強暴迷思的認同與延伸

Rape Myths: Acceptance and Propagation

黃軍義(Jiun-Yih Hunag)

強暴迷思 ； 強暴迷思的延伸 ； 強暴迷思的認同 ； rape myths ； acceptance of rape myths ； propagation of rape myths

應用心理研究

58期（2013 / 06 / 01）

67 - 101

繁體中文

本研究探討三項有關強暴迷思的問題：大專學生對強暴迷思的認同程度、強暴迷思與背景變項及社會讚許反應之間的關聯、強暴迷思是否有延伸至強暴當事人的家人與朋友的現象。本研究以具有全國代表性的大專學生為研究對象，其中大專男生732位，大專女生723位，共計有效樣本數1,455位。採取無記名自陳式問卷調查法蒐集資料。研究結果發現：大專學生對強暴加害人迷思的認同程度高於對強暴被害人迷思的認同程度，男生對強暴迷思的認同程度高於女生，私立大專學生對強暴迷思認同程度高於公立大專學生，而研究參與者的年齡、父母親的教育程度、及城鄉背景對強暴迷思認同度均無影響。強暴迷思與社會讚許反應呈低度正相關，顯示認同強暴迷思，可能是社會所期許的方向。此外，具有高強暴迷思認同度的大專學生，亦常具有高延伸迷思認同度，並且強暴迷思與延伸迷思具有概念上的聚合性，以及區辨無關概念上的一致性，顯示強暴迷思具有延伸到強暴當事人的家人與朋友現象。最後就本研究結果、限制、及未來研究方向進行討論。

This study investigates three issues regarding rape myths: the degree of acceptance of rape myths among Taiwanese college students; the associations between rape myths, background variables and social desirability; and whether rape myths propagate from rape victims and offenders to their families and friends. A representative national sample of college students was selected using a random sampling procedure. 1,455 participants (732 male, 723 female) were recruited for data collection. Results showed that acceptance of the rape-offender myth was higher than that of the rape-victim myth; that acceptance of rape myths was higher among male college students than their female counterparts; and that acceptance rates were higher in private universities than in public ones. It was also found that age, parental education, and urban/rural backgrounds have no influence on acceptance to rape myths. Social desirability and acceptance of rape myths yielded a weak positive correlation, indicating that acceptance may be a socially desirable response. In addition, participants with higher degrees of rape myth acceptance frequently showed higher degrees of extended rape myth acceptance as well, and rape myths and extended rape myths are conceptually convergent. This confirms that rape myths propagate from rape victims and offenders to their families and friends. Finally, the results, limitations of this study, and directions for future study are addressed.

1. 唐華（2009）：〈四分之一南非男性承認強姦他人，其中十分之一強姦男性〉。線上檢索於2012 年6 月18 日，取自：國際線上專稿報導 http://big5.chinabroacast.cn
2. 內政部（2013）。《內政統計年報》。線上檢索於2013 年1 月5 日，取自：http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/list.htm。
3. Aosved, A. C.,Long, P. J.(2006).Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance.Sex Roles,55,481-492.
4. Archer, J.(1994).Male violence.London:Routledge.
5. Bohner, G.,Jarvis, C. I.,Eyssel, F.,Siebler, F.(2005).The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men.European Journal of Social Psychology,35(6),819-828.
6. Brownmiller, S.(1975).Against our will: Men, women and rape.New York:Simon & Schuster.
7. Burt, M. R.(1980).Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,38(2),217-230.
8. Chapleau, K. M.,Oswald, D. L.(2010).Power, sex, and rape myth acceptance: Testing two models of rape proclivity.Journal of Sex Research,47(1),66-78.
9. Check, J. V. P.,Malamuth, N. M.,Elias, B.,Barton, S. A.(1985).On hostile ground.Psychology Today,19,56-61.
10. Cohen, M. L.,Garofalo, R. F.,Boucher, R.,Seghorn, T.(1971).The psychology of rapists.Seminars in Psychiatry,3,307-327.
11. Cowan, G.(2000).Women's hostility toward women and rape and sexual harassment myths.Violence Against Women,6(3),238-246.
12. Drieschner, K.,Lange, A.(1999).A review of cognitive factors in the etiology of rape: Theories, empirical studies, and implications.Clinical Psychology Review,19(1),57-77.
13. Field, H. S.(1978).Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,36(2),156-179.
14. Forbes, G. B.,Adams-Curtis, L. E.,White, K. B.(2004).First-and-secondgeneration measures of sexism, rape myths and related beliefs, and hostility toward women.Violence Against Women,10(3),236-261.
15. Franiuk, R.,Seefelt, J. L.,Cepress, S. L.,Vandello, J. A.(2008).Prevalence and effects of rape myths in print journalism.Violence Against Women,14(3),287-309.
16. Gerger, H.,Kley, H.,Bohner, G.,Siebler, F.(2007).The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression (AMMSA) scale: development and validation in German and English.Aggressive Behavior,33,420-440.
17. Gilmartin-Zena, P.(1987).Attitudes toward rape: Student characteristics as predictors.Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology,15,175-182.
18. Groth, A. N.,Birnbaum, H. J.(1979).Men who rape: The psychology of the offender.New York, NY:Plenum Press.
19. Hammond, E. M.,Berry, M. A.,Rodriguez, D. N.(2011).The influence of rape myth acceptance, sexual attitudes, and belief in a just world on attributions of responsibility in a date rape scenario.Legal & Criminological Psychology,16(2),242-252.
20. Jolliffe, D.,Farrington, D. P.,Hawkins, J. D.,Catalano, R. F.,Hill, K. G.,Kosterrman, R.(2003).Predictive, concurrent, prospective and retrospective validity of self-reported delinquency.Criminal Behavior and Mental Health,13(3),179-197.
21. Koss, M. P.,Gidycz, C. A.(1985).Sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,53(3),422-423.
22. Koss, M. P.,Gidycz, C. A.,Wisniewski, N.(1987).The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization among a national sample of college women.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,55(2),162-170.
23. Lonsway, K. A.,Fitzgerald, L. F.(1995).Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,68(4),704-711.
24. Lonsway, K. A.,Fitzgerald, L. F.(1994).Rape myths: In review.Psychology of Women Quarterly,18(2),133-164.
25. Malamuth, N. M.,Linz, D.,Heavey, C. L.,Barnes, G.,Acker, M.(1995).Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men's conflict with women : A 10-year follow-up study.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,69(2),353-369.
26. McMahon, S.,Farmer, G. L.(2011).An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths.Social Work Research,35(2),71-81.
27. Newcombe, P. A.,van den Eynde, J.,Hafner, D.,Jolly, L.(2008).Attributions of responsibility for rape: Differences across familiarity of situation, gender, and acceptance of rape myths.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,38(7),1736-1754.
28. Payne, D.,Lonsway, K.,Fitzgerald, L.(1999).Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale.Journal of Research in Personality,33(1),27-68.
29. Rapaport, K.,Burkhart, B. R.(1984).Personality and attitudinal characteristics of sexually coercive college males.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,93(2),216-221.
30. Russell, D. E. H.(1984).Sexual exploitation: Rape child sexual abuse, and workplace harassment.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications.
31. Smithyman, S.D.(1978).Claremont Graduate School.
32. Uji, M.,Shono, M.,Shikai, N.,Kitamura, T.(2007).Rape myth scale: Factor structure and relationship with gender egalitarianism among Japanese professionals.Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences,61(4),392-400.
33. Van Dusen, K. T.(Ed.),Mednick, S. A.(Ed.)(1983).Crime and justice: An annual review of research.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
34. 呂明坤(1996)。中央警察大學警政研究所。
35. 李維娜(2001)。中正大學犯罪防治研究所。
36. 林淑梨(2001)。成功大學行為醫學研究所。
37. 卿盛瑛(2005)。成功大學護理學研究所。
38. 陸洛(2008)。人我關係之界定：「折衷自我」的現身。中國人的自我：心理學的分析，臺北:
39. 陸洛、楊國樞(2008)。當代華人的傳統與現代雙文化自我：其現身、組成與變遷。中國人的自我：心理學的分析，臺北:
40. 黃光國(2010)。國家科學委員會整合型研究計畫規劃案成果報告（精簡版）國家科學委員會整合型研究計畫規劃案成果報告（精簡版）,臺北:國家科學委員會。
41. 黃軍義、陳若璋(1997)。強姦犯罪成因及相關問題之研究。臺北:法務部。
42. 楊國樞(2008)。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究：社會取向與個人取向的觀點。中國人的自我：心理學的分析，臺北:
43. 廖玲燕(2000)。臺灣大學心理學研究所。
44. 顧燕翎編(1996)。女性主義理論與流派。臺北:女書出版。

1. 黎進三、楊雅慧(2014)。約會強暴防治教育介入方案對於國中學生約會強暴態度影響之實驗研究。性學研究，5(2)，23-42。
2. (2014)。性暴力法制的歷史交織：一個性別批判的觀點。軍法專刊，60(2)，21-40。