英文摘要
|
The generation of traditional papercutting is profoundly influenced by Chinese cultural thoughts, and the unique characteristic foundation behind is the core of papercutting art. In terms of the modern art as well as design trends and themes, more diverse and extensive attention should be given. To this end, traditional papercutting art needs to keep up with the times, guiding consumers to traverse ancient and modern cultures for communication and exchanges through a systematic design model, and achieving the goal of cultural product value adding. In view of this motivation and adhering to the concept of "culture as the goal, papercutting as the subject, innovation as the purpose, and model as the result", the objective of this research is to specifically construct a systematic and sequential product design model to guide papercutting art and bring new life. In this regard, there are two steps for constructing a cultural product design model: 1. Literature analysis method: Formulate product design procedures and steps through analyses and inductions, with a focus on "cultural connotations" of papercutting; 2. Scholar Gooding's theory research method: Establish a visual presentation procedure model according to the research patterns and cultural mechanisms. With it as a guide assisting the model in exploring the various dimensions of the design field, the integration and construction of the dimensions will definitely enrich the product design contents with greater significance, because it is where the value of a complete design lies and is distinguished from our stereotyped impression of traditional papercutting.
|
参考文献
|
-
李如菁(2007)。溝通的「物」與「物」的溝通:談博物館商品的品質、角色與可能性。科技博物,14(4),68-84。
連結:
-
林榮泰,林伯賢(2009)。融合文化與美學促成文化創意設計新興產業之探討。藝術學報,5(2),81-106。
連結:
-
姚村雄(2002)。日治時期臺灣美術設計中的臺灣女性圖像研究。設計學報,7(2),117-136。
連結:
-
徐啟賢,林榮泰(2011)。文化產品設計程序。設計學報,16(4),1-18。
連結:
-
Andriole, S.(1989).Storyboard prototyping: a new approach to user requirements analysis.Wellesley, MA:QED Information Sciences.
-
Brown, T.(2008).Design thinking.Harvard Business Review,86(9),62-72.
-
Brown, T.(2009).Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation.New York, NY:Harper Business.
-
Gooding, D. C.(2004).Cognition, construction and culture: Visual theories in the sciences.Journal of Cognition and Culture,4(3-4),551-593.
-
Hart. J.(1999).The art of the storyboarding for film, TV and animation.Boston, MA:Focal Press.
-
Leong, B. D.,Clark, H.(2003).Culture-based knowledge towards new design thinking and practice-A dialogue.Design Issues,19(3),48-58.
-
Norman, D. A.(2004).Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things.New York, NY:Basic Books.
-
Verganti, R.(2009).Design-driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean.Boston, CA:Harvard Business Press.
-
王之敏(2001)。國立成功大學中國文學系。
-
王光敏(2006).剪紙文化.呼和浩特:內蒙古人民出版社.
-
王貴生(2009).剪紙民俗的文化闡釋.北京:北京大學出版社.
-
仉鳳皋(2001).中外剪紙藝術.瀋陽:遼寧美術出版社.
-
左漢中(1998).中國民間美術造型.長沙:湖南美術出版社.
-
何明泉,林其祥,劉怡君(1996)。文化商品開發之構思。設計學報,1(1),1-15。
-
林榮泰(2005)。科技與人性的結合:文化創意。科學發展,396,68-75。
-
林榮泰(2005)。文化創意,設計加值。藝術欣賞,1(7),26-32。
-
林榮泰(2009)。文化創意產品設計:從感性科技、人性設計與文化創意談起。人文與社會科學簡訊,11(1),32-42。
-
林榮泰(2006)。來自原住民服飾的文化創意:包山包海的設計。藝術欣賞,2(3),57-65。
-
林榮泰(2014).修齊治平:文化創意平天下.新北:宇晨企業.
-
林榮泰,Kreifeldt, John G.(2015).請勿觸摸:設計科技與人文藝術的對話.新北:宇晨企業.
-
林榮泰,徐啟賢(2012)。數位典藏應用於文化產品設計加值之分析。教育資料與研究,105,39-64。
-
南懷瑾(2006).南懷瑾選集.江蘇:復旦大學出版社.
-
洪顯勝(譯),Barthes, R.(1988).符號學要義.臺北:南方叢書出版社.
-
夏學理(2008).文化創意產業概念.臺北:五南出版社.
-
徐啟賢(2004)。私立長庚大學工業設計研究所。
-
張仁龍(1994).格致學.臺北:格物企管出版.
-
張樹賢(1996).中國民間剪紙藝術.北京:今日中國出版社.
-
陶思炎(2003).中國祥物.臺北:東大出版社.
-
傅銘傳,林品章(2009)。幾何圖形之對稱性之喜好調查。設計學報,7(2),47-60。
-
彭吉象(2007).中國藝術學.北京:北京大學出版社.
-
葉茉莉,林伯賢,徐啟賢(2014)。詩詞形神轉化的文化創意設計應用。設計學報,16(4),91-105。
|