题名

通訊傳播內容管制的重要課題-論媒體問責機制與當事人回覆權

DOI

10.6509/TLM.201001_61(1).0003

作者

吳永乾

关键词
期刊名称

法令月刊

卷期/出版年月

61卷1期(2010 / 01 / 01)

页次

23 - 44

内容语文

繁體中文

主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. 吳永乾(2004)。美國誹謗法所稱「真正惡意」法則之研究。國立中正大學法學集刊,15,1-98。
    連結:
  2. 劉昌德(2007)。民主參與式的共管自律─新聞自律機制之回顧與再思考。臺灣民主季刊,4(1),128。
    連結:
  3. 彭芸,<國家通訊傳播委員會第283次委員會議第十案一部不同意見書>, 2009 年2 月10 日。http://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/news.aspx?site_content_sn=67&is_history=0 2009 年10月1日訪
  4. Office of Communication, Content Board, Code of Conduct, Arts. 16-22. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/about/csg/ocb/codeofconduct (visited Oct. 17, 2009)
  5. Council Directive of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid own by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (89/552/EEC) [1993] OJ L298/23
  6. 林上祚,< NCC增回覆權 恐戕害新聞自由>,《中國時報》,綜合新聞A10 版,2009年2月6日
  7. TVBS 等7家衛星新聞頻道
  8. The Hutchins Commission, REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON THE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS: A FREE AND RESPONSIBLE PRESS 129-30 (1947).
  9. 通訊傳播基本法第2條第1項
  10. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (97/36/EC) [1997] OJ L202/60
  11. Banzhaf v. FCC, 405 F. 2d 1082, 1100-01 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  12. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241 (1974)
  13. Sisante & Legaspi, Kill Bill: Media Groups Unwavering in Stance vs Right of Reply Measure, GMANews.TV, posted March 9, 2009. http://www.gmanews.tv/print/151993 (visited April 6, 2009)
  14. Wikipedia, Accountability. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accountability (visited Oct. 11, 2009)
  15. 我國憲法增修條文第10條第11項
  16. 英國廣播公司(簡稱BBC)編輯綱領Sec. 5.
  17. Ediciones Tiempo S.A. v. Spain, App. No 1310/87, 62 Dec. & Rep. 247 (1989)
  18. Columbia Broadcasting Systems v. Democratic National Committee, 412 U.S. 94, 127-28 (1973)
  19. 台視、公視等5 家無線電視台的網頁
  20. Baran, S.(2008).INTRODUCTION TO MASS COMMUNICATION: MEDIA LITERACY AND CULTURE.
  21. Bates,Chambers(2000).The Ecomic Basis for Radio Deregulation.J. of Media Econ.,12,19+30.
  22. Bratislava, Bucharest,Sofia(2008).The Press in Eastern Europe: Less Free Speech.The Economist,2008(April 28)
  23. Campbell(1999).Self-Regulation and the Media.Fed. Comm. L. J.,51,711+714.
  24. Danziger(1986).The Right of Reply in the United States and Europe.N.Y.U.J. Int' l. L. & Pol.,19,171+179+183-184+188.
  25. Dennis, E.(ed.),Gillmor, D.(ed.),Glasser, T.(ed.)(1989).MEDIA FREEDOM AND ACCOUNTABILITY.
  26. Fiss(1987).Why the State?.Harv. L. Rev.,100,781+787.
  27. Harris,Spanier(1972).Accountability: Answerability and Liability.J. Theory Soc. Behavior,6(2),253-255.
  28. Hayes(2004).The Right of Reply: A Conflict of Fundamental Rights.Colum. J. L. & Soc. Probs.,37,551+561+566+572.
  29. Hundt(1996).The Public s Airwaves: What Does the Public Interest Require of Television Broadcaster?.Duke L. J.,45,1089.
  30. Ingber(1984).The Marketplace of Ideas: A Legitimizing Myth.Duke L. J.,1,5.
  31. Konar-Steenberg(2005).The Needle and the Damage Done: The Pervasive Presence of Obsolete Mass Media Audience Models in First Amendment Doctrine.Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L.,8,45+46-47.
  32. McMahon(2002).Defamation Claims in Europe: A Survey of the Legal Armory.WTR Comm. Law,19,24+31+34.
  33. McQuail, D.(ed.),Golding, P.(ed.),de Bens, E.(ed.)(2005).COMMUNICATION THEORY & RESEARCH: AN EJC ANTHOLOGY.
  34. Pember, D.,Calvert, C.(2005).MASS MEDIA LAW.
  35. Pritchard, D.(2000).HOLDING THE MEDIA ACCOUNTABLE: CITIZENS, ETHICS AND THE LAW.
  36. Simone,Fernback(2006).Invisible Hands or Public Spheres? Theoretical Foundations for U.S. Broadcast Policy.Comm. L. & Pol'y,11,287+289-90+291-92.
  37. Swire.,未出版
  38. Thwaite,Brehm(1994).German Privacy and Defamation Law: The Right to Publish in the Shadow of the Right to Human Dignity.Eur. Intell. Prop. Rev.,8,336+339+348-49.
  39. Vick,Macpherson(1996).Anglicizing Defamation Law in European Union.Va. J. Int' l L.,36,933+956.
  40. Winfield(1999).A Call for Reform.WTR Comm. Law,16,14.
  41. 尤英夫(1996)。新聞法論
  42. 吳永乾。網路新聞的問題與自律。月旦法學雜誌,71,113-114。
  43. 李震山(2000)。人性尊嚴與人權保障
  44. 汪嘉琪(2006)。接近使用媒體的權利。法令月刊,57(6),31。
  45. 周宗憲譯、阿部照哉編(2001)。憲法(下)─基本人權篇
  46. 徐志明(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。世新大學法學院。
  47. 張永明(2009)。傳播生態變遷下的傳播自由與媒體責任。月旦法學雜誌,170,55。
  48. 張錦華(2008)。媒體自律及團體他律之建立與運作邁向三律共管的電視自律機制與台灣公民運動。通傳會新聞,1(11),33。
  49. 陳耀祥(2004)。論國家對於通訊傳播之管制─從德國之規範取向論我國通訊傳播基本法之基本議題。銘傳大學法學論叢,2,51-52+55。
  50. 程之行釋、Schramm, W.(1992)。大眾傳播的責任
  51. 黃旭睦(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。世新大學法律學系。
  52. 蔡宗珍(1999)。人性尊嚴之保障作為憲法基本原則。月旦法學,45,99。
  53. 羅世宏(2008)。去惡管制、揚善管制:建立政府有能與公民有權的媒介結構/內容管制規範。通傳會新聞,1(11),40。
  54. 蘇蘅(2001)。公民VS.消費者─媒體近用與普及服務。千禧傳播法制的回顧與前瞻
被引用次数
  1. 簡旭徵(2012)。傳播內容共同管理機制之探討。廣播與電視,35,1-27。
  2. 吳永乾(2012)。刺探新聞與媒體自律之道─世界新聞報關門事件的啟示。法令月刊,63(2),66-80。