無須政府的產業群聚？內湖科技園區發展的公共領域與制度變遷

Development without Government? Public Domain and Institutional Change in the Origin of the Nei-Hu Technology Park

10.30409/JPA.200609_(20).0001

麻匡復(Kuang-Fu Ma)；邊泰明(Tai-Ming Ben)

公共領域 ； 制度變遷 ； 聲譽 ； 內湖科技園區 ； Public domain ； Institutional change ； Reputation ； Nei-Hu Technology Park

公共行政學報

20期（2006 / 09 / 01）

1 - 32

繁體中文

本文目的在探討內湖科技園區發展過程中公共領域的浮現與引發的制度變遷。透過新制度經濟學的分析，本文指出有過去關於內科發展的「意外」與「巧合」觀點，其實是在市場力量引導下，Barzel(1997)與Webster 與Lai(2003)「公共領域」(public domain)論述的實際演進。內科的發展，起因於「內湖輕工業區輔導管理辦法」正面列舉的缺乏彈性、經濟社會環境的變遷以及法令未能即時修正，讓建商引導高科技廠商進駐的市場力量創造出內科的公共領域。臺北市政府、建商與高科技廠商在公共領域的互動，放寬內科的土地使用管制以解決高科技廠商違規使用的問題。隨著群聚效應成形，無形的「聲譽」成為市政府與廠商注重的標的，不僅成為市政府招商的樣本，也是企業形象的重要考量。而國家在內科發展過程中的逐漸弱化，對傳統國家主義的產業用地開發論述，提供了另外的思考方向。本文結論也提出，當製造業在臺灣產業結構比例越來越低，一般辦公室的需求相對而言會越來越高，再加上企業集團的全球佈局趨勢日益明顯，臺灣在企業佈局的定位將會牽動臺灣產業用地的市場需求變化，這是值得探討的內科後續研究。

This paper discusses the emergence of public domain and institutional change of Nei-Hu Technology Park (NHTP). The public domain theory, formed by market mechanism, can explain the ”coincident” and ”accidental” consensuses of NHTP. Owing to inflexibility of land use regulations and change of economical environment, developers have chances to construct illegal buildings and sell buildings to hi-tech firms. It creates the public domain. Developers, firms and Taipei municipal authority interact in the public domain so as to change the inflexible regulations. Developers and hi-tech firms require Taipei municipal authority to amend outmoded orders by lobbying, protesting and negotiation. After deregulating, many hi-tech companies agglomerate in NHTP due to the reputations of famous firms, such as BenQ, Lite-on and Compal. We conclude that, under global economic competition, change of industrial lands demand will be the major research issues of NHTP.

1. 林森田(2002)。土地使用分區之制度經濟分析。土地問題研究季刊，1(1)，9-18。
   連結：
2. Amin, A.(1999).The Emilian Model: Institutional Challenges.European Planning Studies,7(4),389-405.
3. Amsden, A.,Evans, P.,Rueschemyer, D.,Skocpol, T.(Ed.)(1985).Bringing the State Back In.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
4. Barzel, Y.(1997).Economic analysis of property rights.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
5. Bromley, D.(1997).Constitutional Political Economy: Property Claims in a Dynamic World.Contemporary Economic Policy,15,43-54.
6. Burt, R. S.(1992).Structural holes: The social structure of competition.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
7. Coase, R.(1960).The Problem of Social Cost.Journal of Law and Economics,3,1-44.
8. Deyo, F. (Ed.)(1987).The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism.Ithaca, NY:CornellUniversity Press.
9. Gold, T.(1986).State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle.White Plains, NY:M. E. Sharpe, Inc..
10. Henry, N.,Pinch, S.(2001).Neo-Marshallian Nodes, Institutional Thickness, and Britain's "Motor Sport Valley": Thick or Thin?.Environment and Planning A.,33,1169-1183.
11. Hsu, J.-Y.(2004).The Evolving Institutional Embeddedness of a Late-Industrial District in Taiwan.Journal Of Economic and Social Geography,95(2),218-232.
12. Jakobsen, S-E.,Onsager, K.(2005).Head Office Location: Agglomeration, Clusters or Flow Nodes?.Urban Studies,42(9),1517-1535.
13. Johansson, B.,Quiley, J.(2004).Agglomeration and Networks in Spatial Economies.Papers of Regional Science,83,165-176.
14. Kenny, M.,Patton, D.(2005).Entrepreneurial Geographies: Support Networks in three High-Technology Industries.Economic Geography,81(2),201-228.
15. Lau, L.,Aoki, M.,Kim, H-K.,Fujiwara, M-O. (Ed.)(1997).The Role of Government in East Asian Economic Development: Comparative Institutional Analysis.Oxford, NY:Oxford University Press.
16. Libecap, G.(1989).Contracting for property rights.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
17. Mathews, J.(1997).A Silicon Valley of the east: creating Taiwan's semiconductor industry.California Management Review,39(4),26-54.
18. North, D.(1990).Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
19. Pang, C.-K.(1992).The state and economic transformation: the Taiwan case.NY:Garland Publishing Ltd..
20. Pohl, N.(2004).Where is Wall Street? Financial Geography After 09/11.The Industrial Geographer,2(1),72-93.
21. Powell, W. W.,Koput, K. W.,Bowie, J. I.,Smith-Doerr, L.(2002).The Spatial Clustering of Science and Capital: Accounting for Biotech Firm-Venture Capital Relationships.Regional Studies,36(3),291-305.
22. Raco, M.(1999).Competition, Collaboration and New Industrial Districts: Examining The Institutional Turn In Local Economic Development.Urban Studies,36(5-6),951-968.
23. Rugman, A.,Verbeke, A.(2005).Toward a Theory of Regional Multinationals: A Transaction Cost Economics Approach.Management International Review,45(Special Issue 1),5-17.
24. Rugman, A.,Verbeke, A.(1998).Multinational Enterprises and Public Policy.Journal of International Business Studies,29(1),115-136.
25. Saxenian, A.(1994).Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128.Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press.
26. Tullock, G.(1993).Rent-seeking.Aldershot, Hants, England:Brookfield, Vt.Edward Elgar Press.
27. Veronigue, S.,Stam, E.(2003).The evolution and nature of young firm networks: A longitudinal perspective.Small Business Economics,21(2),115-134.
28. Wade, R.(1990).Governing the market: economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
29. Webster, C.,Lai, W.C.(2003).Property rights, planning and markets: Managing spontaneous cities.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
30. 于宗先、王金利(2003)。一隻看得見的手：政府在經濟發展過程中的角色。臺北:聯經出版社。
31. 天下雜誌編輯部(2005)。2005全臺1000大製造業特刊。臺北:天下雜誌社。
32. 朱凌毅(2003)。臺北，國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所。
33. 紀建良(2004)。桃園，元智大學資訊社會研究所。
34. 徐進鈺(1998)。師大地理研究報告師大地理研究報告,未出版
35. 張維安主編、高承恕(2001)。臺灣的企業組織結構與競爭力。臺北:聯經出版社。
36. e天下雜誌電子版
37. 彭懷恩(1990)。臺灣發展的政治經濟分析。臺北:風雲論壇出版社。
38. 黃玉蓮(2005)。臺北，國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策学系。
39. 詹偉雄(2005)。美學的經濟－臺灣社會變遷的60個微型觀察。臺北:風格者。
40. 龐建國(1993)。國家發展理論：兼論臺灣發展經驗。臺北:巨流圖書公司。
41. 邊泰明(2005)。臺北市新興產業發展策略分析研究－臺北市工業區產業發展自治條例（草案）之研擬臺北市新興產業發展策略分析研究－臺北市工業區產業發展自治條例（草案）之研擬,臺北市政府建設局委託研究。

1. 廖皇傑(2013)。工業地域演化與路徑依賴─以臺北市工業區為例。土地經濟年刊，24，1-32。
2. 蘇曉瑞,邊泰明(2022)。國土計畫城鄉發展地區第2－3類如何面對未登記工廠？以臺中市的劃設為例。土地問題研究季刊，21(3)，115-129。
3. 謝一鋒,李得全(2019)。臺灣都市計畫實施的問題與對策。都市與計劃，46(2)，119-146。
4. 張璠,胡曉嵐(2016)。國有土地參與都市更新之產權處理困境分析－以台北市五分埔安置住宅為例。土地問題研究季刊，15(2)，52-69。
5. 周素卿,吳幸玲,江尚書(2009).後工業化臺北與新自由主義都市政治.中國地理學會會刊,43,15-32.