末期醫療決策中的病人自主：以病人為中心的思考

Autonomy in decision-making in the terminal medical care: A patient-centered perspective

10.3966/156092512020060072003

何雪綾(Hsueh-Lin Ho)；林耀盛(Yaw-Sheng Lin)

末期決策 ； 以病人為中心的照顧 ； 自主 ； 折衷自我 ； 關係自主 ； 醫病關係 ； autonomy ； composite self ； decision-making in terminal care ； patient-centered care ； patient-physician ； relationship ； relational autonomy

應用心理研究

72期（2020 / 06 / 01）

91 - 130

繁體中文

本文探討在台灣末期醫療決策討論的臨床現場，病人自主是否確實被適當維護。從文獻回顧以及臨床觀察可知，源於西方個人主義取向自我觀的自主概念，難以完整描述臺灣長輩在臨床醫療現場的自主性展現。近代的臺灣社會，既有華人儒家文化的傳統，也受西方文化的諸多影響，生長其中使人帶有不同程度的個人取向以及社會取向之自我觀。病人真正認可的自主為何，需要個別化地認識與探究。本文回顧自主概念與不同文化的自我觀，說明女性主義的關係自主與東亞儒家哲學的自主原則，因為考量了「關係脈絡」，皆有助擴充個人自由主義式自主概念的不足；同時，也提醒此兩主張雖然都強調「關係脈絡」的重要性，但他們關注的主體不同，前者仍以個人為主體，而後者則以家庭為單位，此一差異源於兩者背後不同的自我觀。有鑑於對病人之自我觀有一定程度的認識，是以適合其文化背景維護其病人自主的必要前提，本文最後回到醫病互動脈絡下看自主議題，並對臨床工作者提出建議。

This article focuses on the preservation of the patients' autonomy in the Taiwanese context. People in modern Taiwan inherit the Confucian tradition and are experiencing the Western cultural influence. Their unique experiences of autonomy in relationships may shed light on how individuals' autonomy may be preserved in healthcare settings. We reviewed ＂autonomy＂ and ＂self-views＂ in different cultural contexts and juxtaposed constructs of feminist relational autonomy and East Asian autonomy with that of the individualistic autonomy. Both feminist relational autonomy and East Asian autonomy emphasize autonomy in relationships, but their foci are different: feminist relational autonomy focuses on the individuals, whereas East Asian autonomy focuses on the families. Their differences lie in their different underpinning self-views. For clinical professionals to preserve a patient's autonomy, they need to understand the patient's self-view and appreciate individual differences. As the understanding of self-views is a prerequisite to preserve/uphold a patient's autonomy in one's cultural context, we further discussed self-views and autonomy in the context of the patient-physician interactions and offered suggestions for clinical professionals.

1. 成令方, L. F.(2002)。醫「用」關係的知識與權力。台灣社會學，3，11-71。
   連結：
2. 林雅萍, Y. P.(2016)。對自主的再思考：關係取向。應用倫理評論，61，37-57。
   連結：
3. 陸洛(2003)。人我關係之界定－「折衷自我」的現身。本土心理學研究，20，139-207。
   連結：
4. 楊秀儀, H. I.(2009)。「知情放棄」與「空白同意」合乎自主原則嗎？論病人自主之性質。生命教育研究，1(2)，97-122。
   連結：
5. 劉彩娥, T. E.,王萬琳, W. L.,應立志, L. C.(2014)。醫師與病患對醫病關係模式之看法分析。管理實務與理論研究，8(3)，54-66。
   連結：
6. Benbassat, J.,Pilpel, D.,Tidhar, M.(1998).Patients’ preferences for participation in clinical decision making: A review of published surveys.Behavioral Medicine,24(2),81-88.
7. Candib, L. M.(2002).Truth telling and advance planning at the end of life: Problems with autonomy in a multicultural world.Families, Systems, & Health,20(3),213.
8. Chan, H. M.(2004).Sharing death and dying: Advance directives, autonomy and the family.Bioethics,18(2),87-103.
9. Emanuel, E. J.,Emanuel, L. L.(1992).Four models of the physician-patient relationship.Journal of the American Medical Association,267(16),2221-2226.
10. Fins, J. J.,Miller, F. G.,Acres, C. A.,Bacchetta, M. D.,Huzzard, L. L.,Rapkin, B. D.(1999).End-of-life decision-making in the hospital: Current practice and future prospects.Journal of Pain and Symptom Management,17(1),6-15.
11. Gaston, C. M.,Mitchell, G.(2005).Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review.Social Science and Medicine,61(10),2252-2264.
12. Ho, A.(2008).Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family’s role in medical decision making.Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences,22(1),128-135.
13. Huang, C. H.,Hu, W. Y.,Chiu, T. Y.,Chen, C. Y.(2008).The practicalities of terminally ill patients signing their own DNR orders-A study in Taiwan.Journal of Medical Ethics,34(5),336-340.
14. Hubbard, G.,Kidd, L.,Donaghy, E.(2008).Preferences for involvement in treatment decision making of patients with cancer: a review of the literature.European Journal of Oncology Nursing,12(4),299-318.
15. Kleinman, A.(1988).The illness narratives: Suffering, healing, and the human condition.New York:Basic Books.
16. Lee, S. C.(2007).On relational autonomy: From Feminist Critique to Confucian Model for Clinical Practice.The Family, Medical Decision-making, and Biotechnology: Critical Reflections on Asian Moral Perspectives,Dordrecht:
17. Levin, T. T.,Li, Y.,Weiner, J. S.,Lewis, F.,Bartell, A.,Piercy, J.,Kissane, D. W.(2008).How do-not-resuscitate orders are utilized in cancer patients: Timing relative to death and communication-training implications.Palliative and Supportive Care,6(4),341-348.
18. Levinson, W.,Kao, A.,Kuby, A.,Thisted, R. A.(2005).Not all patients want to participate in decision making-A national study of public preferences.Journal of General Internal Medicine,20(6),531-535.
19. Liu, J. M.,Lin, W. C.,Chen, Y. M.,Wu, H. W.,Yao, N. S.,Chen, L. T.,Whang-Peng, J.(1999).The status of the do-not-resuscitate order in Chinese clinical trial patients in a cancer centre.Journal of Medical Ethics,25(4),309-314.
20. Markus, H. R.,Kitayama, S.(1991).Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review,98(2),224-253.
21. Mead, N.,Bower, P.(2000).Patient-centredness: A conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature.Social Science and Medicine,51(7),1087-1110.
22. Modell, A. H.(1997).The private self and relational theory.The inner world in the outer world: Psychoanalytic perspectives,New Haven:
23. Oh, D. Y.,Kim, J. H.,Kim, D. W.,Im, S. A.,Kim, T. Y.,Heo, D.,Kim, N.(2006).CPR or DNR? End-of-life decision in Korean cancer patients: A single center’s experience.Supportive Care in Cancer,14(2),103-108.
24. Reeve, J.(Ed.)(2009).Understanding motivation and emotion.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons.
25. Rogers, C. R.(1957).The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change.Journal of Consulting Psychology,21(2),95-103.
26. Ryan, R. M.,Deci, E. L.(2006).Self-Regulation and the Problem of Human Autonomy: Does Psychology Need Choice, Self-Determination, and Will?.Journal of Personality,74(6),1557-1586.
27. Walter, J. K.,Ross, L. F.(2014).Relational autonomy: Moving beyond the limits of isolated individualism.Pediatrics,133(Suppl 1),S16-S23.
28. 吳讚美, C. M.,薛爾榮, E. J.,鍾春櫻, C. Y.,劉慧玲, H. L.,溫怡然, Y. J.,鐘裕燕, Y. Y.(2009)。癌症死亡病患不施行心肺復甦術簽署情形與是否簽署之相關因素分析。安寧療護雜誌，14，243-253。
29. 李欣慈, H. T.,陳慶餘, C. Y.,胡文郁, W. Y.(2012)。華人孝道與家庭主義文化脈絡下談長照機構住民執行預立醫療照護計畫與老人自主權。安寧療護雜誌，17，187-199。
30. 易慧慈、楊媛婷（2017年5月3日）：〈插管之爭瓊瑤、平鑫濤子女決裂〉。自由電子報。取自：http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/1099131。
31. 范瑞平=Fan R. P.(Ed.)(2011).當代儒家生命倫理學.北京市=Peking:北京大學出版社=Peking University Press.
32. 張榮哲, J. C.,林耀盛, Y. S.(2012)。家庭醫學中的醫病關係與人性關懷。臺灣醫學，16，660-666。
33. 陳榮基, R. C.(2004)。安寧緩和醫療條例的實施與困境。臺灣醫學，8，684-687。
34. 陳榮基, R. C.(2008)。DNR不等於安寧緩和醫療。臺灣醫學，51(4)，36-39。
35. 陸洛(2007)。個人取向與社會取向的自我觀：概念分析與實徵測量。美中教育評論，4(2)，1-23。
36. 黃光國, K. K.(2008)。建構實在論與儒家關係主義：發展本土心理學的知識論策略。本土心理研究取徑論叢，臺北=Taipei City, Taiwan:
37. 黃囇莉, L. L.(2008)。科學渴望創意，創意需要科學：紮根理論在本土心理學中的運用與轉化。本土心理研究取徑論叢，臺北=Taipei City, Taiwan:
38. 楊嘉玲, C. L.,陳慶餘, C. Y.,胡文郁, W. Y.(2008)。醫療預立指示。安寧療護雜誌，13，30-41。
39. 蔡甫昌, D. F. C(2000)。生命倫理四原則方法。醫學教育，4，140-154。
40. 蔡甫昌, D. F. C.,郭蕙心, H. H.(2017)。病人自主權利法之倫理觀點與實務挑戰。臺灣醫學，21(1)，62-72。
41. 蔡甫昌, D. F. C.,潘恆嘉, H. C.,吳澤玫, T. M.,邱泰源, T. Y.,黃天祥, T. S.(2006)。預立醫療計畫之倫理與法律議題。臺灣醫學，10，517-536。
42. 蔡維歆、葉文正（2016年12月7日）：〈83歲傅達仁開刀6次求安樂死發表新書改生前追思會〉。蘋果日報。取自：http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20161207/1006532/。
43. 衛生福利部（2019）：〈預立同意安寧意願註記統計〉。取自https://hpcod.mohw.gov.tw/HospWeb/ [Ministry of Health and Welfare (2019). Statistics of registration for advance directives of receiving palliative care. Retrieved from https://hpcod.mohw.gov.tw/HospWeb/]