题名

長期照顧十年計劃服務對台北市家庭照顧者負荷與健康相關生活品質的影響

并列篇名

Ten-year Long-term Care Project: Service Impacts on Caregivers' Burden and Health-related Quality of Life, Taipei City

DOI

10.6317/LTC.202212_25(2).0005

作者

鄭思妤(Ssu-Yu Cheng);李玉春(Yue-Chune Lee);黃世傑(Shier-Chieg Huang);王素琴(Suh-Chin Wang);陳雅美(Ya-Mei Chen)

关键词

家庭照顧者 ; 長期照顧十年計畫 ; 照顧負荷 ; 健康相關生活品質 ; 複合型服務 ; Caregiver ; Ten-Year Long-term Care Project ; Burden ; Health-Related Quality of Life ; Multiple Service

期刊名称

長期照護雜誌

卷期/出版年月

25卷2期(2022 / 12 / 01)

页次

151 - 169

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

目的:本研究旨在探討不同類型及數量的長期照顧服務使用對台北市家庭照顧者短期負荷與健康相關生活品質的影響。方法:本研究使用臺北市政府衛生局臺北市家庭照護者評估計畫之資料進行次級資料分析,分析140位長期照顧十年計劃服務申請個案之主要家庭照顧者,其三個月前後負荷與健康相關生活品質之改變。本研究使用獨立樣本t檢定、皮爾森積差相關與單因子變異數分析等方法,檢驗家庭照顧者與被照顧者特性對於家庭照顧者負荷與健康相關生活品質間之相關性,並透過複迴歸分析控制可能影響照顧者負荷與健康相關生活品質之特性,比較使用服務與否、使用不同類型服務,以及使用不同數量之服務對家庭照顧者負荷與健康相關生活品質的影響。結果:研究結果發現,在控制相關家庭照顧者與被照顧者特性後,不論是否使用長期照顧十年服務,其家庭照顧者三個月後之負荷及健康相關生活品質皆無顯著改變。將服務分成喘息型服務、居家支持型服務與醫療相關服務三種類型後,則可發現醫療相關服務可顯著降低家庭照顧者三個月後的負荷(β=-3.919,p=0.015)。進一步考量使用服務數量與類型,將服務分為七種服務類型組合後,可發現與僅使用醫療相關服務相比,「僅使用喘息型服務」與「僅使用居家支持型服務」之家庭照顧者,其三個月後的負荷顯著較高(β=13.939、p=0.003;β=5.868、p=0.013);「僅使用居家支持型服務與醫療相關服務」之家庭照顧者,三個月後的心理相關生活品質則顯著較低(β=-5.352,p=0.040)。結論:對於新申請長照服務個案的家庭照顧者,長期照顧十年服務在短期內對家庭照顧者負荷有改善傾向。其中醫療相關服務則是在短期內可顯著改善照顧者的負荷,其他類型服務效果需要長期觀察成效。建議未來政策優先提供新申請服務者醫療相關服務。

英文摘要

Objectives: This study explored the effects of different types and numbers of long-term care (LTC)services on caregivers' burden and health-related quality of life in Taipei. Methods: The study used data from "A Study of Family Caregiver Appraisal in Taipei City" to analyze effects on 140 family caregivers whose care recipients were first-time applicants for LTC services from the Ten-Year Long-Term Care Project (LTCP) in Taipei City. The study controlled care recipients and family caregivers' characteristics which are related to family caregivers' burden and health related quality of life, using multiple regression to investigate how the number of services used, different types of services used, and combinations of services used might have influenced caregivers' burden and health-related quality of life. Result: When the care recipient and family caregivers' characteristics were controlled, the results suggested whether people used Ten-Year Long-term Care services or not, it didn't have significant effect of caregivers' burden and health related quality of life after 3 months. Among the users of Ten-Year Long-term Care services, the study found no significant positive association between number of services used and caregivers' burden and health related quality of life. After grouping the services in the Ten-Year Long-term Care programs into three category, including respite services, home support services, and medically related services, caregivers using medically related services have a significantly lower burden after 3 months of service use comparing to caregivers using any of other types of services ( β= -3.919, p= 0.015). When examining the effects of different combination of services, we found that, caregivers using respite services only (β= 13.939, p= 0.003) and home support services only( β= 5.868, p= 0.013) had higher caregivers' burden after 3 months comparing to caregiver using medically related services. Caregivers using the combination home care related services and medically related services had lower caregivers' mentally related quality of life after 3 months comparing to caregiver using medically related services (β= -5.352, p= 0.040). Conclusion: Receiving LTC services benefitted caregivers of care recipients' who were first-time applicants for LTCP. Medically related services showed significant benefit on caregivers' burden within only 3 months, but effects of other types of LTC services will require longer observation. Medically related services are recommended as a priority for care recipients when they first apply for LTC services.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 王增勇(2011)。家庭照顧者做為一種改革長期照顧的社會運動。臺灣社會研究季刊,85,397-414。
    連結:
  2. 陳品元,李玉春,陳雅美(2017)。家庭照顧者之正、負向照顧經驗與健康相關生活品質關係探討。長期照護雜誌,21(3),285-302。
    連結:
  3. 曾旭民,盧瑞芬,蔡益堅(2003)。國人生活品質評量(Ⅱ):SF-36 台灣版的常模與效度檢測。台灣公共衛生雜誌,22(6),512-518。
    連結:
  4. 黃志忠(2014)。居家服務使用對老人家庭照顧者照顧負荷之緩衝性影響研究。社會政策與社會工作學刊,18(1),1-43。
    連結:
  5. 詹書媛(2018)。國立臺灣大學健康政策與管理研究所。
    連結:
  6. 簡乃卉,徐亞瑛(2000)。住院失能老人之家庭照顧者出院需求的探討。護理研究,8(40),410-422。
    連結:
  7. Bartfay, E.,Bartfay, W. J.(2013).Quality-of-life outcomes among Alzheimer’s disease family caregivers following community-based intervention.Western journal of nursing research,35(1),98-116.
  8. Bass, D. M.,Noelker, L. S.,Rechlin, L. R.(1996).The Moderating Influence of Service use on Negative Caregiving Consequences.The Journals of Gerontology: Series B,51B(3),S121-S131.
  9. Carretero, S.,Garcés, J.,Ródenas, F.(2007).Evaluation of the home help service and its impact on the informal caregiver's burden of dependent elders.International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,22(8),738-749.
  10. Chen, Y.-M.(2014).Differences in Outcomes of Caregiver Support Services for Male and Female Caregivers.SAGE Open,4(3),2158244014548169.
  11. Chen, Y.-M.,Hedrick, S. C.,Young, H. M.(2010).A pilot evaluation of the Family Caregiver Support Program.Evaluation and program planning,33(2),113-119.
  12. Comans, T. A.,Currin, M. L.,Brauer, S.G.,Haines, T. P.(2011).Factors associated with quality of life and caregiver strain amongst frail older adults referred to a community rehabilitation service: implications for service delivery.Disability and rehabilitation,33(13-14),1215-1221.
  13. Dias, A.,Dewey, M. E.,D'Souza, J.,Dhume, R.,Motghare, D. D.,Shaji, K. S.(2008).The Effectiveness of a Home Care Program for Supporting Caregivers of Persons with Dementia in Developing Countries: A Randomised Controlled Trial from Goa, India.PLoS ONE,3(6),e2333.
  14. Gitlin, L. N.,Winter, L.,Corcoran, M.,Dennis, M. P.,Schinfeld, S.,Hauck, W. W.(2003).Effects of the Home Environmental Skill-Building Program on the Caregiver–Care Recipient Dyad: 6-Month Outcomes From the Philadelphia REACH Initiative.The Gerontologist,43(4),532-546.
  15. Hébert, R.,Dubois, M.-F.,Raîche, M.,Dubuc, N.(2008).The effectiveness of the PRISMA integrated service delivery network: preliminary report on methods and baseline data.International Journal of Integrated Care,8
  16. Iecovich, E.(2008).Caregiving burden, community services, and quality of life of primary caregivers of frail elderly persons.Journal of Applied Gerontology,27(3),309-330.
  17. Janse, B.,Huijsman, R.,de Kuyper, R. D. M.,Fabbricotti, I. N.(2014).The effects of an integrated care intervention for the frail elderly on informal caregivers: a quasi-experimental study.BMC Geriatrics,14(1),58.
  18. Jarrott, S. E.,Zarit, S. H.,Stephens, M. A. P.,Townsend, A.,Greene, R.(2005).Instrumental help and caregivers' distress: Effects of change in informal and formal help.American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementiasr,20(3),181-190.
  19. Kumamoto, K.,Arai, Y.,Zarit, S. H.(2006).Use of home care services effectively reduces feelings of burden among family caregivers of disabled elderly in Japan: preliminary results.International journal of geriatric psychiatry,21(2),163-170.
  20. Lopez Hartmann, M.,Wens, J.,Verhoeven, V.,Remmen, R.(2012).The effect of caregiver support interventions for informal caregivers of community-dwelling frail elderly: a systematic review.International journal of integrated care,12(5)
  21. Miura, H.,Arai, Y.,Yamasaki, K.(2005).Feelings of burden and health‐related quality of life among family caregivers looking after the impaired elderly.Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences,59(5),551-555.
  22. Sörensen, S.,Pinquart, M.,Duberstein, P.(2002).How effective are interventions with caregivers? An updated meta-analysis.The gerontologist,42(3),356-372.
  23. Stirling, C. M.,Dwan, C. A.,McKenzie, A. R.(2014).Adult day care respite: caregiver expectations and benefits survey.BMC Health Services Research,14(1),45-58.
  24. Whittier, S.,Coon, D.,Aaker, J.(2002).Caregiver support interventions.Washington, DC:National Association of State Units on Aging.
  25. Zhang, Z. R.,Joycey, L.(2015).Zhang, Z. R.、Joycey, L. (2015). Caregiver Burnout: The Impact Of Adult Day Programs On Caregivers. 2015 NCUR.
  26. 中華民國家庭照顧者關懷總會(2014)。中華民國家庭照顧者關懷總會(2014)。呼籲家庭照顧者「周休喘息一日」立法・「嫁給照顧」的家庭照顧者披婚紗挺身爭權益。
  27. 內政部(2007)。內政部(2007)。 我國長期照顧十年計畫。
  28. 內政部戶政司(2022)。內政部戶政司(2022)。 內政部戶政司全球資訊網:人口資料庫。https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346。https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346
  29. 台灣公共衛生學會(2016)。台灣公共衛生學會(2016)。臺北市家庭照護者評估計畫總結報告。
  30. 呂寶靜(2005)。支持家庭照顧者的長期照護政策之構思。國家政策季刊,4(4),25-40。
  31. 李玉春,林麗嬋,吳肖琪,鄭文輝,傅立葉(2013)。臺灣長期照護保險之規劃與展望。社區發展季刊,141,26-44。
  32. 國家發展委員會(2020).中華民國人口推估(2020 至 2070 年).
  33. 陳芬婷,邱啟潤(2015)。喘息服務方案對家庭照顧者之效益。護理暨健康照護研究,11(1),53-63。
  34. 陳貞吟,陳楚杰,蔡明足,沈玉卿,周歆凱,翁林仲(2008)。影響居家長期照護病患主要照顧者生活品質因素之研究。長期照護雜誌,12(3),267-283。
  35. 陳麗如,邱啟潤,高金盆(2006)。居家照護病患主要照顧者人格韌性。健康狀況與生活品質相關性探討。長期照護雜誌,10(1)
  36. 衛生署(2012)。國民長期照護需要調查(第二階段)。
  37. 衛生福利部(2018)。106 年老人狀況調查主要家庭照顧者調查報告。
  38. 衛生福利部(2016)。衛生福利部(2016)。長期照顧十年計畫 2.0(106~115 年)(核定本)。
  39. 衛生福利部(2015)。衛生福利部(2015)。長期照顧服務量能提升計畫(104-107 年)(核定本)。