教學影片之誘發性細節對於學童學習的影響

The Role of Seductive Details on Children's Multimedia with Respect to Learning

10.30105/JDS.201807_21(1).0001

王秀鳳(Hsiu-Feng Wang)；張孟君(Meng-Chun Chang)

誘發性細節 ； 多媒體學習 ； 學習興趣 ； 兒童 ； 學習成效 ； Seductive Detail ； Multimedia Learning ； Learning Interest ； Children ； Learning Outcome

設計學研究

21卷1期（2018 / 07 / 01）

1 - 22

繁體中文

近年來由於行動裝置及平板電腦等技術快速的成長，導致人們對於資訊以電腦的方式學習隨之改變。其中值得一提的是，教學者在使用多媒體教材教導學童時，更需要了解這些多媒體要如何使用，才可以讓學童學習的更專注且能提高他們的學習成效。本研究即依此思維，欲瞭解學童再利用多媒體學習時，在教材中加入誘發性細節的圖像對學習的成效與學習興趣是否有差異。本研究根據學習認知與情感多媒體理論（CATLM）作為研究的理論基礎，以解釋誘發性细的圖像是否應該加入教材。本研究使用二因子混合（two-way mixed-design）的實驗設計，受試者為國小學童（人數=52），自變項是為有無誘發性细節的圖像及學童年齡（九歲和十一歲）；依變項是學習成效及學習趣味性。他們分別觀看有無誘發性细節圖像之「古典音樂家的一生」學習影片，之後填寫趣味性問卷和測驗。研究結果表示，國小學童在學習影片中，其學習成效生有誘發性細節的圖像時，比在沒有誘發性細節圖像的情況下時較高。當分別觀看兩個不同年學童的學習興趣時，九歲的學童認為具有誘發性細節的多媒體學習教材更有趣，而十一歲的學童則沒有偏好，本研究的结果期提供教師和教學設計師，設計出更好之多媒體學習教材。

The rapid development of mobile devices, apps, and tablet computing is revolutionizing the concept of socializing as well as computing and learning. It is particularly important that educators who are teaching music-related content with children have access to engaging and relevant resources to provide to their learners. The aim of this experiment is to investigate the effect of seductive details in multimedia learning materials on learning outcomes and learning interest. The present study uses The Cognitive-Affective-Theory-of-Learning-with-Media (CATLM) as a theoretical framework to explain these results in seductive details research. Using a two-way mixed-design, we ask a group of elementary school students (N = 52) to learn about ＂The life of a classic musician＂ in a multimedia environment that manipulated the presence of seductive details (with vs. without) and students' age (9 year-olds vs. 11 year-olds). The findings showed that students' learning outcome was significantly higher when seductive details were presented. When the interesting ratings of the two age groups were looked at separately, they revealed that the 9 year-olds felt that multimedia learning materials that had seductive details were more interesting and the 11 year-olds had no preference. The results of this study will help teachers and designers to design better multimedia materials.

1. 王秀鳳、王珮瑜、林昱吟(2013)。不同年齡的學童對於兒童網站之視覺複雜程度與美成偏好之影響。設計學研究，16(2)，23-43。
   連結：
2. 王藍亭、李傳房(2003)。以類神經網路探討網頁視覺圖像複雜度偏好之研究。設計學報，8(2)，89-102。
   連結：
3. Badan, M.,Hauert, C. A.,Mounoud, P.(2000).Sequential pointing in children and adults.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,75,43-69.
4. Carney, R. N.,Levin, J. R.(2002).Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text.Educational Psychology Review,98,182-197.
5. DECI, E. L.(Ed.),RYAN, R. M.(Ed.)(2002).Handbook of Self-Determination Research.New York, NY:University of Rochester Press.
6. Erez, A.,Isen, A. M.(2002).The influence of positive affect on components of expectancy motivation.Journal of Applied Psychology,87(6),1055-1067.
7. Garner, R.(1992).Learning from school texts.Educational Psychologist,27(1),53-63.
8. Garner, R.,Gillingham, M. G.(1991).Topic knowledge, cognitive interest, and text recall: A microanalysis.Journal of Experimental Education,59,310-319.
9. Garner, R.,Gillingham, M. G.,White, C. S.(1989).Effects of "seductive details" on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children.Cognition and Instruction,6,41-57.
10. Gottfredson, L. S.(1981).Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations.Journal of Counseling Psychology,28(6),545-579.
11. Harp, S. F.,Mayer, R. E.(1998).How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,90,414-434.
12. Hidi, S.(2001).Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations.Educational Psychology Review,13,191-209.
13. Hidi, S.(1990).Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning.Review of Educational Research,60,549-572.
14. Lehman, S.,Schraw, G.,McCrudden, M. T.,Hartley, K.(2007).Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text.Contemporary Educational Psychology,32,569-587.
15. Levie, W. H.,Lentz, R.(1982).Effects of text graphic: A review of research.Educational Communication and Technology Journal,30(4),195-232.
16. Linnenbrink, E. A.(2006).Emotion research in education: Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the integration of affect, Motivation, and Cognition.Educational Psychology Review,18(4),307-314.
17. Magner, U. I. E.,Schwonke, R.,Aleven, V.,Popescu, O.,Renkl, A.(2013).Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments.Learning and Instruction,29,141-152.
18. Malone, T. W.,Lepper, M. R.(1987).Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning.Learning and Instruction,3,223-253.
19. Mayer, R. E.(2009).Multimedia Learning.NY:Cambridge University Press.
20. MAYER, R. E.(Ed.)(2014).The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.New York, CA:Cambridge University Press.
21. MAYER, R. E.(Ed.)(2005).The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.New York, CA:Cambridge University Press.
22. Mayer, R.E.,Griffith, E.,Jurkowitz, I.,Rothman, D.(2008).Increased interestingness of extraneous details in a multimedia science presentation leads to decreased learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,14,329-339.
23. Moreno, R.(2006).Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,22(3),149-158.
24. Moreno, R.,Mayer, R. E.(1999).Multimedia-supported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics.Cognition and Instruction,17,215-248.
25. Moreno, R.,Valdez, R.(2005).Cognitive load and learning effects of having students organize pictures and words in multimedia environments: The role of student interactivity and feedback.Educational Technology Research and Development,53,35-45.
26. Park, B.,Flowerday, T.,Brunken, R.(2015).Cognitive and affective effects of seductive details in multimedia learning.Computers in Human Behavior,44,267-278.
27. Pekrun, R.(2006).The control-value theory of achievement emotions: assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice.Educational Psychology Review,18(4),315-341.
28. Piaget, J. (1930), The Child's Conception of Physical Causality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
29. Plass, J. L.,Heidig, S.,Hayward, E. O.,Homer, B. D.,Um, E.(2013).Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning.Learning and Instruction,29,128-140.
30. PLASS, J.(Ed.),MORENO, R.(Ed.),BRUNKEN, R.(Ed.)(2010).Cognitive Load Theory.New York, CA:Cambridge University Press.
31. Renninger, K. A.,Hidi, S.,Krapp, A.(1992).The Role of Interest in Learning and Development.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Rowland, E.,Skinner, C. H.,Davis-Richards, K.,Saudargas, R.,Robinson, D. H.(2008).An investigation of placement and type of seductive details: The primacy effect of seductive details on text recall.Research in the Schools,15,80-90.
33. Sanchez, C. A.,Wiley, J.(2006).An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity.Memory & Cognition,34(2),344-355.
34. Schraw, G.,Lehman, S.(2001).Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research.Educational Psychology Review,13,23-52.
35. Thomas, J. R.(1980).Acquisition of motor skills: Information processing differences between children and adults.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,51,158-173.
36. Um, E. R.,Plass, J. L.,Hayward, E. O.,Homer, B. D.(2012).Emotional design in multimedia learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,104,485-498.
37. Wade, S. E.,Adams, B.(1990).Effects of importance and interest on recall of biographical text.Journal of Reading Behavior,22,331-353.
38. Wang, H. F.(2014).Picture perfect: Girls' and boys' preferences towards visual complexity in children's website.Computers in Human Behavior,13,551-557.
39. WENTZEL, K.(Ed.),WIGFIELD, A.(Ed.)(2009).Handbook of Motivation at School.New York, NY:Routledge.
40. Wigfield, A.,Eccles, J. S.(2000).Expectancy-value theory of motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25,68-81.
41. Williams, M.,Burden, R.,Lanvers, U.(2002).French is the language of love and stuff: Student perceptions of issues related to motivation in learning a foreign language.British Educational Research Journal,28(4),503-528.
42. WOSNITZA, M.(Ed.),KARABENICK, S. A.(Ed.),EFKLIDES, A.(Ed.),NENNIGER, P.(Ed.)(2009).Contemporary Motivation Research: From Global to Local Perspectives.New York, NY:Hogrefe & Huber.
43. Yang, S.(2010).A study on the impacts of team teaching on Taiwanese Elementary children's English learning interests and attitudes.Spectrum: Studies in Languages, Literature, Translation, and Interpretation,6,181-204.
44. 方正銘、卓俊伶(2007)。特定範圍結果獲知對兒童動作表現與學習的效應。2007全國體育運動學術團體聯合年會暨學術研討會，屏東:
45. 王孟惠(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學設計研究所。
46. 伊彬(2009)。插畫與電視廣告之實徵美學。台北:華藝數位出版社。
47. 吳英豪(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台中師範學院自然科學教育學系研究所。
48. 林慧娟(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹教育大學兒童教育學系研究所。
49. 洪碧霞、邱上真(1998)。K-3學童記憶力測驗發展之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，16，65-86。
50. 曾麗珍(2009)。一個橋樑書的新願景：從圖像到文字閱讀的教學研究。台北:秀威出版社。
51. 曾麗珍、王石番、蔣安國(2010)。國民小學學童媒體使用行為之研究─教師媒體素養教育反思。資料與研究雙月刊，95(8)，59-86。
52. 黃佳蓉(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。私立輔仁大學語言學研究所。
53. 黃淑君(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺中師範學院教育測驗統計系研究所。
54. 賴世烱(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系研究所。
55. 賴世烱、卓俊伶(1999)。晚期兒童動作表現的性別與年齡差異。體育學報，27，43-50。