民主治理與非多數機構：公民社會的觀點

Democratic Governance and Non-Majoritarian Institution: A Civil Society Perspective

10.30409/JPA.200803_(26).0001

孫煒(Way Sun)

民主治理 ； 非多數機構 ； 公民社會 ； 政府改造 ； democratic governance ； non-majoritarian institution ； civil society ； reinventing government

公共行政學報

26期（2008 / 03 / 01）

1 - 35

繁體中文

本文嘗試分析非多數機構的意義、特性以及立論根據，並探討非多數機構作為政府部門與公民社會互動的制度性架構，以提供台灣政府改造的政策建議。由理論層面而言，代議民主之中，以官僚體系成為管制及服務人民與公民社會的機關存在著實務性以及正當性的問題。近年來民主治理強調政府部門與公民社會彼此協調合作與依存互動，來體現民主政治的核心價值，更顯示有別於官僚體系的另類制度選擇，將較有於公民社會的健全發展。由實務政策而言，傳統上由政府制定管制政策與分配政策來影響人民行動與公民社會，但隨著政府角色的調整，政府從事管制與分配資源的型態與方式發生顯著變化。攸關保障弱勢族群與非主流價值的社會管制，以及在專業政策領域分配資源的行政型態愈顯重要，以往由民選官員制定及官僚體系執行政策的行政型態已然出現缺陷。相較之下，具有高度專業性與獨立性，而且在決策結構之中包含被管制（被服務）代表的非多數機構，更適合作為政府與公民社會的治理結構。本文列舉四個美國之與公民社會密切互動的非多數機構，並分析各自的制度特徵與運作經驗，並在本文的結語中，簡述台灣公民社會的形成背景，並為設計以台灣公民社會主體性的非多數機構提供政策建議，作為未來政府改造的規劃方向。

This article attempts to analyze the meaning, the characteristics and the rationale of non-majoritarian institution, to investigate non-majoritarian institution as the institutional framework for the interaction between government and civil society, and thereby to provide the Taiwanese Government with policy suggestions for reinventing government. Theoretically speaking, in a representative democracy, the bureaucracy supposed to provide regulation and services to people and civil society has created problems concerning its practicality and legitimacy. In recent years, democratic governance has emphasized the cooperation/coordination and the interdependence/interaction between government and civil society in order to realize the core value of democracy, and also to illustrate that the alternatives to bureaucracy could provide a healthier development of civil society. In terms of pragmatic policies, traditionally the government stipulates and implements the regulatory policies and distributive policies to affect the actions of the people and civil society. However, as the role of government modifies, the patterns and methods of the government regulates and distributes resource also experiences obvious changes. The social regulation protecting the interests of disadvantaged groups and non-mainstream values, and the administrative patterns in the distribution of resources in professional policy domain have become especially important. The flaws of the policies that were in the past stipulated by elected officers and regulated by bureaucracy have already been obvious. In comparison, the highly professional and independent non-majoritarian institutions, in which the policy-making structure includes the administered/served parties, is more adequate to perform as a governance structure for government and civil society. This article lists 4 non-majoritarian institutions in the US with close interactions with the civil society, and analyzes the institutional characteristics and operation experience of each institution. In addition, this article will provide a description of the formation background of the civil society in Taiwan as well as the policy suggestions in the design of non-majoritarian institution based on the subjectivity of Taiwan civil society, thereby points out the direction for reinventing government in the future.

1. 吳重禮(2006)。憲政設計、政黨政治與權力分立：美國分立政府的運作經驗及其啓示。問題與研究，45(3)，133-166。
   連結：
2. Armony, A. C.(2004).The Dubious Link: Civic Engagement and Democratization.Stanford, California:Stanford University Press.
3. Bratton, M.,J. W. Harberson,D. Rothchild,N. Chazan (Eds.)(1994).Civil Society and the State in Africa.Boulder:Lynne Reinner.
4. Braun, D.,F. Gilardi(2006).Delegation in Contemporary Democracies.New York:Routledge.
5. Braun, D.,F. Gilardi (Eds.)(2006).Delegation in Contemporary Democracies.New York:Routledge.
6. Caiden, G. E.(2005).The Repositioning of Public Governance: Global Experience and Challenges.Paper presented at the Conference of the Repositioning of Public Governance: Global Experience and Challenges,Taipei:
7. Coen, D.(2005).Business-Regulatory Relations: Learning to Play Regulatory Games in European Utility Markets.Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions,18(3),375-398.
8. Coen, D.,M. Thatcher(2005).The New Governance of Markets and Non-Majoritarian Requlatory.Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions,18(3),329-346.
9. Cohen, J.,A. Arato(1992).Civil Society and Political Theory.Cambridge, MA.:MIT Press.
10. Cummings, M. C.,R. S. Katz(Eds.)(1987).The Patron State: Government and the Arts in Europe, North America, and Japan.New York:Oxford University Press.
11. Diamond, L.(1999).Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation.Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Dolan, J.,D. H. Rosenbloom(2003).Representative Bureaucracy: Classic Readings and Continuing Controversies.New York:M. E. Sharpe.
13. Edwards, M.(2003).Civil Society.Malden, MA.:Polity Press.
14. Ferlie, E.,L. Ashburner,L. Fitzgerald,A. Pettigrew(1996).The New Public Management in Action.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
15. Fleischer, D. Z.,F. Zames(2001).The Disability Rights Movement: From Charity to Confrontation.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
16. Frederickson, H. G.,K. B. Smith(2003).The Public Administration Theory Primer.Boulder, Colorado:Westview Press.
17. Greenberg, E. S.,T. F. Mayer (Eds.)(1990).Changes in the State: Causes and Consequences.London:Sage.
18. Huber, J.,C. Shipan(2000).The Costs of Control: Legislators, Agencies and Transaction Costs.Legislative Studies Quarterly,25,25-52.
19. Lane, J.(2005).Public Administration and Public Management: The Principal-Agent Perspective.New York:Routledge.
20. Lewis, D. J.(2001).The Management of Non-Government Development Organizations: An Introduction.New York:Routledge.
21. Lowi, T. J.(1979).The End of Liberalism.New York:W. W. Norton.
22. Lowi, T. J.(1972).Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice.Public Administration Review,30,298-310.
23. Lowi, T. J.(1964).American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory.World Politics,16,677-715.
24. Majone, G.(1996).Regulating Europe.New York:Routledge.
25. Majone, G.(2001).Nonmajoritarian Institutions and the Limits of Democratic Governance: A Political Transaction-Cost Approach.Journal of Theoretical and Institutional Economics,157,57-78.
26. Majone, G.(1997).Form the Positive to Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance.Journal of Public Policy,17(2),139-167.
27. March, J. G.,J. P. Olsen(1995).Democratic Governance.New York:The Free Press.
28. Mashaw, J. L.(2006).Recovering American Administrative Law: Federalist Foundations, 1787-1801.The Yale Law Review,115(6),1256-1344.
29. McLaughlin, K.,S. P. Osborne,E. Ferlie (Eds.)(2001).New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects.London:Routledge.
30. Meier, K. J.,L. J. O`Toole(2006).Bureaucracy in a Democratic State: A Governance Perspective.Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press.
31. Minogue, M.(2002).Governance-Based Analysis of Regulation.Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics,73(4),649-666.
32. Mosher, F. C.(1968).Democracy and the Public Service.New York:Oxford University Press.
33. Mulcahy, K. V.,M. C. Cummings,R. S. Katz (Eds.)(1987).The Patron State: Government and the Arts in Europe, North America, and Japan.New York:Oxford University Press.
34. OECD(2002).Distributive Public Governance: Agencies, Authorities and Other Government Bodies.Paris:OECD.
35. OECD(1997).The OECD Report on Regulation Reform: Synthesis.Paris:OECD.
36. Pollack, M. A.(2002).Learning from the Americanists (Again): Theory and Method in the Study of Delegation.West European Politics,25(1),200-219.
37. Rhodes, R. A. W.(1996).The New Governance: Governing without Government.Political Studies,44(3),652-667.
38. Rose, M.(2001).Divided Government and the Rise of Social Regulation.Policy Studies Journal,29(4),611-626.
39. Rosenblom, D. H.,R. S. Kravchuk(2005).Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector.New York:McGraw-Hill.
40. Rundquist, B. S.,J. A. Ferejohn,M. C. Liske,W. Loehr,J. McCamant (Eds.)(1975).Comparative Public Policy.New York:Wiley Inc..
41. Schmidt, M. G.(2002).Political Performance and Type of Democracy: Findings from Comparative Studies.European Journal of Political Research,41,147-163.
42. Schmitter, P.,L. Diamond,M. F. Plattner,Y. H. Chu,H. M. Tien (Eds.)(1997).Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies.Baltimore, MD.:The Johns Hopkins University Press.
43. Sweet, A. S.(2002).Constitutional Courts and Parliamentary Democracy.West European Politics,25(1),77-100.
44. Tatalovich, R.,B. W. Daynes(1998).Moral Controversies in American Politics: Cases in Social Regulation Policy.Armonk, NY.:M. E. Sharpe.
45. Tester, K.(1992).Civil Society.New York:Routledge.
46. Thatcher, M.(2002).Regulation after Delegation: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Europe.Journal of European Public Policy,25(1),1-22.
47. Thatcher, M.,A. S. Sweet(2002).Theory and Practice of Delegation to Non-Majoritarian Institutions.West European Politics,25(1),1-22.
48. Wood, D. B.,R. W. Waterman(1991).The Dynamics of the Political Control of the Bureaucracy.American Political Science Review,85,801-828.
49. Delegation of Regulatory Authority in the European Union: The Relevance of the American Model of Independent Agencies
50. 余致力(2006)。倡廉反貪與民主治理。台灣民主季刊，3(3)，165-176。
51. 吳豐維、《思想》編輯委員會編(2007)。台灣的七十年代。台北:聯經。
52. 官有垣(2000)。非營利組織在台灣的發展：兼論政府對財團法人基金會的法令規範。中國行政評論，10(1)，75-110。
53. 俞可平(2006)。中國公民社會的制度環境。北京:北京大學。
54. 胡至沛(2007)。建構良善的政府管制治理。2007 TASPAA年會暨第三屆兩岸四地公共管理學術研討會，台北:
55. 孫同文(2003)。從威權政府到民主治理：台灣公共行政理論與實務之變遷。台北:元照。
56. 孫煒(2007)。第三部門的治理研究。台北:翰蘆。
57. 張其祿(2007)。管制行政：理論與經驗分析。台北:商鼎。
58. 陳敦源(2002)。民主與官僚：新制度論的觀點。台北:韋伯。
59. 陳櫻琴、劉孔中、施俊吉編(2001)。管制革新。台北:中研院中山人文社會科學研究所。
60. 彭文賢(2007)。邁向後現代的公共行政。2007 TASPAA年會暨第三屆兩岸四地公共管理學術研討會，台北:
61. 曾健民(2005)。1945年破曉時刻的台灣：八月十五日後激動的一百天。台北:聯經。
62. 黃長玲(2007)。第三部門政策環境論壇。台北:國立政治大學第三部門研究中心。
63. 黃錦堂、台灣行政法學會編(2005)。行政法人與組織改造、聽證制度評析。台北:元照。
64. 廖義銘(2005)。反思性公共行政與管制。台北:翰蘆。
65. 劉淑瓊(2006)。失能的政府，拖垮民間活力。2006年兩岸非政府組織學術暨實務研討會，台北:
66. 蔡志剛(2004)。中央銀行獨立性與貨幣政策。北京:中國金融出版社。
67. 蕭全政、中央研究院臺灣研究推動委員會編(2001)。威權體制的變遷：解嚴後的台灣。台北:中研院台史所籌備處。
68. 蕭新煌(1989)。台灣新興社會運動的剖析。台北:台灣研究基金會。
69. 羅清俊(2001)。台灣分配政治。台北:前衛。
70. 顧忠華(2005)。解讀社會力：台灣的學習社會與公民社會。台北:左岸。

1. 簡旭徵(2012)。傳播內容共同管理機制之探討。廣播與電視，35，1-27。
2. 彭渰雯、巫偉倫(2009)。非營利組織參與治理的代表性與課責—以出版品分級評議爲例。臺灣民主季刊，6(3)，87-123。
3. 王曉麟(2017)。獨立機關治理結構與過程之研究。中國行政評論，23(1)，1-33。
4. 張峻豪(2014)。行政權運作與地方治理：臺灣與羅馬尼亞的能源案例分析。思與言：人文與社會科學雜誌，52(3)，99-158。
5. 莊文忠(2022)。我國「公民社會」的學術研究圖像：期刊文章的內容分析初探。東吳政治學報，40(2)，1-62。
6. (2011)。什麼是公民社會？如何建構公民社會？─應用網絡程序分析法解構大學生的公民社會觀偏好之研究。空大行政學報，22，251-278。