目標取向和能力知覺對運動動機之預測

The Effect of Goal Orientations and Perceived Competence on Sports Motivation

10.5297/ser.200609_8(3).0005

李烱煌(Chiung-Huang Li)；季力康(Li-Kang Chi)

成就目標理論 ； 自我決定理論 ； 交互作用 ； achievement goal theory ； self-determination theory ； interaction

大專體育學刊

8卷3期（2006 / 09 / 30）

65 - 76

繁體中文;英文

目的：考驗目標取向和能力知覺在預測運動動機之主要效果和交互作用效果。方法：研究對象為111名高中男子手球校隊選手，平均年齡為15.59歲，皆自願完成填寫一組測量目標取向、能力知覺、運動動機等問卷。結果：經由多元階層迴歸分析，本研究發現工作取向正向預測內在動機，但負向預測無動機；相對地，自我取向則是正向預測認同調節動機、內射調節動機和外在調節動機。此外，能力知覺正向預測認同調節動機，至於「自我取向×能力知覺」和「自我取向×工作取向」則分別能有效預測外在調節動機和無動機。結論：本研究認為當個體聚焦在能力發展，他就會擁有高自我決定動機；反之，強調能力展現的選手則傾向於擁有高控制動機。高能力知覺會提升高自我取向者的外在調節動機，但卻會貶抑低自我取向者的外在調節動機。不論是高或低自我取向者，他們皆會受到高工作取向的調節效應而展現較低水率的無動機，其中又以低自我取向者所受到的調節效應較強。

This study examined the main and interactive effects of athletes' goal orientations and perceived competence on sports motivation. One hundred and eleven handball players from eight high school teams of an average age of 5.59 years participated in the study. All the participants were asked to complete a series of questionnaires, which measured personal goal orientations, perceived competence, and sports motivation. A moderated hierarchical regression analyses revealed that task orientation positively predicted intrinsic motivation but negatively predicted amotivation. In contrast, ego orientation positively predicted identified, introjected and external regulation. Perceived competence positively predicted identified regulation. It was found that there were significant interactive effects for ego orientation with perceived competence and for ego orientation with task orientation in predicting external regulation and amotivation, respectively. The results suggest that athletes who focus on development of ability have high self-determined types of motivation, whereas those who focus on demonstration of ability have high controlling types of motivation. For athletes high in perceived competence, the high ego orientation increases, while the low ego orientation attenuates the external regulation. Regardless of high or low levels of ego orientation, the athletes' amotivational levels tend to be downplayed by their high task orientation, which exerts more impact on the low-ego-oriented athletes.

1. 林季燕、季力康(2003)。運動動機量表之編製－信度與效度分析。台灣運動心理學報，2，15-32。
   連結：
2. Aiken, L. S.,West, S. G.(1996).Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
3. Aiken, L. S.,West, S. G.(1996).Multiple regression. Testing and interpreting interactions.Newbury Park:Sage.
4. Chi, L.,Duda, J. L.(1995).Multi-sample confirmatory factor analysis of the task and ego orientation in sport questionnaire.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,66,91-98.
5. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(1985).Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.New York:Plenum Press.
6. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(1985).Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior..New York:Plenum Press.
7. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(1991).A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality.Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 38: Perspectives on motivation,Lincoln, NE:
8. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.,R. A. Dienstier(1991).A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality.Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 38: Perspectives on motivation,Lincoln:
9. Duda, J. L., Chi, L., Newton, M., Walling, M.,Catley, D.(1995).Task and ego orientation and intrinsic motivation in sport.International Journal of Sport Psychology,26,40-63.
10. Duda, J. L.,Chi, L.,Newton, M.,Walling, M.,Catley, D.(1995).Task and ego orientation and intrinsic motivation in sport.International Journal of Sport Psychology,26,40-63.
11. Duda, J. L.,G. C. Roberts(Ed.)(2001).Advances in motivation in sport and exercise.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
12. Duda, J. L.,G. C. Roberts(Ed.)(2001).Advances in motivation in sport and exercise.Champaign:Human Kinetics.
13. Duda, J. L.,Nicholls, J. G.(1992).Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport.Journal of Educational Psychology,84,1-10.
14. Hall, H. K.,Kerr, A. W.,Mathews, J.(1998).Precompetitive anxiety in sport: The contribution of achievement goals and perfectionism.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,20,194-217.
15. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R.,Wan, C. K.(1990).Interaction effects in multiple regression.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
16. Jaccard, J.,Turrisi, R.,Wan, C. K.(1990).Interaction effects in multiple regression.Newbury Park:Sage.
17. Landers, D. M.(1983).Whatever happened to theory testing in sport psychology.Journal of Sport Psychology,5,135-151.
18. Nicholls, J. G.(1989).Cambridge, MA,Harvard University Press.
19. Nicholls, J. G.(1989).The competitive ethos and democratic education.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
20. Ntoumanis, N.(2001).Empirical links between achievement goal theory and self- determination theory in sport.Journal of Sports Sciences,19,397-409.
21. Pelletier, L. G.,Fortier, M. S.,Vallerand, R. J.,Tuson, K. M.,Briere, N. M.,Blais, M. R.(1995).Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The sport motivation scale (SMS).Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,17,35-53.
22. Roberts, G. C.,G. C. Roberts(Ed.)(2001).Advances in motivation in sport and exercise.Champaign:Human Kinetics.
23. Roberts, G. C.,G. C. Roberts(Ed.)(2001).Advances in motivation in sport and exercise.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
24. Standage, M.,Duda, J. L.,Ntoumanis, N.(2003).Predicting motivational regulations in physical education: The interplay between dispositional goal orientations, motivational climate and perceived competence.Journal of Sports Sciences,19,397-409.
25. 季力康(1994)。運動目標取向量表的建構效度－驗證性因素分析的應用。體育學報，18，229-310。
26. 柯秋溢(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
27. 柯秋溢(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
28. 黃英哲(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
29. 黃英哲(2002)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學。

1. 陳其昌(2009)。大學運動員的運動目標取向和團隊規範對運動員精神的影響。大專體育學刊，11(1)，43-56。
2. 郭嘉鴻、馬上閔(2011)。應用跨理論模式於目標取向與心理康寧之相關研究：以休閒羽球運動為例。人文社會科學研究，5(3)，1-15。
3. 楊明蓁、黃崇儒、張詩婕(2013)。女子超級籃球聯賽新人球員的生涯轉換經驗。臺灣運動心理學報，13(2)，23-36。
4. 葉允棋、陳思羽、季力康、江衍宏(2013)。中文版「教練─選手關係量表」之編製。大專體育學刊，15(4)，429-438。