题名

影響綠色大學教職員採取環保行為意願之因素以台灣北部某大學為例

并列篇名

The Factors to Influence Staff's Intention to Adopt Environmental Behavior in Green University: An Example of Green University in North Taiwan

DOI

10.30105/JDS.201407_17(1).0004

作者

沈盛達(Sheng-Ta Shen)；邱弘毅(Hung-Yi Chiou)

关键词

綠色大學 ； 計畫行為理論 ； 新生態典範 ； 環保行為 ； Green University ； Theory of Planned Behavior ； New Ecological Paradigm ； Environmental Behavior

期刊名称

設計學研究

卷期/出版年月

17卷1期（2014 / 07 / 01）

页次

71 - 90

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

台灣在「綠色大學」的相關研究尚在起步階段，大多數公私立大專院校也才正開始著手進行「綠色大學」之工作，若要加速綠色大學擴散與深化的速度，本研究認為應可從了解教職員的心理與行為開始。因此，本研究以計畫行為理論（theory of planned behavior, TPB）為主軸，來探討有哪些因素會影響台灣綠色大學內教職員採取環保行為的意願，以及運用新生態典範量表（new ecological paradigm, NEP）來了解環境素養是否會影響態度。本研究運用問卷調查的方式訪問了182位大學的教職員，結果發現：受訪者雖然認同新生態典範的精神，但仍存有人類中心主義思想。在TPB的結果分析上，態度是影響受訪教職員採行環保行為意願的最主要因素，提升環境意識能夠強化受訪者對綠色大學與環保行為的態度；知覺行為控制、主觀規範也都是影響受訪者採行環保行為意願的重要因子。
英文摘要

Studies in green university and related topics were still in the very beginning stage in Taiwan, as well as greening work just started in most universities in Taiwan. To speed up the spreading and deepening of green university, understanding the minds and behavior of staff on campus can be a good start for the work. Using the theory of planned behavior as fundamental framework, this study aimed to discover the factors that have influence on intention of staff to carry out environmental behaviors. New ecological paradigm (NEP) was also adapted to see if environmental literacy exerted a strong influence on attitude. A survey was used to interview 182 staff in the participant university. The result showed that although interviewees approved of principles of NEP, the participants maintained a self-centered mindset. Analysis on the result of TPB showed that attitude is the most influential factor for staff to take environmental behavior, and enhanced environmental awareness could strengthen attitude towards green university. Perceived behavior control, subjective norms were also factors of intention of participant staff members.
主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
参考文献
  1. United Nations Environment Programme (2007),'Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment', website: http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=97&ArticleID=1503 (accessed: November 11, 2013)
  2. 葉欣誠(2009)，〈綠色大學〉，網址:http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:KkvV3QZ2US0J:oga.ncut.edu.tw/ncut_oga_2013/front/down.php%3Fdata%3D985+&cd=1&hl=zh-TW&ct=clnk&gl=tw (上網日期:March 3, 2014)
  3. Ajzen, I.(1988).Attitudes, Personality and Behavior.Chicago:The Dorsey Press.
  4. Ajzen, I.(1991).The theory of planned behaviour.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50,179-211.
  5. Ajzen, I.,Madden, T. J.(1986).Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,22(5),453-474.
  6. Albretch, D.,Bultena, G.,Holberg, E.,Nowak, P.(1982).The new environmental paradigm scale.Journal of Environmental Education,13,39-43.
  7. Armitage, C. J.,Conner, M.(2001).Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review.British Journal of Social Psychology,40,471-499.
  8. Best, H.(2008).Organic agriculture and the conventionalization hypothesis: A case study from West Germany.Agriculture and Human Values,25,95-106.
  9. Ceren, T.,Dilek S. K.,Elvan, S.(2011).A study on teacher candidates' recycling behaviors: A model approach with the theory of planned behaviour.Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences,special issue,29-36.
  10. Chu, P.Y.,Chiu, J. F.(2003).Factors influencing household waste recycling behavior: Test of an integrated model.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,33,604-626.
  11. Corral-Verdugo, V.,Armendariz, L. I.(2000).The New Environmental Paradigm in a Mexican Community.The Journal of Environmental Education,31(3),25-32.
  12. Diekmann, A.,Preisendo, P.(2000).The Wealth of Nations and Environmental Concern.Environment and Behavior,31,540-549.
  13. Dunlap, R. E.,Van Liere, K. D.,Merting, A. G.,Jones, R. E.(2000).Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale.Journal of Social Issues,56(3),425-442.
  14. Fleer, M.(2002).Curriculum Compartmentalisation? A future perspective on environmental education.Environmental Education Research,8(2),138-154.
  15. Hartmann, P.,Apaolaza-Ibanez, V.(2008).Virtual nature experiences as emotional benefits in green product consumption: The moderating role of environmental attitudes.Environment and Behavior,40,818-842.
  16. Hines, J. M.,Hungerford, H.R.,Tomera, A. N.(1986).Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis.The Journal of Environmental Education,18(2),1-8.
  17. Hwang, Y. H.,Kim, S. I.,Jeng, J. M.(2000).Examining the causal relationships among selected antecedents of responsible environmental behaviour.The Journal of Environmental Education,31(4),19-25.
  18. Thapa, B.(1999).Environmentalism: The relation of environmental attitudes and environmentally responsible behaviors among undergraduate students.Bulletin of Science,Technology & Society,18(5),426-438.
  19. Vogel, S.(1999).Farmers environmental attitudes and behavior: A case study for Austria.Environment and Behavior,28(5),591-613.
  20. 吳明峰(2008)。SPSS操作與應用問卷統計分析實務。台北:五南。
  21. 吳明峰(2011)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所。
  22. 張南華、蕭文達、陳銘雄、邱建誠(2009)。朝陽科技大學推動綠色大學的現況與展望2009年。第四屆綠色大學理論與實務國際研討會，台北:
  23. 黃竣豊(2012)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學科學應用與推廣學系。
  24. 葉欣誠、莊育禎、黃瓊慧(2005)。綠色大學的評鑑工具發展。第二屆綠色大學理論與實務研討會論文集，高雄:
  25. 鄭時宜(2004)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所。
  26. 蕭新煌(1999)。台灣環境意識與價值研究1999。調查研究，7，79-82。
  27. 蕭新煌(1986)。新環境典範與社會變遷：台灣民眾環境價值的初探。台大社會學刊，18，81-134。
被引用次数
  1. 林昀萱,林明瑞(2022)。民眾颱風、洪水風險及災害調適行為模式之研究。災害防救科技與管理學刊，11(1)，77-102。
  2. 沈盛達(2015)。影響民眾到綠色醫院接受醫療服務意願之研究─以台灣北部某綠色醫院為例。設計學研究，18(1)，73-97。
print cancel