The Impact Of Journal Ranking Systems on Emerging Journals and Academic Freedom: How Should Academics Respond?

10.30166/PPMR.201207.0003

Dennis Tourish

Pan-Pacific Management Review

15卷2期（2012 / 07 / 01）

169 - 183

英文

Pressure on academics to publish articles in 'top' journals continues to grow. In consequence, we have seen a proliferation of journal rankings, purporting to provide a guide to the quality of journals. As editors become more preoccupied by the ranking of 'their' journal, they also exercise performative power over authors, by setting standards for publication that exclude many while compelling those that are published to adapt to the styles, priorities and imperatives of editors. One result has been a ceaseless quest for novelty, expressed in an insistence that each paper must make a 'distinctive' theoretical contribution. This is producing an environment in which scholarship is increasingly mechanised and industrialised, while rendering its outputs more arcane and inaccessible non-specialists. It also means that academics are becoming ever more complicit in their own subordination to performative processes that we frequently criticise when observing them in the outside, 'real' world of management practice. We are therefore seeing more barriers to entry for both authors and new journals - unless both conform to norms that bear an orthodox but often sterile imprint. I consider the implications of these issues for emergent journalsand academic freedom, while also suggesting how academics should respond.

1. Adler, N.,Harzing, A.(2009).When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings.Academy of Management Learning and Education,8,72-95.
2. Barney, J.(1991).Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.Journal of Management,17,99-120.
3. Colquitt, J.,Zapata-Phelan, C.(2007).Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five decade study of the Academy of Management Journal.Academy of Management Journal,50,1281-1303.
4. Davis, G.(2010).Do theories of organizations progress?.Organizational Research Methods,13,690-709.
5. Dunne, S.,Harney, S.,Parker, M.(2008).The responsibilities of management intellectuals.Organization,15,271-282.
6. Edwards, J.(2010).Reconsidering theoretical progress in organizational and management research.Organizational Research Methods,13,615-619.
7. Gabriel, Y.(2010).Organization Studies: A space for ideas, identities and agonies.Organization Studies,31,757-775.
8. Gephart, R.(2004).From the editors: Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal.Academy of Management Journal,47,454-462.
9. Giacalone, R.(2009).Academic rankings in research institutions: A case of skewed mind-sets and professional amnesia.Academy of Management Learning and Education,8,122-126.
10. Glynn, M.,Raffaeli, R.(2010).Uncovering mechanisms of theory development in an academic field: Lessons from leadership research.The Academy of Management Annals,4,359-401.
11. Grey, C.(2010).Organizing studies: Publications, politics and polemic.Organization Studies,31,677-694.
12. Grey, C.,Sinclair, A.(2006).Writing differently.Organization,13,443-453.
13. Hambrick, D. C.(2007).The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing.Academy of Management Journal,50,1346-1352.
14. Kacmar, K.,Whitfield, J.(2000).An additional rating method for journal articles in the field of management.Organizational Research Methods,3,392-406.
15. Lawrence, P.(2008).Lost in publication: How measurement harms science.Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics,2008(January),1-3.
16. Learmonth, M.(2008).Evidence-based management: A backlash against pluralism in organizational studies.Organization,15,283-291.
17. Lyotard, J.(1984).The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
18. Madden, C.,Easley, R.,Dunn, M.(1995).How journal editors view replication research.Journal of Advertising,24,77-87.
19. McGrath, R.(2007).No longer a stepchild: How the management field can come into its own.Academy of Management Journal,50,1365-1378.
20. Mckinley, W.(2010).Organizational theory development: Displacement of ends?.Organization Studies,31,47-68.
21. Nkomo, S.(2009).The seductive power of academic journal rankings: Challenges of searching for the otherwise.Academy of Management Learning and Education,8,106-112.
22. Pfeffer, J.(1993).Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable.Academy of Management Review,18,599-620.
23. Rynes, S.(2007).Academy of Management Journal editor's forum on research with relevance to practice. Editor's foreword; carrying Sumantra Ghoshal's torch: Creating more positive, relevant and ecologically valid research.Academy of Management Journal,50,745-747.
24. Segalla, M.(2008).Editorial: Publishing in the right place or publishing the right thing.European Journal of International Management,2,122-127.
25. Singh, G.,Haddad, K.,Chow, C.(2007).Are articles in "top" management journals necessarily of higher quality?.Journal of Management Inquiry,16,319-331.
26. Smith, K.(Ed.),Hitt, M.(Ed.)(2005).Great minds in management: The process of theory development.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
27. Starkey, K.,Tiratsoo, N.(2007).The business school and the bottom line.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
28. Sutton, R.,Staw, B.(1995).What theory is not.Administrative Science Quarterly,40,371-384.
29. Weick, K.(1995).What theory is not, theorizing is.Administrative Science Quarterly,40,385-390.