法令政策與研究證據的互動—由他山之石檢視臺灣資優教育政策的擬定與修正

The Interaction between Policies and Research Evidences: Gifted Education Policy Making and Amendment in Taiwan

10.6218/GEQ.201209_(124).0004

王昭傑(Jhao-Jie Wang)

資優教育 ； 法律 ； 政策 ； 研究證據 ； gifted education ； law ； policy ； research evidence

資優教育季刊

124期（2012 / 09 / 01）

31 - 40

繁體中文

本文旨在探討臺灣資優教育政策的擬定與修正，先由美國資優教育的修法歷程檢視臺灣資優教育的修法概況，並討論臺灣資優教育修法過程中法令政策與研究證據的互動脈絡。根據資料分析結果，臺灣資優政策與法令修正大致上與實徵研究及相關實驗支持有良性互動，雖然臺灣與美國的資優教育立法歷程不盡相同，但皆保有以學生需求為本的精神。

The main purpose of this article was to analyze the policy making and amending processes of gifted education in Taiwan. The amendment to the United States gifted educational policy was reviewed and the interaction between the research and Taiwan gifted educational policy worlds was further discussed. The results showed positive interactions between policy and research world in gifted education policy amendment in Taiwan. Although differences exist in the gifted legislation processes between Taiwan and the United States, there is significant similarity in the student-centered core value.

1. Anderson, J. E.(1994).Public policy making.Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
2. Anderson, J. E.,Brady, D. W.,Bullock, C.(1984).Public Policy and politics in the United States.Monterey, CA:Brooks/Coles.
3. Bateman, B.(2007).Law and the conceptual foundation of special education practice.Achieving the radical reform of special education: Essays in honor of James M. Kauffman,New York:
4. Dye, T. R.(1995).Understanding public policy.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
5. Heller, K. A.(Ed.),Monks, F. J.(Ed.),Passow, A. H.(Ed.)(1993).International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent.Oxford:Pergamon Mifflin.
6. Jolly, J. L.(2009).The National Defense Education Act, Current STEM Initiative, and the Gifted.Gifted Child Today,32(2),50-53.
7. Lester, J. P.,Stewart, J. R.(2000).Public Policy: An evolutionary approach.Florence, KY:West Wadswroth.
8. Marland, S.(1972).Report to the U.S. Congress by the U.S. Commissioner of EducationReport to the U.S. Congress by the U.S. Commissioner of Education,Washington, DC:Government Printing Office.
9. Passow, A.(Ed.)(1978).The Gifted and talented: Their education and development.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago.
10. Ross, P. O.(1993).National excellence: A case for developing America's talent.Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office.
11. Ross, P. O''Connell(Ed.)(1994).National excellence: A case for developing America's talent: An Anthology of readings.Washington DC:U.S. Department of Education.
12. Stevenson, H. W.,Lee, S. Y.,Chen, C.(1994).Education of gifted and talented students in mainland China, Taiwan, and Japan.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,17(2),104-130.
13. Subotnik, R. F.,Rickoff, R.(2010).Should eminence based on outstanding innovation be the goal of gifted education and talent development? Implications for policy and research.Learning and Individual Differences,20,358-364.
14. Swanson, J. D.(2007).Policy and Practice: A Case Study of Gifted Education Policy Implementation.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,31(2),131-164.
15. Walford, G.(Ed.)(2003).Investigating educational policy through ethnography.NY:JAI.
16. 吳武典(1996)。我國資優教育政策分析與調查研究。特殊教育研究學刊，14，179-206。
17. 吳武典(1997)。資優教育向誰看齊。資優教育季刊，62，1-10。
18. 林天祐、虞志長、張志毓、余瑞陽、邱春堂、楊士賢(1996)。教育政策形成及制定過程之分析。初等教育學刊，5，1-40。
19. 俞懿嫻(2006)。教育政策的哲學思維。教育資料集刊，31，3-16。
20. 陳玉娟(2005)。美國重要教育政策回顧與啟示─以「將每個小孩帶上來法案」為例。中等教育，56(5)，152-163。
21. 陳啟榮(2006)。教育政策制定過程之論述。初等教育學刊，25，81-98。
22. 黃乃熒(2006)。從意識形態觀點探索教育政策的執行。教育資料集刊，31，241-264。
23. 廖榮啟(2001)。從行政法學基本理論探討我國資優教育法規。特教園丁，17(1)，1-11。

1. Eva Suk-Mei Chiu(2022)。Tensions between the notions of "equality" and "excellence": Examining the gifted education policies in Taiwan, the UK and Australia。資優教育論壇，20(2)，71-95。
2. 曹祐榮,段世珍(2022)。邁向卓越的多元取徑—臺灣、芬蘭、新加坡資優教育法令政策發展與實踐之跨國比較。資優教育論壇，20(2)，3-22。
3. 陳錫鴻(2014)。我國十二年國教資優教育政策制定與發展。資優教育，130，9-16。
4. 李家兆(2016)。析論我國教育部國教署資優教育優質發展中程計畫。資優教育，139，1-7。
5. 童品華,林斌(2019)。臺中市公立國中資賦優異教育實施現況之研究。教育學誌，41，1-48。
6. 顏瓊雯,吳巧雯(2021)。東亞資優教育政策之比較－以亞洲四小龍為例。資優教育季刊，156，1-12。