题名

影響全球電子治理發展的因素：以政策擴散理論爲基礎的分析

并列篇名

Factors Affecting Global E-governance Development: An Application of Policy Diffusion Theory

DOI

10.30409/JPA.201009_(36).0002

作者

李仲彬(Chung-Pin Lee)

关键词

政策擴散 ； 電子治理 ； 比較公共政策 ； 社會科技理論 ； 科技決定論 ； policy diffusion ； e-governance ； comparative public policy ； socio-technical theory ； technology determinism

期刊名称

公共行政學報

卷期/出版年月

36期（2010 / 09 / 01）

页次

39 - 89

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

在資訊化與全球化的浪潮之下，政府間的政策採用與擴散現象，在學術界或是實務界都已有頗多討論。理論上，此議題是比較公共政策(comparative public policy)的延伸，與政策學習概念有密不可分的關係；實務上，影響政策選擇與發展的因素，更是政策過程相當重要的關鍵。本文主要目的是以政府業務電子化發展為個案，探討全球各國電子治理發展的解釋模型，主要研究問題為什麼因素影響電子化政府與電子民主參與的發展？ 研究結果顯示，包含網路應用程度、全球化程度、人力資本指數、自由程度、相鄰國家發展程度、國民生產毛額…等，都與電子化成效有正向的顯著關係。網路應用程度越高電子化政府發展越好，在專制獨裁型國家的影響效果高於總統制國家；全球化程度越高電子化發展越好，尤其在剛開始發展電子化的國家中。電子化民主參與方面，自由程度是電子化民主參與能否從低階發展到進階的重要因素；網路應用程度與人力資本指數，對高度電子民主參與發展的國家而言是重要的影響因素；相鄰國家的成績越好，發展電子化的動機越強，且影響力量隨著電子化發展成效的上升而加強；最後，經濟條件所產生的影響集中在那些剛開始發展電子化的國家中。 本文依據研究發現，建議各國政府放棄追求一體適用的全球性架構，停止國際名次的追求，建構以地方為中心、使用者為導向的電子化措施。整體而言，本文的貢獻為全球化與資訊化環境底下的政策發展理論，提供了新的實證資料與解釋，也對長期以來科技決定論與社會科技主義兩者平衡提供了一個穩固的基礎。
英文摘要

Both e-government and e-participation have been recognized as worldwide trends. Many studies offer e-government development models that are based on intellectual speculation rather than data from empirical observation. This paper aims to construct e-government and e-participation development models by using a panel data analysis and quantile regression analysis. The findings show that the competition pressure from the neighboring countries, the degree of globalization, human capital index, freedom index, the percentage of internet users, and GDP all have positive associations with e-government and e-participation performance. It is also interesting to note that there are some important differences noticed in the different stages of the conditional distribution of e-government and e-participation. While the effect of competition pressure is not significant for all countries, the results show that it is significant for countries classified as highly developed. The freedom degree has a positive significant effect on countries that have developed higher e-participation and shows no association with countries that are less developed in the area of e-participation. The competition pressure has a higher effect on a presidential system than a parliamentary system and the degree of globalization produce higher pressure on a parliamentary system than on a presidential system. A key factor for the early development of e-participation is citizen needs, but for the further maintenance of c-participation, this factor must be coupled with the degree of societal freedom. In conclusion, this research argues that both e-government and e-participation development do not have a generally agreed upon global framework. Taiwan should focus on local citizens needs; give up the pursuit of the title of world leader: and rebuild the e-policy vision.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 李仲彬、陳敦源、黃東益、蕭乃沂(2008)。網路投票可以提升投票率嗎？以政治大學學生會網路投票爲例。台灣民主季刊，5(3)，1-32。
    連結：
  2. 崔灝東(2008)。由全球化觀點探討臺灣電子化政府之發展。多國籍企業管理評論，2(1)，155-168。
    連結：
  3. 陳建良(2007)。1980年至2000年台灣擁屋家戶儲蓄行為之變遷：分量迴歸分析的新發現。住宅學報，16(1)，57-78。
    連結：
  4. 陳敦源、李仲彬、黃東益(2007)。應用資訊通訊科技可以改善「公眾接觸」嗎？台灣個案的分析。東吳政治學報，25(3)，25-92。
    連結：
  5. 項靖(2005)。數位化政府的城鄉差距：以我國鄉鎮市公所爲例。政大公共行政學報，15，1-48。
    連結：
  6. 黃紀(2005)。投票穩定與變遷之分析方法：定群類別資料之馬可夫鍊模型。選舉研究，12(1)，1-35。
    連結：
  7. 黃朝盟(2005)。政府組織的知識管理現狀與挑戰。政治科學論叢，24，137-168。
    連結：
  8. Shipan, C. R., & C. Volden (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. Retrieved Oct 19, 2008, from http://polisci.osu.edu/faculty/cvolden/ShipanLocal.pdf
  9. Hao, L., & D. Q. Naiman (2007). Quantile regression. Retrieved Aug 3, 2009, from http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/14854_Introduction.pdf
  10. Simon, H. (1947). Administration behavior. New York: Macmillan
  11. World Bank (2005). A definition of e-government. Retrieved February 28, 2009, from http://go.worldbank.org/M1JHE0Z280
  12. DeCoster, J. (2007). Applied linear regression notes set 1. Retrieved Aug 2, 2009, from http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html
  13. Backus, M.(2001).,未出版
  14. Bala, V.,Goyal, S.(1998).Learning from neighbors.The Review of Economic Studies,65(3),595-621.
  15. Bennett, C. J.(1997).Understanding ripple effects: The cross-national adoption of policy instruments for bureaucratic accountability.Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration,10(3),213-233.
  16. Berry, F. S.,Berry, W. D.(2007).Innovation and diffusion models in policy research.Theories of the policy process,Colorado:
  17. Berry, F. S.,Berry, W. D.(1999).Innovation and diffusion models in policy research.Theories of the policy process,Colorado:
  18. Berry, F. S.,Berry, W. D.(1990).State lottery adoption as policy innovations: An event history analysis.American Political Science Review,84(2),395-415.
  19. Berry, F. S.,Berry, W. D.,Foster, S. K.(1998).The determinants of success in implementing an expert system in state government.Public administration Review,58(4),293-305.
  20. Berry, F. S.,Lee, C.-P.,Chang, K.(2008).Understanding the adoption, use and development of e-government and e-democracy by national governments: A global perspective.2008 Midwest Political Science Association National Conference,Chicago:
  21. Berry, W. D.,Baybeck, B.(2005).Using geographic information systems to study interstate competition.American Political Science Review,99(4),505-519.
  22. Bimber, B.(1990).Karl Marx and the three faces of technological determinism.Social Studies of Science,20,331-351.
  23. Bishop, P.,Anderson, L.(2004).E-government to e-democracy: 'High Tech' solutions to 'No Tech' problems.The Australian Electronic Governance Conference,Melbourne Victoria:
  24. Boehmke, F. J.,Witmer, R.(2004).Disentangling diffusion: The effects of social learning and economic competition on state policy innovation expansion.Political Research Quarterly,57(1),39-51.
  25. Brueckner, J. K.(2000).Welfare reform and the race to the bottom: Theory and evidence.Southern Economic Journal,66(3),505-525.
  26. Buckley, J.(2002).Diffusion or confusion? Modeling policy diffusion with discrete event history data.The 19th Annual Summer Political Methodology Meetings,Seattle:
  27. Carter, L.(2008).E-government diffusion: A comparison of adoption constructs.Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy,2(3),147-161.
  28. Castells, M.(1996).The rise of the network society.Cambridge, Mass:Blackwell Publishers.
  29. Chadwick, A.(2003).Bring e-democracy back in: Why it matters for future research on e-governance.Social Science Computer Review,21(4),443-455.
  30. Chinn, M. D.,Fairlie, R. W.(2010).ICT use in the developing world: An analysis of differences in computer and internet penetration.Review of International Economics,18(1),153-167.
  31. Coursey, D.,Norris, D. F.(2008).Models of e-government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment.Public Administration Review,68(3),523-536.
  32. Coursey, D.,Yang, K.,Kasserkert, A.,Norris, D.(2007).E-Gov adoption in U.S. local governments: Bridging public management and institutional explanations in a pooled time series model.The 2007 Public Management Research Conference,Arizona:
  33. Daley, D. M.,Garand, J. C.(2005).Horizontal diffusion, vertical diffusion, and internal pressure in state environmental policymaking, 1989-1998.American Politics Research,33(5),615-644.
  34. Dimaggio, P. J.,Powell, W. W.(1983).The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.American Sociological Review,48,147-160.
  35. Dobbin, F.,Simmons, B.,Garrett, G.(2007).The global diffusion of public polices: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning?.Annual Review of Sociology,33,449-472.
  36. Dunleavy, P.,Margetts, H.,Bastow, S.,Tinkler, J.(2003).E-government and policy innovation in seven liberal democracies.The Political Studies Association's Annual Conference 2003,Leicester:
  37. Feiock, R.,West, J. P.(1993).Testing competing explanations for policy adoption: Municipal solid waste recycling programs.Political Research Quarterly,46(2),399-419.
  38. Fountain, J. E.(2001).Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change.Washington D.C.:Brookings Institution Press.
  39. Frees, E. W.(2004).Longitudinal and panel data: Analysis and applications in the social sciences.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  40. Garson, G. D.(2006).Public information technology & e-governance: Managing the virtual state.MA.:J&B.
  41. Garson, G. D.(ed.)(1999).Information technology and computer applications in public administration: Issues and trends.Hershey:IDEA Group Publishing.
  42. Geroski, P. A.(2000).Models of technology diffusion.Research Policy,29,603-625.
  43. Gibbs, J.,Kraemer, K. L.,Dedrick, J.(2003).Environment and policy factors shaping global e-commerce diffusion: A cross-country comparison.The Information Society,19(1),5-18.
  44. Gilbert, D.,Balestrini, P.(2004).Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government.The International Journal of Public Sector Management,17(4),286-301.
  45. Grossback, L. J.,Nicholson-crotty, S.,Peterson, D. A. M.(2004).Ideology and learning in policy diffusion.American Politics Research,32(5),521-545.
  46. Grossman, L.(1995).The electronic commonwealth.New York:Penguin.
  47. Hague, B. N.,Loader, B. D.(1999).Digital democracy: Discourse and decision-making in the information age.London:Routledge.
  48. Hargittai, E.(1999).Weaving the western web: Explaining differences in internet connectivity among OECD countries.Telecommunications Policy,23,701-718.
  49. Heeks, R.,Bailur, S.(2007).Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice.Government Information Quarterly,24,243-265.
  50. Heeks, R.,Santos, R.(2009).Understanding adoption of e-government: Principals, agents and institutional dualism.
  51. Ho, A. T.-K.,Ni, A. Y.(2004).Explaining the adoption of e-government features: A case study of Iowa country treasures' offices.American Review of Public Administration,34(2),164-180.
  52. Holzinger, K.,Knill, C.(2005).Cause and conditions of cross-national policy convergence.Journal of European Public Policy,12(5),775-796.
  53. Hsiao, C.(1986).Analysis of panel data.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  54. Kasprzyk, D.(ed.),Duncan, G. J.(ed.),Kalton, G.(ed.),Singh, M. P.(ed.)(1989).Panel surveys.New York:Wiley.
  55. Khosrow-Pour, M.(ed.)(2005).Practicing e-government: A global perspective.Hershey:Idea Group Publishing.
  56. Kiiski, S.,Pohjola, M.(2002).Cross-country diffusion of the internet.Information Economics and Policy,14,297-310.
  57. Klevmarken, N. A.(1989).Panel studies: What can we learn from them? Introduction.European Economic Review,33,523-529.
  58. Koenker, R. W.,Bassett, G. Jr.(1978).Regression quantiles.Econometrica, Econometric Society,46(1),33-50.
  59. Kumar, V.,Mukerji, B.,Butt, I.,Persaud, A.(2007).Factors for successful e-government adoption: A conceptual framework.Electronic Journal of e-Government,5(1),63-76.
  60. Lee, C. K.,Strang, D.(2006).The international diffusion of public-sector downsizing: Network emulation and theory-driven learning.International Organization,60,883-909.
  61. Lenk, K.,Traunmüller, R.(2002).Electronic government: Where are we heading?.Electronic government: First international conference, EGOV 2002,New York:
  62. Liu, M.-C.,San, G.(2006).Social learning and digital divides: A case study of internet technology diffusion.KYKLOS,59(2),307-321.
  63. Mahler, A.,Rogers, E. M.(1999).The diffusion of interactive communication innovations, and the critical mass: The adoption of telecommunications services by German banks.Telecommunications Policy,23,719-740.
  64. Mahrer, H.,Krimmer, R.(2005).Towards the enhancement of e-democracy: Identifying the notion of the middleman paradox.Information Systems Journal,15(1),27-42.
  65. Mälkä, M.(ed.),Anttiroikoand, A.(ed.),Savolainen, R.(ed.)(2004).eTransformation in governance: New directions in government and politics.Pennsylvania:Idea Group Publishing.
  66. McNeal, R. S.,Tolbert, C. J.,Mossberger, K.,Dotterweich, L. J.(2003).Innovating in digital government in the American states.Social Science Quarterly,84(1),52-70.
  67. Meseguer, C.(2005).Policy learning, policy diffusion, and the making of a new order.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,598,67-81.
  68. Millard, J.,Iversen, J. S.,Kubicek, H.,Westholm, H.,Cimander, R.(2004).,未出版
  69. Milner, H. V.(2003).The global spread of the internet: The role of international diffusion pressures in technology adoption.The conference on Interdependence, Diffusion and Sovereignty,MJ:
  70. Mintrom, M.,Vergari, S.(1998).Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms.Journal of Politics,60,126-148.
  71. Moon, M. J.(2002).The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?.Public Administration Review,62(4),424-433.
  72. Moon, M. J.,Norris, D. F.(2005).Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level.Information System Journal,15,43-60.
  73. Moon, M. J.,Welch, E. W.,Wong, W.(2005).What drives global e-governance? An exploratory study at a macro level.The 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,Washington, DC:
  74. Neter, J.,Kutner, M. H.,Nachtsheim, C. J.,Wasserman, W.(1996).Applied linear statistical models.Chicago:Irwin.
  75. Newmark, A. J.(2002).An integrated approach to policy transfer and diffusion.The Review of Policy Research,19(2),151-178.
  76. Norris, P.(2001).Digital divide.Cambridge:The Cambridge University Press.
  77. Rabe-Hesketh, S.,Skrondal, A.(2008).Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata.College Station:Stata Press Publication.
  78. Rabe-Hesketh, S.,Skrondal, A.(2008).Generalized linear mixed effects models.Longitudinal data analysis: A handbook of modern statistical methods,Boca Raton, FL:
  79. Reddick, C. G.(2005).Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers?.Government Information Quarterly,22,38-57.
  80. Reddick, C. G.(2004).Empirical models of e-government growth in local governments.E-Service Journal,3(2),59-84.
  81. Rogers, E. M.(2003).Diffusion of innovation.New York:Free Press.
  82. Rose, R.(2005).A global diffusion model of e-governance.Journal of Public Policy,25(1),5-27.
  83. Simmons, B. A.,Elkins, Z.(2004).The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy.American Political Science Review,98(1),171-189.
  84. Stoneman, P.,Diederen, P.(1994).Technology diffusion and public policy.The Economic Journal,104,918-930.
  85. Tolbert, C. J.,Mossberger, K.,McNeal, R.(2008).Institutions, policy innovation, and egovernment in the American states.Public Administration Review,68(3),549-563.
  86. United Nations=UN(2003).,New York:UN.
  87. United Nations=UN(2006).,New York:UN.
  88. Walker, J. L.(1969).The diffusion of innovations among the American states.American Political Science Review,63,880-899.
  89. Walker, R.,Avellanenda, C.,Berry, F.(2007).The diffusion of innovations: A longitudinal empirical test of the Berry and Berry model.The Public Management Research Association Conference,Tucson:
  90. Warkentin, M.,Gefen, D.,Pavlou, P. A.,Rose, G. M.(2002).Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust.Electronic Markets,12(3),157-162.
  91. Wei, J.(2004).Global comparisons of e-government environments.Electronic Government,1(3),229-252.
  92. West, D. M.(2005).Digital government.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  93. Weyland, K.(2005).Theories of policy diffusion lessons from Latin American Pension Reform.World Politics,57,262-295.
  94. Yang, K.(2003).Neoinstitutionalism and e-government.Social Science Computer Review,21(4),432-442.
  95. 江明修、陳敦源、黃東益、莊國榮、蕭乃沂(2004)。九十三年度財團法人資訊工業策進會委託研究報告九十三年度財團法人資訊工業策進會委託研究報告,財團法人資訊工業策進會。
  96. 江明修、曾德宜(2003)。資訊科技與政府轉型：社會建構的觀點。研考雙月刊，27(3)，78-87。
  97. 陳敦源、黃東益、李仲彬、林子倫、蕭乃沂(2008)。資訊通訊科技下的審議式民主：線上與實體公民會議比較分析。行政暨政策學報，46，49-106。
  98. 黃東益(2006)。同心協力或同床異夢—政府內外部顧客對於電子化政府政策推動的偏好比較。e化十年回顧研討會，台北:
  99. 黃東益(2004)。全球治理下政府知識管理的新面向：府際政策學習。國家政策季刊，3(1)，135-153。
  100. 黃東益、李仲彬(2008)。電子化政府與政府信任：台灣的個案分析。2008台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會（TASPAA）年會暨學術研討會，台中:
  101. 黃東益、陳偉華(2006)。國際非政府組織與跨國政策學習：「國際透明組織」的個案探討。中國行政，77，1-26。
  102. 黃東益、蕭乃沂、陳敦源(2003)。網際網路時代公民直接參與機制的機會與挑戰：台北市政府「市長信箱」的個案研究。東吳政治學報，17，121-152。
被引用次数
  1. 蔡文軒,林瑞華(2022)。科技創新與央地關係：習近平時代的政策汲取、擴散與調適。遠景基金會季刊，23(4)，3-51。
  2. 蔡文軒,林瑞華(2022)。科技創新與央地關係：習近平時代的政策汲取、擴散與調適。遠景基金會季刊，23(4)，3-51。
  3. 曾冠球、李仲彬(2017)。地方政府電子治理執行架構與推動策略：以臺北市政府為例的初步觀察。中國地方自治，70(2)，3-23。
  4. 郭毓倫(2020)。中國治理下的綠能政策擴散－以LED節能照明改善工程為例。中國地方自治，73(3)，24-52。
  5. 黃國宬、張惠堂、李有容(2016)。桃園免費公車之擴散與延續：2001-2014。東吳政治學報，34(2)，109-161。
  6. 柯于璋(2016)。我國「閱讀起步走」政策創新與擴散之研究─政策知識管理的研究途徑。公共行政學報，51，35-67。
  7. 阮孝齊、王麗雲(2017)。縣市教育資源對學習共同體擴散影響之研究。教育研究集刊，63(1)，69-107。
  8. 詹永茂,孟繁勳,王俊元(2020)。影響政策學習效果因素之研究：臺灣地方政府成立騎警隊之分析。東吳政治學報，38(1)，57-112。
print cancel