電子化跨域治理影響因素之研究：多個案之探索

Influential Factors of Electronic Cross-Boundary Governance: An Exploratory Study with Multiple Cases

10.30409/JPA.201309_(45).0001

胡龍騰(Lung-Teng Hu)；曾冠球(Kuan-Chiu Tseng)；張智凱(Chih-Kai Chang)；黃榮志(Rong-Chih Huang)

電子治理 ； 跨域治理 ； 電子化政府 ； 後端平台整合 ； 跨組織系統 ； electronic governance ； cross-boundary governance ； e-government ； back-office integration ； interorganizational system

公共行政學報

45期（2013 / 09 / 01）

1 - 39

繁體中文

隨著全球與社會環境的快速變遷，公共事務的範疇和內涵日趨複雜，依據傳統社會型態所形成的政府組織架構，顯已不足以應付劇烈變動下所衍生的許多有賴透過跨機關或跨部門合作等「跨域」方式加以解決的棘手性議題。但在已習於部門化和專業分工的政府部門中處理跨域問題，實是當前公共治理中的一大挑戰。在民眾向政府申辦的案件處理上，同樣面臨跨域問題的挑戰，因此政府部門亟思透過資通科技的協助，藉以改善傳統組織分工下的跨域治理問題。但在引入資通科技後，政府真能解決現階段後端組織整合之問題？有哪些因素對於跨機關整合具有關鍵性的影響？甚者，業務相互關聯的機關間是否真有其意願採納跨域服務整合的觀念？爰此，本研究之主要目的，即在於由電子治理的角度，耙梳歸納當前理論文獻針對電子跨域整合所討論的相關影響因素，並進而檢視我國目前在電子化服務中跨域整合管理的代表性個案所呈現之影響成敗的關鍵因素，以期透過此理論與個案的交互對話補充，提出更為廣博的電子化跨機關整合服務之影響因素架構，作為電子化跨機關整合在實務推動或理論研究時參照與思辨的基礎。

Accompanying with the rapid evolution of information and communication technologies, customer service delivery has been confronted a radical transformation in both the public and private sectors. One-stop service with inter-organizational integration, even joined-up government, has become a beautiful vision as well as desired expectation of future public service. As a strong body of literature in business process reengineering and interorganizational system presents the possibility of ubiquitous public service delivery, however, we still do not have a clear idea in terms of what factors that may influence agency’s decision to adopt or not to adopt electronic cross-boundary initiatives. Still, we remain unclear about the critical success factors of such electronic cross-boundary public initiatives.Therefore, the present paper aims to explore the factors which may influence public agency's intention of adopting electronic cross-boundary initiatives to provide integrated public services. On the other hand, the critical success factors of such back-office reforms in the public sector will be examined as well. In addition to the literature reviews of business process reengineering and interorganizational system theories, multiple case studies in Taiwan's government agencies along with in-depth interviews and focus group interviews were employed as the primary methods of the study. Research findings and implications for the application of electronic cross-boundary governance in Taiwan will be discussed at the end of the present paper.

1. 趙永茂(2003)。台灣府際關係與跨域管理：文獻回顧與策略途徑初探。政治科學論叢，18，53-70。
   連結：
2. Anthopoulos, L.,Siozos, P.,Nanopoulos, A.,Tsoukalas, I. A.(2006).The bottom-up design of e-government: A development methodology based on a collaborative environment.e-Service Journal,4(3),3-24.
3. Becker, J.,Algermissen, L.,Niehaves, B.(2006).A procedure model for process oriented e-government projects.Business Process Management Journal,12(1),61-75.
4. Bekkers, V.(2007).The governance of back-office integration: Organizing co-operation between information domains.Public Management Review,9(3),377-400.
5. Bekkers, V.(2009).Flexible information infrastructures in Dutch e-government collaboration arrangements: Experiences and policy implications.Government Information Quarterly,26,60-68.
6. Boonstra, A.,de Vries, J.(2005).Analyzing inter-organizational systems from a power and interest perspective.International Journal of Information Management,25,485-501.
7. Dias, G. P.,Rafael, J. A.(2007).A simple model and a distributed architecture for realizing one-stop government.Electronic Commerce research and Applications,6,81-90.
8. Eynon, R.,Dutton, W. H.(2007).Barriers to networked governments: Evidence from Europe.Prometheus,25(3),225-242.
9. Fedorowicz, J.,Gelinas, U. J., Jr.,Gogan, J. L.,Williams, C. B.(2009).Strategic alignment of participant motivations in e-government collaborations: The Intenet Payment Platform pilot.Government Information Quarterly,26,51-59.
10. Fedorowicz, J.,Gogan, J. L.,Williams, C. B.(2007).A collaborative network for first responders: Lessions from the CapWIN case.Government Information Quarterly,24,785-807.
11. Gil-Garcia, J. R.,Chengalur-Smith, I.,Duchessi, P.(2007).Collaborative e-government: Impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector.European Journal of Information Systems,16,121-133.
12. Gouscos, D.,Kalikakis, M.,Legal, M.,Papadopoulou, S.(2007).A general model of performance and quality for one-stop e-government service offerings.Government Information Quarterly,24,860-885.
13. Hammer, M.,Champy, J.(1993).Reengineering the corporation.London:Nicholas Brealy.
14. Hesson, M.,Al-Ameed, H.(2007).Business process reengineering in UAE public sector: A town planning case study.Business Process Management Journal,13(3),348-378.
15. Hughes, M.,Scott, M.,Golden, W.(2006).The role of business process redesign in creating e-government in Ireland.Business Process Management Journal,12(1),76-87.
16. Kettl, D. F.(2006).Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaboration Imperative.Public Administration Review,66(s1),10-19.
17. Krueger, R. A.,Casey, M. A.(2009).Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
18. Kumar, K.,van Dissel, H. G.(1996).Sustainable collaboration: Managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems.MIS Quarterly,20(3),279-300.
19. Kunstelj, M.,Vintar, M.(2004).Evaluating the progress of e-government development: A critical analysis.Information Polity,9,131-148.
20. Luna-Reyes, L. F.,Gil-Garcia, J. R.,Cruz, C. B.(2007).Collaborative digital government in Mexico: Some lesions from federal web-based interorganizational information integration initiatives.Government Information Quarterly,24,808-826.
21. McAdam, R.,Donaghy, J.(1999).Business process re-engineering in the public sector: A study of staff perceptions and critical success factors.Business Process Management Journal,5(1),33-49.
22. O''Toole, L. J., Jr.(1997).Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration.Public Administration Review,57(1),45-52.
23. Scholl, H. J.,Klischewski, R.(2007).E-government integration and interoperability: Framing the research agenda.International Journal of Public Administration,30,889-920.
24. Schooley, B. L.,Horan, T. A.(2007).Towards end-to-end government performance management: Case study of interorganizational information integration in emergency medical services (EMS).Government Information Quarterly,24,755-784.
25. Simon, H. A.(1976).Administrative behavior (3rd ed.).New York:Maxmillan.
26. Soliman, K. S.,Janz, B. D.(2004).An exploratory study to identify the critical factors affecting the decision to establish Internet-based interorganizational information systems.Information & Management,41,697-706.
27. Stemberger, I. M.,Jaklic, J.(2007).Towards E-government by business process change: A methodology for public sector.International Journal of Information Management,27,221-232.
28. Thong, J. Y. L.,Yap, C. S.,Seah, K. L.(2000).Business process reengineering in the public sector: The case of the housing development board in Singapore.Journal of Management Information Systems,17(1),245-270.
29. Volkoff, O.,Chan, Y. E.,Newson, E. F. P.(1999).Leading the development and implementation of collaborative interorganizational systems.Information & Management,35,63-75.
30. Weerakkody, V.,Baire, S.,Choudrie, J.(2006).E-government: The need for effective process management in the public sector.Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
31. Wimmer, M. A.(2002).Integrated service modeling for online one-stop government.Electronic Markets,12(3),149-156.
32. Wimmer, M. A.(2002).A European perspective towards online one-stop government: The eGOV project.Electronic Commerce Research and Applications,1,92-103.
33. Yin, R. K.(2003).Case study research: Design and methods.Calif.:Sage Publications.
34. Zuurmond, A.(2005).Organizational transformation through the Internet.Journal of Public Policy,25(1),133-148.
35. 江明修、曾冠球(2009)。政府再造：跨部門治理的觀點。國家菁英季刊，5(1)，97-122。
36. 李長晏(2008)。英國跨域治理的制度發展。研考雙月刊，32(5)，34-45。
37. 林水波、李長晏(2005)。跨域治理。臺北:五南。
38. 林慈玲(2008)。日本的廣域行政。研考雙月刊，32(5)，46-57。
39. 紀俊臣(2008)。論台灣跨域治理的法制及策略。研考雙月刊，32(5)，26-33。
40. 趙永茂(2008)。地方與區域治理發展的趨勢與挑戰。研考雙月刊，32(5)，3-15。

1. 曾冠球,莊文忠,張鐙文,胡龍騰(2019)。電子化跨域治理成效指標之設計與衡量：主觀性測量指標的應用與比較。東吳政治學報，37(1)，1-54。
2. 黃東益,黃宗賢(2023)。當政府開放，「後臺」準備好了嗎？開放政府革新下的組織變革策略。行政暨政策學報，77，1-32。
3. 黃錦堂、林彥超(2015)。公務人員薪俸激勵化之研究─英國、德國與我國之比較法觀察。法令月刊，66(4)，13-56。
4. 賴泱州、楊東謀(2017)。地方政府機關之開放資料影響因素探討：以台中市政府為例。教育資料與圖書館學，54(2)，185-219。
5. 賴怡樺、劉宜君、陳敦源、林昭吟(2018)。專業職能分歧作為另類的跨域治理議題：以衛生福利部為例之初探研究。文官制度季刊，10(2)，21-52。
6. 孫煒(2019)。政府資助地方族群型非營利組織之影響－客家社團的多個案研究。臺灣民主季刊，16(3)，113-154。
7. 孫煒(2022)。臺灣地方族群型文化與藝術活動委外的聯結型治理－以桃園市為例。臺灣民主季刊，19(3)，87-130。
8. 鍾瑞萱、蔡逸敬、王宏文(2018)。臺灣食安管理中的跨域治理：以2014年黑心油品事件為例。政治科學論叢，76，103-158。
9. (2024)。以協力治理觀點探究我國資通安全區域聯防體系。行政暨政策學報，78，33-66。