臺北市青年的飲食行爲及其障礙因素探討

A Study of Dietary Behaviors and the Obstacles to Dietary Behaviors among Youth in Taipei City

10.30026/CJSH.201012.0006

游麗惠(Li-Hui Yu)；鄭惠美(Huey-Mei Jeng)；張嘉莉(Chia-Li Chang)；林大涵(Da-Han Lin)；邱文祥(Allen Wen-Hsiang Chiu)；張惠美(Hui-Mei Chang)；林秀亮(Hsiu-Lian Lin)

青年 ； 飲食行為 ； 障礙因素 ； youth ； diet behaviors ； obstacles

學校衛生

57期（2010 / 12 / 01）

107 - 138

繁體中文

Taipei City youth aged 15 to 24 formed the population under study. A cluster random sample of Taipei City was surveyed. Altogether 259 properly completed questionnaires were generated. Results: Taipei City youth on average took 11.35 meals per week outside the home, or about 54.05% of all meals. Only 1.56% of youth took all meals at home over a week. The youth averaged 20.97 in Body Mass Index and only 11.76% had a BMI above 24. While 42.35% were trying to control weight, 83.78% of youth concurred that diet were important to health. On average, the two most practiced health behaviors per week in decreasing order were eating breakfast (5.13 days) and eating green and yellow vegetables (4.17 days). The least practiced health behaviors were not drinking sugared beverages (2.5 days) and eating whole-grain food (2.87 days). Whether a youth is on a diet, appear to make a statistically significant difference in 6 of 9 measures of healthy eating, and those are the most important factor identified. Other factors identified in decreasing order of influence are eating out, excessive school work, lack of time, and the force of habit or inertia. These factors account for 10.3% to 24.0% of the observed variation in the number of days of healthy behavior practiced in the surveyed population. This study recommends the development of new strategies in health education, adapted to the peculiarities and proclivities of youth, including the adoption of sugar-free beverages as part of popular food culture; the aggressive popularization of health-promoting practices in the workplace; and the creation of eating establishments that support healthy eating outside the home.

Taipei City youth aged 15 to 24 formed the population under study. A cluster random sample of Taipei City was surveyed. Altogether 259 properly completed questionnaires were generated. Results: Taipei City youth on average took 11.35 meals per week outside the home, or about 54.05% of all meals. Only 1.56% of youth took all meals at home over a week. The youth averaged 20.97 in Body Mass Index and only 11.76% had a BMI above 24. While 42.35% were trying to control weight, 83.78% of youth concurred that diet were important to health. On average, the two most practiced health behaviors per week in decreasing order were eating breakfast (5.13 days) and eating green and yellow vegetables (4.17 days). The least practiced health behaviors were not drinking sugared beverages (2.5 days) and eating whole-grain food (2.87 days). Whether a youth is on a diet, appear to make a statistically significant difference in 6 of 9 measures of healthy eating, and those are the most important factor identified. Other factors identified in decreasing order of influence are eating out, excessive school work, lack of time, and the force of habit or inertia. These factors account for 10.3% to 24.0% of the observed variation in the number of days of healthy behavior practiced in the surveyed population. This study recommends the development of new strategies in health education, adapted to the peculiarities and proclivities of youth, including the adoption of sugar-free beverages as part of popular food culture; the aggressive popularization of health-promoting practices in the workplace; and the creation of eating establishments that support healthy eating outside the home.

1. 林淑惠、黃韞臻(2010)。大學生體型和健康自覺與飲食習慣之相關分析。人文與社會學報，2(5)，37-60。
   連結：
2. 林薇、林宜親(2004)。台灣地區青少年節制飲食行為及其影響因素初探。家政敎育學報，6，1-21。
   連結：
3. 范國棟、李蘭(2008)。職場健康促進：國際與台灣經驗之比較。台灣衛誌，27(4)，271-281。
   連結：
4. 陳芬苓(2005)。企業規模與實施職場健康促進之調查研究。台灣管理學科，5(1)，149-168。
   連結：
5. 陳素芬、鄭惠美、照屋博行、李詩鎮(2004)。日本與臺灣小學生生活習慣、生活態度、生活狀況的比較研究。學校衛生，45，1-15。
   連結：
6. 陳惠欣、林薇、周麗端(2008)。影響台灣地區青少年營養知識、態度與行為的個人與家庭因素。台灣衛誌，27(6)，543-555。
   連結：
7. 魏米秀、陳建宏、呂昌明(2005)。應用市場區隔分析大專生蔬果攝取行為之研究─以某技術學院二專部學生為例。衛生敎育學報，23，1-18。
   連結：
8. 行政院衛生署國民健康局（2006）。民國95年國中學生健康行為調查。2010年4月3日摘自國民健康局的健康數字123h網站，http://olap.bhp.doh.gov.tw
9. 臺北市政府衛生局（2010）。健康飲食：天天五蔬果，新食尚運動。2010年9月1日摘自臺北市政府衛生局網站http://www.health.gov.tw/Default.aspx?tabid=569
10. 臺北市政府衛生局（2008）。97年度「天天5蔬果新食尚運動」成果發表會：你今天5蔬果了嗎？ 2010年9月1日摘自臺北市政府衛生局網站http://www.health.gov.tw/Default.aspx?tabid=569&mid=1325&itemid=22037
11. 臺灣癌症基金會（2006）。蔬果風瘋蔬果，吃得健康壽比南山。大學生飲食習慣網路調查。2010年8月30日摘自臺北市政府衛生局網站http://www.health.gov.tw/Default.aspx?tabid=569&mid=1325&itemid=22037
12. 臺北市政府教育局（2009）。97學年度台北市政府教育局瓣李學校衛生與健康促進實施計畫。2010年8月30日摘自臺北市政府教育局網站http://www.edunet.taipei.gov.tw/public/DownFile
13. 臺北市商業管理處（2010）。臺北市登記家數統計表。2010年9月1日摘自臺北市商業管理處網站http://www.tcooc.taipei.gov.tw/public/Data/081214564771.xls
14. 內政部（2010）。戶籍登記現住人口數—按五歲、十歲年齡組分。2010年8月3日 摘自中華民國內政部全球資訊網，http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/month/m1-06.xls
15. United Nations General Assembly. (1985). Youth and the United Nations. Retrieved February 22, 2010, from the United Nations Web site: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unyin/qanda.htm
16. 行政院衛生署（2010）。國民飲食指標。2010年8月3日摘自行政院衛生署食品資訊網， http://food.doh.gov.tw/foodnew/MenuThird.aspx?SecondMenuID=16&ThirdMenuID=104
17. 行政院衛生署（2010）。98年度死因統計。2010年8月3日摘自行政院衛生署網站，http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DM/DM2_2.aspx?now_fod_list_no=11122&class_no=440&level_no=3
18. World Health Organization. (2010). Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. Retrieved August 2, 2010, from the WHO Web site: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/diet/en/index.html
19. World Health Organization. (2004). Fifty-seventh World Health Assembly. Retrieved August 2, 2010, from the WHO Web site: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/events2004/wha57/en/index.html
20. 行政院主計處（2010）。人口靜態統計—現住人口按年齡分。2010年3月11日摘自行政院主計處網站，http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15408&CtNode=4594
21. Alexander, D.(1994).Adolescents and young adult: Overview.Preventive Medicine,23,653-654.
22. Belloc, N. B.,Breslow, L.(1972).Relationship of physical health status and health practices.Preventive medicine,1(3),409-421.
23. Dever, G. E. Alan(1976).An epidemiological model for health policy analysis.Social indicators research,2,453-466.
24. Eaton, D. K.,Kann, L.,Kinchen, S.,Shanlin, S.,Ross, J.,Hawkins, J.,Harris, W. A.,Lowry, R.,McManus, T.,Chyen, D.,Lim, C.,Brener, N. D.,Wechsler, H.(2008).Youth risk behavior surveillance- United States, 2007.MMWR Surveillance Summaries,57,1-131.
25. Grant, D.,Kurosky, S.(2008).Trends in the health of young children in California.UCLA Center Health Policy Research.
26. Hayman, L. L.,Williams, C. L.,Daniels, S. R.,Steinberger, J.,Paridon, S.,Dennison, B. A.,McCrindle, B. W.(2004).Cardiovascular health promotion in the schools: A statement for health and education professionals and child health advocates from the committee on atherosclerosis, hypertension, and obesity in Youth (AHOY) of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young.Circulation,110(15),2267-2275.
27. Jessor, R.(1998).Problem behavior and developmental transition in adolescence.The Journal of School Health,4,295-300.
28. Kestilä, L.,Martelin, T.,Rahkonen, O.,Härkänen, T.,Koskinen, S.(2009).The contribution of childhood circumstances, current circumstances and health behavior to educational health differences in early adulthood.BMC Public Health,9,164-176.
29. Lalonde, M.(1974).A new perspective on the health of Canadians-a working document.Ottawa:Government of Canada.
30. McGinnis, J. M.,Foege, W. H.(1993).Actual causes of death in the United States.JAMA,270,2207-2212.
31. Mechanic, D.(1979).The stability of health and illness behavior: results from a 16-years follow-up.American Journal of Public Health,69(11),1142-1145.
32. National Research Council, Committee on Diet and Health, Food and Nutrition Board, Commission on Life(1989).Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk.Washing, DC:National Academy Press.
33. New Mexico Department of Health(2008).Adolescent Health Data Report.New Mexico:Department of Health.
34. Pignone, M. P.,Ammerman, A.,Fernandez, L.,Orleans, C. T.,Pender, N.,Woolf, S.,Lohr, K. N.,Sutton, S.(2003).Counseling to promote a healthy diet in adults: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.American journal of preventive medicine,24(1),75-92.
35. Rampersaud, G. C.,Pereira, M. A.,Girard, B. I.,Adams, J.,Metal, J.(2005).Breakfast habits, nutritional status, body weight, and academic performance in children and adolescents.Journal Diet Association,105(5),743-760.
36. Siega-Riz, A. M.,Popkin, B. M.,Carson, T.(1998).Trends in breakfast consumption for children in the United States from 1965-1991.American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,67(4),748-756.
37. Timlin, M. T.,Pereira, M. A.,Story, M.,Neumark-Sztainer, D.(2008).Breakfast eating and weight change in a 5-year prospective analysis of adolescents: Project EAT(eating among teens).Pediatrics,121(3),e638-45.
38. Troiano, R. P.,Macera, C. A.,Ballard-Barbash, R.(2001).Be physically active each day. How can we?.Journal Nurtion,131,451-460.
39. WHO-ROTWP(1999).Regional Guidelines for The Development of Healthy Workplaces.Manila:WHO-Regional Office for The Western Pacific.
40. 林金定、羅慶徽、蔡艷清、羅嘉楓、朱明若(2006)。職場健康促進計畫評估初探。中華職業醫學雜誌，13(1)，1-7。
41. 財団法人福岡市健康づくり財団(2003)。福岡市民の生活習慣調查報告。日本:財?法人福岡市健康???財?。
42. 張富琴(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學衛生敎育學系。
43. 陳政友(1999)。大學生健康生活型態與相關因素研究─以國立台灣師範大學四年級學生為例。衛生教育學報，12，115-135。
44. 陳政友(2001)。臺灣地區高中（職）與大專學生健康生活型態與相關因素研究。學校衛生，38，1-31。
45. 陳富莉、李蘭(2001)。臺灣地區不同年齡層民眾的健康行為聚集型態。公共衛生，28(1)，37-47。
46. 章慶堅、胡雪萍(2006)。某學院住宿生營養知識和飲食行為與低密度營養敎育成效研究。台灣營養學會雜誌，31(2)，40-48。
47. 傅安弘、簡嘉靜(2009)。台灣地區大學生屬性對營養知識、飲食態度與飲食行為之影響。台灣營養學會雜誌，34(4)，142-154。
48. 彭紹珆(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市醫學大學保健營養系。
49. 黃松元、陳政友、呂昌明、姜逸群、楊慕慈、胡益進、馬藹屏(2005)。臺北市青少年危害健康行為及相關因子調查研究報告。臺北市:臺北市政府衛生局。
50. 臺北市政府衛生局(2006)。95年度臺北市「健康職場」評核活動說明手冊。臺北市:臺北市政府衛生局。
51. 臺北市政府衛生局(2009)。臺北衛生足跡40年。臺北市:臺北市政府衛生局。

1. 蔡秀金、陳宏斌(2012)。以計劃行為理論探討大學生的健康飲食行為意圖－以國立澎湖科技大學為例。運動休閒餐旅研究，7(3)，78-103。
2. 鄭淑仁、林彥均、周育伶(2011)。健康體重課程對肥胖女學生體重管理與身體適能成效研究─以新竹女中為例。輔仁大學體育學刊，10，245-256。