勾勒台灣非營利部門的組織特色：一項全國調查研究的部分資料分析

A Portrait of the Distinguishing Features of Taiwan Nonprofit Sector: Data Analysis on the Partial Findings of a Nationwide Survey

10.30409/JPA.201012_(37).0004

官有垣(Yu-Yuan Kuan)；杜承嶸(Cherng-Rong Duh)；王仕圖(Shu-Twu Wang)

台灣非營利部門 ； 調查研究 ； 社會團體 ； 財團法人基金會 ； 社團法人協會 ； The nonprofit sector in Taiwan ； survey research ； social groups ； foundations ； associations

公共行政學報

37期（2010 / 12 / 01）

111 - 151

繁體中文

「台灣非營利部門：範圍與重要層面」是一項全國性的調查研究計畫，目的在於提供基礎性的台灣非營利部門的相關資訊，包括瞭解台灣營利部門的組成與結構、NPO對台灣的社會、文化與經濟發展的貢獻、NPO目前面臨了哪些組織生存與成長的挑戰，以及在都會區與非都會區地域內，NPO特質、發展與貢獻有何差異等。本文定位於「研究紀要」，因此首要的目的在於詳細說明本調查研究的研究方法與過程，並對於從事台灣非營利部門調查研究的理論基礎予以論述；接著分析本調查研究的部分成果，包括「組織特質」（成立與立案時間、立案層級、主要活動、隸屬與分支機構、宗教屬性）、「方案與服務」（組織宗旨、服務對象、收費情形），以及「人力資源」（專兼職人員、志工、治理人員）等。根據研究結果來描繪台灣非營利部門的初步輪廓，大致上可整理出如下的特徵：組織年齡輕、規模小而美、服務對象大眾化、運作屬地色彩濃厚、社會服務與教化功能強等特色。

The purpose of this paper is to describe and explain the partial findings from ”The Nonprofit Sector in Taiwan: Scope and Dimensions”, which was a two-year term (2007-2009) and nationwide NPO survey project supported financially by National Science Council. The purpose for conducting this large-scale study is to provide academics, practitioners, and policy makers the fundamental knowledge regarding Taiwan nonprofits' landscape. The project was unique in its focus on all types of nonprofit organizations (faith-based, charitable, advocacy, and membership organizations) rather than on only one of these types. As a result, a meaningful and useful database of Taiwan NPO listings, which includes national & local social groups, foundations, professional associations, and religious nonprofits, had been established. This paper focuses on the analysis of (1) the study's research methods, and (2) the Taiwan nonprofit sector's general information, programs & services, and human resources. Based on the research findings, a general profile of the NPO sector in Taiwan is portrayed with the following features: young of age, small in size, serving the general public, strong local focus, and with strength in social services and educational functions.

1. Abramson, A. J.,Salamon, L. M.(1986).The nonprofit sector and the new federal budget.Washington, DC:Urban Institute Press.
2. Anheier, H. K.,Lam, M.,Mosley, J. E.,Garrow, E.,Guihama, J.(2006).New horizons: The state of the nonprofit sector in Los Angeles.Los Angeles:UCLA.
3. Ben-Ner, A.,Van Hoomissen, T.(1992).An empirical investigation of the joint determination of the size of the for-profit, nonprofit and voluntary sectors.Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics,63,391-415.
4. Bielefeld, W.,Corbin, J. J.(1996).The institutionalization of nonprofit human service delivery.Administration & Society,28(3),362-389.
5. Corbin, John J.(1999).A study of factors influencing the growth of nonprofit in social services.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,28(3),296-314.
6. Deitrick, L.,Rafter, K.,Kato, L.,Velez-Confer, S. H.(2006).A spotlight on San Diego's third sector.San Diego:University of San Diego.
7. Elazar, D. J.(1972).American federalism: A view from the state.New York:Thomas Y. Crowell.
8. Florida Philanthropic Network(2004).Philanthropy in the sunshine state.Tampa:Florida Philanthropic Network.
9. Gamm, G.,Putnam, R.(1999).The growth of voluntary associations in America, 1840-1940.Journal of Interdisciplinary History,29,511-557.
10. GrØnbjerg, K. A.(1990).Poverty and nonprofit organizational behavior.Social Service Review,64(2),208-243.
11. GrØnbjerg, K. A.(2001).The U.S. nonprofit human service sector: A creeping revolution.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,30(2),276-297.
12. GrØnbjerg, K. A.(1994).The NTEE: Human service and regional applications.Voluntas,5(3),301-328.
13. GrØnbjerg, K. A.(2002).Evaluating nonprofit database.American Behavior Scientist,45(10),1741-1777.
14. GrØnbjerg, K. A.,Clerkin, R. M.(2005).Examining the landscape of Indiana's nonprofit sector: Does what you know depend on where you look？.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,34(2),232-259.
15. GrØnbjerg, K. A.,Paarlberg, L.(2001).Community variations in the size and scope of the nonprofit sector: Theory and preliminary findings.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,30(4),684-706.
16. Guterbock, T. M.,Fries, J. C.(1987).Maintaining America's social fabric: The AARP survey of civic involvement.Washington, D.C.:American Association of Retired Persons.
17. Hansmann, H.(1987).The effect of tax exemption and other factors on the market share of nonprofit versus for-profit firms.National Tax Journal,40(1),71-82.
18. Herman, R. D.,Renz, D. O.(1999).Theses on nonprofit organizational effectiveness.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,28(2),107-126.
19. Hodgkinson, V. A.(ed.),Lyman, R. W.(ed.)(1989).The future of the nonprofit sector.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
20. James, E.(ed.)(1989).The nonprofit sector in international perspective: Studies in comparative culture and policy.New York:Oxford University Press.
21. Johansson, P.(1991).An introduction to modern welfare economics.Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press.
22. Kaufman, J.(1999).Three views of associationalism in 19th-centery America: An empirical examination.American Journal of Sociology,104(5, March),1296-1345.
23. Lincoln, J. R.(1977).The urban distribution of voluntary organizations.Social Science Quarterly,58,472-480.
24. Powell, W. W.(ed.)(1987).The nonprofit sector: A research handbook.New Haven:Yale U. Press.
25. Putnam, R. D.(2000).Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community.New York:Simon & Schuster.
26. Putnam, R. D.(1993).Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
27. Putnam, R. D.(1995).Bowling alone: America's capital.Journal of Democracy,6(1),65-78.
28. Rose-Ackerman, S.(ed.)(1986).The economics of nonprofit institutions: Studies in structure and policy.New York:Oxford University Press.
29. Salamon, L. M.(1996).The marketization of welfare: Changing nonprofit and for-profit roles in the American welfare state.Social Service Review,67,16-39.
30. Salamon, L. M.(1992).America's nonprofit sector: A primer.New York:Foundation Center.
31. Salamon, L. M.(1997).Private action/public good: Maryland's nonprofit sector in a time of change.Baltimore:Maryland Association of Nonprofit Organizations.
32. Salamon, L. M.,Anheier, H. K.,Associates(1999).Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector.Baltimore:Center for Civil Society Studies.
33. Salamon, L. M.,Sokolowski, S. W.,Associates(2004).Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector.Bloomfield, CT:Kumarian Press.
34. Smith, D. H.(1997).Grassroots associations are important: Some theory and a review of the important literature.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,26,269-306.
35. Smith, D. H.(1997).The rest of the nonprofit sector: Grassroots associations as the dark matter ignored in prevailing "flat earth" maps of the sector.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,26,114-131.
36. Smith, D. H.,Shen, C.(2000).A theory of voluntary association prevalence: Application to data on larger contemporary nations.annual ARNOVA Conference,New Orleans, LA.:
37. Smith, S. R.,Lipsky, M.(1993).Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
38. Stevens, J. B.(1993).The economics of collective choice.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
39. The Central Policy Unit(2004).Study on the third sector landscape in Hong Kong.Hong Kong:Hong Kong SAR Government, Central Policy Unit.
40. Verba, S.,Schlozman, K. L.,Brady, H. E.(1995).Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics.Cambridge, MA:Harvard U. Press.
41. Warren, D. J.(1975).Black neighborhoods: An assessment community power.An Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
42. Weisbrod, B. A.(1977).The voluntary nonprofit sector.Lexington, MA:Lexington Books.
43. Weisbrod, B. A.(1988).The nonprofit economy.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
44. Wilson, W. J.(1987).The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
45. Wolch, J. R.,Geiger, R. K.(1983).The distribution of urban voluntary resources: An exploratory analysis.Environment and Planning,15,1067-1082.
46. Wuthnow, R.(ed.),Hodgkinson, V. A.(ed.),associates(ed.)(1990).Faith and philanthropy in America: Exploring the role of religion in America's voluntary sector.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
47. Young, D. R.,Bania, N.,Bailey, D.(1996).Structure and accountability: A study of national Associations.Nonprofit Management and Leadership,6(4),347-365.
48. Young, D. R.,Koenig, B. L.,Najam, A.,Fisher, J.(1999).Strategy and structure in managing global associations.Voluntas,10,323-243.
49. 官有垣(2002)。行政院國科會補助專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國科會補助專題研究計畫成果報告,行政院國科會。
50. 官有垣(2006)。國科會補助專題研究計畫成果報告國科會補助專題研究計畫成果報告,國科會。
51. 官有垣(2005)。國科會補助專題研究計畫成果報告國科會補助專題研究計畫成果報告,國科會。
52. 官有垣、杜承嶸(2008)。臺灣南部民間社會組織的自主性、創導性、與對社會的影響研究：社團法人與財團法人之比較。社區發展季刊，122，6-28。
53. 官有垣、陸宛蘋(2004)。政府暨準政府機構創設的非政府組織之治理分析：以台灣農業財團法人為例。第三部門學刊，創刊號，27-168。
54. 官有垣、鄭清霞、呂朝賢(2006)。台灣第三部門的就業：2005年調查研究資料的分析。香港亞洲研究協會第一屆年會暨研討會，香港:
55. 蕭新煌(2011)。自主、創導與影響：臺北的民間社會組織。「介於家庭與國家之間」研究論壇，香港:
56. 蕭新煌編、江明修編、官有垣編(2006)。基金會在台灣：結構與類型。台北:巨流圖書公司。
57. 蕭新煌、江顯新、江明修、馮燕、官有垣、邱瑜瑾、劉維公、陸宛蘋、高永興(2002)。二○○一年台灣的基金會調查研究計畫成果報告。台北:政治大學。

1. 韓意慈、徐煒勛(2018)。誰在虛擬社會中做什麼？非營利組織資源與官網資訊的內容分析。公共行政學報，55，37-71。
2. 賴秋伶、胡至沛(2018)。新竹直笛合奏團經營管理之研究：以音樂課教育為例。中華行政學報，23，85-111。
3. 林淑馨(2012)。日本地方政府促進非營利組織協力之理想與現實。政治科學論叢，51，91-128。
4. 林淑馨(2015)。我國非營利組織與地方政府協力現況之初探與反思：以臺北市為例。文官制度季刊，7(2)，17-45。
5. 林淑馨(2018)。協力神話的崩壞？我國地方政府與非營利組織的協力現況。公共行政學報，55，1-36。
6. 張凱程,林俊瑩,林志豪(2022)。臺灣地區非營利幼兒園的政策效果與侷限。臺北市立大學學報.教育類，53(1)，23-42。
7. (2014)。社會資本與信任：東亞社會資本調查的反思。臺灣社會學刊，54，1-30。
8. (2023)。公私協力的實踐－準公共幼兒園政策的影響與反思。臺東大學教育學報，34(2)，1-33。