衝突左轉車道之停等車疏解行為分析

Analysis on Queue Discharge Behavior of Opposed Left-turn Lanes

10.29774/UT.200806.0003

曾平毅(Pin-Yi Tseng)；張瓊文(Chiung-Wen Chang)；張倩宜(Chiann-Yi Chang)

號誌化路口 ； 衝突左轉車道 ； 臨界間距 ； 停等車疏解行為 ； Signalized intersections ； Opposed left-turn lane ； Critical gap ； Queue discharge behavior

都市交通

23卷1期（2008 / 06 / 01）

34 - 47

繁體中文

號誌化路口衝突左轉車道之疏解行為相當複雜，但國內之相關研究並不多。本研究將衝突左轉之疏解行為解構為先行左轉、強行左轉、利用間距左轉及燈號轉換期間左轉等四項主要行為，迴轉行為暫未納入分析。本研究利用了11個衝突左轉車道之錄影資料，輔以22個車道探討先行左轉行為，進行各項基礎之交通行為分析。透過現場資料分析，本研究分別探討臺北市與臺北市以外之其他地區的各項疏解行為特性，並進行比較分析，結果發現：(1)臺北市先行左轉之情形很少，其他地區較多；(2)其他地區強行左轉之週期百分比亦明顯高於臺北市；(3)臨界間距之大小在郊區路口有隨對向車道數之正向關係，但臺北市之資料則無明顯關聯；(4)臺北市於燈號轉換時段能疏解之車輛數平均為2.9小車／週期，但郊區沒有適當的觀測值。進一步衡酌臺北市交通負荷較重而其他地區一般交通負荷相較低，此特性可作為前述行為之合理解釋。

The behavior of opposed left turn traffic at signalized intersections was complicated. However, there were scarce researches about opposed left turn in Taiwan. Opposed left turn behavior in this study were decomposed as four major parts: leading-left-turn, forced opposed-flow left-turn, gap acceptance left-turn, and change interval left-turn. This study tried to analyze the basic behavior by field data collected on 11 opposed left turn lanes and 22 leading-left-turn lanes. Moreover, the behavior of Taipei city were compared with those of other city. There were four major findings in this study. (1) Leading-left-turn behavior were very seldom found in Taipei, but those were often found in other cities. (2) The probability of vehicle forced opposed-flow to left turn in other cities was significantly higher than those in Taipei. (3) The acceptance gaps to left turn was alike positive related with the number of lanes in opposed flow at suburban signalized intersections, however, there were no significant relationship for the signalized intersections in Taipei. (4) The discharge vehicles on signal change intervals were about 2.9 vehicles per cycle in Taipei. The above-mentioned different behavior at signalized intersections between in Taipei and other cities could be explained by different traffic situations, that is, the traffic of Taipei was always heavier than that of other cities.

1. 曾平毅、張瓊文、陳文斌(2006)。無衝突左轉停等車之疏解特性。運輸計劃季刊，35(2)，233-260。
   連結：
2. Gattis, J. L.,Low, S T.(1999).Gap Acceptance at Atypical Stop-Controlled Intersections.ASCE Journal of Transportation,125(3),201-207.
3. Raff, M. S.,Hart, J. W.(1950).A Volume Warrant for Urban stop Signs.ENO Foundation for Highway Traffic Control.
4. 交通部運輸研究所(2007)。市區號誌化路口容量分析及服務水準研究(2/2)。
5. 交通部運輸研究所(2005)。臺灣地區郊區多車道公路容量及特性研究（三）。
6. 交通部運輸研究所(2001)。2001年臺灣地區公路容量手冊。
7. 朱松偉(1994)。左轉直行共用車道飽和流率與容量推估方法之檢討。都市交通，74，57-66。
8. 朱松偉(1994)。左轉直行共用車道飽和流率與號誌時制設計互動關係之研究。都市交通，77，4-21。
9. 金慶松(1986)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺灣大學土木研究所。
10. 孫信泰(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。交通大學交通運輸研究所。
11. 曹壽民、朱松偉(1993)。雙左轉車道之飽和流率推估。中華民國運輸學會第八屆學術論文研討會論文集
12. 曹壽民、朱松偉(1994)。直行車道與左轉專用車道重車調整因子之研究。中國土木水利工程學刊，6(4)，457-465。
13. 許育齊(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。逢甲大學建築及都市計畫研究所。
14. 曾平毅、張瓊文、張倩宜(2007)。號誌化路口衝突左轉行為之解析。中華民國運輸學會第二十二屆學術論文研討會
15. 蕭淑微(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺灣大學土木工程研究所。

1. 張瓊文、林豐博(2013)。以測試車調查都市幹道旅行速率之誤差分析。運輸學刊，25(3)，399-420。