题名

桃園市北區國小導師對學童近視防治行為意圖及其相關因素研究

并列篇名

A Study on Elementary School Teachers' Behavioral Intention and Related Factors for School Children Myopia Prevention in the North District, Taoyuan City

DOI

10.30026/CJSH.202312_(77).0001

作者

林慧玲(Heui-Ling Lin);葉國樑(Gwo-Liang Yeh);曾治乾(Chie-Chien Tseng);黃禎貞(Jen-Jen Huang)

关键词

國小教師 ; 近視防治 ; 健康信念 ; 自我效能 ; 行為意圖 ; elementary school teachers ; myopia prevention ; health beliefs ; self-efficacy ; behavior intention

期刊名称

學校衛生

卷期/出版年月

77期(2023 / 12 / 01)

页次

1 - 38

内容语文

繁體中文;英文

中文摘要

以桃園市北區某三個行政區109學年度現職公立國民小學班級導師為母群體,採分層集束抽樣法以學校為抽樣單位,以自編結構式問卷為研究工具,共得有效問卷共341份,有效回收率97.7%。本研究的結果如下:一、研究對象「自覺學童近視罹患性」會因「年齡」、「婚姻狀況」、「是否有子女」、「子女是否近視」而有顯著差異;研究對象「自覺學童近視防治障礙性」會因「教育程度」、「服務年資」、「婚姻狀況」、「是否有子女」而有顯著差異;研究對象「自覺學童近視防治之行動效益」會因「是否有子女」而有顯著差異,而「對學童近視防治之行動線索」則會因「婚姻狀況」、「是否有子女」有顯著差異;另外研究對象對「學童近視防治之自我效能」會因「年齡」、「婚姻狀況」、「是否有子女」、「子女是否近視」、「服務年資」、「任教年級」、「是否參與學童近視防治研習課程」而有顯著差異;而「對學童採取近視防治行為意圖」則會因「性別」而有顯著差異。二、研究對象「自覺學童近視罹患性」、「自覺學童近視嚴重性」、「自覺學童近視防治效益性」越高,而「自覺學童近視防治障礙性」越低者,對學童近視防治行為意圖越高。三、「對學童近視防治健康信念」、「對學童近視防治之自我效能」與「社會人口學變項」可解釋「對學童採取近視防治之行為意圖」達42.6%。其中影響力最大的為「對學童近視防治之自我效能」。

英文摘要

The study focused on current class teachers in public elementary schools within three administrative districts in the North District of Taoyuan City for the academic year 109. Stratified cluster sampling was utilized, with schools as the sampling units. A self-compiled structured questionnaire served as the research tool, and a total of 341 valid responses were collected, resulting in an effective response rate of 97.7%. The study's findings are summarized as follows: 1. Among the study participants, there were significant differences in the health beliefs about "perceived susceptibility of student myopia" based on factors such as "age," "marital status," "parental status," and "whether children have myopia." The "perceived barriers of student myopia prevention" varied significantly depending on factors such as "educational level," "years of service," "marital status," and "parental status." The "perceived benefits of student myopia prevention" differed significantly based on "parental status." Additionally, the "cues to action for student myopia prevention" varied significantly based on "educational level," "marital status," "parental status," "teaching grade," "participation in student myopia prevention workshops" and "involvement as a health and physical education teacher." Moreover, the study participants' "self-efficacy for student myopia prevention" differed significantly based on "age," "parental status," "whether children have myopia," "years of service," "teaching grade," and "participation in student myopia prevention workshops." The "behavior intention for student myopia prevention" varied significantly based on "gender." 2. The study revealed that individuals with higher levels of "perceived susceptibility of student myopia", "perceived severity of student myopia", "perceived benefit of student myopia prevention", "cues to action for student myopia prevention" and those with lower "perceived barriers of student myopia prevention" were more likely to have stronger "behavior intention of student myopia prevention". 3. The variables "health beliefs about student myopia prevention", "self-efficacy for student myopia prevention" and "sociodemographic variables" accounted for 42.6% of the "behavior intention for student myopia prevention". Among these variables, "self-efficacy for student myopia prevention" had the most significant impact.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 郭瑞玲(2008)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
    連結:
  2. 郭瑞玲,陳政友(2009)。台北縣國小教師對學童近視預防的信念與相關教學行為之研究。學校衛生,55,1-18。
    連結:
  3. 陳政友(2013)。我國學幼童近視問題與對策。學校衛生,63,103-110。
    連結:
  4. 彭秀英,林隆光,吳仁宇(2010)。國小及幼稚園教師對學童視力保健知識、態度、行為效能的相關因素研究。學校衛生,56,21-38。
    連結:
  5. 劉乃昀,陳政友(2008)。臺北市家長對兒童採取近視防治行為及其相關因素研究-健康信念模式之應用。學校衛生,52,13-35。
    連結:
  6. Bandura, A.(1977).Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review,94(2),191-215.
  7. Chua, SYL,Sabanayagam, C,Cheung, Y-B,Chia, A,Valenzuela, RK,Tan, D,Wong, TY,Cheng, C-Y,Saw, S-M(2016).Age of onset of myopia predicts risk of high myopia in later childhood in myopic Singapore children.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,36,388-394.
  8. Holden, B. A.,Fricke, T. R.,Wilson, D. A.,Jong, M.,Naidoo, K. S.,Sankaridurg, P.,Wong, T. Y.,Naduvilath, T. J.,Resnikoff, S.(2016).Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050.Ophthalmology,123(5),1036-1042.
  9. Ikuno, Yasushi(2017).Overview of the complications of high myopia.Retina,37(12),2347-2351.
  10. Lam, C. S.,Lam, C. H.,Cheng, S. C.,Chan, L. Y.(2012).Prevalence of myopia among Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren: changes over two decades.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt.,32(1),17-24.
  11. Mayo-Wilson, E.,Ng, S. M.,Chuck, R. S.,Li, T.(2017).The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews.BMC Ophthalmology,17
  12. Moynihan, S.,Paakkari, L.,Välimaa, R.,Jourdan, D.,Mannix-McNamara, P.(2015).Teacher competencies in health education: results of a Delphi study.PLoS One,10(12),e0143703.
  13. Naidoo, K. S.,Fricke, T. R.,Frick, K. D.,Jong, M.,Naduvilath, T. J.,Resnikoff, S.,Sankaridurg, P.(2019).Potential lost productivity resulting from the global burden of myopia: systematic review, meta-analysis, and modeling.Ophthalmology,126(3),338-346.
  14. Palank, C. L.(1991).Determinants of health-promotive behavior. A review of current research.The Nursing Clinics of North America,26(4),815-832.
  15. Rim, T. H.,Kim, S. H.,Lim, K. H.,Choi, M.,Kim, H. Y.,Baek, S. H.(2016).Refractive errors in koreans: the Korea national health and nutrition examination survey 2008-2012.Korean J Ophthalmol,30(3),214-224.
  16. Rose, K. A.,Morgan, I G.,Smith, W.,Burlutsky, G.,Mitchell, P.,Saw, S. M.(2008).Myopia, lifestyle, and schooling in students of Chinese ethnicity in Singapore and Sydney.Arch Ophthalmol,126(4),527-530.
  17. Rosenstock, I. M.(1974).Historical origins of the health belief model.Health Education Monographs,2(4),328-335.
  18. Rosenstock, I. M.,Strecher, V. J.,Becker, M. H.(1988).Social learning theory and the health belief model.Health Education Quarterly,15(2),175-182.
  19. Shahnazi, H,Ahmadi-Livani, M,Pahlavanzadeh, B,Rajabi, A,Hamrah, MS,Charkazi, A.(2020).Assessing preventive health behaviors from COVID-19 based on the health belief model (HBM) among people in Golestan province: a cross-sectional study in northern Iran.Infect Dis Poverty,9(1),157.
  20. World Health Organization (2019). Universal eye health: a global action plan 2014-2019. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment
  21. 中國國家衛生健康委員會(2019)。2018年中國全國兒童青少年近視調查報告。
  22. 牛玉珍,李昭勳,曾文祥(2015)。多元策略對國小四年級學童視力保健知識、態度、行為之成效研究。學校衛生護理雜誌,24,15-32。
  23. 行政院衛生福利部國民健康署(2018).2018國民健康署年報.臺北市:行政院衛生福利部國民健康署企劃組.
  24. 行政院衛生福利部國民健康署 (2015)。近視歷年流行病學調查結果。取自http://www.hpa.gov.tw/BHPNet/Web/HealthTopic/TopicArticle.aspx?No=200712250418&parentid=200712250086
  25. 行政院衛生福利部國民健康署 (2018)。近視是疾病!國健署推動「護眼123」幫孩子從小存視力。取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/fp-3794-41061-1.html
  26. 吳煒涵(2010)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  27. 呂威揚(2014)。良好視力保健從小開始。彰基院訊,31(6),6-7。
  28. 沈希哲,陳政友,劉婉柔,黃世欣,盧玉玫,蔡宛珊,謝雅萍(2008)。台北縣家長對學童採取近視預防行為及其相關因素研究。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌,28,83-110。
  29. 林佳琪(2012)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  30. 林國煌,王溢嘉,吳仁宇,林隆光(2001)。加強學童視力保健座談會。健康世界,181(301),21-27。
  31. 林麗媛(2011)。臺南市,國立臺南大學。
  32. 邱皓政(2006).量化研究與統計分析.台北:五南.
  33. 施永豐,蕭朱杏,江亭萱(2004)。行政院衛生署國民健康局2004年委託實證回顧研究行政院衛生署國民健康局2004年委託實證回顧研究,行政院衛生署國民健康局。
  34. 倪翊茹(2017)。新竹市,元培醫事科技大學。
  35. 張雅筑(2005)。臺北市,國立臺北教育大學。
  36. 教育部 (2017)。教育部體育司加強學童視力保健五年計畫檢討報告。國健署106年度委託台大醫院團隊進行「兒童青少年視力監測調查」。
  37. 教育部 (2015)。104學年學童視力防治計畫簡介。取自http://hpshome.hphe.ntnu.edu.tw/Admin/uploadFiles/elearning/2015/05-1015/01/index.html
  38. 教育部統計處 (2019)。108 (2019-2020)學年度各級學校基本資料。取自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/News.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96
  39. 陳木琳(2004)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  40. 陳佳欣(2015)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  41. 湯仁燕(1993)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  42. 楊心慈(2015)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  43. 楊惠芳,劉薇君(2014)。學校健康促進議題飛盤教學之視力保健推展對國小特殊學童視力影響研究。惠明特殊教育學刊,1,79-90。
  44. 劉乃昀(2005)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  45. 蕭雅娟,蔡景耀,翁林仲,劉秀雯,游麗惠(2012)。為靈魂之窗把關從小做起。臺北市醫師公會會刊,56(3),38-40。