論公共行政學之本土化與國際化：知識創造與理論建構的特殊性與普遍性

On the Nativelization and Internationalization of Public Administration: Knowledge Creation and The Particularity and Universality of Theoretical Construction

10.30409/JPA.200409_(12).0003

吳瓊恩(Chyung-En Wu)

知識創造 ； 外延真理 ； 同感的知識 ； 非量化的人文因素 ； knowledge creation ； external truth ； intentional truth ； sympathized knowledge ； unquantifiable human factors

公共行政學報

12期（2004 / 09 / 01）

79 - 91

繁體中文

真理有兩種，一種是外延真理，另一種內容真理。西方文化擅長外延真理，而中國文化擅長內容真理。本文著重內容真理，這是迄今為止，在公共行政學術領域尚未給予應有的重視。 本文認為行動知識比行政科學重要，吾人必須發展行動知識，這是非量化的人文因素，諸如價值、意義、與體驗的知識，而為正式的事業規劃與策略資源運用所排除的因素。 就知識創造而言，根據Nonaka和Takeuchi兩人得分類，有四種知識即同感知識、概念知識、操作知識、與系統的知識。西方組織的風格幾乎完全與日本或東方式的組織風格不同。 做為中國人，吾人有信心從中國文化的體驗中發展行政理論，以追求可應用於西方世界的較普遍理論。

There are two kinds of truth: one is extensional truth, the other is intentional. Western culture is good at the former truth, while Chinese culture is good at the later. This paper put emphasis on the intentional truth, which is not yet given im-portance in the field of public administration. This paper argues that action knowledge is more important than administrative science. We need to develop this kind of action knowledge which is unquantifi-able human factors, such as values, meanings, and experience, are excluded, from formal business planning and development of strategic resources. In terms of knowledge creation, according to Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995: 72), there are four kinds of knowledge, which are sympathized knowledge, conceptual knowledge, operational knowledge, and systemic knowledge. Therefore, the style of Western organization is almost totally different from the Japanese or oriental organization. As a Chinese people, we do have confidence to develop administrative theory from the experience of Chinese culture in pursuit of more Universal theory, which can be applied to the West.

1. (1985).Action Science.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
2. Barnard, C.I.(1938).The Functions of the Executive.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
3. Capra, Fritjof(1982).The Turning Point: Science, Society and the Rising Culture.New York:Simon and Schuster.
4. Capra, Fritjof(1985).The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels Between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism (2nd ed).Boston:Shamlihala.
5. Cook, Scott D. N.,John Seely Brown(1999).Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance Between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing.Organization Science,10(4),381-400.
6. Jun, Jong S.(1994).Philosophy of Administration.Seoul, Korea:Daeyoung Moonhwa International.
7. Nonaka, Ikujiro,Hirotaka Takeuchi(1995).The Knowledge-Creating Company.New York:Oxford University Press.
8. Prigogine, I.,I. Stengers(1984).Order out of Chaos: Man`s New Dialogue with Nature.New York:Bantam Books.
9. Simon, H. A.(1991).Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning.Organization Science,2(1),125-134.
10. 甘陽(1987)。從『理性的批判』到『文化的批判』。當代雜誌，20，84-99。
11. 牟宗三(2003)。牟宗三先生全集。台北:聯經。
12. 牟宗三(1960)。『家國時代與歷史文化』序。人生雜誌，21(4)
13. 牟宗三(2003)。『家國時代與歷史文化』序。牟宗三先生全集，157-160。
14. 吳瓊恩(2001)。行政學。台北:三民。
15. 吳瓊恩(1993)。政學的範圍與方法。臺北:五南。
16. 唐君毅(1991)。唐君毅先生全集。台北:學生。
17. 熊十力(2000)。新唯識論。台北:明文。
18. 熊十力(1999)。讀經示要。台北:明文。
19. 熊十力(1997)。原儒。台北:明文。