全觀型治理之研究

A Study of Holistic Governance

10.30409/JPA.200906_(31).0001

韓保中(Bao-Chung Han)

碎裂化 ； 棘手問題 ； 協調 ； 組織社會學 ； 新涂爾幹理論 ； fragmentation ； wicked problems ； coordination ； sociology of organizations ； neo-Durkheimian theory

公共行政學報

31期（2009 / 06 / 01）

1 - 48

繁體中文

全觀型治理是新一波的行政學說，該理論強調政府組織的整合關係，與電子化政府及主動型文官學說相結合下，成為具回應性與解決人民需求的治理學說。全觀型治理的奠基者－席克斯，在二○○○年後的相關著作中，屢屢提及新涂爾幹理論，著墨與闡釋組織多樣性問題，以及全觀型治理的組織社會學基礎。在全觀型治理運行過程中，協調是整合工作的第一步，而協調是個複雜的問題，與協調相關的概念，包括碎裂化政府與棘手問題，此三概念構成組織協調論題，是認識全觀型治理的重要基礎。新涂爾幹理論闡釋了協調論題的組織社會學基礎，其主張面對多元與複雜的組織關係，依據化異與求同兩原則，有容忍性制度、分立、互賴與妥協四種基本協調之法及解決之道，這體現協調工作必須採取多樣的方式。協調之法的多樣化，實與涂爾幹所述現代社會的分工特質有關，身處全球化、後現代及風險社會的今日，社會分工與分化的強度甚於過去，我們更應重視協調的意義與方式。而全觀型治理援用新涂爾幹理論及組織社會學分析，為當代行政學與社會學對話的代表之一，讓行政發展能因應社會的變遷與需求，此一研究途徑對現今公共行政學研究來說，實有深刻的啟發意義。

Holistic governance is a new theory in contemporary public administration studies. This theory stressess the integrated governmental organizations, when conjoining with theories of e-government and active bureaucracy, holistic governance would be the theory of responding and solving citizens' needs. Perri 6, the founder of holistic governance, in his works after 2000 A. D., often mentioned the neo-Durkheimian theory, emphasized the complexity and plurality of organizations, and the foundations of sociology of organizations. In the working process of holistic governance, coordination is the first step toward integration. Coordination is a complex problem, other concepts relating to coordination, ”fragmented government” and ”wicked problems”, they compose the ”interorganizational coordination thesis” which is the cornerstone for understanding holistic governance. The neo-Durkheimian theory discusses the interorganizational coordination thesis of the sociology of organizations. According to the principles of reducing dissimilarity and producing internal similarity drawn from the neo-Durkheimian theory, Dr. 6 puts forward four fundamental settlements for coordination: toleration of a specific set of institution, separation, mutual dependency and compromise. This reflects coordination requires various ways. The various ways of coordination are related with the characteristic of modern society, the characteristic which Emile Durkheim called the division of labor. In the age of globalization, postmodern and risky society, the intensity of division of labor and social differentiation is higher than ever. Facing the plural organizational types and complex interorganizational relations in contemporary society, we should put more emphasis on the coordination of organizations. The neo-Durkheimian theory and sociology of organizations as the analyzing tools of holistic governance that represents the interdisciplinary work between public administration and sociology, it makes the development of public administration well responding to the social transition and needs. And the enlightenment of the research approach of holistic governance is significant to the public administration studies today.

1. 王中天(2003)。社會資本（Social Capital）：概念、源起及現況。問題與研究，42(5)，139-163。
   連結：
2. 馬財專(2007)。結構網絡的分析及其脈絡。政治科學論叢，33，1-42。
   連結：
3. 黃鉦堤(2006)。盧曼的風險社會學與政策制訂。政治科學論叢，28，123-162。
   連結：
4. 6 Perri(2004).Joined-up government in the western world in comparative perspective: A preliminary literature review and exploration.Journal of public Administration Research and Theory,14(1),103-138.
5. 6 Perri(2002).What is there to feel? A neo-Durkheimian theory of the emotions.The European Journal of Psychotherapy, Counselling & Health,5(3),263-290.
6. 6 Perri(2003).Institutional viability: A neo-Deukheimian theory.Innovation: the European Journal of Social Science Research,16(4),395-415.
7. 6 Perri(2004).The Value of Inconsistency.nr Venice, Italy:Villa Margherita.
8. Holistic government
9. Governing by technique: Judgement and the prospects for governance of and with technology
10. 6 Perri (Eds.)(1995).Missionary government.London:Demos Press.
11. 6 Perri (Eds.),G. Mars (Eds.)(2008).The institutional dynamics of culture: The new durkheimians.VT. Ashgate:
12. 6 Perri (Eds.),S. Radstone (Eds.),C. Squire (Eds.),A. Treacher (Eds.)(2007).Public emotions.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
13. 6 Perri,D. Leat,K. Seltzer,G. Stoker(1999).Governing in the round-strategies for holistic government.London:Demos Press.
14. 6 Perri,D. Leat,K. Seltzer,G. Stoker(2002).Towards holistic governance: The new reform agenda.London:Palgrave Press.
15. 6 Perri,E. Peck(2004).New labour's modernisation in the public sector: A neo-Durkheimian approach and the case of mental health services.Public Administration,82(1),83-108.
16. 6 Perri,N. Goodwin,E. Peck,T. Freeman(2006).Managing networks of twenty-first century organisations.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Barnhart, C.,R. K. Barnhart(1984).The world book dictionary.Chicago:World Book, Inc..
18. Beck, U.,A. Giddens,S. Lash(1994).Reflexive modernization- politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order.London:Polity Press.
19. Burns, T.,G. M. Stalker(1979).The management of innovation.London:Tavistock.
20. Christensen, T.,P. Lægreid(2007).The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform.Public Administration Review,67(6),1059-1066.
21. The Netherlands and its whole of government approach on fragile states
22. Perri 6's publications
23. Durkheim, E.(1984).The division of labour in society.N.Y.:Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc..
24. Eldridge, J. E. T.,A. D. Crombie(1974).A sociology of organizations.London:Allen and Unwin.
25. Fowler, H. W.,F. G. Fowler(1990).The concise oxford dictionary of current English.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
26. Fox, C. J.,H. T. Miller(1995).Postmodern public administration-Toward discourse.London:Sage.
27. Funk, I. K. (Ed.)(1953).New standard dictionary of the English langauge.N.Y.:Funk & Wagnalls Company.
28. Giddens, A.(1971).Capitalism and modern social theory-an analysis of the writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber.London:Cambridge University Press.
29. Gulick, L. (Eds.),L. Urwick (Eds.)(1937).Notes on the theory of organization.Papers on the science of administration.
30. Habermas, J.(1975).Legitimation crisis.Boston:Beacon Press.
31. Hanks, P. (Ed.)(1979).Collins dictionary of the English language.London:Collins.
32. Harte, V.(2002).Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
33. Staff details-Perri 6
34. Jones, B. D.(1998).Turf wars: How congressional committees claim jurisdiction.The American Political Science Review,92(2),465-466.
35. Keohane, R. O.(1984).After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy.N.Y.:Princeton University Press.
36. Kerstholt, F.,S. R. Cleg (Ed.)(1989).Organization theory and class analysis: New approaches and new issues.New York:W. de Gruyter.
37. Lawrence, P. R.,J. W. Lorsch(1967).Differentiation and integration in complex organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly,12(1),1-47.
38. Leach, R.,J. Percy-Smith(2001).Local governance in Britain.London:Palgrave Press.
39. Mulgan, G. (Eds.),Perri 6(1996).New enterprise culture.London:Demos.
40. Professor Perri 6
41. Osborne, D.,T. Gaebler(1992).Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector.New York:A William Patrick Book.
42. Parsons, T.,K. H. Wolff (Ed.)(1964).Essays on Sociology and Philosophy.N.Y.:Harper & Row.
43. Patel, T.(2007).The role of dynamic cultural theories in explaining the viability of international strategic alliances: A focus on indo-French alliances.Management Decision,45(10),1532-1559.
44. Peck, E.,Perri 6(2006).Beyond delivery: Policy implementation as sense-making and settlement.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
45. Peters, T. J.(1987).Thriving on chaos: Handbook for a management revolution.New York:Knopf.
46. Pierre, J.,B. G. Peters(2000).Governance, politics and the state.London:Macmillan Press.
47. Rhodes, R. A. W.(2001).The diffenentiated polity: The case of the civil services of the UK.The 51st Political Studies Association Conference,Manchester, United Kingdom:
48. Scott, W. R. (Ed.)(1994).Organizational sociology.Vt, Dartmouth:
49. Simmons, A.(2002).Turf wars at work.Strategic Finance,84(2),51-55.
50. Sullivan, H.,C. Skelcher(2002).Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services.London:Palgrave Press.
51. Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective
52. Joined up government: A review of national and international experiences
53. Weber, M.,A. M. Henderson,T. Parsons (Trans.)(1947).Max Weber: The theory of social and economic organization.London:Collier Macmillan.
54. Perri 6
55. Wilson, W.(1887).The study of administration.Political Science Quarterly,2(2),197-222.
56. 吳庚(1993)。韋伯的政治理論及其哲學基礎。台北市:聯經出版社。
57. 李宗勳、陳欽春、史美強、謝立功(2008)。建構全民反貪網絡促進廉能政治之研究。中央警察大學學報，45，155-194。
58. 李長晏(2004)。從全局治理論區域政府的設計。全球政治評論，8，131-152。
59. 李逸洋(2004)。數位時代之公務人力資源管理新方向。研考雙月刊，28(2)，55-66。
60. 周雪光(2003)。組織社會學十講。中國北京:社會科學文獻。
61. 高毓喬(2007)。南投，國立暨南大學公共行政與政策學系。
62. 彭文賢(1999)。邁向後現代的組織理論。中國行政評論，8(4)，63-82。
63. 彭錦鵬(2005)。全觀型治理：理論與制度化策略。政治科學論叢，23，61-100。
64. 社會分層與社會和諧
65. 廖興中、史美強(2000)。論官僚組織在後現代社會中的困境與轉型。中國行政評論，10(1)，215-249。
66. 劉坤億、范祥偉(2003)。第二回合的文官改革趨勢：從全觀型治理觀點談起。人事月刊，37(2)，7-16。
67. 格柵∕群體分析：瑪麗‧道格拉斯的文化研究圖式
68. 顧忠華(1999)。風險、社會與倫理。國立政治大學哲學學報，5，19-37。

1. 陳力葦(2020)。我國廉政機構運作現況與檢討： 全觀型治理觀點。文官制度季刊，12(3)，87-129。
2. 江欣彥、丁仁方(2011)。資本主義經濟發展成本歸屬弔詭－從風險社會課責觀點析之。人文暨社會科學期刊，7(2)，1-15。
3. 柯于璋、呂美暄(2016)。桃園航空城計畫之治理問題與解決對策─全觀型治理的觀點。文官制度季刊，8(1)，19-48。
4. 李長晏(2020)。新冠肺炎防疫之府際問題、對策及反思。中國地方自治，73(11)，3-29。
5. (2018)。糧食安全問題、美國糧食安全治理政策及措施。空大行政學報，32，1-34。