students and designing a set of semi-structural assessment standard for the test. The HCHCT have two scales, it consists of humor comprehension scales and humor creativity scales. The humor comprehension scales have two subscales, they are humor jokes choice and humor jokes changing. The humor creativity scales also have two subscales, they are humor pictures naming and humor articles writing. All scales have 7 items, thus the HCHCT have 28 items. In reliability , humor comprehension scales and humor creativity scales, the coefficient of internal consistency were .80 and .79, and the test-retest reliability coefficient were .65 and .65, scorer reliability were .78-.90. Confirmatory factor analysis assisted HCHCT's construct validity. The results suggested: a. the low correlation of HCHCT and MSHS reveals they aren't identical constructs; b. the correlation between HCHCT and peers ratings is higher than the correlation between MSHS and peers ratings. The above results demonstrated HCHCT can assess students' humor comprehension ability more accurately than MSHS. Besides, the norm of HCHCT was established based on 2443 fifth graders or eighth graders students all around Taiwan.

1. Babad, E. Y.(1974).A multi-multi-method approach to the assessment of humor: A critical look at humor tests.Journal of Personality,42,618-631.
2. Eysenck, H .J .,Eysenck, S. B. G.(1975).Manual of the eysneck personality questionnaire.London:Hodder and Stoughton Press.
3. Firestien, R, L.(1991).Effect of creative problem solving training on communication behaviors in small groups.Small-Group-Research,2,506-512.
4. Lefcourt, H. M.,Martian, R. A.(1986).Humor and life stress: Antidote to adversity.New York:Springer-Verlag.
5. Martin, R. A.,Willibald Ruch. ( Eds.)(1998).The sense of humor: explorations of a personality characteristic.Berlin:Druckerei Hidebrand.
6. Masten, A. S.(1986).Humor, its origin and development.San Francisco:W. H. Freeman.
7. McGhee, P. E.(1971).Cognitive development and children`s comprehension of humor.Child Development,42,123-138.
8. McGhee, P. E.(1976).Laughing matter: A symposium: Sex differences in children`s humor.Journal of Communication,26(3),176-189.
9. Nerhardt, G.(1970).Humor and inclination to laugh: Emotion relations to stimuli of different divergence from range of expectancy.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,11,185-195.
10. Nevo, O.,Nevo, B.(1983).What do you do when asked to answer humorously?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,44(1),188-194.
11. Suls, J.,J. N. Goldstein,P. E. McGhee (Eds.)(1972).Handbook of humor research.New York:Springer Verlag.
12. Svebak, S.(1974).Revised questionnaire on the sense of humor.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,15,328-331.
13. Thorson, J. A.,Powell, F. C.(1993).Development and validation of a multidimensional sense of humor scale.Journal of Clinical Psychology,49(1),13-23.
14. Treadwell, Y.(1970).Humor and Creativity.Psychological Reports,26(1),55-58.
15. Wycoff, E. B.,Pryor, B.(2003).Cognitive processing, creativity, apprehension, and the humorous personality.North American Journal of Psychology,5,31-44.
16. Zigler, Levine,Gould(1966).Congnitive process in the development of children`s appreciation of humor.Child Development,37,507-518.
17. Ziv, A.(1984).Personality and sense of humor.New York:Spring Publishing Company.
18. 何茉如(1998)。台北，國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
19. 吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1998)。教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究報告教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究報告,未出版
20. 吳靜宜(2004)。台北，台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
21. 林小麗(2003)。台北，國立台灣師範大學心理與輔導研究所。
22. 孫聖和(2000)。台北，國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所。
23. 張如鈞(1990)。台北，國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
24. 陳淑蓉(2002)。台北，國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
25. 陳學志(1991)。台北，國立台灣大學心理研究所。
26. 台灣學術網路BBS站輔仁大學應用心理系情治社區笑話版
27. 劉君業(2000)。笑遍天下：如何成為幽默高手。台北:桂冠。
28. 劉莉芬(2001)。台北，國立台灣師範大學華語文教育研究所。
29. 謝慧珍(1995)。台北，國立政治大學教育研究所。

1. 徐欣萍(2017)。心理健康促進與正向心理學的本土化反思。應用心理研究，66，7-46。
2. 鄭其嘉、盛慧珊、邱玉蟬、李蘭、吳文琪、江宜珍(2011)。「台灣青少年幽默測量工具」之發展與編製。測驗學刊，58(專刊)，179-205。
3. 鄭其嘉、楊蕙如、邱玉蟬、李蘭、吳文琪、江宜珍(2008)。國中生的幽默概念及表現類型：焦點團體討論結果。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，27(6)，519-529。