社會知覺推論測驗中文版的信效度研究

Reliability and Validity of The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT)-Mandarin Chinese Version

10.3966/156092512018040068002

劉又綺(Yu-Chi, Liu)；曾亦涵(Yi-Han, Tseng)；蔡明成(Ming-Cheng, Tsai)；葉在庭(Zai-Ting, Yeh)

社會覺察 ； 信效度 ； 腦傷患者 ； social awareness ； reliability ； validity ； patients with brain injury

應用心理研究

68期（2018 / 04 / 01）

3 - 41

繁體中文

目的：社會覺察是個體社會行為中的重要能力，社會覺察包含了解他人意圖、認知訊息的理解與高層次的社會智商，如社會習俗的知識、預期他人的行為、問題解決的能力，這些知覺能力需要運用語言訊息、非語言訊息，如臉部表情、眼神、姿態，以及社交的情境脈絡來理解情境。若社會覺察能力較差，則容易導致個體以無效、不合時宜或不適當的方式對他人做出回應。隨著科技發達，影片形式的測驗工具，不但能展現人際互動的生態效度，也能吸引一般民眾，本研究目的將社會覺察推論測驗（the awareness of social inference test, TASIT）進行中文化編制，並且檢驗其信效度。方法：將測驗英文與中文版本相互翻譯後，確認其意義並拍攝成中文影片，加入中文字幕，以107位大學生來評估中文版的信效度，建構效度的部分則邀請北部某醫院23位腦傷患者進行評估。結果：內容效度顯示出修訂後各情緒和情境均有80%以上的同意度，信度的α值介於.70∼.86的中上範圍；建構效度方面發現腦傷患者確實有社會互動知覺能力的損害，且比心智理論作業更能測得受試者社會覺察的能力。結論：測驗中文化後具有良好的信效度，可應用於相關社會覺察能力的評估。

Objective: Social awareness, an important ability in individual social behavior, includes understanding the intentions of others, processing and understanding cognitive information, and a high level of social intelligence. For example, knowledge of social customs, predicting the behavior of others, and problem- solving skills are all aspects of social awareness. Social awareness requires the use of language, non-verbal signals, and social contexts to understand different social situations. Individuals with poor social awareness may respond to others in a manner that is ineffective, poorly-timed, or inappropriate. With the development of technology, film-based testing tools can both demonstrate the ecological validity of social interaction and simultaneously attract the general public. The purpose of this study has been to translate and transmute the Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT) into a Mandarin Chinese version and examine its reliability and validity. Method: The test was translated twice, both from English to Chinese then back to English. Once the meanings and texts of the test were confirmed, the test was filmed in Mandarin Chinese and Chinese subtitles were added. This Chinese version was evaluated by 107 undergraduates. Construct validity was established by evaluating 23 patients with brain injuries in a hospital in Northern Taipei. Results: Content validity showed that all types of emotions and situations had more than 80% agreement. The alpha value of reliability was above average, between the range of .70 to .86. Evaluations of construct validity found evidence to support the claim that patients with brain injury suffer impairments to social awareness. Also, the use of TASIT to measure social awareness was better than Theory of Mind (ToM) tasks. Conclusion: The Mandarin Chinese version of TASIT has good reliability and validity and can used to evaluate social awareness-related abilities.

1. 葉在庭, Z. T.,花茂棽, M. S.,劉珣瑛, S. L.(2009)。猜猜我在想什麼？--- 中文版心智理論作業的信效度研究及其在老年人的表現初探。中華心理學刊，1(3)，375-395。
   連結：
2. Allender, J.,Kaszniak, A. W.(1989).Processing of emotional cues in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type.International Journal of Neuroscience,46(3),147-155.
3. Baron Cohen, S.,Jolliffe, T.,Mortimore, C.,Robertson, M.(1997).Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,38(7),813-822.
4. Bauminger, N.(2002).The facilitation of social-emotional understanding and social interaction in high-functioning children with autism: Intervention outcomes.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,32(4),283-298.
5. Brinkman, S. D.,Largen, J. W.,Gerganoff, S.,Pomara, N.(1983).Russells revised wechsler memory scale in the evaluation of dementia.Journal of Clinical Psychology,39(6),989-993.
6. Bryson, G.,Bell, M.,Lysaker, P.(1997).Affect recognition in schizophrenia: a function of global impairment or a specific cognitive deficit.Psychiatry Research,71(2),105-113.
7. Bucks, R. S.,Radford, S.(2004).Emotion processing in Alzheimer's disease.Aging & Mental Health,8(3),222-232.
8. Burnham, H.,Hogervorst, E.(2004).Recognition of facial expressions of emotion by patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type.Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders,18(1),75-79.
9. Costanzo, M.,Archer, D.(1989).Interperting the expressive behavior of others: The Interpersonal Perception Task.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,13(4),225-245.
10. Cullum, C.,Thompson, L.,Smernoff, E.(1993).Three-word recall as a measure of memory.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,15(2),321-329.
11. Edinger, J. A.,Patterson, M. L.(1983).Nonverbal involvement and social control.Psychological Bulletin,93(1),30.
12. Edwards, J.,Jackson, H. J.,Pattison, P. E.(2002).Emotion recognition via facial expression and affective prosody in schizophrenia: a methodological review.Clinical Psychology Review,22(6),789-832.
13. Fiske, S. T.,Taylor, S. E.(2013).Social cognition: From brains to culture.Sage.
14. Green, R. E.,Turner, G. R.,Thompson, W. F.(2004).Deficits in facial emotion perception in adults with recent traumatic brain injury.Neuropsychologia,42(2),133-141.
15. Gregory, C.,Lough, S.,Stone, V.,Erzinclioglu, S.,Martin, L.,Baron-Cohen, S.,Hodges, J. R.(2002).Theory of mind in patients with frontal variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: Theoretical and practical implications.Brain,125(4),752-764.
16. Happe, F. G.(1993).Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory.Cognition,48(2),101-119.
17. Hargrave, R.,Maddock, R. J.,Stone, V.(2002).Impaired recognition of facial expressions of emotion in Alzheimer's disease.Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences,14(1),64-71.
18. Henry, J. D.,Ruffman, T.,McDonald, S.,O’Leary, M. A,Phillips, L. H.,Brodaty, H.,Rendell, P. G.(2008).Recognition of disgust is selectively preserved in Alzheimer's disease.Neuropsychologia,46(5),1363-1370.
19. Kern, R. S.,Green, M. F.,Fiske, A. P.,Kee, K. S.,Lee, J.,Sergi, M. J,Subotnik K. L.,Sugar C. A.,Nuechterlein, K. H.(2009).Theory of mind deficits for processing counterfactual information in persons with chronic schizophrenia.Psychological Medicine,39,645-654.
20. Kipps, C.,Nestor, P.,Acosta-Cabronero, J.,Arnold, R.,Hodges, J.(2009).Understanding social dysfunction in the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia: the role of emotion and sarcasm processing.Brain,132(3),592.
21. Koff, E.,Zaitchik, D.,Montepare, J.,Albert, M. S.(1999).Emotion processing in the visual and auditory domains by patients with Alzheimer's disease.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,5(1),32-40.
22. Lavenu, I.,Pasquier, F.,Lebert, F.,Petit, H.,der Linden, M. V.(1999).Perception of emotion in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease.Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders,13(2),96-101.
23. Leitman, D. I.,Ziwich, R.,Pasternak, R.,Javitt, D. C.(2006).Theory of Mind (ToM) and counterfactuality deficits in schizophrenia: misperception or misinterpretation?.Psychological Medicine,36(8),1075-1083.
24. Leslie, A. M.,Friedman, O.,German, T. P.(2004).Core mechanisms in "theory of mind".Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8(12),528-533.
25. Logue, P.,Wyrick, L.(1979).Initial validation of Russell's Revised Wechsler Memory Scale: A comparison of normal aging versus dementia.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,47(1),176-178.
26. McDonald, S.(2012).New frontiers in neuropsychological assessment: Assessing social perception using a standardised instrument, The Awareness of Social Inference Test.Australian Psychologist,47(1),39-48.
27. McDonald, S.(2002).Awareness of Social Inference Test: Manual.Thames Valley Test Company.
28. McDonald, S.,Bornhofen, C.,Shum, D.,Long, E.,Saunders, C.,Neulinger, K.(2006).Reliability and validity of The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT): A clinical test of social perception.Disability & Rehabilitation,28(24),1529-1542.
29. McDonald, S.,Flanagan, S.(2004).Social perception deficits after traumatic brain injury: Interaction between emotion recogni tion, mentalizing ability, and social communication.Neuropsychology,18(3),572-579.
30. McDonald, S.,Flanagan, S.,Rollins, J.,Kinch, J.(2003).TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury.The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation,18(3),219-238.
31. Premack, D.,Woodruff, G.(1978).Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1(4),515-526.
32. Rosenthal, R.,Hall, J. A.,DiMatteo, M. R.,Rogers, P. L.,Archer, D.(1979).Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Sergi, M. J.,Rassovsky, Y.,Nuechterlein, K. H.,Green, M. F.(2006).Social perception as a mediator of the influence of early visual processing on functional status in schizophrenia.American Journal of Psychiatry,163(3),448-454.
34. Shamary-Tsoory, S. G.,Tomer, R.,Berger, B. D.,Aharon-Peretz, J.(2003).Characterization of empathy deficits following prefrontal brain damage: The role of the right ventromedial prefrontal cortex.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,15(3),324-337.
35. Sharp, C.,Fonagy, P.,Goodyer, I.(2008).Social Cognition and Developmental Psychopathology.UK.:Oxford.
36. Shyu, Y.,Yip, P.(2001).Factor structure and explanatory variables of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for elderly persons in Taiwan.Journal of the Formosan Medical Association,100(10),676-683.
37. Sparks, A.,McDonald, S.,Lino, B.,O’Donnell, M.,Green, M. J.(2010).Social cognition, empathy and functional outcome in schizophrenia.Schizophrenia Research,122(1-3),172-178.
38. Stone, V. E.,Baron-Cohen, S.,Knight, R. T.(1998).Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,10,640-656.
39. Stuss, D. T.,Gallup, G. G. J.,Alexander, M. P.(2001).The frontal lobes are necessary for "theory of mind".Brain,124(2),279-286.
40. Testa, J.,Beatty, W.,Gleason, A.,Orbelo, D.,Ross, E.(2001).Impaired affective prosody in AD: Relationship to aphasic deficits and emotional behaviors.Neurology,57(8),1474-1481.
41. 花茂棽, M. S.,張本聖, B. S.,林克能, K. N.,楊建銘, C. M.,盧小蓉, H. J.,陳心怡, H.(2005).魏氏記憶力量表第三版（WMS-III）中文版指導手冊.台北=Taipei City:中國行為科學社=Chinese Behavioral Science Corporation.