論兩岸旅遊糾紛之刑事訴訟障礙

10.6509/TLM.200906_60(6).0007

張明偉

法令月刊

60卷6期（2009 / 06 / 01）

106 - 135

繁體中文

1. Coy v. Iowa, 487 U.S. 1012, 1021 (1988).
2. 2 N. C. (1 Hayw.)77, 77 (1794)
3. United States v. Lanza, 260 U.S. 377, 382 (1922)
4. United States v. Barkus, 359 U.S. 121, 155 (1959).
5. Motes v. United States, 178 U.S. 458 (1900)
6. 124 S. Ct. 1354, 1368, 1370 (2004)
7. FindLaw, Confrontation, available at http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment06/08.html (May 01 2009).
8. United States v. Scott, 437 U.S. 82, 87 (1978)
9. 30 S.C.L. (1 Rich 124, 125) 51 (1844), at 51-2
10. FRE 807
11. California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149, 155-6 (1970)
12. 1 Tenn. (1 Overt.) 229, 229 (1807)
13. United States v. Manfre, 368 F. 3d 832, 833 (8th Cir. 2004)
14. Abbate v. United States, 359 U.S. 187, 188-9 (1959)
15. James Bradley Thayer, A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law, 1-2 (Boston Little Brown, 1898)
16. Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836, 849, 850 (1990)
17. 174 U.S. 47, 61(1899).
18. 400 U.S. 74, 76, 89 (1970)
19. 最高法院七十二年台上字第一三三二號判例
20. United States v . Burr, 25 F. Cas. 187, 193 (1807)
21. United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313, 322 (1978)
22. People v. Cage, 15 Cal. Rptr. 3d 846, 851 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)
23. 司法院說明 Available at: http://www.judicial.gov.tw (May 01 2009 )
24. Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97, 122 (1934)
25. 現行刑事訴訟法第一百五十九條第一項之規定修訂理由
26. 355 U.S. 184, 187-8 (1957)
27. Sir Walter Raleigh, 399 U.S. 149, 156-7, n. 10 (1970)
28. 156 U.S. 237, 240 (1895)
29. 10 Tenn. (2 Yer.) 58, 59-60 (1821)
30. Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 65, 66, 65, note 7, 63 (1980)
31. Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237, 243 (1895)
32. Krulewitch v. United States, 366 U.S. 440 (1949)
33. Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719, 725-6 (1968)
34. (1968).Note, Confrontation, Cross-Examination, and the Right to Prepare a Defense.Geo. L. J.,56,939-940.
35. 刑事訴訟法第159-2條、第159-3條、第159-4條、第159-5條
36. Amar, Akhil Reed(1994).Fourth Amendment Principles.HARV. L. REV.,107,757+773.
37. Amar, Akhil Reed(1992).The Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment.YALE L. J.,101,1193+1206.
38. Best, Authur(2001).Evidence.New York:Aspen Law & Business.
39. Cohen, Neil P.(2004).Crawford v. Washington: Confrontation Revolution.Tenn. B. J.,40,22.
40. Fenner, G. Michael(2003).The Hearsay Rule.Carolina Academic Press.
41. Graham, Kenneth J.(1972).The Right to Confrontation and the Hearsay Rule: Sir Walter Raleigh Loses Another One.Crim. L. Bull.,8,99-100.
42. Jonakait, Randolph N.(1995).The Origins of the Confrontation Clause: An Alternative History.Rutgers L. J.,27,77+109+113+115+122-124.
43. Klotter, John C.(1992).Criminal Evidence.Ohio Anderson Publishing.
44. Lilly, Graham C.(1984).Notes on the Confrontation Clause and Ohio v. Roberts.U. Fla. L. Rev.,36,207+209.
45. Mueller, Christopher B.(2000).Evidence Under the Rules.New York:Aspen Law & Business.
46. Nesson, Charles R.(1995).Constitutional Hearsay: Requiring Foundamental Testing and Corroboration Under the Confrontation Clause.Va. L. Rev.,81,149+151-2.
47. 王兆鵬。當事人進行主義爭議之評議。刑事法雜誌，43(4)，36-37。
48. 朱石炎(1992)。兩岸人民關係條例刑事章釋義。法令月刊，43(10)，16+18。
49. 吳巡龍(2004)。對質詰問權的保障與限制－釋字第五八二號解釋評析。月旦法學雜誌，115，99。
50. 周成瑜(2005)。兩岸海上犯罪問題與對策。軍法專刊，51(3)
51. 林永謀(2004)。傳聞證據（上）。司法周刊，1162，第二版。
52. 俞叔平(1956)。刑事訴訟法學。中國法學編譯社。
53. 張麗卿(2002)。刑事訴訟法理論與運用。五南圖書出版社。
54. 陳樸生(1994)。刑事訴訟法爭議問題研究。五南圖書出版公司。
55. 黃東熊、吳景芳(2002)。刑事訴訟法論。三民書局。

1. 吳俊毅(2019)。2018年國際刑事司法互助法制定後境外取得證據的使用與相互承認原則。刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊，22，12-24。