题名

國小輔導教師實施防制霸凌課程之個案研究

并列篇名

A case study of the anti-bullying courses for elementary school counseling teacher

DOI

10.30026/CJSH.201806_(72).0002

作者

王承諺(Chan-Yan Wang);李明憲(Ming-Shinn Lee)

关键词

專任輔導教師 ; 防制霸凌課程 ; 個案研究 ; elementary school counseling teacher ; anti-bullying courses ; case study method

期刊名称

學校衛生

卷期/出版年月

72期(2018 / 06 / 01)

页次

15 - 28

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究統整2007-2017年的防制霸凌課程的研究,發現欠缺以處遇爲主的防制霸凌課程,也沒有爲專任輔導教師制定的課程,因此本研究透過個案研究法,收集訪談内容、教材大綱、學習單來探討國小專任輔導教師實施霸凌防制課程的動機和目標。研究結果如下:一、授課動機爲處理班上霸凌狀況,二、授課目標偏重「預防」而非「處遇」,與動機相互矛盾,從文獻探討來看,目前欠缺以處遇爲主的防制霸凌課程,教師被迫選擇預防爲主的課程,從研究結果來看,授課時間只有80分鐘,很難實施處遇式課程,因此選擇預防式課程,以講授爲主要方式。

英文摘要

The result of the survey on anti-bullying courses from 2007 to 2017 revealed that it lacked of intervene anti-bullying courses, and there were no courses developed by elementary school counseling teachers. Therefore, this study implemented a case study method and collected counselors' interviews, course materials, and assignments to explore the motivation and purposes of anti-bullying courses. The results of the study were as follows: (1) The motivation for teaching is to deal with the situation of bullying in the class. (2) The teaching purposes focused on "prevention" instead of "interventions", and the purposes and motivation are contradictory. The main reason for choosing a preventive course is that there is few evidence based anti-bullying intervention courses currently, therefore, teachers have no much options. The anti-bullying prevention course is preference for them. Moreover, teaching time is only 80 minutes, there is not enough time to teach anti-bullying intervention courses.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 方朝郁(2016)。教師合作自編國小霸凌防治教材與教學實踐之個案研究。教科書研究,9(2),101-0134。
    連結:
  2. 馮嘉玉、晏涵文(2013)。國中校園霸凌與同儕性騷擾防治介入課程設計與介入效果。臺灣性學學刊,19(1),21-52。
    連結:
  3. 黃資富、張鳳琴、李景美、邱瓊慧(2014)。臺北市高職一年級學生網路霸凌預防教育介入成效評估。學校衛生,64,1-23。
    連結:
  4. Battey, G. L.,Ebbeck, V.(2013).A qualitative exploration of an experiential education bully prevention curriculum.Journal Of Experiential Education,36(3),203-217.
  5. Bauman, S.,Cross, D.,Walker, J. L.(2013).Principles of cyberbullying research: Definitions, measures, and methodology.New York, NY:Routledge.
  6. Goodman-Scott, E.,Doyle, B.,Brott, P.(2014).An action research project to Determine the Utility of Bully Prevention in Positive Behavior Support for Elementary School Bullying Prevention.Professional School Counseling,17(1),120-129.
  7. Olweus, D.(1993).Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do.Malden, MA:Blackwell Publishing.
  8. Pepler, D. & Craig, W. (2014). Bullying prevention and intervention in the school environment: factsheets and tools. Resource prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Education. Available at: www.prevnet.ca/resources/bullying-prevention-facts-and-tools-for-schools
  9. Rigby, K(2010).Bullying interventions in schools: six basic methods.Camberwell:ACER.
  10. Smith, P. K.,Madsen, K.,Moody, J.(1994).What causes the age decline in reports of being bullied in school? Towards a developmental analysis of risks of being bullied.Educational Research,41,267-285.
  11. Willard, N. (2007). Educator's guide to cyberbullying and cyberthreats. Retrieved Nov. 19, 2017, from https://education.ohio.gov/getattachment/Topics/Other-Resources/School-Safety/Safe-and-Supportive-Learning/Anti-Harassment-Intimidation-and-Bullying-Reso urce/Educator-s-Guide-Cyber-Safety.pdf.aspx
  12. Ybarra, M. L.,Mitchell, K. J.(2004).Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth charcteristics.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,45,308-1316.
  13. Yin, R. K.(2009).Case study research: design and methods.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
  14. 王煜凱、吳忻哿(2018)。國民中學專任輔導教師教育實習與實務現場反思。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(1),223-226。
  15. 吳姿霈(2012)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮,國立東華大學。
  16. 李明憲與楊芳茵 (2009)。「推動防制霸凌安全學校計畫」推動手冊。取自: http://www.klhcvs.kl.edu.tw/resources/sammainweb/%E6%96%B0%E5%A2%9E/%E3%80%8C%E6%8E%A8%E5%8B%95%E5%8F%8D%E9%9C%B8%E5%87%8C%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E5%AD%B8%E6%A0%A1%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB%E3%80%8D%E6%8E%A8%E5%8B%95%E6%89%8B%E5%86%8A.pdf
  17. 林嘉璇(2013)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台東,國立台東大學。
  18. 張益瑞、崔夢萍(2014)。數位影片案例教學對國小學童反霸凌知識、社交技巧及同理心之影響。市北教育學刊,47,47-74。
  19. 教育部 (2012)。校園霸凌防制準則。取自:http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll. aspx?PCode=H0020081
  20. 黃建群(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台東,國立臺東大學。
  21. 熊雪娟(2014)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化,國立彰化師範大學。
  22. 歐楊桂櫻(2013)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台南市,南台科技大學。
被引用次数
  1. 鄧文章,陳亦鳳,杜淑芬(2021)。國中輔導教師介入關係霸凌事件的輔導困境與策略。教育心理學報,53(1),223-249。
  2. 趙淑珠,何忻蓓,Shaofan Bu,Ada L. Sinacore(2022)。Teachers' Perceptions of the Implementation of the Bullying Prevention Policies in Taiwan。中華輔導與諮商學報,65,63-91。
  3. (2024)。中學輔導教師對霸凌受害者的輔導策略分析:多向度Rasch模式。教育實踐與研究,37(1),1-34。