公共工程執行績效的評估：一種交易失靈模式的應用

The Performance of Implementation Public Construction Projects: An Application of the Concept of Transaction Failure

10.30409/JPA.200909_(32).0001

邱吉鶴(Chi-Ho Chiou)

公共工程 ； 交易成本 ； 交易失靈 ； 執行績效 ； 績效評估 ； public construction ； transaction cost ； transaction failure ； implementation performance ； performance evaluation

公共行政學報

32期（2009 / 09 / 01）

1 - 31

繁體中文

公共工程計畫具有工程投身長及政府投資龐大預算等特性，其執行績效將影響政府預算的分配及經濟的成長。傳統上，續效評估理論大多以公共工程執行的效率、效果與品質為評量指標，忽略了公共工程交易失靈所延伸的成本及對整體經濟效益的影響；而交易成本理論從公共工程交易活動途徑分析，將可彌補傳統績效評估理論的不足。本文蒐集國內重大公共工程北二高之執行量化與質化資料進行分析，研究結果發現：公共工程執行的有限性、環境不確定性及工程特殊性為交易失靈的主要因素，並引伸相關成本的增加；如果公共工程執行正常，總成本即為工程實體成本加上交易成本（即TC'=Ce+Ct，正常型總成本）；如果公共工程執行落後或延期，總成本分析模式將增加實體成本與交品成本，以及新增的機會成本、社會成本及效用成本等（即TC'=Ce+Ct+Ce'+Ct'+Co+Cs+Cu'失靈型總成本）。

Public construction project has characteristics of complex engineering practice and huge budget amount of government budget, so it will affect the government budget allocation and even economic growth of the nation. Traditionally, the performance evaluation of public construction projects are judged mostly in terms of efficiency, effectiveness and quality as indicators; however, this approach neglects the costs of transaction failure that may result in other costs or have impact on overall economic growth. If the transaction cost theory is incorporated into the process of the public construction, it will make up the lack of attention on transaction failure of performance evaluation. From the qualitative and quantitative research data of No.2 National Highway project, this research found the bounded rationality of human factors, uncertainty of environmental factors, and special characteristics of the project will increase the total cost. In addition, even if the implementation of public construction proceeds normally, the total cost (TC) should equal the actual expense of construction of project involved (Ce) plus the normal transaction cost (Ct). However, if construction is set back by failures or delays, the method for analyzing the total cost should add the increased construction cost (Ce'), the increased transaction cost (Ct'), increased opportunity costs (Co), social costs (Cs), and utility costs (Cu) (that is, TC'=Ce + Ct + Ce' + Ct' + Co + Cs + Cu).

1. Behn, R.(2003).Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures.Public Administration Review,63(5),586-606.
2. Berman, B.,J. R. Evans(2006).Retail management: A strategic approach.NY.:Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc..
3. Brown, T. L.,M. Potoski(2003).Managing contract performance: A transaction costs approach.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,22(2),275-297.
4. Butler, R. S.(1923).Marketing and merchandising.NY.:Alexander Hamilton Institute.
5. Coase, R. H.(1960).The problem of social cost.Journal of Law and Economics,3,1-44.
6. Coase, R. H.(1937).The nature of the firm.Economic,4,386-405.
7. Coase, R. H.(1992).The institutional structure of production: 1991 Alfred Nobel memorial prize lecture in economic sciences.American Economic Review,82(4),713-719.
8. D''Aveni, R. A.,D. J. Ravenscraft(1994).Economies of integration versus bureaucracy costs: Does vertical integration improve performance?.The Academy of Management Journal,37(5),1167-1206.
9. De Lancer, J. P.,D. Holzer(2001).Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation.Public Administration Review,61(6),693-708.
10. Dixit, A. K.(1996).The making of economic policy: A transaction-cost politics perspective.Cambridge, MA.:The MIT Press.
11. Epstein, D.,S. O''Halloran(1999).Delegating powers: A transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers.MA.:Cambridge University Press.
12. Heide, J. B.,G. John(1998).The role of dependence balancing in safeguarding transaction-specific assets in conventional channels.Journal of Marketing,52(1),20-35.
13. Heller, D. E.(1996).Tuition, financial aid, and access to public higher education: A review of the literatureTuition, financial aid, and access to public higher education: A review of the literature,未出版
14. Hunt, S. D.(2002).Foundations of marketing theory: Toward a general theory of marketing.NY.:Armonk.
15. Klein, L. R.,G. L. Frazier,V. Roth(1990).A transaction cost analysis model of channel integration in international markets.The Journal of Marketing Research,27,196-208.
16. Klein, S.(1989).A transaction cost explanation of vertical control in international markets.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,17,253-260.
17. Kravchuk, R.,R. Schack(1996).Designing effective performance-measurement systems under the government performance and results act of 1993.Public Administration Review,56,348-358.
18. Lam, S. W.,C. M. Low,W. A. Teng(1994).ISO 9000 in construction..Singapore:McGraw-Hill.
19. Malone, T. W.(1987).Modeling coordination in organizations and markets.Management Science,33,1317-1332.
20. Masten, R. H.,J. W. Meehan,E. A. Snyder(1989).Vertical integration in the U.S. auto industry: A note on the influence of transaction specific assets.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,12,265-273.
21. Moe, T. M.(1984).The new economics of organization.American Journal of Political Science,28(4),739-777.
22. Moe, T. M.,D. C. Mueller (Ed.)(1996).Perspectives on public choice: A handbook.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
23. Noordewier, T. G.,G. John,J. R. Nevin(1990).Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships.Journal of Marketing,54(4),80-93.
24. North, D.(1990).A transaction cost theory of politics.Journal of Theoretical Politics,2(4),355-367.
25. Osborn, R. N.,C. C. Baughn(1990).Forms of interorganizational governance for multinational alliances.Academy of Management Journal,33(3),503-519.
26. Ouchi, W. G.(1979).A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms.Management Science,25(9),833-848.
27. Pilling, B. K.,L. A. Crosby,D. W. Jackson(1994).Relational bonds in industrial exchange: An experimental test of the transaction cost economic framework.Journal of Business Research,30,237-251.
28. Rindfleisch, A.,J. B. Heide(1997).Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications.The Journal of Marketing,61,30-54.
29. Simon, H. A.(1957).Models of man.NY.:John Wiley & Sons.
30. Sriram, V.,R. Krapfel,R. Spekman(1992).Antecedents to buyer-seller collaboration: An analysis from the buyer's perspective.Journal of Business Research,25,303-320.
31. Tam, C. M.,Z. M. Deng,S. X. Zeng,C. S. Ho(2000).Performance assessment scoring system of public housing construction for quality improvement in Hong Kong.International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,17(4/5),467-675.
32. Walker, G.,L. Poppo(1991).Profit centers, single-source suppliers and transaction costs.Administrative Science Quarterly,36,66-87.
33. Williamson, O.(1999).Public and private bureaucracies: A transaction cost economics perspectives.The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,15,306-342.
34. Williamson, O.(1975).Markets and hierarchies.NY.:The Free Press.
35. Williamson, O. E.(1991).Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization.Strategic Management Journal,12,75-94.
36. Williamson, O. E.(1985).The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting.NY.:The Free Press.
37. Williamson, O. E.(1991).Comparative economic organization: An analysis of discrete structural alternatives.Administrative Science Quarterly,36,269-296.
38. 交通部國工局(1985)。北部區域第二高速公路建設計畫。台北:交通部。
39. 交通部國工局(1998)。北二高工程計畫實施成效總結評估報告。
40. 行政院研考會(1985)。行政院列管案件進度報告。
41. 李得璋(2004)。政府績效評估－公共工程建設計畫績效評估。台北:行政院研考會。
42. 邱吉鶴(2008)。台北，台北大學企業管理學系。
43. 邱吉鶴、莊麗蘭(2005)。施政計畫執行力之探討。研考雙月刊，29(2)，50-60。
44. 張其祿(2001)。管制政策之交易成本途徑分析：以醫療管制爲例。東海社會科學學報，21，57-74。
45. 許惠珠(2003)。交易成本理論之回顧與前瞻。中華科技期刊，28，79-98。

1. 柯于璋(2020)。公私協力夥伴關係之爭議與課責－以我國文化創意產業園區委外經營為例。公共行政學報，58，55-87。
2. (2019)。地方政府災害管理核心職能之重要性分析：以臺北市及新北市為初探。空大行政學報，33，67-104。