题名

從生活型態觀點探討消費者對空調機美感認知之研究

并列篇名

A Study of Consumers' Aesthetic Perception from Perspective of Consumers' Life Styles-Taking Air Conditioners as Examples

DOI

10.30105/JDS.201407_17(1).0005

作者

陳文亮(Wen-Liang Chen);江雅媚(Ya-Mei Chiang)

关键词

產品美學 ; 生活型態 ; 空調機 ; Product aesthetics ; Life Style ; Air Conditioner

期刊名称

設計學研究

卷期/出版年月

17卷1期(2014 / 07 / 01)

页次

91 - 112

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

近年來產品的視覺外觀顯著影響消費者對產品的認知,使得美感相關主義題逐漸受到重視,因此本研究將以空調機產品為例,藉由問卷調查探討個人之生活型態對於產品美感的偏好。研究藉由生活型態經因素分析後,再透過集群方法歸納出三種不同生活型態的族群,而各族群對於產品美感的認知與訴求不盡相同。研究發現想法中立的人數佔最多,此族群的人偏好空間使用方式、整體性與質感;另外,生活單純保守務實的族群,比較在意物品的實用性勝於物品的外觀形式,偏好空間使用方式、整體性與大小;而屬於比較活躍、資源豐沛及受過藝術訓練者的族群,對於流行的趨勢與事物外在的呈現比較會有自己的意見與想法,偏好質感、空間使用方式與整體性,而且也會強調產品的風格、意象、獨創性或新穎性等。另外空調機的使用方式與整體性這二項偏好因子是所有偏好因子中最為明顯的特徵,而幾何造形是偏好最低的因子。此結果進一步地了解生活型態不同的受訪者,其對於空調機偏好的美感存在著差異性。根據研究結果,提供業者或設計者設計產品之參考。

英文摘要

In recent years, visual appearances of products have significantly influenced consumers' perception, and therefore, aesthetic-related issues have gradually caught attention. This paper, takes air conditioners for example, tends to explore consumers' personal life styles and their preferences for appearances of products by distributing questionnaires. The participants were divided into three groups by Cluster Analysis. Each group has different aesthetic perception. The study found that most people belong to the "neutral" group, and they prefer space usage, integrity and texture. The second group which has conservative and pragmatic life styles cares practical use than appearance, space usage, and size. People in third group are more active, resource-abundant and well-trained, and they have their own opinions and ideas about trends and presenting styles. They prefer the texture, space usage and integrity of the product, and they put emphasis on products' styles, images, originality or novelty and so on. On the other hand, among the preferences, the usage of air conditioners and integrity are two most obvious factors, while geometric appearance is lowest. This result further investigated consumers in different life styles have different preferences of aesthetic perception. Results of the study can be provided as references for product industry and designers.

主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
参考文献
  1. 伊彬、林演慶(2008)。近一世紀審美實徵研究趨勢。設計學報,13(2),1-29。
    連結:
  2. 林永森、林姵伶(2008)。學生族群對運動鞋的消費決策型態與品牌忠誠度關係之研究。運動休閒管理學報,5(1),57-72。
    連結:
  3. 侯嘉政、傅柏霖(2008)。產品涉入與品牌涉入對品牌忠誠度之影響─以數位相機為例。行銷評論,5(1),27-56。
    連結:
  4. 高清漢(2002)。從風格原型─看泳鏡造形特徵與意象的關係。設計學報,7(1),33-47。
    連結:
  5. 張文智、林旻樺(2004)。產品造形意象與造形特徵之相關性研究。設計學報,9(3),59-70。
    連結:
  6. 莊修田、陳文麗(2003)。空間印象、生活型態與忠誠度關係之研究:以星巴克為例。設計學研究,6(1),81-99。
    連結:
  7. 莊修田、劉時泳、劉懿瑾(2009)。大學生對建築空間之美感評量。設計學研究,12(1),153-173。
    連結:
  8. 陳俊智、莊明振(2006)。以行動電話為例探討灰色田口方法於產品美感品質最佳化設計之研究。設計學報,1(1),65-81。
    連結:
  9. 陳殿禮、洪珮芬(2009)。工藝家具參觀者生活型態與造形意象偏好之研究。設計學報,14(2),19-36。
    連結:
  10. 曾信超、李昀真、黃先鋒(2009)。建構行動電話加值服務市場區隔:以消費者生活型態、滿意度與忠誠度為變數。行銷評論,6(2),249-298。
    連結:
  11. 黃幹忠、劉薇玲、古雅芳(2012)。購屋者對負面風水之認知程度及其對購屋意願的影響─以台南市為例。建築與規劃學報,13(1),27-44。
    連結:
  12. 鄭健雄、劉孟奇(2001)。國人渡假生活型態量表建構之初探─以墾丁國家公園遊客為例。戶外遊憩研究,14(3),57-80。
    連結:
  13. 譚大純、陳正男、賴孟寬(2000)。生活型態量表之適合度檢驗、因素重組與趨勢比較:以ICP生活型態量表為例。調查研究,8,79-102。
    連結:
  14. 東方線上(2010),〈東方消費者行銷資料庫(2012)〉,網址:http://www.isurvey.com.tw/3_product/1_eicp.aspx (查詢日期:2013.01.10)。http://www.isurvey.com.tw/3_product/1_eicp.aspx
  15. (2010)。,高雄:。
  16. (1991).Object and Images-Studies in design and advertising.
  17. Maslow, A. H. (1943), A theory of human motivation, Psychological Review, (50), pp. 370-396
  18. Abbey, J.(1979).Does life-style profiling work?.Journal of Travel Research,18(1),8-14.
  19. Altman, I.(Ed.),Wohlwill, J.F.(Ed.)(1976).Human Behavior and the Environment: Advances in Theory and Research.New York:Plenum.
  20. Audi, R.(Ed.)(1995).The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
  21. Babakus, E.,Mangold, W. G.(1992).Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation.Health Services Research,26(6),767-786.
  22. Bearden, W.O.,Teel, J.E.,Durand, R.M.(1978).Media usage, psychographic and demographic dimensions of retail shoppers.Journal of Retailing,54(1),65-74.
  23. Blijlevens, J.,Creusen, Marielle E. H.,Schoormans, Jan P. L.(2009).How consumers perceive product appearance: the identification of three product appearance attributes.International Journal of Design,3(3),27-35.
  24. Bloch, P. H.,Brunel, F. F.,Arnold, T. J.(2003).Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: concept and measurement.Journal of Consumer Research,29(4),551-565.
  25. Bolton, R. N.,Drew, J. H.(1991).A multistage model of consumer's assessment of service quality and value.Journal of Consumer Research,17,375-384.
  26. Brown, M. B.,Forsythe, A. B.(1974).Robust tests for equality of variances.Journal of the American Statistical Association,69,364-367.
  27. Chan, C. S.(1992).Exploring individual style in design.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,19,503-523.
  28. Chang, W. C.,Wu, T. Y.(2007).Exploring types and characteristics of product forms.International Journal of Design,1(1),3-14.
  29. Chen, K. H.,Owen, C.(1997).Form language and style description.Design Studies,18(3),249-274.
  30. Crilly, N.,Moultrie, J.,Clarkson, P. J.(2004).Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design.Design Studies,25(6),547-577.
  31. Darden, W. R.,Perreault, W. D.(1975).A multivariate analysis of media exposure & vacation behavior with life style covariates.Journal of Consumer Research,2(2),93-103.
  32. Darden, W.R.,Ashton, D.(1974).Psychographic profiles of patronage preference groups.Journal of Retailing,50(4),99-112.
  33. Flannery, M. C.(1991).Science and aesthetics: A partnership for science education.Science Education,75(5),577-593.
  34. Games, P. A.,Howell, J. F.(1976).Pairwise multiple comparison procedures with unequal N's and/or variances: A Monte Carlo study.Journal of Educational Statistics,1,113-125.
  35. Gilbert, F.W.,Warren, W.E.(1995).Psychographic constructs and demographic segments.Psychology and Marketing,12(3),223-237.
  36. Gladwell, N. J.(1990).A psychographic and sociodemographic analysis of State Park Inn users.Journal of Travel Research,28(4),15-20.
  37. Hair, J., Jr.,Anderson, R.,Tatham, R.,Black, W.(1998).Multivariate Data Analysis.New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
  38. Hill, K. Q.,Fowles, J.(1975).The methodological worth of the Delphi forecasting technique.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,7,179-192.
  39. Hui, M.,Joy, A.,Kim, C.,Laroche, M.(1993).Equivalence of lifestyle dimensions across four major subcultures in Canada.Journal of International Consumer Marking,5(3),15-35.
  40. Kaiser, H. F.(1974).An index of factorial simplicity.Psychometrika,39,31-36.
  41. Kelly, G. A.(1975).The Psychology of Personal Constructs.N. Y.:Norton Co..
  42. Kotler, P.(1991).Marketing Management.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
  43. Lazer, W.(1963).Life style concepts and marketing.Towards Scientific Marketing,Chicago:
  44. Lewalski, Z. M.(1988).Product Esthetics-an interpretation for designers.Carson City, Nevada:Design and Development Engineering Press.
  45. Mastandres, S.,Zani, A.,Giuliani, M. V.,Bore, G.(1992).Meaning of industrial design objects: from designer to users.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,19,307-319.
  46. Moore, G.(Ed.),Zube, E.(Ed.)(1991).Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design.New York:Plenum Press.
  47. Moschis, G.P.(1976).Shopping orientations and consumer uses of information.Journal of Retailing,52(2),61-70.
  48. Murry, J. W.,Hammons, J. O.(1995).Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research.The Review of Higher Education,18(4),423-436.
  49. Nagamachi, M.(1995).Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,15(1),3-11.
  50. Nasar, J. L.(1989).Symbolic meanings of house styles.Environment and Behavior,21,235-257.
  51. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychology theory.N. Y.:McGraw-Hill.
  52. Orth, U. R.,Malkewitz, K.(2008).Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions.Journal of Marketing,72(3),64-81.
  53. Osman, M. Z.(1993).A conceptual model of retail image influences on loyalty patronage behavior.International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research,3(2),133-148.
  54. Plummer, J. T.(1974).The concept and application of life style segmentation.Journal of Marketing,38(1),33-37.
  55. Reynoles, F.D.,Darden, W.R.(1972).Intermarket patronage: A psychographic study of consumer out-shoppers.Journal of Marketing,36(4),50-54.
  56. Schewe, C. D.,Calantone, R.(1978).Psychographic segmentation of tourists.Journal of Travel Research,16(3),14-20.
  57. Schmitt, B. H.,Simonson, A.,Marcus, J.(1995).Corporate aesthetics: managing your company's image and identity.Long Range Planning,28(5),82-92.
  58. Silverberg, K. E.,Backman, S. J.,Backman, K. F.(1996).A preliminary investigation into the psychographics of nature-based travelers to the Southeastern United States.Journal of Travel Research,30,19-28.
  59. Stewart, T. R.(1987).The Delphi technique and judgmental forecasting.Climatic Change,11,97-113.
  60. Tjalve, E.(1979).A short course in industrial design.London:Butterworth & Co Ltd..
  61. Valentine, C. W.(1968).The experimental psychology of beauty.London:Methuen.
  62. Veryzer, R. W.(1995).The place of product design and aesthetics in consumer research.Advances in Consumer Research,22,641-645.
  63. Veryzer, R. W. J.(1993).Aesthetic response and the influence of design principles on product preferences.Advances in Consumer Research,20,224-228.
  64. Veryzer, R. W.,Hutchinson, J. W.(1998).The influence of unity and prototypicality on aesthetic responses to new product designs.Journal of Consumer Research,24(4),374-394.
  65. Well, W. D.(Ed.)(1974).Life Style and Psychographics.Chicago:American Marketing Association=AMA.
  66. Wells, W. D.(1975).Psychographics: A critical review.Journal of Marketing Research,12(2),196-213.
  67. Wells, W. D.,Tigert, D. J.(1971).Activities, interests and opinions.Journal of Advertising Research,11(4),27-35.
  68. Wiliam, D. W.(Ed.)(1974).lifestyle and psychographics.Chicago:American Marketing Association=AMA.
  69. Zins, A. H.(1998).Leisure travel choice models of theme hotels using psychographics.Journal of Travel Research,36,3-25.
  70. 孔方正、許宏哲、黃惠芬、傅彥菁(2004)。旅館業之環境管理系統─以台北地區民眾之接受度為例。戶外遊憩研究,14(4),1-26。
  71. 方紀蘋(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。東海大學景觀學系。
  72. 呂清夫(1999)。造形原理。台北:雄獅圖書。
  73. 李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。台北市:心理。
  74. 周彥宇(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所。
  75. 林玉珮、柯志祥(2012)。熟齡女性生活型態及色彩喜好之調查。工業設計,40(1),8-13。
  76. 邱永福(1998)。設計基礎。台北市:藝風堂。
  77. 邱永福(1997)。造形原理。台北市:藝風堂。
  78. 邱皓政(2007)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗板資料分析範例解析。台北:五南。
  79. 洪珮芬、陳殿禮、林振陽(2008)。人口統計變數對家具消費價值觀之探討。應用藝術與設計學報,3,67-82。
  80. 莊明振、蕭坤安(1996)。建構圈椅的造形要素及其操作之探討。設計學報,1(1),51-66。
  81. 郭明健(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學機械工程學研究所。
  82. 陳明陽(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立交通大學應用藝術研究所。
  83. 游萬來、林俊明(1997)。產品風格的量化描述研究─以轎車形態為例。設計學報,2(2),89-107。
  84. 黃立倫(2008)。機車產品消費者偏好研究─以125cc重型速克達機車消費者為例。商業現代化學刊,4(4),81-102。
  85. 溫冬藏、邱勤山(2005)。技專院校航空管理類學門專業能力內函之建構。民航季刊,7(1),55-88。
  86. 廖建順、韋宗楒(2013)。2013全球小型空調機市場發展介紹(上)。冷凍空調與能源科技雜誌,81,40-49。
  87. 廖建順、韋宗楒(2008)。全球小型空調機市場發展介紹。冷凍空調與能源科技雜誌,50,37-50。
  88. 榮泰生(2007)。SPSS與研究方法。台北市:五南。
  89. 管倖生、林彥呈(2001)。應用類神經網路於手機色彩與造形搭配之研究。工業工程學刊,18(6),84-94。
  90. 劉維公(2001)。當代消費文化社會理論的分析架構:文化經濟學、生活風格與生活美學。東吳社會學報,11,113-136。
被引用次数
  1. 陳文亮,江雅媚(2019).A STUDY ON THE AESTHETIC QUALITY IMPROVEMENT OF THE PRODUCT DESIGN.品質學報,26(3),141-155.