The Effect of Passing Rate of CPA Examination on the Industrial Structure of Accounting Firms in Taiwan

10.30166/PPMR.200207.0004

Anlin Chen；Roger C. Y. Chen；Wenchih Lee

Auditing Market ； Industrial Structure of Accounting Firms ； Earnings of CPA Firms ； Passing Rate of CPA exam

Pan-Pacific Management Review

5卷2期（2002 / 07 / 01）

155 - 170

英文

Auditing report conveys useful information about the financial condition of a firm to the public and is costly to the firm. In Taiwan, the passing rate of the certified public accountant (CPA) exam is quite low before 1988. However, the Examination Yuan in Taiwan raises the passing rate of CPA exam since 1988. Due to the increase of the passing rate, the auditing market is full of CPAs and the market becomes more competitive. This paper examines the effect of the passing rate of CPA exam on the industrial structure of accounting firms and the earnings of CPA firms. Basically, we find that the earnings of CPA firms is positively related to the market share, on-job training costs, labor costs and lawsuit risk. Moreover, the earnings of CPA firms decline after the increase of the passing rate due to a more competitive market. We also find that the on-job training becomes more significant after the increase of the passing rate but the market share becomes less significant. Obviously, the increase of the CPA passing rate induces the accounting firms to spend more education expenditure in raising the quality of their practicing CPA and thus the audit quality. However, the market share of accounting firms is less significant because the market is more competitive after the increase of the passing rate of the CPA exam. Our results are consistent with the theoretical arguments on the agency costs and the monopoly power of the market.

1. Chan, D.(1999).Low-Balling and Efficiency in a Two-Period Specialization Model of Auditing Competition.Contemporary Accounting Research,16,609-642.
2. Chow, C.(1982).The Demand for External Auditing: Size, Debt and Ownership Influences.The Accounting Review,272-291.
3. Chow, C.,S. Rice(1982).Qualified Audit Opinions and Auditor Switching.The Accounting Review,325-335.
4. Chow, G.(1960).Tests for Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions.Econometrica,28,591-605.
5. Cowling, K.,M. Waterson(1976).Economica.
6. Cullinan, C.(1998).Evidence of Non-Big 6 Market Specification and Pricing Power in a Niche Assurance Service Market.Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory,17,47-67.
7. DeAngelo, L.(1981).Auditor Independence, Low Balling, and Disclosure Regulation.Journal of Accounting and Economics,113-127.
8. DeAngelo, L.(1981).Auditor Size and Audit Quality.Journal of Accounting and Economics,183-199.
9. DeFond, M.(1992).The Association Between Changes in Client Firm Agency Costs and Auditor Switching.Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory,15-31.
10. Defond, M.,J. Francis,T. J. Wong(2000).Auditor Industry Specificatin and Market Segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong.Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory,19,49-66.
11. Dopuch, N.,D. Simunic(1982).The Competition in Auditing: An Assessment.The Fourth Symposium Research, University of Illinois.
12. Eichenseher, J.,D. Shields(1989).Structure and Auditor "Fit".Advances in Accounting.
13. Francis, J.,E. Wilson(1988).Auditor Changes: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation.Accounting Review,63,663-682.
14. Healy, P.,T. Lys(1986).Auditor Changes Following Big Eight Mergers with Non big Eight Audit Firms.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,5(Winter),251-265.
15. Hogan, C.,D. Jeter(1999).Industry Specification by Auditors.Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory,18,1-17.
16. Intriligator, M. D.(1996).Econometric Models, Techniques and Applications.Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall.
17. Judge, G.,W. Griffiths,R. Hill,H. Lutkepohl,T. Lee(1986).The Theory and Practice of Econometrics.New York:John Wiley.
18. Menon, K.,D. Williams(1991).Auditor Credibility and Initial Public Offerings.Accounting Review,66,313-332.
19. Nichols, K.,D. Smith(1983).Auditor Credibility and Auditor Changes.Journal of Accounting Research,21,534-544.
20. Palmrose, Z.(1984).The Demand for Quality-Differentiated Audit Services in an agency Setting: an Empirical Investigation.The Sixth Illinois Auditing Research symposium.
21. Pong, C.(1999).Auditor Concentration: A Replication and Extension for the UK Audit Market 1991-1995.Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,26,451-475.
22. Schwartz, K.,K. Menon(1985).Auditor Switches by Falling Firms.Accounting Review.
23. Shockley, R.,R. Holt(1983).A Behavioral Investigation of Supplier Differentiation in the Market for Audit Services.Journal of Accounting Research,545-564.
24. Simunic, D.(1980).The Pricing of Audit Service: Theory and Evidence.Journal of Accounting Research,117-161.
25. Simunic, D.,M. Stein(1987).Product Differentiation in Auditing: Auditor Choice in the Market for Unseasoned New Issues.The Canadian Certified General Accountants` Research Foundation.
26. Tinic, S.(1988).Anatomy of Initial Public Offerings of Common Stock.Journal of Finance,43,789-822.
27. Weng, C. C(1998).PhD dissertation, Department of Economics.Taipei, Taiwan:National Cheng Chi University.

1. 蔡淑芬、侍台誠(2014)。智慧資本對會計師事務所經營效率之影響─以聯合執業會計師事務所為例。輔仁管理評論，21(2)，55-84。
2. 陳燕錫、李家琪(2006)。管理顧問與會計師事務所策略聯盟之績效探討－資源基礎理論觀點。管理與系統，13(4)，499-522。
3. 傅鍾仁、陳燕錫、林昭伶(2008)。價格管制解除、市場佔有率與財務績效—以合夥型會計師事務所爲例。商管科技季刊，9(2)，169-196。
4. 管國珍、陳燕錫、陳筱平(2011)。訓練與會計師事務所財務績效：考慮策略與市場區隔之影響。人力資源管理學報，11(4)，23-46。
5. 黃媺婷、陳燕錫、許智順(2011)。市場區隔下：會計師事務所經營績效決定因素探討。會計學報，4(1)，51-94。
6. 林昭伶(2013)。以區域觀點為基礎探討我國審計市場競爭對會計師產業績效之影響。會計評論，56，1-38。
7. 鍾彥良、侍台誠(2014)。臺灣地區會計師事務所效率評估─二階段資料包絡分析法之應用。Journal Of Data Analysis，9(3)，63-98。
8. (2006)。管理顧問與會計師事務所策略聯盟之績效探討—資源基礎理論觀點。管理與系統，13(4)，499-522。