景觀與健康研究：環境經驗視角

Landscape and Health Research: Environmental Experience Perspectives

10.30105/JDS.201812_21(2).0004

黃丰姿(Feng-Tzu Huang)

環境經驗 ； 質性研究 ； 園藝治療 ； 景觀治療 ； 景觀療癒 ； 食物地景 ； 可食地景 ； Environmental Experience ； Qualitative Research ； Horticulture Therapy ； Therapeutic Landscape ； Healing Landscape ； Foodscape ； Edible Landscape

設計學研究

21卷2期（2018 / 12 / 01）

65 - 77

繁體中文

近十幾年來，由於社會變遷、流行病學的變化及人們對健康觀點的改變，國內外對於景觀與健康的研究增加。本文目的在於透過健康照護的觀點，檢視景觀與健康的研究現況，討論未來的研究方向，提倡環境經驗的重要性，並剖析質性研究在景觀與健康研究的角色與價值。本文認為園藝治療、景觀治療、食物地景與可食地景是可以跨領域合作的三大研究主題，現行的研究方向傾向將景觀作為「一種處方」來進行健康效益的量測，較少探討環境經驗或是涵蓋社會文化的面向。量性研究方法在眾多學術領域被視為主流，尤其是醫護領域在實證醫學推動下，隨機分配實驗向來被視為黃金標準。然而質性研究仍具有相當的重要性，也是「可以科學的」。本文認為景觀承載人們生活中的環境經驗，應將景觀視為日常生活的一部分，期許未來有更多質性研究探討真實世界中人們的環境經驗、檢視自然經驗的健康效益是如何被社會所建構，以及識別蘊含其中的社會文化意涵，以深化景觀與健康的跨領域研究。

In the recent decades, changes in our society, epidemiology of disease and health concepts are regarded as main reasons which make the expansion of the landscape and health research. Therefore, this article examines the current research development and suggests future research agenda based on the point of views from the healthcare discipline. Meanwhile, the significance of environmental experiences is emphasized and the role and contributions of qualitative research are analyzed. Horticulture therapy, therapeutic landscape, and foodscape and edible landscape can be three main research themes studied through a wider range of underpinning disciplines. There is a tendency that therapeutic landscape is regarded as 'a treatment' and the research is designed to measure its' health benefits. Little attention is paid to the individuals' environmental experiences and social-culture aspects towards landscape and health. Contrasting to qualitative research, quantitative approaches in the academic research is often considered as gold standard, particularly in the healthcare domain after the movement of evidence-based medicine/nursing. However, the significant of qualitative studies cannot be ignored. Landscape is loaded with people's environmental experiences and is part of people's daily life. In order to deepen the understanding in the current research, qualitative approaches to explored people's environment experiences in the real world, to examine how the society constructs health benefits of nature experiences, and to identify the social-cultural meanings within, are suggested.

1. American Horticulture Therapy Association (2018), 'Definitions and positions', website:https://www.ahta.org/ahta-definitions-and-positions (accessed: Mach 12, 2018)
2. Chou, R. J.,Wu, C. T.,Huang, F. T.(2017).Fostering multi-functional urban agriculture: Experiences from the champions in a revitalized farm pond community in Taoyuan, Taiwan.Sustainability,9(11),2097.
3. Cipriani, J.,Benz, A.,Holmgren, A.,Kinter, D.,McGarry, J.,Rufino, G.(2017).A systematic review of the effects of horticultural therapy on persons with mental health conditions.Occupational Therapy in Mental Health,33,47-69.
4. Colley, K.,Brown, C.,Montarzino, A.(2016).Restorative wildscapes at work: An investigation of the wellbeing benefits of greenspace at urban fringe business sites using 'go-along' interviews.Landscape Research,41(6),598-615.
5. Cutillo, A.,Rathore, N.,Reynolds, N.,Hilliard, L.,Haines, H.,Whelan, K.,Madan-Swain, A.(2015).A literature review of nature-based therapy and its application in cancer care.Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture,25(1),3-14.
6. Dahlkvist, E.,Hartig, T.,Nilsson, A.,Högberg, H.,Skovdahl, K.,Engström, M.(2016).Garden greenery and the health of older people in residential care facilities: A multi‐level cross‐sectional study.Journal of Advanced Nursing,72(9),2065-2076.
7. Denzin N. K.,Lincoln, Y. S.(1994).Handbook of Qualitative Research.California:Sage.
8. Denzin, N. K.(1988).The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Printice-Hall.
9. Gerlach-Springgs, N. and Healy, V. (2010), 'The therapeutic garden: A definition', American Society of Landscape Architects: Healthcare and Therapeutic Design Newsletter, website: http://www.htsa.com.au/assets/references-and-resources/asla-healthcare-and-therapeutic-design.pdf (accessed: March 1, 2018).
10. Gonzalez, M. T.,Kirkevold, M.(2013).Benefits of sensory garden and horticultural activities in dementia care: A modified scoping review.Journal of Clinical Nursing,23(19-20),2698-2715.
11. Gonzalez, M. T.,Kirkevold, M.(2015).Clinical use of sensory gardens and outdoor environments in Norwegian nursing homes: A cross-sectional e-mail survey.Mental Health Nursing,36(1),35-43.
12. Greenhalgh, T.,Howick, J.,Marskrey, N.(2014).Evidence based medicine: A movement in crisis?.British Medical Journal,348,g3725.
13. Greider, T.,Garkovich, L.(1994).Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment.Rural Sociology,59(1),1-24.
14. Hartig, T.,Cooper-Marcus, C.(2006).Healing gardens-places for nature in health care.Lancet,368,S36-S37.
15. Hartig, T.,Mitchell, R.,de Vries, S.,Frumkin, H.(2014).Nature and health.Annual Review of Public Health,35,207-228.
16. Hernandez, R. O.(2007).Effects of therapeutic gardens in special care units for people with dementia: Two case studies.Journal of Housing for the Elderly,21(1-2),117-152.
17. Jiang, S.(2014).Therapeutic landscapes and healing gardens: A review of Chinese literature in relation to the studies in western counties.Frontiers of Architectural Research,3,141-153.
18. Kamioka, H.,Tsutani, K.,Yamada, M.,Park, H.,Okuizumi, H.,Honda, T.,Okada, S.,Park, S. J.,Kitayuguchi, J.,Abe, T.,Handa, S.,Mutoh, Y.(2014).Effectiveness of horticultural therapy: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Complement Therapies in Medicine,22(5),930-943.
19. Kaplan, R.,Kaplan, S.(1989).The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective.New York:Cambridge University Press.
20. Lindquist, R.,Snyder, M.,Tracy, M. F.(2013).Complementary & Alternative Therapies in Nursing.New York:Springer.
21. Mason, J.(2002).Qualitative Research.London:Sage.
22. Mol, A.(2008).The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice.London:Routledge.
23. Muir Gray, J. A.(2001).Evidence-Based Healthcare: How to Make Health Policy and Management Decisions.Edinburgh:Churchill Livingstone.
24. Ohly, H.,White, M. P.,Wheeler, B. W.,Bethel, A.,Ukoumunne, O. C.,Nikolaou, V.,Garside, R.(2016).Attention restoration theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments.Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B,19(7),305-343.
25. Oxford Dictionary (2018), 'Therapy', website: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/therapy (accessed: March 1, 2018).
26. Reynolds, G. (2013), 'Easing brain fatigue with a walk in the Park', The New York Times, website: https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/27/easing-brain-fatigue-with-a-walk-in-the-park/ (accessed: March 12, 2018).
27. Robson, C.(2002).Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner -Researchers.Oxford:Blackwell.
28. Roe, M.(2016).Editorial: Food and landscape.Landscape Research,41(7),709-713.
29. Roe, M.,Herlin, I. S.,Speak, S.(2016).Identity, food and landscape character in the urban context.Landscape Research,41(7),757-772.
30. Ulrich, R. S.(1984).View through a window may influence recovery from surgery.Science,224(4647),420-421.
31. WHO (2003), 'Definition of health', website: http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html (accessed: December 18, 2017)
32. WHO (2018), 'Types of health settings: health cities', website: http://www.who.int/healthy_settings/types/cities/en/ (accessed: March 1, 2018)
33. 郭毓仁(2005)。治療景觀與園藝治療。台北市:詹氏書局。
34. 陳惠美（ 2015 ），〈可食地景/ 社區屋頂農場規畫管理〉， 台北產經資訊網， 網址：https://www.taipeiecon.taipei/article_cont.aspx?MSid=654073524143411667&MmmID=1201 （上網日期：March 1, 2018）
35. 新北市政府綠美化環境景觀處（2018），〈什麼是可食地景〉，網址：https://www.landscaping.ntpc.gov.tw/cht/index.php?code=list&ids=117（上網日期：March 1, 2018）
36. 盧嬿羽、郭毓仁(2013)。園藝治療活動對糖尿病友心理效益之研究。台灣農會學報，14(6)，522-544。
37. 盧嬿羽、郭毓仁、王治元(2011)。園藝治療的發展。健康世界，301，42-43。
38. 魏心怡(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學園藝學研究所。

1. 黃丰姿、周融駿、吳振廷(2018)。食物的社會設計：桃園跨族裔地區之食物地景。建築與規劃學報，19(1)，25-41。
2. 譚鴻仁,謝偉民(2021)。茶油的社會生命之探討－以臺灣北部地區為例。地理研究，74，61-83。