以大學為基礎的週六資優教育充實方案：以美國普度大學資優中心為例

A University-Based Saturday Enrichment Program: Introduction of Purdue University Super Saturday Program

10.6218/GEQ.201106_(119).0002

任恩儀(En-Yi Jen)

充實方案 ； 資優教育中心 ； 社經文化殊異資優學生 ； enrichment program ； gifted education institution ； Low SES and culture diversity students

資優教育季刊

119期（2011 / 06 / 01）

9 - 16

繁體中文

本文旨在介紹美國以大學資優教育中心為基礎運行的週六資優教育充實方案。以實施34年的週六Super Saturday方案為例，先介紹方案的理念與特色，包含：以普度三階段充實模式（PTSM）為課程設計理論、多樣化的課程、具備專家知識的師資與結合大學資源的優勢等，到方案實際辦理的流程與如何進行成效評估，最後介紹方案近三年來提供社經文化背景殊異資優學生學習機會的HOPE計畫。藉著分析普度大學所提供方案之特色、運作方式、優點及限制，提供國內資優教育學者與實務老師參考如何進行這類周六資優教育充實方案。

This paper was an introduction of the Super Saturday, a Saturday enrichment program at Purdue University. The purpose was to address some important questions in talent development programs in the gifted education area, including the theory framework in program curriculum design, the operation and strengths of such a Saturday enrichment program, the influence of scholarships on gifted and talented learners from low-income backgrounds, and the evaluation of the enrichment program. Also, the paper analyzed the characteristics, strengths and limitations of Super Saturday. Suggestions are made with recommendations for practical applications of such programs.

1. 王文科、李乙明、潘裕豐、李偉俊、蔡桂芳、于曉平、蔣勇南、王小萍(2009)。「其他特殊才能」資優教育的實踐。資優教育研究，9(2)，145-177。
   連結：
2. 蔡典謨、陳英豪(2009)。各類資優教育師資及設備、設施標準訂定。資優教育研究，9(2)，65-10。
   連結：
3. Gifted Education Resource Institute. (n.d.). Parent program evaluation form. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, Gifted Education Resource Institute.
4. Vanderbilt Program for Talented Youth. (2010). Saturday Academy at Vanderbilt for the Young. Retrieved from http://pty.vanderbilt.edu/savy/
5. Center for Talent Development. (2010). Saturday Enrichment Program. Retrieved from http://www.ctd.northwestern.edu/sep/
6. Gifted Education Resource Institute. (2010). Super Saturday brochure. Retrieved from University of Purdue, Gifted Education Resource Institute Achievement website: http://www.geri.education.purdue.edu/PDF%20Files/S12%20Brochure.pdf
7. The Center of Gifted Studies. (2010). Super Saturdays. Retrieved from http://www.wku.edu/Dept/Support/AcadAffairs/Gifted/giftedsite/wordpress/?page_id=47
8. Bangel, N. J.,Enersen, D.,Capobianco, B.,Moon, S. M.(2006).Professional development of preservice teachers: Teaching in the Super Saturday program.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,29(3),339-361.
9. Bangel, N. J.,Moon, S. M.,Capobianco, B. M.(2010).Preservice teachers' perceptions and experiences in a gifted education training model.Gifted Child Quarterly,54(3),209-221.
10. Borland, J. H.(1989).Planning and implementing programs for the gifted.New York:Teachers College.
11. Colangelo, N.(ed.),Davis, G. A.(ed.)(2003).Handbook of gifted education.Boston, MA:Allyn &l Bacon.
12. Davis, G. A.,Rimm, S. B.,Siegle, D.(2010).Education of the gifted and talented.New York:Pearson.
13. Feldhusen, J. F.,Wyman, A. R.(1980).Super Saturday: Design and implementation of Purdue' s special program for gifted children.Gifted Child Quarterly,24(1),15-21.
14. Hertzberg-Davis, H. L.(2009).Myth7: Differentiation in the regular classroom is equivalent to gifted programs and is sufficient, classroom teachers have the time, the skill, and the will to differentiate adequately.Gifted Child Quarterly,53(4),251-253.
15. Johnsen, S. K.,Witte, M.,Robins, J.(2006).Through their eyes: Students' perspectives of a university-based enrichment program-The University for Young People Project.Gifted Child Today,29(3),56-61.
16. Lee, S. Y.,Matthews, M. S.,Olszewski-Kubilius, P.(2008).A national picture of talent search and talent education program.Gifted Child Quarterly,52(1),55-69.
17. Miller, R.,Gentry, M.(2011).Benefits of providing enrichment to high-potential students from low-income families and how you can provide the same opportunities at Your School.Teaching for high potential,Fall
18. Miller, R.,Gentry, M.(2010).Developing talents among high-potential students from low-income families in an out-of-school enrichment program.Journal of Advanced Academics,21(4),594-627.
19. Moon, S. M.(2004).Using the Purdue three-stage model to develop talent in the science and technology.The 8th Asia-Pacific Conference on Giftedness,Daejeon, Korea:
20. Olszewski-Kubilius, P.(2006).Addressing the achievement gap between achievement through Project EXCITE.Gifted Child Today,29(2),28-37.
21. Olszewski-Kubilius, P.,Thomson, D.(2010).Gifted programming for poor or minority urban students: Issues and lessons learned.Gifted Child Today,33(4),58-64.
22. Pereira, N.,Jordan, S.(2009).The simplicity of complexity: Rube Goldbergineering in the classroom.The 56th Annual Convention of the National Association for Gifted Children
23. Pereira, N.,Peters, S. J.,Gentry, M.(2010).My class activities instrument as used in Saturday enrichment program evaluation.Journal of Advanced Academics,21(4),568-593.
24. Peters, S. J.,Gates, J. C.(2010).The teacher observation form: Revisions and updates.Gifted Child Quarterly,54(3),179-188.
25. Peters, S. J.,Gentry, M.(2010).Multigroup construct validity evidence of the "HOPE Scale": Instrumentation to identify low-income elementary students for gifted programs.Gifted Child Quarterly,54(4),298-313.
26. Renzulli, J. S.(ed.)(1986).Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented.Mansfield Center, CT:Creative Learning.
27. Rinn, A. N.(2006).Effects of a Summer program on the social self-concepts of gifted adolescents.Journal of Secondary Gifted Education,17(2),65-75.
28. The Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted and the National Association for Gifted Children(2009).States of the states: In gifted education national policy and practice data 2008-2009.Washington, D.C.:National Association for Gifted Children.
29. Van Tassel-Baska, J.(2006).A content analysis of evaluation findings across 20 gifted programs: A clarion call for enhanced gifted program development.Gifted Child Quarterly,50(3),199-215.
30. Wood, B.,Feldhusen, J. F.(1996).Creating special interest programs for gifted youth: Purdue's Super Saturday serves as successful model.Gifted Child Today Magazine,19(4),22-25+28-29+40-42.
31. 教育部(2008)。資優教育白皮書。臺北:教育部。
32. 鄭聖敏(2009)。社經文化殊異資優教育─我們已經做了甚麼？我們應該做些什麼？。資優教育季刊，113，1-9。

1. 陳彥瑋(2019)。系列性充實方案的長期成效。資優教育論壇，17(2)，45-63。
2. 黃琬純、郭靜姿、李家兆、宋沛寰(2016)。大學推動資優教育的現況與未來發展。資優教育，140，1-10。
3. 游健弘(2016)。亞太菁英Fun Taipei —文化嚮導體驗營課程介紹與辦理反思。資優教育論壇，14，73-83。