题名

探究環境治理中的知識溝通:台灣氣候變遷研究的網絡分析

并列篇名

Exploring Knowledge Communication in Environmental Governance: Network Analysis on Taiwan's Climate Change Research

DOI

10.30409/JPA.200712_(25).0001

作者

陳世榮(Shih-Jung Chen)

关键词

知識溝通 ; 環境治理 ; 永續科學 ; 氣候變遷 ; 網絡分析 ; knowledge communication ; environmental governance ; sustainability science ; climate change ; network analysis

期刊名称

公共行政學報

卷期/出版年月

25期(2007 / 12 / 01)

页次

1 - 30

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

晚近國際社會對於環境治理與永續工作提出重新檢視知識系統的呼籲,這主要是體認到解決全球性環境課題,必須著重地方知識生產、傳播與運用的效能,方能使在地回應機制永續經營。然而反省知識系統效能,首先就必須正視環境相關科學的社會溝通功能。為此,國際間乃積極倡議「永續科學」概念,期望藉由表彰科研的可信度、關鍵性與正當性,重新詮釋科學在環境治理中的角色。本研究則將之轉化,認為永續科學所強調的「在地關聯」,可以作為衡量地方科研議題的判準,藉此賦予科學社群承擔知識溝通的責任。本文進而以當前全球環境治理最感急迫,但與地方認知較屬疏遠的氣候變遷議題,運用網絡分析與語意系絡,解析台灣氣候變遷研究的分布與結構,評估台灣氣候變遷研究的在地關聯性,以衡量其契合永續科學的程度,並從中鑑別出具有在地意義的研究議題,提供未來科研工作的參考。

英文摘要

In recent years various international organizations and academies call for the re-examination of knowledge system predicated on the recognition that the linkage between knowledge production, diffusion, and application has to be emphasized and enhanced if firm and sustainable local responses are to be realized in dealing with global environmental issues. To reexamine knowledge system, it is science that becomes the focal point. In response, scientific community comes up with the concept of ”sustainability science” to underline the role of science in transformation from knowledge to action by way of attaining its credibility, saliency, and legitimacy. The study goes further step to make use of sustainability science as a criterion to evaluate regional scientific research in terms of its performance in social communication. To measure the extent to which knowledge production contains ”local relevance” is to demand scientific community to be accountable for knowledge communication. The paper thus takes Taiwan as an example to explore its array and structure of scientific research in climate change, a field that is closely related with the most pressing issues of global environmental governance but somehow remotes to the daily life of the local citizen. Network Analysis and semantic context are used to construct issue maps regarding Taiwan's climate change research so as to detect its compatibility with sustainability science. Research issues attaining salient ”local relevance” will be identified from the issues maps, which are suggested to be the feasible topics for fulfilling knowledge communication in the local setting.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 張玲星(2006)。資訊系統發展中政治行爲之意圖:以計畫行爲理論爲基礎之研究-資訊專業人員與使用者差異之比較。管理學報,23(3),347-365。
    連結:
  2. 張玲星、林東清(2005)。從多重理論觀點詮釋企業資訊化中的政治行爲。資訊管理學報,12(4),185-210。
    連結:
  3. 黃貞芬、林東清(2002)。資訊部門的權力基礎與決策影響力之分析:結合定量法與定性法。資訊管理學報,9(1),81-106。
    連結:
  4. 黃國隆、陳惠芳(1998)。資訊技術、組織價值觀與組織承諾之關係。管理學報,15(3),343-366。
    連結:
  5. 黃國隆、蔡啓通(1999)。工作價值觀與領導行爲對員工效能的影響。台大管理論叢,9(1),51-85。
    連結:
  6. Bachrach, P.,M. S. Baratz(1962).The Two Face of Power.American Political Science Review,56,88-94.
  7. Ball, K.,D. C. Wilson(2000).Power, Control and Computer-Based Performance Monitoring: Repertoires, Resistance and Subjectivities.Organization Studies,21,539-565.
  8. Berger, P. L.,T. Luckman(1971).The Social Construction of Reality.Harmonsworth:Penguin.
  9. Bloomfield, B. P.,R. Coombs(1992).Information Technology, Control and Power: The Centralization and Decentralization Debate Revisited.Journal of Management Studies,29,459-484.
  10. Boland, R.,W. F. Day(1989).The Experience of System Design: A Hermenutic of Organizational Action.Scandinavian Journal of Management,5(2),87-104.
  11. Braverman, H.(1974).Labour and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century.London:London Month Review Press.
  12. Burawoy, M.(1979).Manufacturing Consent: Change in the Labour Process under Monopoly Capitalism.Chicago:Chicago University Press.
  13. Chang, C. L. H.(2006).The Political Behavior Intention in Information System Development from MIS Professionals Perspective: A Study Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management,3(4),341-360.
  14. Chang, C. L. H.(2007).The Political Behavior Intention of User in Information System Development.Human Systems Management,26(2),123-137.
  15. Chang, C. L. H.,K. K. Hwang(2004).Political Strategies of Manager at MIS Department in Information System Implementation-Interpretations from the Framework of Chinese Power Games.Paper presented at the Pre-ICIS 2004 International Symposium/Forum,Washington D. C.:
  16. Clegg, S. R.(1989).Frameworks of Power.London:Sage.
  17. Clegg, S. R.(1981).Organization and Control.Administrative Science Quarterly,26,545-562.
  18. Coombs, R.(1992).Paper presented at ESRC Policy Research.Brunel University.
  19. Curtis, B.,H. Krasner,N. Iscoe(1988).A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems.Communications of the ACM,31(11),1268-1287.
  20. Dagwell, R.,R. Weber(1983).System Designers` User Models: A Comparative Study and Methodological Critique.Communications of the ACM,26(11),987-997.
  21. Dickson, G.,J. Wetherbe(1985).The Management of Information Systems.N. Y.:MacGraw-Hill.
  22. Doolin, B.(2004).Power and Resistance in the Implementation of a Medical Management Information System.Information Systems Journal,14,343-362.
  23. Emerson, R. M.(1962).Power Dependence Relations.American Sociological Review,27,31-41.
  24. Fincham, R.(1992).Perspectives on Power: Processual, Institutional and 'Internal' Forms of Organizational Power.Journal of Management Studies,29(6),741-759.
  25. Foucault, M.(1980).Power/Knowledge.New York:Harvester.
  26. Franz, C.,D. Robey(1984).An Investigation of User-Led System Design: Rational and Political Perspectives.Communications of the ACM,27(12),1202-1209.
  27. French, J. R. P.,B. Raven,D. Cartwright (Ed.)(1959).Studies in Social Power.Ann Arbor, Michigan:Institute for Social Research.
  28. Friedman, A. L.,D. S. Comford(1989).Computer Systems Development: History, Organization and Implementation.London:Wiley.
  29. Giddens, A.(1984).The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration.Oxford:Polity Press.
  30. Gottlieb, C. C.,A. Borodin(1973).Social Issues in Computing.London:Academic Press.
  31. Gray, P. H.(2001).The Impact of Knowledge Repositories on Power and Control in the Workplace.Information Technology and People,14,368-484.
  32. Grote, G.,C. Baitsch(1991).Reciprocal Effects between Organizational Culture and Implementation of an Office Communication System: A Case Study.Behaviour and Information Technology,10(3),207-218.
  33. Gwillim, D.,K. Dovey,B. Wieder(2005).The Politics of Post-Implementation Reviews.Information Systems Journal,15,307-319.
  34. Hill, S.(1981).Competition and Control at Work.London:Heinemann.
  35. Hindess, B.(1996).Discourses of Power: From Hobbes to Foucault.Oxford:Blackwell.
  36. Ives, B.,M. H. Olson(1984).User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research.Management Science,30(5),586-603.
  37. Jasperson, J.,T. A. Carte,C. S. Saunders,B. S. Butler,H. J. P. Croes,W. J. Zheng(2002).Review: Power and Information Technology Research: A Metatriangulation Review.MIS Quarterly,26(4),397-459.
  38. Kakadadse, A.,C. Parker(1990).Power, Politics, and Organizations.San Francisco:Chuliu.
  39. Keen, P. G. W.(1981).Information Systems and Organizational Change.Communications of the ACM,24(1),24-33.
  40. Keil, M.,J. Mann,A. Rai(2000).Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models.MIS Quarterly,24(4),631-664.
  41. Klein, H. K.,M. D. Myers(1999).A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems.MIS Quarterly,23(1),67-94.
  42. Kling, R.(1991).Computerization and Social Transformation.Science, Technology and Human Values,16(3),342-367.
  43. Kling, R.,S. Iacono(1984).The Control of Information Systems after Implementation.Communications of the ACM,27(12),1218-1226.
  44. Knights, D.,F. Murray(1994).Managers, Divided: Organizational Politics and Information Technology Management.New York:Wiley.
  45. Lawrence, T. B.,M. K. Mauws,B. Dyck(2005).The Politics of Organizational Learning: Integration Power into the 4I Framework.Academy of Management Review,30(1),180-191.
  46. Littler, C.(1982).The Development of the Labour Process in Capitalist Societies.London:Heinemann.
  47. Lukes, S.(1974).Power: A Radical View.London:MacMillan Press.
  48. M. Foucault,H. L. Dreyfus,P. Rabinow (Eds.)(1982).Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics.New York:Harvester Wheastsheaf.
  49. Markus, M. L.(1981).Implementation Politics: Top Management Support and User Involvement.Systems, Objectives, Solutions,1,203-215.
  50. Markus, M. L.(1983).Power, Politics, and MIS Implementation.Communications of the ACM,26(6),430-444.
  51. Markus, M. L.,D. Robey,V. Grover,W. Kettinger (Eds.)(1995).Business Process Reengineering: A Strategic Approach.Middletown, PA:Idea Group.
  52. Markus, M. L.,J. Pfeffer(1983).Power and the Design and Implementation of Accounting and Control Systems.Accounting, Organizations and Society,8,205-218.
  53. Mason, R. O.,I. I. Mitroff(1973).A Program for Research on Management Information Systems.Management Science,19(5),475-487.
  54. Mayes, B. T.,R. W. Allen(1977).Toward a Definition of Organizational Politics.Academy of Management Review,2(4),672-678.
  55. Mosco, V.(1989).The Pay-Per Society.Toronto:Garamond Press.
  56. Mouakket, S.,A. A. Sillince,F. A. Fretwell-Downing(1994).Information Requirements Determination in the Software Industry: A Case Study.European Journal of Information Systems,3(2),101-111.
  57. Murray, F.(1989).The Organizational Politics of Information Technology Studies from the UK Financial Services Industry.Technology Analysis and Strategic Management,1(3),285-298.
  58. Newman, M.,D. Robey(1992).A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships.MIS Quarterly,16(2),249-267.
  59. Newman, M.,D. Rosenberg(1985).Systems Analysis and the Politics of Organizational Control.International Journal of Management Science,13(5),393-406.
  60. Newman, M.,F. Noble(1990).User Involvement as an Interaction Process: A Case Study.Information Systems Research,1(1),89-113.
  61. Noble, D.(1984).Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation.New York:Knopt.
  62. Norris, G.,L. Willcocks (Ed.)(1996).Investing in Information Systems.London:Chapman & Hall.
  63. Orlikowski, W. J.(2000).Using Technology and Constitating Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations.Organization Science,11(4),404-428.
  64. Orlikowski, W. J.(1989).Division among the Ranks: The Social Implications of CASE Tools for Systems Developers.Paper presented at the Proc. 10th International Conference in Information Systems,Boston, Mass.:
  65. Orlikowski, W. J.,D. Robey(1991).Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations.Information Systems Research,2(2),143-169.
  66. Patton, Q. P.(1990).Strategic Themes in Qualitative Inquiry.C. A.:Sage.
  67. Pettigrew, A. M.(1973).The Politics of Organizational Decision-Making.London:Tavistocl.
  68. Pfeffer, J.(1992).Managing with Power.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
  69. Pfeffer, J.(1981).Power in Organizations.Marshfield, Mass.:Pitman.
  70. Ranson, S.,B. Hinings,R. Greenwood(1980).The Structuring of Organizational Structures.Administrative Science Quarterly,25,1-17.
  71. Robey, D.(1981).Computer Information Systems and Organization Structure.Communications of the ACM,26(10),679-687.
  72. Robey, D.,D. Farrow(1982).User Involvement and Information Systems Development: A Conflict Model and Empirical Test.Management Science,28,73-85.
  73. Robey, D.,L. A. Smith,L. R. Vijayasarathy(1993).Perceptions of Conflict and Success in Information Systems Development Projects.Journal of Management Information Systems,10(1),123-139.
  74. Robey, D.,M. C. Boudreau(1999).Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications.Information Systems Research,10(2),167-185.
  75. Serafeimidis, V.,S. Smithson(2000).Information Systems Evaluation in Practice: A Case Study of Organizational Change.Journal of Information Technology,15,93-105.
  76. Serafeimidis, V.,W. V. Grembergn (Ed.)(2001).Information Technology Evaluation Methods and Management.Hershey, Pa.:Idea Publishing Group.
  77. Sillince, J. A. A.,S. Mouakket(1997).Varieties of Political Process during Systems Development.Information Systems Research,8(4),368-397.
  78. Silva, L.,J. Backhouse(2003).The Circuits-of-Power Framework for Studying Power in Institutionalization of Information Systems.Journal of the Association for Information Systems,4(6),294-336.
  79. Smithson, S.,R. Hirschheim(1998).Analyzing Information Systems Evaluation: Another Look at an Old Problem.European Journal of Information Systems,7,158-174.
  80. Voyer, J. J.(1994).Coercive Organizational Politics and Organizational Outcomes: An Interpretive Study.Organization Science,5(1),72-85.
  81. Walsham, G.(1993).Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations.New York:Wiley.
  82. Walsham, G.(1997).Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations.Chichester:John Wiley & Sons.
  83. Webster, J.(1989).Office Automation: The Labour Process and Women`s Work in Britain.Hemel Hempstead:Wheatsheaf.
  84. Willmott, H.(1987).Studying Managerial Work: A Critique and a Proposal.Journal of Management Studies,24(3),249-270.
  85. Willocks, L.,D. Mason(1987).Computerising Work: People, Systems Design and Workplace Relations.London:Paradigm Press.
  86. Zuboff, S.(1988).In the Age of the Smart Machine.New York:Basic Books.
  87. 林東清、張玲星(2000)。資訊系統發展過程中使用者與資訊人員之政治遊戲-一個探索性研究。中山管理評論,8(3),479-510。
被引用次数
  1. Koyama, Naonori(2018).Does Official Development Assistance Promote Foreign Direct Investment? Evidence from Japan and China.Tamkang Journal of International Affairs,22(1),39-68.
  2. Lee, Chang-Chieh,Chen, Kuo-Hua(2018).Investigating Taiwan's Integrated Scenarios of Climate Change through Visualization Rhetoric in Science Communication.Tamkang Journal of International Affairs,22(1),1-38.
  3. 陳建仁、周柏彣(2012)。都市內分權與環境治理機制─以台中市大雪山社區為例。臺灣民主季刊,9(2),124-164。
  4. 陳世榮、李河清(2011)。中國燃料電池研發及其環境溝通。中國大陸研究,54(3),33-69。
  5. 黃之棟(2016)。批判種族理論的批判性反思。政治與社會哲學評論,58,53-128。
  6. 李明昆(2017)。全球氣候變遷議題融入技職大學生通識課程教學之研究。通識學刊:理念與實務,5(1),1-36。
  7. 廖宜霈,林峰田(2022)。臺灣氣候變遷調適知識本體(CCAO)之建構與應用。都市與計劃,49(3),263-283。
  8. 王光旭(2013)。社會網絡分析在公共政策權力途徑上應用之初探:以全民健保的重要政策事件為例。行政暨政策學報,57,37-90。
  9. 謝儲鍵(2019)。氣候變遷下的網絡觀點:探索環境政治協商的複雜性。公共行政學報,56,171-187。
  10. 謝儲鍵、陳敦源、張鐙文(2018)。臺灣公共行政領域智識流動的研究:治理概念擴散與連接之初探。行政暨政策學報,66,39-83。
  11. 張雅婷(2020)。社會企業利害關係人之社會網絡分析-以里仁事業股份有限公司為例。中國行政評論,26(3),30-63。
  12. 張雅婷(2021)。綠色經濟與綠色成長-綠色城市多層次治理模式之初探。社會與區域發展學報,6(2),131-171。
  13. (2016)。地方政府執行氣候變遷調適計畫之研究-以中彰投為例。空大行政學報,30,37-80。