高中資優生假設驗證能力之探究

Exploring the Hypothesis-Testing Abilities in Gifted High School Students

10.6218/GEQ.202008_(153).15-28

梁文瀞(Wen-Ching Liang)；張靖卿(Ching-Ching Chang)；詹孟琦(Meng-Chi Chan)

假設驗證 ； 數理資優 ； 語文資優 ； hypothesis testing ； giftedness in math and science ； giftedness in language and art

資優教育季刊

153期（2020 / 08 / 01）

15 - 28

繁體中文

假設驗證（hypothesis-testing）是人們重要的認知能力，此能力與概念的形成、推理、問題解決，乃至於創造力都有密切關係。本研究旨在探討高中資賦優異學生與普通學生之假設驗證能力的差異。研究對象為56名中部地區之高中生，其中語文資優生18名、數理資優生19名及普通生19名。透過自編之假設驗證作業，比較語文資優生、數理資優生與普通生在數字作業和文字作業上的假設驗證能力表現，包括答對題數與六個表現變項（測試次數、案例數、總假設數、假設種類、不合理假設與測試策略），答對題數越多表示假設驗證能力越好。研究結果發現：三組學生在假設驗證的答對題數上沒有顯著差異；語文資優生在數字作業上的測試次數顯著多於普通生；數理資優生在數字作業上使用互包性測試策略的比率顯著多於普通生，在文字作業上產生的不合理假設比率顯著低於普通生，在數字作業的正例測試策略的使用比率顯著低於語文資優生和普通生。

Hypothesis testing is an important cognitive ability to humans, which is highly related to concept formation, reasoning, problem solving as well as to creativity. The purpose of this study was to explore whether there were any differences in their ability to hypothesis testing between gifted and regular high school students. This study recruited 56 high school students from the middle region of Taiwan, including 18 students gifted in language and art, 19 students gifted in math and science, and 19 regular students. Using a self-made test with 12 hypothesis-testing tasks, the performances of the three groups in hypothesis testing were further analyzed. Research findings indicated that: (a) there were no differences in the number of correct items among the three groups; (b) when compared to the performance of regular students in numeral tasks, students gifted in language and art made more trials while students gifted in math and science more frequently used mutually embedded strategies; (c) students gifted in math and science used less positive testing strategies in numeral tasks than regular students and students gifted in language and art did, and had less unreasonable hypotheses in word tasks than regular students.

1. 林緯倫,連韻文(2001)。如何能發現隱藏的規則？從科學資優生表現的特色，探索提升規則發現能力的方法。科學教育月刊，9，299-322。
   連結：
2. 張碧芝,吳昭容(2009)。影響六年級學生立方體計數表現的因素—空間定位與視覺化的角色。教育心理學報，41(1)，125-146。
   連結：
3. 十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱（2014）。中華民國一零三年十一月二十八日教育部臺教授國部字第 1030135678A 號令訂定發布。
4. Adsit, D. J.,London, M.(1997).Effects of hypothesis generation on hypothesis testing in rule-discovery tasks.Journal of General Psychology,124(1),19-34.
5. Bruner, J. S.(1961).The act of discovery.Harvard Educational Review,31,21-32.
6. Bruner, J. S.,Goodnow, J. J.,Austin, G. A.(1956).A study of thinking.New York, NY:Wiley.
7. Clark, B.(2006).Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school.Columbus, OH:Merrill/Prentice Hall.
8. Davis, G.A.,Rimm, S. B.,Siegle, D.(2011).Education of the gifted and talented.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
9. Doherty, M. E.,Mynatt, C. R.,Tweney, R. D.,Schiavo, M. D.(1979).Pseudodiagnosticity.Acta Psychologica,43,11-21.
10. Fay, A.,Klahr, D.(1996).Knowing about guessing and guessing about knowing: Preschoolers’ understanding of indeterminacy.Child Development,67,689-716.
11. Gallagher, J. J.,Gallagher, S. A.(1994).Teaching the gifted child.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
12. Goodwin, J. C.(1995).Research in psychology: Methods and design.New York, NY:Wiley.
13. Gorman, M. E.,Gorman, M. E.(1984).A comparison of disconfirmatory, confirmatory and control strategies on Wason’s 2 - 4 - 6 task.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36,629-648.
14. Gregg, L. W.(ed.)(1974).Knowledge and cognition.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
15. Kirk, S. A.,Gallagher, J. J.,Anastasiow, N. J.(2000).Educating exceptional children.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
16. Klahr, D.,Dunbar, K.(1988).Dual Space search during scientific reasoning.Cognitive Science,12,1-55.
17. Klayman, J.,Ha, Y. W.(1989).Hypothesis testing in rule discovery: Strategy, structure, and content.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,15,596-604.
18. Legrenzi, P.,Girotto, V.,Johnson-Laird, P. N.(1993).Focussing in reasoning and decision-making.Cognition,49,37-66.
19. Lin, Y. T.,Chen, M. P.,Chang, C. H.,Chang, P. C.(2017).Exploring the peer interaction effects on learning achievement in a social learning platform based on social network analysis.International Journal of Distance Education Technologies,15(3),65-85.
20. Lovett, M. C.(ed.),Shah, P.(ed.)(2007).Carnegie Mellon symposia on cognition: Thinking with data.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Mynatt, C. R.,Doherty, M. E.,Tweney, R. D.(1977).Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29,85-95.
22. Pearsall, N. R.,Skipper, J. E. J.,Mintzes, J. J.(1997).Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology.Science Educaion,81,193-215.
23. Piaget, J.(1952).The child's conception of number.London, England:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
24. Sternberg, R. J. (ed.)(1988).The nature of creativity.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University.
25. Wang, Y. L.,Tsai, C. C.(2019).Grade level differences in high school students’ conceptions of and motives for learning science.Research in Science Education,49(5),1213-1229.
26. Wason, P. C.(1960).On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,12,129-140.
27. Wason, P. C.(1966).New horizons in psychology.Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England:Penguin.
28. Wason, P. C.,Brooks, P. G.(1979).THOG: The anatomy of a problem.Psychological Research,41,79-90.
29. Wellman, H. M.,Gelman, S. A.(1992).Cognitive development: Foundational theories in core domains.Annual Review of Psychology,43,337-375.
30. 吳昆壽(2009).資優教育概論.臺北:心理.
31. 吳明樺(1997)。國立交通大學工業工程與管理系。
32. 吳庭瑜(2000)。國立交通大學工業工程與管理系。
33. ch&article_uid 科技部（2016）。科技部與教育部聯合記者會新聞資料―― PISA 2015 臺灣學生的表現。2020年 11 月 24 日， 取自 http://www.most.gov.tw/folksonomy/detail?l=ch&article_uid=57b7c383-4064-4300-b481-1a6231dfac3e&menu_id=9aa56881-8df0-4eb6-a5a7-32a2f72826ff
34. 連韻文(2000)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
35. 連韻文(2000)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
36. 連韻文(1998)。科學資優生哪裡資優？以假設驗證能力為例。資優教育二十五週年研討會論文專輯，臺北:
37. 郭靜姿,王曼娜(2020)。全球疫動，資優教育的未來趨勢。2020年資優教育學術研討會論文集：資優匯聚、放眼未來，臺北:
38. 黃麗分(1998)。國立交通大學工業工程與管理研究所。
39. 鄭昭明(2006).認知心理學—理論與實踐.臺北:桂冠.
40. 鄭碧雲(1990)。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。