ECFA試金石？臺灣名品博覽會及名品城的相關法律問題

Touchstone for ECFA? Legal Issues of Taiwan Trade Fair and Taiwan Trade Mart

10.6509/TLM.201406_65(6).0005

范相堯(Hsiang-Yao Fan)

外貿協會 ； 臺灣名品博覽會 ； 臺灣名品城 ； ECFA ； RTA ； TAITRA ； Taiwan trade fair ； Taiwan trade mart

法令月刊

65卷6期（2014 / 06 / 01）

81 - 95

繁體中文

在2010年6月29日，兩岸正式簽訂了《海峽兩岸經濟合作架構協議》（ECFA）。簽署ECFA不單是兩岸經貿交流上的需要，也是臺灣在當前區域貿易協定（Regiona I Trade Agreement, RTA）浪潮中的突破。簽暑後大陸許多地方政府為響應ECFA而與臺灣有關機構合作推出臺灣名品博覽會（臺灣名品交易會）及臺灣名品城模式，都是為了提早實現ECFA並帶來更緊密的經貿交流效果：但至今名品博覽會在大陸闖出名聲，但名品城模式發展卻不如預期，雖然影響因素很多，但可以發現名晶城模式除了市場適應、成本及地方性限制外，也因ECFA架構下在進口、工商財稅以及認證標準等方面尚未完成協調，而使發展受阻。因此建議兩岸仍應繼續深化ECFA的議題達結及制度協調並完善機制，以使兩岸人民真正享受ECFA能帶來的利益。

In June 29, 2010, Taiwan and Mainland China signed the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA). The signing of ECFA met the need of the cross-strait economic transactions; it's also a breakthrough of tides of RTA for Taiwan. For the purpose of executing ECFA and brought the closer relationship in economic transaction, the model of Taiwan Trade Fair and Taiwan Trade Mart were introduced under the cooperation of some local governments in Mainland China with related Taiwan corporations after the signing of ECFA. However, while the Taiwan Trade Fair is achieving successes, the Taiwan Trade Mart is fainting. The reasons Taiwan Trade Mart failed could be numerous includ In June 29, 2010, Taiwan and Mainland China signed the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA). The signing of ECFA met the need of the cross-strait economic transactions; it's also a breakthrough of tides of RTA for Taiwan. For the purpose of executing ECFA and brought the closer relationship in economic transaction, the model of Taiwan Trade Fair and Taiwan Trade Mart were introduced under the cooperation of some local governments in Mainland China with related Taiwan corporations after the signing of ECFA. However, while the Taiwan Trade Fair is achieving successes, the Taiwan Trade Mart is fainting. The reasons Taiwan Trade Mart failed could be numerous including the difficulties in local market acquaintance, cost and local restrictions; also, the unfulfilled harmonization of ECFA and local regulations in importing, taxation, company setup and standards, could be main obstacle. The conclusion suggests both side authorities shall devoting efforts in implementation of connecting ECFA's related subjects and the harmonization of regulations, in order to bringing more benefits to people cross-strait.

1. 兩岸經貿網http://www.seftb.org
2. 國務院臺灣事務辦公室 (大陸) http://www.gwytb.gov.cn
3. 行政院大陸委員會http://www.mac.gov.tw
4. WTO http://www.wto.org
5. Dreyer, Iana,Erixon, Fredrik,Lee-Makiyama, Hosuk,Sally, Razeen(2010).ECIPE OCCASIONAL PAPERECIPE OCCASIONAL PAPER,未出版
6. Franck, Susan D.(2007).FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION, AND THE RULE OF LAW.Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L. J.,19
7. Hsieh, Pasha L.(2011).The China-Taiwan ECFA, GeopoliticalDimensions and WTO Law.Journal of International Economic Law,14(1)
8. Hsieh, Pasha L.(2008).China-Taiwan trade relations Implications of WTO and Asia regionalism.Oxford University Press.
9. Pauwelyn, Joost(2006).Adding sweetener to softwood lumber: the WTO-NAFTA "Spaghetti Bowl' is cooking".J. Int'l Econ. L.,9
10. 王泰銓、陳月端(2000)。兩岸關係法律。大中國圖書公司。
11. 丘宏達(2006)。現代國際法。臺北:三民書局。
12. 申通、温耀慶(2009)。關於海峽兩岸簽署CECA並擴大其內涵的研究。世界貿易組織動態與研究，7
13. 朱敬一(2009)。ECFA：開創兩岸互利雙贏新局面。財團法人兩岸交流遠景基金會。
14. 行政院大陸委員會(2009)。兩岸經貿交流法規彙編。陸委會。
15. 行政院大陸委員會(2009)。兩岸人員往來交流法規彙編。陸委會。
16. 余敏友(1998)。世界貿易組織爭端解決機制法律與實踐。武漢大學出版社。
17. 沙平、余敏友(2002)。國際法問題專論。武漢大學出版社。
18. 南京市對外貿易經濟合作局(2008)。利用外資法律法規選編。南京市外經局。
19. 梁西(2002)。國際組織法。武漢大學出版社。
20. 梁西(2003)。國際法。武漢大學出版社。
21. 曾令良(2009)。WTO框賀下兩岸經濟合作協定的法律定位。時代法學，7(6)
22. 曾令良、余敏友(2006)。全球化時代的國際法—基礎、結構與挑戰。武漢大學出版社。
23. 蔔睿哲、林添貴譯(2010)。臺灣的未來。遠流出版社。