社區志工對老人虐待知識與態度之探討

A Study of Knowledge and Attitudes of Community Volunteers Toward Elder Abuse

10.6540/NTJN.202103_23(1).0005

葉惠雯(Hui-Wen Yeh)；林碧珠(Pi-Chu Lin)

老人虐待 ； 老人虐待知識 ； 老人虐待態度 ； 社區志工 ； lder abuse ； knowledge of elder abuse ； attitudes toward elder abuse ； community volunteers

新臺北護理期刊

23卷1期（2021 / 03 / 01）

43 - 54

繁體中文

背景：老人保護問題是人權之捍衛和保障，除運用跨專業整合，更必須結合社區組織力量以健全之老人保護網絡。目的：1.了解社區志工對老人虐待之知識與態度。 2.了解社區志工基本屬性和老人虐待知識、態度之相關性。3.了解社區志工老人虐待態度之預測因子。方法：採用橫斷式調查研究，使用結構式問卷以立意取樣調查台灣東北部某一鄉鎮從事社區老人服務之志工，共收案400人。結果：1.整體老人受虐知識平均146.9±28.47分。整體受虐態度量表平均47.34±7.85分。2.志工教育程度與整體老人受虐知識有顯著相關（F = 4.31, p ＜ 0.5）；家庭型態與整體老人受虐知識有顯著相關（F = 10.68, p ＜ .001）；不同志工服務經驗者在老人受虐知識有顯著差異（p ＜ .05）。整體老人受虐知識與整體老人受虐態度達顯著正相關（r = .24，p ＜ .001）。3.志工教育程度（F = 4.32, p ＜ .05）、家庭型態（F = 4.92, p ＜ .01）、及目前與65歲以上老人同住（F = 6.33, p ＜ .001）與整體老人受虐態度有顯著相關性。不同的志工服務經驗在老人受虐態度得分有顯著差異（p ＜ .05）。4.老人受虐態度之預測因子，國中畢業志工的態度表現優於國小畢業者（t = 2.07 , p ＜ .05）；屬於折衷家庭態度表現優於小家庭（t = 2.30 , p ＜ .05）。

Background: The protection of the elderly is the defense and protection of human rights. In addition to the use of cross-professional integration, it is necessary to combine the community organizations to improve the protection of the elderly. Purposes: (1) To understand knowledge and attitudes of community volunteers toward elder abuse; (2) to examine the association of the basic information of community volunteers to their knowledge and attitudes toward elder abuse; and (3) to understand the predictors of community volunteer elder abuse attitudes. Method: A cross-sectional study with purposive sampling was used. A structured questionnaire was used to survey volunteers engaged in community services for the elderly in a town in northeastern Taiwan. A total of 400 cases were collected. Results: (1) The mean score of knowledge of elder abuse was 146.9 ± 28.47 and mean score of attitudes toward elder abuse was 47.34 ± 7.85; (2) The education of volunteers was significantly correlated with the knowledge of elder abuse (F = 4.31, p ＜ 0.5); the family type was significantly correlated to the knowledge of elder abuse (F = 10.68, p ＜ .001); volunteers with difference experience had significant difference of knowledge (p ＜ .05); the overall knowledge of elder abuse was positively correlated to the overall attitudes toward elder abuse (r = .24, p ＜ .001); (3) volunteers' education (F = 4.32, p ＜ .05), family type (F = 4.92, p ＜ .002), and currently living with elderly relatives aged over 65 (F = 6.33, p ＜ .001) were significantly correlated to the attitudes toward elder abuse. Volunteers with difference service experience had significant difference in attitudes toward elder abuse (p ＜ .05); and (4) In terms of the predictors of attitudes, volunteers with junior high school education performed better than elementary school graduates (t = 2.07, p ＜ .05); volunteers from a stem family performed better than those from a nuclear family (t = 2.30 , p ＜ .05).

1. 吳敏欣(2017)。受暴老人保護令撤回原因探討。社會發展研究學刊，專刊，110-129。
   連結：
2. 鄭倩樺,鍾其祥,簡戊鑑(2012)。利用傷害型態及醫療利用辨識親密伴侶暴力受虐者。醫務管理期刊，13(1)，32-47。
   連結：
3. 衛生福利部保護服務司統計資料（2017，9月6日）‧97-105 家庭暴力各類型受暴人數‧取自：https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOPS/cp1303-33738-105.html。
4. Burnett, J.,Achenbaum, W. A.,Murphy, K. P.(2014).Prevention and early identification of elder abuse.Clinics in Geriatric Medicine,30(4),743-759.
5. Laumann, E. O.,Leitsch, S. A.,Waite, L. J.(2008).Elder mistreatment in the United States: Prevalence estimates from a nationally representative study.Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,63(4),248-254.
6. Wang, M. S.,Kang, S. W.,Schiamberg, L. B.(2015).Ecological factors associated with elder abuse in Taiwan: A systematic review.Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development,25(1),13-28.
7. Wolf, R. S.(2000).The Nature and Scope of Elder Abuse.Generations,6-12.
8. 世界衛生組織（WHO）（2016）‧Ageing and life-course‧取自http://www.who.int/ageing/projects/elder_abuse/en/.
9. 世界衛生組織（WHO）（2015）‧World health organization. Elder abuse. ‧取自http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs357/zh/.
10. 世界衛生組織（WHO）（2011）‧世界衛生組織歐洲辦公室出版「防止老人受虐」報告（The european report on preventing elder maltreatment. copenhagen, WHO European Regional. Office for Europe）‧取自http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/144676/e95110.pdf.
11. 全國法歸資料庫（2020）‧老人保護通報及處理辦法 ‧https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0050196.
12. 林宛諭(2010)。南投，暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系。
13. 國家發展委員會(2020).國家發展委員會（2020）‧中華民國人口推估（2020至2070年）‧取自https://pop-proj.ndc.gov.tw/..
14. 張宏哲(2012)。內政部委託研究報告內政部委託研究報告,內政部。
15. 莊秀美,姜琴音(2000)。從老人虐待狀況探討老人保護工作：以臺北市家庭暴力暨性侵害防治中心之老人受虐個案為例。社區發展季刊，91，269-285。
16. 郭馥葵(2017)。老人虐待簡介。北市醫學雜誌，14(2)，262-268。
17. 曾雅梅,陳雪芬(2017)。運用社會生態學模式分析社區志工對服務獨居老人之意願。福祉科技與服務管理學刊，5(3)，207-218。
18. 黃庭瑋(2018)。老人虐待現況之初探。家庭教育雙月刊，74，6-24。
19. 楊培珊,吳慧菁(2011)。內政部委託研究報告內政部委託研究報告,內政部。
20. 廖婉君,蔡明岳(2006)。老人虐待。基層醫學，21(7)，183-186。
21. 蔡秀鳳(2004)。台北，陽明大學臨床暨社區護理研究所。
22. 蔡啟源(2005)。老人虐待與老人保護工作。社區發展季刊，108，185-197。
23. 蘇怡菁(2013)。老年人的需求議題探討。家庭教育雙月刊，42，71- 76。

1. (2024)。提升急診保護性個案處遇作業完整率。新臺北護理期刊，26(2)，74-86。