题名
|
臺灣與美國預立醫療照護諮商特色之比較研究
|
并列篇名
|
A Comparison Research of Advance Care Planning's Characteristics between Taiwan and the U.S.
|
DOI
|
10.6509/TLM.201805_69(5).0003
|
作者
|
張婷(Ting Chang)
|
关键词
|
病人自主權利法 ; 預立醫療照護諮商 ; 預立醫療決定 ; 醫療委任代理人 ; 美國律師協會 ; 安寧緩和醫療條例 ; "Patient Right to Autonomy Act" ; Advance Care Planning ; Advance Decision ; Health Care Agent ; American Bar Association ; "Hospice Palliative Care Act"
|
期刊名称
|
法令月刊
|
卷期/出版年月
|
69卷5期(2018 / 05 / 01)
|
页次
|
59
-
74
|
内容语文
|
繁體中文
|
中文摘要
|
預立醫療照護諮商為「病人自主權利法」新增之機制,為「安寧緩和醫療條例」所無。本文主旨在於探討「病人自主權利法」施行後,預立醫療照護諮商之內容,並藉由借鏡美國聯邦立法(「病人選擇與品質照護法」(草案))、美國律師協會、美國猶他州(「預立健康照護指示法」)與紐約州(「緩和照護資訊法」)之州立法經驗,進行臺灣與美國預立醫療照護諮商特色之比較。本文冀望值此「病人自主權利法」相關配套機制建置之際,藉由不同地域之經驗借鏡與特色比較,可為臺灣自1995年3月1日起開始實施全民健康保險制度以來,期待開創另一波舉世矚目之臺灣奇蹟做好奠基準備。
|
英文摘要
|
Advance care planning is a newly developed mechanism, none regulated in the "Hospice Palliative Care Act", but regulated in the "Patient Right to Autonomy Act". The theme of this article is to discuss the content of advance care planning after the "Patient Right to Autonomy Act" is executed. Besides, lessons from the U.S., including federal legislation ("Patient Choice and Quality Care Act of 2017"(draft)), American Bar Association, Utah state ("Advance Health Care Directive Act") and New York state ("Palliative Care Information Act") legislation are studied. Also, advance care planning’s characteristics are compared both in Taiwan and the U.S. Now, related mechanisms of the "Patient Right to Autonomy Act" are establishing through comparing different lessons learning and characteristics, preparation of another remarkable Taiwan miracle is expected after the implementation of the National Health Insurance in March 1st, 1995.
|
主题分类
|
社會科學 >
法律學
|
参考文献
|
-
吳莉芬、洪玉純、陳昱光、何景良、張乃文、潘雪幸(2016)。末期病人撤除維生醫療—安寧共同照護介入之經驗。腫瘤護理雜誌,16(2),5-14。
連結:
-
林秀碧、蔡永杰、蔡政庭(2013)。從需求理論探討病人權利的落實認知與管理。醫務管理期刊,14(1),18-37。
連結:
-
林淑瓊、張銀益、林宣均(2016)。從醫病關係管理觀點探討醫療服務與病人的互動關係。慈濟科技大學學報,27,67-99。
連結:
-
柯莉珊、張媚、胡文郁(2017)。運用SWOT 分析預立醫療照護諮商之推行—以某醫學中心之高齡病房為例。領導護理,18(2),13-28。
連結:
-
馬瑞菊、林佩璇、馬瑞萍、鄭婉如、張喬茹、蕭嘉瑩、蘇珉一(2017)。不施行心肺復甦術(DNR)在內科加護病房氣切病人之現況分析。安寧療護雜誌,22(2),164-179。
連結:
-
張碧容、李鳳屏、蕭華岑、謝秀芳(2015)。治療或不治∼就是問題所在:老年癌症病人照護的倫理議題。腫瘤護理雜誌,15(2),1-18。
連結:
-
黃文翰、鄭逸如、楊于婷、張琦郁、黃士哲(2017)。如何面對臨終的死亡焦慮—誰該為自身的死亡負責?。安寧療護雜誌,22(2),202-212。
連結:
-
楊茵淇、詹雅如(2016)。家庭系統對醫療自主性的影響—加護病房安寧共同照護模式照顧一位乳癌末期病人之經驗。安寧療護雜誌,21(3),341-351。
連結:
-
劉盈君、蔡育倫、蔣欣欣(2017)。生命中可承受之重—探究臨終照護護理人員的倫理自我。護理雜誌,64(2),34-43。
連結:
-
蔡宏志、周宇光、黃崇濱(2016)。病人拒絕急救不插氣管內管之倫理法律觀。弘光學報,78,25-32。
連結:
-
American Bar Association (2017), My Health Care Wishes App, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/law_aging/MyHealthCareWishesApp.html(last visited: 2017/11/2).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2016), Advance Care Planning, https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/AdvanceCarePlanning.pdf (last visited: 2017/10/31).
-
CONGRESS.GOV (2017), H.R.2797-Patient Choice and Quality Care Act of 2017, https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/2797 (last visited: 2017/10/27).
-
Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2016), Advance Care Planning, https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/AdvanceCarePlanning.pdf (last visited: 2017/10/31).
-
Henry, M.(2007).Advance health care planning in Utah.Utah Bar Journal,20,9-14.
-
National Cancer Institute (2006), EPEC™-O (Education in Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Oncology), Self-Study Modules and Materials for Trainers, CD-ROM and DVD, https://www.cancer.gov/resources-for/hp/education/epeco/self-study/module-13 (last visited: 2017/10/30).
-
National Council on Aging (2017), Medicare Coverage of Advance Care Planning, https://www.ncoa.org/resources/medicare-advance-care-planning/ (last visited : 2017/10/31).
-
National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (2017), Advance Care Planning, https://www.nhpco.org/advance-care-planning (last visited: 2017/10/31).
-
New York State Department of Health (2012), Palliative Care, https://www.health.ny.gov/professionals/patients/patient_rights/palliative_care/ (last visited: 2017/10/30).
-
Rachel, R. (2016), Medicare Will Now Pay Doctors to Talk to Their Patients About Death, https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/01/medicare-will-now-pay-doctors-to-talk-to-their-patients-about-death/459243/ (last visited: 2017/10/27).
-
Rhonda, M. (2016), Congress and the Administration Are Taking Steps to Help Patients Plan for End-of-life Medical Care, http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/congress_and_the_administration_are_taking_steps_to_help_patients_plan_for (last visited: 2017/10/27).
-
Sabatino, Charles P.(2015).Six key steps of advance care planning.Bifocal,36(4)
-
Sabatino, Charles P.(2013).Eight advance care planning lessons that took me thirty years to learn.Bifocal,34(6)
-
吳亮儀(2017),〈想預立醫療計畫 七醫院提供諮商〉,《自由時報》,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/1127114(最後瀏覽日:2017/10/31)。
-
吳雅汝(2017)。這些年,病人教我的善終—重症加護病房與安寧療護。人醫心傳—慈濟醫療人文月刊,164,40-55。
-
扶小萍(2017),〈生命最終章自己決定南投醫院試辦醫療照護諮商〉,《台灣好新聞》,http://www.taiwanhot.net/?p=441143(最後瀏覽日:2017/10/27)。
-
林綉君、李佳苓、張家銘(2016)。高齡者之預立醫療指示。台灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌,11(2),89-104。
-
孫效智(2017)。《病人自主權利法》評釋。澄清醫護管理雜誌,13(1),4-7。
-
財團法人中華民國(台灣)安寧照顧基金會(2017),〈基金會大事紀〉,http://www.hospice.org.tw/2009/chinese/about-4.php(最後瀏覽日:2017/10/31)。
-
尉遲淦(2017)。為什麼病人想要回家臨終。中華禮儀,36,23-27。
-
陳可欣、高靖秋(2017)。醫病共享決策中的「病人偏好及價值觀」。醫療品質雜誌,11(4),31-37。
-
陳貞秀、唐秀治(2014)。癌症病人預後告知的現況及其影響的探討。台灣癌症醫學雜誌,1(2),103-112。
-
陳榮基(2017)。醫院的善終處置協助病人魂歸故里。健康世界,486,3-5。
-
彰化基督教醫院(2017),〈全台首設 彰基預立醫療照護諮商門診 5 類重病者有善終權〉,http://www.cch.org . tw/news/news_2_detai l .aspx?oid=3023&no=9(最後瀏覽日:2017/10/27)。
-
綦守鈺(2017),〈奇美奇恩病房 擴增病床與服務〉,《聯合新聞網》,https://udn.com/news/story/7266/2769620( 最後瀏覽日:2017/10/27)。
-
蔡甫昌、郭蕙心(2017)。病人自主權利法之倫理觀點與實務挑戰。台灣醫學,21(2),62-72。
-
衛生福利部(2017),《106 年度衛生福利部委託辦理「建置病人自主權利法相關配套機制」》,https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxFFdQoHqTZ6M2RRSklVRWpSYTQ/view(最後瀏覽日:2017/10/30)。
-
賴寧生(2017)。溫暖醫療以病人為中心。人醫心傳—慈濟醫療人文月刊,162,6-7。
|
被引用次数
|
-
黃琨祥、曾斐琳、陳詩佩、施君穎、周嫚君、江明珠(2019)。尊重生命的選擇~淺淡病人自主權利法。長庚護理,30(4),466-473。
-
廖俊裕,黃曉蓓,張秋芬,吳芝儀(2020)。病人自主權利法下之臨終諮商面面觀。諮商與輔導,411,22-27+8。
-
蘇珉一,蕭嘉瑩,曾令君,馬瑞菊,林佩璇(2019)。自主善終的臨床觀點-從病人自主權利法與ACP談起。領導護理,20(1),16-27。
-
(2019)。論「病人自主權利法」於現行醫療法制上存在之必要性。醫事法學,24(1&2),25-56。
|