機構照顧服務員核心能力量表之發展

Development of the Core-Competency Institutional Nurse Aide Scale

10.6317/LTC.202312_26(2).0007

陳芝穎(Chih-Ying Chen)；邱恩琦(En-Chi Chiu)

內容效度 ； 表面效度 ； 核心能力 ； 機構照顧服務員 ； content validity ； face validity ； core competency ； institutional nurse aide

長期照護雜誌

26卷2期（2023 / 12 / 01）

239 - 260

繁體中文;英文

背景與目的：臺灣住宿式機構使用率高，機構的照顧品質為不可忽視的重要指標。照服員為長照機構最主要的照顧人力，機構照顧品質優劣與機構照服員的能力息息相關，因此，建立機構照服員核心能力量表有其重要性，故本研究目的為瞭解機構照服員的能力內涵，以發展機構照服員核心能力量表（Core-competency Institutional Nurse Aide scale, CINA）。方法：分為三個步驟。一、文獻回顧：發展初版的CINA；二、專家審核：修訂CINA並檢驗內容效度指標（Content Validity Index, CVI）；三、認知訪談：建立CINA最終版和確定表面效度（face validity）。結果：本研究根據文獻回顧發展初版CINA，執行三回專家審核，第三回合之CVI值皆為1，具有良好的內容效度，並執行二回認知訪談，建立良好的表面效度，完成CINA最終版包含八面向（共74題）：身體照顧、生活照顧、緊急狀況處理、心理支持、人際溝通、活動促進、團隊合作及職業倫理。結論：本研究CINA具有良好的內容效度與表面效度，能使機構照服員瞭解其職務之核心能力，並提供機構管理者訂定進階教育訓練，改善機構照顧品質。

Background: The utilization rate of services in residential institutions is high in Taiwan. The quality of care provided by institutions is an important indicator that cannot be ignored. Nurse aides are the most important caregiversin long-term care institutions. The quality of institutional care is closely related to the ability of institutional nurse aides. Therefore, it is important to establish a core competency scale for institutional nurse aides. The purpose of this study was to understand the competency of institutional nurse aides and to develop the Core-competency Institutional Nurse Aide scale (CINA). Methods: There were three steps: (1) Literature review for developing the first version of the CINA; (2) Expert review for revising the CINA and estimating content validity(CVI); and (3) Cognitive interview for verifying the final version of the CINA and determining face validity. Results: We developed the first version of the CINA based on a literature review, and carried out three rounds of expert reviews. The CVI values were 1 in the third round of expert reviews, demonstrating good content validity. Moreover, two rounds of cognitive interviews were administered and good face validity was established. The final version of the CINA consisted of 74 items with 8 domains: physical care, daily care, emergency management, psychological support, interpersonal communication, activity facilitation, teamwork cooperation, and occupational ethics. Conclusions: The CINA had good content validity and face validity, which could enable institutional nurse aides to understand the core competencies required for their duties, and provide institutional managers with advanced on-the-job education and training, which would further improve the quality of care in institutions.

1. 王怡分(2019)。我國機構式照顧服務員職能模型建構及相對權重評估之研究。社會政策與社會工作學刊，23(2)，49-90。
   連結：
2. 林艷君,黃璉華(2018)。高齡者自立支援之照護模式。護理雜誌，65(2)，20-26。
   連結：
3. 郭昱瑩(2019)。政策設計析論：長期照顧政策為例。文官制度，11(2)，1-25。
   連結：
4. 曾淑芬,謝宇忠,陳惠芳,趙海倫,郭姵伶(2011)。機構式長期照護住民特質與照護需要組合之探討。嘉南學報（人文類），37，375-387。
   連結：
5. 黃惠璣,李中一(2009)。某市養護機構住民身體被約束之狀況及相關因素之研究。台灣公共衛生雜誌，28(2)，132-143。
   連結：
6. 蔡淑鳳,陳文意,林育秀,梁亞文(2013)。台灣地區長期照護機構女性照顧服務員工作壓力源與工作適應、離職意願之研究。台灣公共衛生雜誌，32(5)，476-490。
   連結：
7. 韓慧林,林姿儀,陳玟秀,吳敏暄(2015)。專題論文關鍵成功職能：以實踐大學資管系為例。管理資訊計算，4(2)，15-28。
   連結：
8. 龔玉齡,張瀝分,陳麗珠(2009)。台南市護理之家「照顧服務員」專業能力需求之研究。嘉南學報（人文類），35，596-610。
   連結：
9. Beynon, C.,Supiano, K.,Siegel, E. O.,Edelman, L. S.,Hart, S. E.,Madden, C.(2021).It’s all about the nurse aides.Journal of Long Term Care,2021,356-364.
10. Castle, N. G.(2007).Assessing job satisfaction of nurse aides in nursing homes: The nursing home nurse aide job satisfaction questionnaire.Journal of Gerontological Nursing,33(5),41-47.
11. Chang, Y.-C.,Yeh, T.-F.,Lai, I.-J.,Yang, C.-C.(2021).Job competency and intention to stay among nursing assistants: The mediating effects of intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,18(12),6436.
12. Chao, H.-C.,Yang, Y.-P.,Huang, M.-C.,Wang, J.-J.(2016).Development and psychometric testing of the caregiver communication competence scale in patients with dementia.Journal of Gerontological Nursing,42(1),32-39.
13. Cheng, T.-J.,Hsu, Y.-M.,Tsai, T.-H.,Chen, M.-Y.,Tsay, S.-F.,Shieh, S.-H.(2020).Factors affecting The competence of nursing assistants in taiwan long-term care institutions.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,17(24),9413.
14. Conrad, F., & Blair, J. (1996). From impressions to data: Increasing the objectivity of cognitive interviews. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.117.4003&rep=rep1&type=pdf
15. Cox, L. E.,Mainiero, F.(2017).Perceptions of communication and respect among coworkers: A comparison of employees with and without experience in long-term care environments.Journal of Human Rights and Social Work,2(4),134-142.
16. Davis, L. L.(1992).Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts.Applied Nursing Research,5(4),194-197.
17. Drake, A.(2020).,未出版
18. Drennan, J.(2003).Cognitive interviewing: Verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires.Journal of Advanced Nursing,42(1),57-63.
19. Harmuth, S.(2002).The direct care workforce crisis in long-term care.North Carolina Medical Journal,63(2),87-94.
20. Madden, C.,Clayton, M.,Canary, H. E.,Towsley, G.,Cloyes, K.,Lund, D.(2017).Rules of performance in The nursing home: A grounded theory of nurse–CNA communication.Geriatric Nursing,38(5),378-384.
21. McGilton, K. S.,Boscart, V. M.,Brown, M.,Bowers, B.(2014).Making tradeoffs between the reasons to leave and reasons to stay employed in long-term care homes: Perspectives of licensed nursing staff.International Journal of Nursing Studies,51(6),917-926.
22. Polit, D. F.,Beck, C. T.,Owen, S. V.(2007).Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.Research in Nursing and Health,30(4),459-467.
23. Rubio, D. M.,Berg-Weger, M.,Tebb, S. S.,Lee, E. S.,Rauch, S.(2003).Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research.Social Work Research,27(2),94-104.
24. Thompson, J. J.,Kelly, K. L.,Ritenbaugh, C.,Hopkins, A. L.,Sims, C. M.,Coons, S. J.(2011).Developing a patient-centered outcome measure for complementary and alternative medicine therapies II: Refining content validity through cognitive interviews.BMC Complementary Alternative Medicine,11(1),136.
25. Tourangeau, A.,Cranley, L.,Laschinger, H. K. S.,Pachis, J.(2010).Relationships among leadership practices, work environments, staff communication and outcomes in long-term care.Journal of Nursing Management,18(8),1060-1072.
26. Zysberg, L.,Band-Winterstein, T.,Doron, I.,Shulyaev, K.,Siegel, E. O.,Kornas-Biela, D.,Zisberg, A.(2019).The health care aide position in nursing homes: A comparative survey of nurses’ and aides’ perceptions.International Journal of Nursing Studies,94,98-106.
27. 李良玉(2016)。國立臺北護理健康大學。
28. 施麗紅(2019)。是保護還是傷害？老人長期照顧機構住民約束的倫理抉擇探究。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊，9(2)，53-112。
29. 洪幸雪(2017)。中臺科技大學。
30. 許志隆,鄭晉昌(2003)。職能辭典（Competency Dictionary）的發展與應用。第九屆企業人力資源管理實務專題研究成果發表會，桃園市:
31. 陳蔡美惠(2013)。南華大學。
32. 陳曉梅,黃美智(2013)。失能老人非自願入住機構自主權的提昇。長期照護雜誌，17(1)，57-66。
33. 陳麗津,林昱宏(2011)。照顧服務員之工作能力初探。崇仁學報，5，2-24。
34. 黃秀苗(2021)。國立臺北護理健康大學。
35. 黃淑如,陳郁慧,姜秀子,吳怡慧,吳麗鴻,林均穗,施智源,盧敏吉,薛博仁(2017)。老人福利機構（長期照顧機構及安養機構）之感染管制與查核準備建議。感染控制雜誌，27(2)，59-70。
36. 蔡金蘭(2012)。明新科技大學。
37. 蔡素琴(2013)。高雄醫學大學。
38. 鄭如雅,李易駿(2011)。社區工作者核心能力之探討：專業社會工作者之經驗與觀點。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊，1(1)，1-42。
39. 蕭宇佑,薛漪平,姚開屏,陳怡妙,謝清麟(2011)。中風病人自覺職能治療照護品質問卷—PROTS發展：向度與題目編製。職能治療學會雜誌，29(2)，41-63。
40. 藝嵐(2015)。高齡化社會的安心保障《長期照顧服務法》。衛福，6，20-23。
41. 嚴隆慶(2018)。國立臺灣大學。