視覺思考策略對美術資優教育之啟示

Implications of Visual Thinking Strategies for Art Talented Education

10.6218/GEQ.2013.129.31-39

李佳蓉(Chia-Rong Lee)

視覺隱喻 ； 視覺思考 ； 美術資優教育 ； visual metaphor ； visual thinking ； art talented education

資優教育季刊

129期（2013 / 12 / 01）

31 - 39

繁體中文

視覺影像是「思想的形式」，藉由影像來進行視覺思考活動，並有效地在腦中形成視覺化影像，以達到創造力思維的基礎。當今美術資優課程與考試制度，也逐漸重視以評量學生創造力為導向。因此，在美術資優教育中如何提升學生創造力思維則為須正視的議題。故本文提出以視覺隱喻為基礎的視覺思考策略之教學，主張從兩方面來加以努力：（1）確保具創造力之視覺隱喻基礎之課程規劃與實施；（2）融入視覺思考策略的美術教學原則與多元動態評量。最後，總結相關討論，期能提供美術資優教育界參考。

Visual image is another ＂forms of thought＂ which based on an image can be performed by visual thinking activities, and effectively forming a visual image in the brain. It is the foundation for creative thinking. Today's evaluation of art talented curriculum and examination system pay attention to assess students' creativity. The paper provides visual thinking teaching strategies based visual metaphor and advocates two approaches: (1) to ensure the planning and implementation based visual metaphor of creativity; (2) to integrate art teaching principles of visual thinking strategies and multi dynamic-assessment. Finally, the paper concludes with discussion and advices for art talented education.

1. 邱文彬(2003)。視覺思考及教學觀的初探模型：認知發展與建構取向。藝術教育研究，6，21-38。
   連結：
2. 高博銓(2011)。融入多元文化觀點的創造力教育。資優教育季刊，118，9-14。
   連結：
3. 陳瓊花(2012)。創造力的載體：從「創意表現」探討創造力具體化的圖像類型、表現策略及其意涵。資優教育論壇，11(1)，43-72。
   連結：
4. 譚祥安、劉仲嚴(2010)。高中生在考試情境下的藝術評論模式。藝術教育研究，20，1-31。
   連結：
5. Anderson, T.(1995).Toward a cross-cultural approach to art criticism.Studies in Art Education,36(4),198-209.
6. Arnheim, R.(1969).Visual think.Berkeley, CA:University of California.
7. Arnheim, R.(1976).Art and visual perception.Berkeley, CA:University of California.
8. Broudy, H. S.(1987).The role of imagery in learning.Los Angeles, CA:The Getty Center for Education in the Arts.
9. Clark, G.,Zimmerman, E.(1983).Identifying artistically talented students.School Arts,83(3),26-31.
10. Clark, G.,Zimmerman, E.(1992).Issues and Practices Related to Identification of Gifted and Talented Students in the Visual Arts.The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
11. Clark, G.,Zimmerman, E.(1988).View of family background and school interview with artistically talented students.Gifted Child Quarterly,32(4),340-346.
12. Damasiom, A. R.(1999).The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness.New York:Harcourt Brace & Co..
13. Efland, A.(2002).Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum.New York:Teachers College.
14. Eisner, E. W.(Ed.),Day, M. D.(Ed.)(2004).Handbook of research and policy in art education.Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
15. Feldman, E. B.(1992).Varieties of visual experience.New York:Harry N. Abrams.
16. Gardner, H.,Winner, E.(1982).First intimations of artistry.U-shaped behavioral growth,New York:
17. Hurwitz, A.(1983).The gifted and talented in art a guide to program planning.Davis Publications, Inc..
18. Hutchens, J. W.(Ed.),Suggs, M. S.(Ed.)(1997).Art education: Content and practice in a postmodern era.Reston, VA:The National Art Education Association.
19. Kauchank, D. P.,Eggen, P. D.(2006).Learning and teaching: Research-based methods.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
20. Kertess, K.(Eds.)(1995).Biennial exhibition.New York:Whitney Museum of American Art.
21. Lakoff, G.(1993).The contemporary theory of metaphor.Metaphor and though,Cambridge.UK:
22. LeDoux, J.(2002).Synaptic self.New York:Penguin.
23. Mckim, R. H.(1980).Experience in visual thinking.Monterey, CA:Brooks/Cole Publishing Co..
24. Moore, D. M.,Dwyer, F. M.(1994).Visual Literacy: A Spectrum of Visual Learning.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology.
25. Parsons, M.(1998).Review of child development art.Studies in Art education,40(1),80-91.
26. Perkins, D.(1994).Learning to think by looking at art.LA:Gerry Publications.
27. Phillips, B. J.,McQuarrie, E. F.(2004).Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in Advertising.Marketing Theory,4(1-2),113-136.
28. Roam, D.(2006).The back of the napkin: Solving problems and selling ideas with pictures.New York:Penguin Portfolio.
29. Roukes, N.(1998).Design synectics.Worchester, MA:Davis Publications.
30. Serig, D.(2006).A conceptual structure of visual metaphor.Studies in Art Education,47(3),229-247.
31. Weeden, P.,Winter, J.,Broadfoot, P.(2002).Assessment: What's in it for schools?.London:Routledge, Falmer.
32. Wileman, R. E.(1980).Exercises in visual thinking.New York:Hastings House.
33. Wilson, B.(1994).Reflections on the relationship among art, life and research.Studies in Art Education,35(4),197-208.
34. 王溢然、王亮(2001)。圖示與圖像。新竹:凡異。
35. 何瑞芳(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北，世新大學傳播研究所。
36. 呂庭儀(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北，國立臺灣科技大學設計研究所。
37. 林千鈴(2009)。畫不像的畫像。臺北:天下。
38. 香港考試及評核局(2009)。香港中學文憑考試視覺藝術—水平參照成績匯報資料套。臺北:作者。
39. 高燕(2009)。視覺隱喻與空間轉向—思想史視野中的當代視覺文化。上海:復旦大學。
40. 張世忠(2002)。教學創新—應用與實例。臺北:心理。
41. 教育部(2003)。創造力教育白皮書。
42. 陶東風譯、Ellen, W.(1997)。創造的世界—藝術心理學。臺北:田園城市文化。
43. 黃學誠(2000)。本土化第五項修練：圖像系統思考。臺北:世茂。
44. 蔡子瑋譯、Mckim, R. H.(2002)。視覺思考的經驗。臺北:六合。
45. 盧台華(2009)。創意表現對美術資優教育之意義與啟發—以臺北縣國中為例。資優教育季刊，111，1-7。
46. 韓文正譯、Roam, D.(2008)。餐巾紙的背後。臺北:遠流。
47. 羅玲妃(1997)。心智繪圖思想整合利器。臺北:一智。

1. 李佳蓉(2014)。融入博物館視覺表徵的美術資優教育：從多元智能理論角度探析。資優教育，131，29-37。